Welcome to the awards.
For award definitions, see this year’s primer.
This week’s proof that assigning wins and losses to a pitcher is an arcane practice that must stop
Good luck division
The Padres were a good team this year, but not one that was noted for putting a lot of runs on the board. So it is a little surprising to see Kevin Correia on the list of starters who received excellent run support. Nevertheless, it does explain his perfectly average 10-10 record in 26 starts and less than average 5.40 ERA. The average batter hit .271/.348/.435 against Correia and he had a 1.48 WHIP. He won three games in which he gave up four or more runs, including a six-inning, six-run shelling. And he had two starts in which he escaped with a no-decision while allowing five runs; in one, he didn’t make it to the third frame.
Tommy Hunter didn’t appear in this category all year until now. The reason is because he didn’t have any ugly wins in which he gave up five runs and still got enough run support to win a game he didn’t deserve. But he is here because he had some of the best run support in the business, which enabled him to put up a 13-4 record. He lost only one quality start all season, which as you will soon learn, in the bad luck division category, is something that not everybody can boast. He averaged more than five runs allowed per in his four losses. Hunter was a good pitcher this season, with a .255/.304/.436 line against. But he was not as good as his gaudy record would have you believe.
Jake Arrieta started only 18 games in his rookie season, but five times he failed to throw a quality start and avoided the loss. He was 1-2 with two no-decisions when he allowed five or more runs. You can expect to lose in those situations the vast majority of the time.
Daisuke Matsuzaka eked out a win or no-decision in 10 non-quality starts, including four in which he allowed five or more runs.
Javier Vazquez was almost unusable for large chunks of the 2010 season. The Yankees were forced to use him, though, and while he was terrible, there are definite perks to pitching for the team with the highest scoring lineup in the game. He had six games in which he lasted five or fewer innings, allowed four or more runs, and didn’t receive a loss.
Dice-K’s teammate Josh Beckett qualifies on the strength of his April alone. At the end of that month, he stood with a 1-0 ERA in five starts with a 7.22 ERA. He had back-to-back starts in which he gave up 15 combined runs and got no-decisions. After that month of non-stop shelling, he had three more games with either a no-decision or a win despite allowing five or more runs.
Chris Volstad had a run of three straight starts of allowing five or more runs. He went 1-0 in those three early September starts.
Bad luck division
If Felix Hernandez wins the Cy Young Award, it will be despite the work of his teammates as much as because of it. While they gave him some helpful defense, the team scored fewest runs in a season since the early 1970s.
It has been well documented how poorly his 13-12 record reflects the real quality of his work and how pathetic the Mariners offense was this season. I will only belabor the point so much here, since I have some comments in a couple other sections. Right now I will only mention that by my count, Hernandez lost or received no result in 15 quality starts this season and that in five of those starts, he went at least seven innings and allowed one run or no runs.
Josh Johnson had 12 quality starts that resulted in a no-decision or a loss. In five, he allowed one run or fewer in six-plus innings. This is how you end up with a 2.30 ERA in 28 starts and only 11 wins. In his wins, he had a 0.91 ERA. In his 11 no-decisions, he had a 2.60 ERA with a .227/.280/.329 line against.
Ross Ohlendorf was not a great pitcher this year. He gave the Pirates a quality start in only 11 of his 21 tries. Batters hit .260/.335/.439 off him. The thing is, though, he was nowhere near bad enough to warrant a 1-11 record. He was 1-4 in those 11 quality starts. In his nine no-decisions, he had a .633 OPS against with a 2.62 ERA because almost every game in which he wasn’t really good ended up in the loss column.
In Johan Santana’s nine no-decisions, he averaged seven innings pitched with an ERA of 2.10. He ended this season with a 2.98 ERA and a 11-9 record.
Jered Weaver failed to get the victory in any game that wasn’t a quality start. He lost four quality starts and ended the season with a 3.01 ERA and a 13-12 record.
Zack Greinke’s 4.17 ERA means that his poor run support won’t cost him a Cy Young, as was the fear last year. On the other hand, while mortal, he should not have been 10-14. In 19 of his 33 starts, he received three or fewer runs of support.
Believe it or not despite winning 21 games, Roy Halladay deserves at least a mention here. He received losses in five quality starts.
Halladay’s teammate Cole Hamels is a more obvious choice. He lost or received no-decisions in 10 quality starts. It seems like he is a nominee in this category every season.
Another annual nominee is Matt Cain, who had nine quality start losses or no-decisions for the Giants, leading to a 13-11 record despite a 3.14 ERA.
Alternatives to pitcher wins
From time to time I get asked what people should look at to get an idea of how good a starting pitcher is. I would like to formally address the subject.
The answer is it depends on how complicated and accurate you want to get. If you just want something quick and dirty, quality starts (as a ratio of total starts) and ERA combined will give you a rough outline. It isn’t the gold standard by any stretch. You still haven’t taken into account unearned runs, the range of the defense behind you, or park factors, but it is better than saying somebody is 12-8. The next level would probably be ERA+ and quality starts or maybe innings pitched. At some point you can switch to WAR and FIP. Metrics like xFIP and SIERA add some more neutrality, but I think they’re more useful for what might happen next than what has happened.
Tyler Clippard won 11 games out of the bullpen. Half of those came in games in which he was charged with a blown save.
Wes Littleton Award
Bobby Jenks saved 27 games and he didn’t even blow too many saves (four), but he looked shaky all year and with Matt Thornton, J.J. Putz, Chris Sale and Sergio Santos around, by the end of the season he was likely no better than the fifth best option in the White Sox pen.
