May 25, 2013

THT Essentials:
Fangraphs Player Search:


And here's the full roster.

Now available


You can now purchase the Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2013, with 300 pages of great content. It's also available on Amazon and Kindle. Read more about it here.

THT's latest e-book


Third Base: The Crossroads is THT's new e-book, available for $3.99 from the Kindle store. The good news is that anyone can read a Kindle book, even on a PC. So enjoy the best from THT in a new format.

Most Recent Comments





Get your very own THT merchandise from our CafePress store. We've got baseball caps, t-shirts, coffee mugs and even wall clocks with the classy THT logo prominently displayed. Also, check out the THT Bookstore. Please support your favorite baseball site by purchasing something today.



Or you can search by:


Creative Commons License
All content on this site (including text, graphs, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Roll mouse over date for entries
THT Live Calendar
May 2013
S M T W T F S



1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31

Friday, July 31, 2009

Errata data

Posted by Dave Studeman
Stew Thornley has been compiling information on baseball errors, and he's posted his findings, year by year. Here is the rate of errors per game and per ball in play for the last five decades:
Decade     E/G     E/BIP
1960's    1.76     3.15%
1970's    1.76     3.05%
1980's    1.63     2.86%
1990's    1.46     2.60%
2000's    1.31     2.35%
So what's the story here? Are fielders getting better? Maybe the gloves are better? Or are scorers getting more lenient?

(thanks to the Retrosheet mailing list, as inspired by Tango)




Dave was called a "national treasure" by Rob Neyer. Seriously. Comments about this article can be sent to him through the miracle of e-mail.


Comments

Gold Star for Robot Boy said...

Groundskeeping improvements?

Posted 07/31  at  01:06 PM
Jeff Sackmann said...

Positioning?  You’d expect to see the effect of positioning show up more in BABIP, but hitters getting stronger might counteract, or at least mask, that effect.

But…if more plays are routine, rather than tough “shoulda made it, but…” plays, that would reduce the error rate.  And it the players are better positioned, that would seem to make some plays more routine.

Also, I’d be interested to see the rates for bunts broken out.  It seems like bunts generate more errors because of the rushed nature of a play on a good bunt, and if the rate of bunt attempts (both sacs and for hits) went down, perhaps overall error rate would too.

And hey, while I’m at it, the error rate on bunts might tell us something about the quality of bunting.  The nostalgic types among us would probably say that in the past, more players could bunt better, and that they would run out sac bunts, etc.  That would make more plays closer.  I have no idea whether the nostalgic view is true or not, though I suspect it is if you go back far enough.

Posted 07/31  at  02:23 PM
Page 1 of 1

Leave a comment:

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.