Offseason decisions: the Cardinals and the Machineby Greg Simons
November 15, 2011
One of a series on dilemmas facing major league teams this winter.
Well, the St. Louis Cardinals took care of one significant need this offseason, tabbing one of their former catchers, Mike Matheny, as the new field manager. Another key step should be to identify the players who will man the middle infield in 2012, because the incumbents are either free agents, insufficient or both.
But the elephant in the room is, of course, Albert Pujols. Resolving the free agent status of the team's—and maybe the sport's—best player will be the most critical component of the franchise's 2011-12 offseason.
Everyone knows how good Pujols has been throughout his career. There isn't a team in the majors that wouldn't be thrilled to have his production. (Okay, the Reds and Phillies might not have spots for him, but you get my point.) In case you've been hiding in a bomb shelter since the Y2K "crisis," here's what an average Pujols season looks like.
.328/.420/.617 BA/OBP/SLG 170 OPS+ 8.0 WAR (FanGraphs or Baseball-Reference) 40 home runs 121 RBIs 117 runs scored 87:64 BB:K ratio
And here are some of the awards and honors Pujols has garnered throughout his career.
Three Most Valuable Player awards Top-10 finishes in MVP voting every year of his career (2011 results pending) Nine-time All-Star Six Silver Sluggers Two Gold Gloves
The case for retaining Pujols is easy. He has had, quite simply, one of the greatest 11-year runs in baseball history and is likely to remain remarkably productive over the next several seasons. He is the centerpiece around which championship teams can be—and have been—built. The Cardinals with Pujols would continue to compete for playoff berths season after season.
The Cardinals without Pujols would...well, that's a tough question. The 2012 plan most likely would have Lance Berkman at first base and Allen Craig in right field. While Craig proved his mettle several times throughout the season and particularly in the playoffs, he clearly is no Pujols.
Beyond 2012, St. Louis could continue on a year-to-year basis with Berkman at first until he wears out, or pursue another long-term solution at the position. But the on-field and off-field ramifications of seeing Sir Albert depart would be massive.
Pujols puts butts in the seats. He sells merchandise—have you seen the vast quantities of No. 5 jerseys in the stands at Busch Stadium? He brings headlines and TV and radio ratings to the franchise. His charity work endears him to the public. His worth to the Redbirds far outstrips the merely phenomenal performance he provides on the field.
Re-signing Pujols would be completely justified from a baseball and a financial perspective. Having him wear the birds-on-a-bat jersey as he reaches the 3,000-hit, 500-homer, 600-homer, etc. milestones would bring money and publicity to the team that it couldn't get any other way.
If Pujols retires as a lifetime Cardinal after a stupendous 20-year career, he could surpass Stan Musial as the greatest player in team history. That's rarefied air, but Albert Pujols appears destined to reach such lofty heights.
Just about every Cardinal fan is hoping to hear Pujols say, "I'll be back."
Ghosts in the Machine
There have been whispers throughout Pujols' career that he is older than his claimed age. His listed birthdate is Jan. 16, 1980, meaning he'll be entering his age-32 year in 2012. I give little credence to these age-related accusations, but it should be noted.
Assuming his age is accurate, an eight-year deal still would run through age 39, and there aren't too many players in history who have maintained strong production through that age. And you know any contract would pay Pujols top dollar every season of its duration.
There have been numerous players who have received long-term deals only to see their production slip, at best, or crater, at worst. Typical declines in skills, the wear and tear of a 162-game seaon, and traumatic injuries all have played roles in bringing the greatest players down to earth.
So even if Pujols continues to excel for a few more years, a long-term deal will pay him upwards of $30 million a season at the end of the decade for contributions that most likely will fall far short of his salary.
The other issue is whether that decline has already begun. I've taken to calling Pujols "Mr. 99" lately. He finished the 2011 season with a .299 batting average and 99 RBI, both career lows and the first time he finished a season been below .300 or 100 RBI. He also had a 99-runs scored season back in 2007.
In addition to those average and ribbie marks, Pujols walks-to-strikeouts total last year was 61:58. That ratio is the worst it's been since 2002, and he had never finished with fewer walks than this past season.
Perhaps even more telling, his OPS was only .906, the lowest of his career by nearly 50 points and the first time it has been under 1.000 since 2007 (when it was .997). Yes, offense was down last year, but Pujols' OPS+ of 150 also was a career low. Sure, a broken wrist and his ever-present nagging injuries certainly contributed to his relatively weak year. But the total picture shows a player who is still incredibly talented, but not clearly the best baseball player on the planet.
There are justifiable reasons for St. Louis to say "Hasta la vista" to Pujols.
This is the free agent dilemma every team must deal with. Players who reach free agency typically are at or near their peaks, so future production is nearly guaranteed to be lesser than past production, particularly with a long-term contract. But free agency allows teams to acquire these highly-skilled players around the top of their games and may put a World Series championship within reach.
Adding in the significance players such as Pujols have beyond just their on-field performance only further muddies the waters when a team has to decide whether to re-sign a player, and for how much and how long.
Cards GM John Mozeliak has a very difficult decision on his hands. Reports are that St. Louis isn't willing to move far off last spring's offer in the nine-year, $200 million range, which works out to a $22.2 million average annual value (AAV). Pujols and agent Dan Lorenzo are said to be looking for a record AAV, topping Alex Rodriguez's $27.5 million-AAV deal with the Yankees.
A contract worth $200 million over seven years would net Pujols nearly $28.6 million a season, eclipsing A-Rod. (I would recommend a $199 million pact for Mr. 99, but that's just me.) But I don't know if that's enough years for the Cardinals to retain him. Tacking on another year or two at $25 milllion per—either as options or guaranteed, if necessary—would retain that record AAV while all but ensuring Pujols would be a Cardinal for life.
There certainly is a match to be made between this courting couple. Hopefully the sides can reach an agreement that works for both of them, providing St. Louis and its fans with an iconic player to continue to cheer for the next several years and Pujols with the monetary recognition his sensational career has earned.
Greg Simons finally, sadly has conceded that he won't have an MLB playing career. However, in his dreams, he's still the second coming of Ozzie Smith. Please don't wake him up, though you can e-mail him at gregbsimons AT yahoo DOT com.