TUCK! sez: He would have been safe if he’d said “Royals” or “Pirates”
by TuckNovember 04, 2010
Follow TUCK! on Twitter: @ TUCKsez
Feedback and inquiries: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
|
June 19, 2013
THT Essentials:
Rich Barbieri
John Barten Kyle Boddy Brian Borawski James Gentile Matt Hunter Frank Jackson Chris Jaffe Brad Johnson Jason Linden Dan Lependorf Bruce Markusen Jeff Moore Greg Simons Scott Spratt Dave Studeman Shane Tourtellotte Steve Treder And here's the full roster. Now available
Or you can search by:
THT E-book    All content on this site (including text, graphs, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. |
TUCK! sez: He would have been safe if he’d said “Royals” or “Pirates”by TuckNovember 04, 2010
Follow TUCK! on Twitter: @ TUCKsez Feedback and inquiries: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) Comments
TUCK! said...
@Jim: You’re right, neither the Royals (nor the Bucs) are apathetic nor violent. I was more just wondering if MLB would have been as swift to, uh, “solicit” (yeah, that’s it) the apology (or, if you will, “apology”) if the remarks had been made about a smaller-market team. Thanks very much for the post/for allowing me to clear up any confusion there. Posted 11/04 at 11:16 AM
Leo Walter said...
Personally,I think he would have been safe ( and truthful ! ) if he had used Phillies and Red Sox fans or the the Yankees. Posted 11/06 at 11:32 AM
Page 1 of 1
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry. Next Article: This annotated week in baseball history: Oct. 31-Nov. 6, 2010>> <<Previous Article: Examining what went wrong for Rangers, right for Giants | ||||
How about it should have said Baltimore, Seattle or Arizona. All had fewer wins than the Royals. And no he wouldnt have been safe, Royals fans aren’t any of those things.