Five Questions: New York Mets

In 2007:



W-L: 88-74, second in NL East

Runs: 804, fourth in NL

Runs Allowed: 750, seventh in NL

Pythagorean Record: 86-76



Last season, starting around the middle of September, the Mets
…. Wait. I did not come here to write about the past. Let’s talk
about 2008, okay?

1. What is the meaning of Johan Santana?

It’s all been said, hasn’t it? How much ink has been spilled, how
many typewriter ribbons consumed*, how many toner cartridges replaced
in writing about the Mets’ acquisition of superstar lefty Johan
Santana
this offseason. Well, not enough, to my mind, which is why I’m
adding my voice to the chorus (or maybe it should be mob).

*I’m betting you haven’t thought about typewriter ribbons in a
while, am I right? The other day my family and I were visiting
friends, when I noticed tucked away on a bookcase an Olivetti manual
typewriter. I brought it to the attention of my six-year-old daughter
and asked her if she had any idea what it was. None, none at all. It
was the first time she’d ever seen one. She was eager to try it out,
but, alas, it was not working. It had one of those half-and-half
red/black ribbons, which allows you to type in two different
colors.

Lots of folks have made estimates of how much Santana will be worth to
the Mets in 2008 and you can get as complicated as you like, but I’m
going to keep my estimate very simple. Santana is basically replacing
Tom Glavine in the rotation. The Hardball Times Season Preview 2008
projects ERAs of 2.83 for Santana and 4.49 for Glavine. Assuming, 200
IP for both pitchers (an approximation, to be sure, but it doesn’t
matter much), I get Santana saving 37 runs compared to Glavine, which
translates to nearly four extra wins.

Those four extra wins will certainly come in handy, especially
considering the degree of uncertainty hovering over the rest of the
rotation. Not that they aren’t good—there is an awful lot to
like about having Pedro Martinez, John Maine, Oliver Perez and Orlando
Hernandez
as your No. 2 to No. 5 starters.

I’m a Pedro-believer—I think if he can stay healthy, he will
be among the better pitchers in the NL this year, say in the top 15 or
so. Some folks still mention Maine’s lack of stuff, but according
to my pitch f/x analysis, he throws a fastball that averages 92-93
mph, which is nothing to sneeze at. He struck out 8.5 batters per nine
last year, which is well above average for starting pitchers. His
stuff looks pretty good to me. Oliver Perez and El Duque have question
marks regarding consistency and health, respectively. Mike Pelfrey is
on hand to fill in (or take over) when needed.

2. What can we expect from Billy Wagner?

Well, I threw myself a batting practice fastball here, since it’s
pretty obvious what we can expect. Here’s what the Mets closer has
done the last five seasons:

+------+------+------+------+------+------+
| Year | TEAM | IP   | ERA  | WHIP | SV   |
+------+------+------+------+------+------+
| 2003 | HOU  | 86.0 | 1.78 | 0.87 |   44 |
| 2004 | PHI  | 48.3 | 2.42 | 0.77 |   21 |
| 2005 | PHI  | 77.7 | 1.51 | 0.84 |   38 |
| 2006 | NYN  | 72.3 | 2.24 | 1.11 |   40 |
| 2007 | NYN  | 68.3 | 2.63 | 1.13 |   34 |
+------+------+------+------+------+------+

So, the Mets should probably expect around 70 innings, an ERA in the
mid-twos and a WHIP somewhere around 1.10. And, of course, the usual
30-40 saves.

You know something? Billy Wagner is simply one of the top two or three
relief pitchers of his generation. Maybe you did know it, but somehow
Wagner doesn’t seem to have the cache’ of some other top closers. I
had a look at all relief pitchers who have pitched at least 500 innings
since Wagner’s debut year, 1995. This gives me a sample of 99
pitchers. Here are Wagner’s ranks in various key pitching categories:

ERA:  Second (behind Mariano Rivera) 
WHIP: First
K/9:  First
H/9:  Second (behind Troy Percival)
BB/9: 24th
HR/9: 29th

Note that he was even in the top third of relievers in BB/9 and HR/9,
which is pretty impressive for a high-K guy like Wagner, who lives by
the high fastball. In case you’re interested, he also ranked third in
saves over that time. You could certainly make a good case for Wagner
being the second best reliever of this period, after Rivera.*

*I noticed when looking at these numbers that Rivera leads all
relievers in keeping the ball in the park, with a miniscule HR/9 of
0.46. That’s quite a bit below the next best reliever (Robb Nen at
0.58 HR/9) and is even more impressive when you consider he’s doing it
with essentially one pitch. I need to start looking at Mariano’s
cutter using the pitch f/x data (although, Mike Fast has already had a
href="http://mvn.com/mlb-stats/2007/12/09/tales-of-the-cutter-mariano-rivera/"
target="new">look.)

