BOB:  MLB gives A’s gives A’s advice about moving

MLB spells out Athletics move to San Jose

News leaked last week that Major League Baseball had told the Oakland Athletics what they’ll need to do to move to San Jose. Bill Shaikin of the Los Angeles Times, who broke the news, didn’t provide a lot of details, but thinks the guidelines don’t say how much the Athletics will have to pay the San Francisco Giants to buy out their territorial rights in Santa Clara County.

Nothing is going to happen on this front anytime soon. The Athletics have agreed to a lease extension with the Oakland Coliseum through the 2017 season. so the earliest they would move is 2018. Even then, it’s going to be a tough road, because the Giants aren’t yielding their rights any time soon and it’s unlikely that 75 percent of the owners would vote to take those rights from the Giants and give them to the Athletics.

MLB mandates new, safer helmets

Spring training games have started and one of the changes is the head gear batters will use when they’re at the plate. The new batting helmets are the S100 Pro Comp model by Rawlings. The helmet is made of aerospace-grade carbon fiber and it’s designed to protect hitters from those 100 mph fastballs that are becoming more common these days.

Last year, the helmets were used voluntarily by about 200 players. This is the second round of safer batting helmets; a few years ago, Rawlings was given the task but turned out a helmet that was a little too heavy and bulky for the players’ liking. This new helmet is only an ounce heavier than a traditional batting helmet.

Durham to host 2014 Triple-A All-Star Game

Durham Bulls Athletic Park, the home of the Tampa Bay Rays Triple-A affiliate, the Durham Bulls, will be the site of the Triple-A All-Star Game in 2014. While there’ll be a five-day celebration, the actual All-Star Game gets some interesting television time because it’s normally played the day after the major league All-Star Game, when there’s not a lot of competition. It’s also nationally televised on the MLB Network.

This will be the first time Durham has hosted the game. This year’s site is Aces Ballpark in Reno. As in the major league game, the winner of the Triple-A All-Star Game gets home field advantage for the Triple-A championship.

Apartment owner creates her own stadium site

Sybil Kay Andrews-Wells, the co-chair of a non-profit that controls Tampa Park Apartments, has been getting the word out that she’d be open to selling her 21-acre property if the Tampa Bay Rays are allowed to move from St. Petersburg to Tampa. A few public officials have confirmed that it would make a good site for a ballpark. One potential snag for the location is federal restrictions related to HUD subsidies that the complex receives.

Of course, at this point it’s all talk. St. Petersburg has threatened to sue anyone who tries to interfere with its current lease with the Rays and that includes letting the team look elsewhere for a new stadium. Until this is changed, it’s going to be hard for any of this speculation to gain legs.

Jeffrey Loria speaks out

Miami Marlins owner Jeffrey Loria took out a full page ad in the three major South Florida newspapers. In the ad, he defends some of the fire sale trades he’s made, saying he doesn’t have unlimited money and citing the team’s 2003 World Series win as an indication that he’s a winner.

He brings up some good points but it’s hard to see them through all the noise. The team, which made some high profile signings for the 2012 season, has bailed on all of them. As far as I know, nobody at the top of the front office lost his job and you’d think an admission that things could go this wrong would also mean you’d see some turnover at the top.

Print Friendly
 Share on Facebook0Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Google+0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone
« Previous: It’s time to get acquainted with Melky Mesa
Next: Alternate baseball: chapter four »

Comments

  1. scott said...

    “she’d be open to selling her 21-acre property” – I don’t know much about acreage.  How many acres does the ‘average’ MLB ballpark take?

  2. Philip said...

    Didn’t the Athletics already pay an indemnity to the Giants when they moved to the Bay Area from Kansas City?

    Was the four county agreement official and part of the Athletics initial move to Oakland?

    Seems to me for the Giants to demand another territorial indemnity about the A’s moving further away from where they are now with respect to the Giants ballpark is disingenuous and nothing but a money grab.

    Sort of like the Dodgers complaining when the Angels started calling themselves “Los Angeles Angels” again. I don’t recall the Dodgers giving the Angels back the indemnity Gene Autry paid in 1961.

  3. BW Radley said...

    To answer Philip’s question, the A’s did not pay an indemnity to the Giants when they moved to Oakland in late 1967.  At that time, the relocation only needed to be approved by the involved league (in this case the American League).  Additionally, there was no agreement (at least as far as I can tell) regarding splitting the Bay Area in 1967-8.

  4. Philip said...

    Thanks for the info, BW.

    This is the best thing I can find that details some loose, unofficial four-country agreement.

    http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/columns/story?columnist=bryant_howard&id=6665421

    As BW indicated, it wasn’t part of any 1967-68 agreement, but came about later as the Giants switched ownerships.

    http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/7658699/oakland-athletics-san-francisco-giants-odds-territorial-rights

    Late Oakland owner Walter Haas gave the Giants the OK to assume rights to San Jose in a favor of sorts to former San Francisco owner Bob Lurie when his team was considering moving to Florida. The deal basically happened with a handshake—and “without compensation,” the A’s wrote—and then was approved by baseball’s owners.

    The A’s said that “MLB-recorded minutes clearly indicate that the Giants were granted Santa Clara, subject to relocating to the city of Santa Clara.”

    Said the Giants: “The Giants’ territorial rights were not granted ‘subject to’ moving to Santa Clara County.”

    If the MLB did indeed record minutes of the meeting, release of those minutes (probably in a court battle if the A’s sue) should clear it up.

  5. Paul M said...

    Any fair-minded baseball fan in the Bay Area knows the only reason the A’s granted the Santa Clara County rights to the Giants was to assist the latter in their attempt to win a ballot measure to give them a new stadium in Santa Clara. For the Giants to use that privilege to stifle the A’s attempt to do the same more than 20 years later—after the Giants had successfully built a new and prosperous stadium 45 miles to the north of Santa Clara—must be viewed for what it is: a pure statement of greed designed to either a) have the A’s be contracted (risk of that has fallen considerably); b) have the A’s move out of the market (risk still present though dormant for now); or c) make the A’s do what Walter Haas did not do—pay huge money over the barrel to their regional rivals. World Series victories or no World Series victories, the Giants of McGowan, Baer and Co. show their true colors in this situation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Current ye@r *