Please hold the applause
Clippard is an obvious nominee here as well, given that he got the hold in 23 games and earned a -1.60 clutch rating according to FanGraphs.
Any sufficiently advanced defense is indistinguishable from pitching
Bronson Arroyo outperformed his peripherals for the second year in a row, striking out only 5.05 batters per nine. His .246 BABIP seems fluky to me. I wouldn’t expect a repeat of his 17 wins or his 3.88 ERA.
Trevor Cahill’s .238 BABIP is the biggest explanation for why his ERA was 2.97 and his FIP ended the year at 4.19. My keeper league team hopes that either his K rate climbs or his groundball ways keep him on the Tim Hudson career path.
On the other side of the coin, James Shields had a BABIP almost 50 points higher than his career average, which explains a lot about how his xFIP was almost a run and a half better than his actual ERA. His rates say that he’s still the same pitcher he was back in 2007 and 2008.
2010 AL Cy Young: a litmus test for sabermetric acceptance
I have sat down to write a brief editorial on the current state of sabermetric acceptance in mainstream baseball conscience at least a half dozen times this year, dating back to spring training. I have three pages in my notebook of thoughts and observations on the subject, often contradictory. But I never have finished any such piece until now.
I’m not the first person to present the current King Felix versus CC Sabathia Cy race as a barometer on inroads we’ve made into the public consciousness. Given that I write more than two dozen columns per year poking a sharpened stick into the eye of pitcher wins, saves, RBI and batting average, it is pretty obvious where my rooting interests lie. But I think it might be a little more complicated than that, both in the specific and the general sense. And that is probably why I have been unsuccessful at finishing this item so many times.
In the general sense, major battles have already been won. Anybody who is even a little intellectually curious about baseball has a world of resources. There are dozens of websites doing interesting work and the reader really can choose how deep to go, from working with entry-level saber-friendly triple slash stats to analysis that I don’t have the math chops to do anything with.
You have writers and analysts everywhere on the internet. Most team-specific blogs have significant sabermetric voices among the fans and/or the analysts. There is an army of influential columnists at traditional baseball media outlets who embrace the new school, starting with the obvious examples of Joe Posnanski and the longtime sabermetric gateway drug, Rob Neyer. His presence at ESPN at one time was easy to avoid and is significantly less so now that the Sweet Spot blog is prominently located on the Worldwide Leader’s baseball front page. If you want to know something and have internet access, it isn’t hard to get your fill.
The audience has grown as well, which should be obvious since media outlets wouldn’t be paying attention if there weren’t a growing audience. Anybody who is a serious seamhead is probably already familiar with the general themes and the approach. Fantasy players and gamblers looking for an edge are a good bet to be looking for analysis that goes further than clichés about the desire to win and pitching and fundamentals.
And the new school has been widely embraced within the management structures of almost every team, to a point where I wonder if the game has entered a post-sabermetric world and those of us on the outside are engaging in an argument that has been settled long ago.
All that said, the casual fan still walks around looking more at stats that predate the Spanish-American War than at WAR and FIP. Those fans have a better than passing familiarity with the concept that getting on base is important and is different than batting average, but they aren’t going to take a lot of time and effort to tell you that CC Sabathia wasn’t as good a pitcher as Felix Hernandez.
As much as I disagree with the sentiment, I think the mentality is reasonable and one that we all use in various aspects of everyday life. It is part of how we cope with the restrictions of time and attention. We can’t all be baseball geeks and music snobs and movie snobs and car snobs and drink snobs and food snobs and TV snobs and political wonks. Even if you don’t have kids and jobs and date nights and chores to run, it would be mentally draining to try to be all of these things. We have to draw lines and live with it. So I guess I need to come to grips with the idea that there is an audience for Colin Cowherd and Bill Plaschke.
In the specific, I think the complication is that award voting is a messy thing that doesn’t easily lend itself to black and white conclusions. I was optimistic last year after the BBWAA gave me no glaringly obvious reasons to become annoyed at my monitor. But it wasn’t as simple as Zack Greinke won, therefore good triumphed over evil. It would be one thing if it were only a choice of Carsten Charles or HRH Felix of Pugetshire, but while I think they will be the only two with first place votes, the hyper partisans on both sides of the debate will have enough Cliff Lee and David Price-like alternatives to push one or the other off of some ballots. So really I think the signal to noise ratio in the voting results will be such that we can’t draw really firm conclusions.
AL: There is a valid argument to made that Felix benefited from a friendly ballpark and a good defense behind him to a greater extent than a Jered Weaver, a Jon Lester or a David Price did. Still, he led the league in innings and ERA. Opposing batters hit .212/.273/.312 against him.
I can’t decide in what order to put Weaver, Lester, Sabathia, Price, Francisco Liriano, Cliff Lee and Clay Buchholz. The term “Year of the pitcher” may be overwrought and silly, but this really was a great year to watch elite pitchers. Coward’s way out? Maybe.
NL: This has been a nice year for Roy Halladay. At this point in his career, he feels like a force of nature. I love Josh Johnson this year and it is too bad that Adam Wainwright lives in a world in which he doesn’t have an award yet, but Halladay seems to get a little better every season. This year he ratcheted his command up even more, posted his highest innings total since 2003, threw nine complete games for the fourth straight year, and put up a career-best WHIP.
Johnson led the league in ERA and quality start percentage, but he played his home games in a much friendlier park than Halladay and threw a lot fewer innings.
Wainwright limited hitters to a .224/.274/.330 line.
Next week we take on the hitters. Until then, enjoy the playoffs.