The rest of the bullpen in 2008 should be solid. Last year the Mets
were middle-of-the-pack in bullpen ERA, but remove Guillermo Mota and Aaron Sele
(please) and add Duaner Sanchez (although there are health issues with
Duaner, of course) and the ‘pen should improve in 2008.

3. Will the real Jose Reyes please stand up?

If the previous question was a BP fastball, this one is a
bat-splintering cutter from Mo Rivera. Reyes, after an excellent 2006
and a hot start to the 2007 season, somehow slumped miserably over the
second half of the season. His poor play was exacerbated by the
sensation that the young shortstop was having motivational
problems. You know, failing to run out ground balls and stuff like that.

On Aug. 12 last year, Reyes walked and homered in five trips against
the Marlins, pushing his OPS to .837, which was almost identical to
his 2006 OPS (.841). The rest of the way, Reyes turned into Pedro
Feliz
without the power (.215/.292/.325). As the Mets were melting
down in September last year, Reyes was the player most obviously
struggling and, in fact, bore much of the blame for the Mets’
collapse.

A common complaint against Reyes during this period was that he was
very prone to popping the ball up in key situations. Indeed, during a
mid-September series with the Phillies, who swept all three games by the
way, Reyes seemed to pop out every other time up (in reality, he
popped out four times in the three games, still a frustratingly high
number). Here’s a breakdown by month of Reyes’ pop-out propensity,
along with this OPS:

+-------+-----+--------+--------+------+
| month | PA  | inPlay | PopPct |  OPS |
+-------+-----+--------+--------+------+ 
| 04    | 120 |  0.78  |  0.042 | 1038 |
| 05    | 126 |  0.74  |  0.048 |  697 |
| 06    | 123 |  0.77  |  0.073 |  829 |
| 07    | 126 |  0.86  |  0.064 |  770 |
| 08    | 139 |  0.83  |  0.101 |  733 |
| 09    | 131 |  0.79  |  0.137 |  612 |
+-------+-----+--------+--------+------+
inPlay - percentage of PAs resulting in ball in play
PopPct - percentage of PAs resulting in pop-up

Hey, it wasn’t just our imagination, Jose really did pop out a lot in
the last two months of the season.

Was he pressing while in the depths
of his slump, swinging at pitches he normally wouldn’t? Well, a quick
look at the Retrosheet data shows that he actually swung at fewer
pitches in September:

+-------+-----+------+----------+
| month | PA  | NP   | SwingPct |
+-------+-----+------+----------+
| 04    | 120 |  414 |    0.42  |
| 05    | 126 |  456 |    0.43  |
| 06    | 123 |  436 |    0.47  |
| 07    | 126 |  450 |    0.44  |
| 08    | 139 |  495 |    0.47  |
| 09    | 131 |  475 |    0.40  |
+-------+-----+------+----------+

This is not conclusive, of course, since pitchers may have been giving
him little to hit if they thought they could get him out that way. A
more detailed study using detailed pitch f/x data might shed some
light on this.

In any case, it looks like Reyes is implementing some changes for
2008, both in his href="http://www.newsday.com/sports/baseball/mets/ny-spmets205584499feb20,0,6703213.story"
target="new">dugout and on-field mannerisms and, perhaps more worrisomely*, in his
target="new">hitting approach.


* I say “worrisomely,” because anytime a player feels he has to
apologize or explain himself after hitting the ball off the center
field wall—well, that seems worrisome to me.

4. Is this the trainer’s room or a M*A*S*H unit?

Injuries are the Mets’ biggest concern going into the start of the ’08
season. Let’s see, we have would-be starting left fielder Moises Alou
out four to six weeks with a hernia. Then we have Carlos Delgado’s hip
impingement, although it’s not clear which is more worrisome:
Delgado’s feeble hip or his feeble bat*.

