Brett Gardner is running

Gardner caught in a rare moment of swinging the bat. Does this even count as swinging? I’m not sure. (Icon/SMI)

Last year I told you to hop onto the Brett Gardner bandwagon. If you listened, you were rewarded with a Top 50 fantasy performance.

As I hope everyone here knows, Gardner’s most valuable asset is his speed—responsible for his stealing 47 bases last year, good for fourth in the majors. Throw in 97 runs, 47 RBIs, five homers, and a .277 average and you get the line of the 17th-ranked outfielder by ESPN’s player rater. And even if you feel ESPN’s player rater overrates speed guys a little (it does), adjusting them down would appropriately place Gardner around the 25th most valuable outfielder. Pretty good.

Considering how Gardner was a last-round pick in many leagues last year and in preseason rankings was ranked as the 80th-best outfielder at the earliest, he undoubtedly provided a good return on investment. Though I suppose when the cost of investing is near zero, it is easy to make the investment worthwhile. Either way, Gardner made it well worth the while with his production.

After his impressive 2010, Gardner won’t come quite as cheaply, but let’s see if he is still worth the somewhat larger investment you will have to make in him this year. Looking at a few websites with early rankings out we see he is ranked the 31st outfielder by Jeff Gross here at THT, recent Fangraphs hijackers have him as the No. 36 outfielder, and Grey at Razzball aggressively ranks him 22nd.

Based on the value of his performance last yea,r we know Gardner can break even with the Razzball ranking if he repeats his impressive 2010. For the sake of saving virtual ink and your reading time, I’ll provide the summary conclusion: Gardner is a good candidate to replicate his breakout season. In a less ink-conscious article, Matt Klaassen at Fangraphs looked into the issue more in-depth and concluded that due to Gardner’s fantastic plate discipline he is less likely to play terribly.

Don’t you love summarizing?

Anyway I don’t believe a lack of skill to be the weakness in Gardner’s armor, but rather his potential playing time issues, so let’s focus more on those. Last year Randy Winn and Marcus Thames were cast as the potential playing time thieves and did a poor job in the role. This year Andruw Jones is the villain and figures to be a bit more prominent, especially when the Yankees are facing a lefty. However I still see Gardner starting an overwhelming majority of the time; he was their second-highest WAR-ranked player let us not forget.

The bottom line is if you believe Gardner can repeat his 2010, which to me seems likely, then he can appropriately be drafted around pick 100. In most drafts he is still going later than that, making him an obvious selection if he falls deeper in the 100s. Once again, Brett Gardner appears to be a good value pick heading into the season.

Print Friendly
 Share on Facebook0Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Google+0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone
« Previous: Has Kyle Drabek arrived?
Next: Inside the rules: the NCAA “no agent” rule »


  1. Paul Singman said...

    I agree Tabata is also a good player to target, though he didn’t steal at an elite rate (19 SBs in 441 PA), which equates to just 25 steals given full PT. It’s worth noting he also was caught stealing a not good 7 times. He is just 22 though so what intrigues me is his potential to develop some power being listed as 210 pounds.

    After trading Wells and signing Raj to a two year extension, more attention should be paid to him. I like the combination of turf and Rajai a lot.

  2. Rockaway Mike said...

    I have to keep either Gardner or Stubbs for a 16-team 6×6 league (OPS is the extra offensive category). Other keepers are Pujols, Wainwright, CarGo and Oswalt. As a Yankee fan, the easy way out would be to keep Gardner and be happy with it; but I still think Stubbs could have a huge year. Decisions, decisions…

  3. Paul Singman said...

    If it was an OBP league I could see keeping Gardner over Stubbs and Gardner is definitely the “safer” player here btw. However as you said, Stubbs has the potential to put up a monster season and I don’t think you should pass up the opportunity to own him this year and into the future just b/c of your Yankee fandom. My advice is to go with Stubbs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>