Five questions: Atlanta Braves

After going 163 games in 2010 and suffering a Mets-esque fall in 2011 (although the fact that the Braves weren’t leading the division somehow makes it seem less painful) 2012 is a year full of expectation for Braves fans. However, one thing is for sure: the NL East suddenly has become a lot more competitive with the free-spending Marlins throwing their wallet at every free agent that moves and the Nationals potentially about to move Bryce Harper into their lineup.

Onward with our five questions then.

Will Jason Heyward recover?

Stats never lie, and J-Hey’s 2011 had all the hallmarks of a classic sophomore slump. After a respectable .376 wOBA in 2010, he fell to a mark of .314 in 2011. The issue was both contact and power as he struggled with a dud shoulder for much of the year. As the slump set in, he tried to force contact at the plate and ended up striking out too often. His Achilles’ heel was pitches outside the zone, where he had a 28.3 percent swing rate compared to 23.3 percent in 2010.

Wind the clock back a couple of years and Heyward had superstar potential. In fact, going into 2010 he was Baseball America’s top prospect. That year, he showed enough potential in the bigs to suggest he has what it takes to be a regular All-Star.

The good news is he’s still very young. Heyward turned 22 in August, and that makes him younger that many of the top hitting prospects expected to get playing time this year like Brett Jackson and Devin Mesoraco. The other factor that hurt J-Hey last year was a precipitous drop in BABIP from .335 to .260, and that should rebound somewhat. Factor in an xBABIP of .315, and 2011 suddenly is a .365 wOBA-type season.

As a result, his projections going into 2012 are good. Oliver pegs him at .274/.367/.475 with 20 homers. My view is that line feels a little conservative. Given the Braves’ lack of power in general, Heyward needs to deliver if the Braves are going to play deep into October.

Can the 2012 bullpen replicate the success of last year?

In 2011, the Braves bullpen was lights out—well, at least until the last couple of weeks of the season. Even with that little slip, the Eric O’Flaherty-Jonny Venters-Craig Kimbrel combination was among the best shutdown end-game in the bigs. Can the young trio maintain its form into 2012?

One issue that potentially plagued Kimbrel & Co. was overuse. Kimbrel hurled 77 innings while Venters notched up 88—that’s a lot for two hard-throwing young relievers. The projections for 2012 are strong. Venters is expected to have a FIP in the high twos, while the expectation is that Kimbrel will be substantially better. On paper, that makes for a lights-out bullpen again in 2013.

Perhaps the biggest question is mental. Time and again we’ve seen young relievers have a couple of bad high-leverage outings that then go on to affect the rest of their careers. Joey Devine anyone? Of course, comparing Devine to Kimbrel may be akin to comparing Kraft cheese slices with a fine French Brie.

Kimbrel has a powerful fastball/slider combination and over 97 career innings, he has struck out 167 batters. The biggest change is his command as he has slashed his walks-per-nine innings from 5.7 in Triple-A to 3.7 last year in the majors. The key to a successful 2012 is ensuring his command stays strong.

Can Tommy Hanson remain healthy?

One reason the Braves fell away in 2011 is because Hanson spent quite a bit of time on the DL hampered by a sore shoulder. The reports for 2012 so far are positive, but reality won’t hit until Hanson has thrown in anger, which won’t be before Opening Day. Also, it is one thing to be healthy at the start of the season, but the big question is durability. A baseball season is 162 games, so if the Braves are to contend, Hanson will need to pitch deep into September.

Pitcher health is always difficult to predict, but Hanson has had a history of (minor) ailments. In 2010, he struggled with back pain as a result of a deviated facet joint. The Braves’ belief is that the back injury contributed to the shoulder problem as he adjusted his mechanics slightly. In the offseason, Hanson has worked on a comprehensive strengthening program that he hopes will fix both issues.

However, if history is a guide, the odds are that Hanson won’t be able to stay healthy all 2012. However, despite not adding anyone this offseason, the one advantage the Tomahawks have in 2012 over 2011 is a much deeper pitcher bench as some of the elite pitchers in the minor leagues become big-league ready. Braves uber-prospects like Julio Teheran, Arodys Vizcaino and Randall Delgado are all waiting in the wings if any of the starters end up on the DL.

Can Chipper Jones still be productive?

At 39 years old, Chipper is certainly in the twilight of his career. Indeed, this is likely his penultimate season in the majors as his contract is up at the end of 2013. A few days ago, a rather unflattering photo of Chipper doing his best Prince Fielder impression was flying around the Internet, casting doubt on his ability to keep it together. Jones responded that he’s in the better shape than he was this time last year, having dropped 10 pounds—now weighing a svelte 225.