*I’m not referring to Delgado’s horrible spring (the last I looked
he was hitting .111 or something, but that means next-to-nothing), but
to his 2007 performance, his worst since becoming a regular player in
1996. Delgado’s 2007 line of .258/.333/.448 was well below that of the
average NL first baseman (.284/.365/.481). Delgado is at an age (36
this season) where many players hit the steep part of their decline
phase.

Luis Castillo and Carlos Beltran are, apparently, still recovering
from off-season operations. Beltran, at the time of this writing
(March 15), has played the field in his last two spring training
games, so it appears that he is coming around. I am hearing that
Castillo will play for the first time this weekend.

Oh, we’re not done yet. We still have catcher Brian Schneider’s balky
hamstring, Ryan Church’s collision with Marlon Anderson and I can’t
even remember what’s wrong with Endy Chavez or Jose Valentin
(something, though). Orlando Hernandez has some sort of owie that’s
caused him to abandon that cool knee-lift windup thing he does. Let’s hope
that the altered mechanics doesn’t reduce his effectiveness.

And finally: Duaner Sanchez is still working his way back into top form after
missing all of the last season because of injuries sustained in an
auto accident during the 2006 season. I recently read he feels he’s
at 97 percent full strength, which would certainly be good news for the
bullpen.

5. Is lack of depth going to be a problem?

General manager Omar Minaya was very active this offseason, as we all
know, turning some of the team’s best prospects into major league
ready players (“major league ready” is rather an understated way of
describing Johan Santana, isn’t it?). But is the thinning out of the
farm system going to come back to haunt the Mets given the spate of
injuries that has hit the club this spring?

Of the five outfielders on the official Mets href="http://newyork.mets.mlb.com/team/depth_chart/index.jsp?c_id=nym"
target="new">depth
chart, only one, Damion Easley, has not been banged up this
spring. Not yet on the chart, but certainly in the picture, is Angel
Pagan
, who is having a nice little spring training and is rumored to
be in the running for holding down the fort in left while Alou is
out. Other rumors have the Mets looking to trade for somebody to fill
in for Alou.

If this had happened last year, which it did, of course, the Mets had
Lastings Milledge and Carlos Gomez to plug holes. These promising
outfield prospects, however, were dealt away in the Ryan Church and
Johan Santana deals, respectively.

The Mets are also a little thin at first base: The backup first
baseman, according to the chart linked above, is, well, nobody. On the other hand,
second-string catcher Ramon Castro is probably as good as
first-stringer Brian Schneider, if the latter cannot open the season.
Likewise, Pelfrey would make a solid fifth starter if Pedro or El
Duque need reinforcements. The bullpen is also quite deep, especially
if Sanchez is back at full strength. In fact, one could imagine the
Mets dealing a bullpen arm to shore up the outfield corps.

Also, keep in mind that Minaya has a href="http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/ten-great-pickups-by-omar-minaya/"
target="new">good track record when it comes
to plugging holes when necessary.

6. Bonus question: how will the Mets do in 2008?

I think they will win the division, and that’s not just because I’m a
fan. I picked the Phillies to win the division last year* (and
received some e-mail that was so nasty, I at first thought it was
intended for Brattain), but I’m comfortable going with the Metsies
this year. They will have to overcome the health problems that are
looming, or at least most of them, but if they do, they will be very
tough to beat.

*Just so I won’t be accused of tooting my own horn, I will say
that my predictions last year were among the worst ever. I picked the
Rockies to finish dead last in the NL West, while I had the
juggernaught St. Louis Cardinals taking the NL Central. I also had the
White Sox second in the AL West, which was, ummm, slightly incorrect.

References & Resources

Some of the best baseball writing on the Internet, or anywhere for
that matter, can be found on href="http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/" target="new">Joe Posnanski’s
blog. Not only is Joe’s writing insightful and oftentimes
hilarious, he also does that cool thing with the asterisks, which I
have borrowed* for this piece.


*Some might not call it borrowing, but stealing, but that obviously
depends on your point of view. Was Lennon ripping off Dylan with
“You’ve Got to Hide Your Love Away” or was he paying him homage?

Print Friendly
 Share on Facebook0Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Google+0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone
« Previous: Off-season blockbusters:  March (Part 2:  1981-2002)
Next: Five Questions: Texas Rangers »

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Current ye@r *