The expectation is that Jones will be fortunate to play in 120 games this year; over the last two seasons, he’s averaged 110 games and about 450 plate appearances. Over the same time period, he has averaged a .350 wOBA, implying there is little doubt he’ll be productive. However, it is worrying that he is one the better hitters in the lineup, since he’s not expected to be there full-time.

Given Chipper’s career history, it is little surprise that the projection systems converge around a consistent forecast, with the expectation is that he’ll continue to deliver a .350 wOBA in 2012 and around 14 home runs. Arguably, the bigger issue is health.

Since 2005, Jones has only really had one injury-free season (in 2009 when he racked up close to 600 plate appearances). In a way, he’s been fortunate that he has only suffered niggles, but those add up and wear down the body. Chipper’s projection doesn’t feel to have much upside, but it could have a lot of downside. Let’s hope the Braves don’t need to rely on his bat too much.

What will be the final pecking order in the NL East?

As mentioned at the top of the article, the NL East will be among the toughest divisions in baseball this year. The Phillies still have a star-studded rotation and will contend, the Marlins have upgraded significantly, and the Nationals have Stephen Strasburg back full time and Bryce Harper potentially about to enter the fray.

A quick look at Vegaswatch gives us some over/unders. Vegas has the Phillies at 96 wins (incidentally, the best in baseball), the Braves at 86, the Marlins at 83, the Nationals on the line at 81 and the Mets at 75. Vegas also predicts the first NL Wild Card winner will log 87 wins, so Atlanta is a genuine contender, especially with a second Wild Card coming to fruition this year.

We need to be careful with win projections, and particularly Vegas lines, which have a tendency to reflect betting patterns. The standard deviation of team wins is around eight, which is large enough to make drawing conclusions a fool’s game. That issue aside, the Braves are a young and improving team, and they should have learned a lot from last year’s meltdown.

Dropping Derek Lowe while moving a few of the young arms into the rotation will improve the pitching, and there is no reason to expect the pen will be anything other than the “blue screen of death” for opponents. The big question is batting and, frankly, I’m not sure it can be much worse than last year. The Phillies likely will remain out of reach, but I’d bet my second house that the Braves make October ball.

Print Friendly
 Share on Facebook0Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Google+0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone
« Previous: Let there be news – Volume 11
Next: Five questions: Baltimore Orioles »


  1. Marc Schneider said...

    It’s discouraging to a fan to see your favorite team’s ownerhip being content with being just good enough to be a contender.  They have a rookie at short, a 39 year old at third who, while still a very good player, figures to miss a lot of games(and no replacement on the horizon), a left fielder who really should play second base, a right fielder trying to come back,  injuries in the rotation, and a manager that doesn’t help and may actively hurt.  It seems to me the Braves are better than average but no more unless a lot of things fall into place.  But with the new playoff format, they have a legitimate chance to get in and then, who knows?  I can’t say I’m wildly optimistic about this team but I am hopeful.

  2. me said...

    the nats aren’t going to have stras back full-time.  innings limit.  if they’re in contention in september, he’ll more than likely be on the shelf.

  3. Jason S. said...

    The biggest problem right now is that the Braves aren’t very deep, so a few key injuries could really hurt.  For example, if Jack Wilson becomes a starting SS for any reason, I do not see them as being a playoff team.

  4. Marc Schneider said...

    Strasburg won’t be on an innings limit this year; he was last year.  You are probably thinking about Jordan Zimmerman.

  5. Marc Schneider said...

    My mistake about the innings limit.  Zimmerman was on an innings limit last year.  I got that confused.  I have to believe that, if the team is in contention, they won’t shelve Strasburg completely.  It would be pretty hard to sell to the fans up here after all the talk about how the Nats expect to contend for the playoffs.  I can see them possibly skipping some of his turns earlier in the season to save something for September.

  6. Atlanta Crackers said...

    Strasburg certainly will be on an innings limit for 2012 – best guess is that he’ll be shelved at around 160 IP. Source:

    I’m guessing the quote that “the actual number won’t be determined until later in the season” means they may let him make another start or two if they’re still in contention later in the season.

  7. Undocorkscrew said...

    “Given the Braves’ lack of power in general”

    Is this true? That was the only category they were any good at offensively last season, finished 3rd in the NL in homers despite getting almost no power from any outfield position. Pastornicky won’t hit 15 bombs like Gonzo did, but I think they’ll be fine in the power department.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>