November 22, 2009
Order NowThe Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2010 is now in development and will ship in mid November! This year's book will feature articles by THT's staff as well as Bill James, Tom Tango and Craig Wright. If you use this link to purchase the Annual, you will be in the first group to receive it and you'll be supporting THT. Most Recent Comments
Introducing Visual Baseball (0)
Building a Retrosheet database, the short form (3) HR/FB Park Factors (5) Is peak at age 29? (7) On whiffing (4) ![]()
Or you can search by:
Gear up for baseball season with Chicago White Sox tickets and New York Yankees tickets. LA Angels tickets, Houston Astros tickets, and Atlanta Braves tickets are hot sellers! You can get Boston Red Sox tickets, San Diego Padres tickets or Chicago Cubs tickets for your favorite baseball fan. Coast to Coast Tickets has the best MLB tickets like Minnesota Twins tickets, LA Dodgers tickets, Milwaukee Brewers tickets, New York Met tickets and St. Louis Cardinals tickets. Find premium Chicago Cubs tickets and other Chicago tickets at JustGreatTickets.com. Chicago Cubs Tickets Chicago Tickets ![]() All content on this site (including text, graphs, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. |
Friday, July 31, 2009Errata dataPosted by Dave StudemanStew Thornley has been compiling information on baseball errors, and he's posted his findings, year by year. Here is the rate of errors per game and per ball in play for the last five decades: Decade E/G E/BIP 1960's 1.76 3.15% 1970's 1.76 3.05% 1980's 1.63 2.86% 1990's 1.46 2.60% 2000's 1.31 2.35%So what's the story here? Are fielders getting better? Maybe the gloves are better? Or are scorers getting more lenient? (thanks to the Retrosheet mailing list, as inspired by Tango) Dave was called a "national treasure" by Rob Neyer. Seriously. Comments about this article can be sent to him through the miracle of e-mail. Comments
Jeff Sackmann said...
Positioning? You’d expect to see the effect of positioning show up more in BABIP, but hitters getting stronger might counteract, or at least mask, that effect. But…if more plays are routine, rather than tough “shoulda made it, but…” plays, that would reduce the error rate. And it the players are better positioned, that would seem to make some plays more routine. Also, I’d be interested to see the rates for bunts broken out. It seems like bunts generate more errors because of the rushed nature of a play on a good bunt, and if the rate of bunt attempts (both sacs and for hits) went down, perhaps overall error rate would too. And hey, while I’m at it, the error rate on bunts might tell us something about the quality of bunting. The nostalgic types among us would probably say that in the past, more players could bunt better, and that they would run out sac bunts, etc. That would make more plays closer. I have no idea whether the nostalgic view is true or not, though I suspect it is if you go back far enough. Posted 07/31 at 02:23 PM
Page 1 of 1
Leave a comment:Commenting is not available in this weblog entry. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Groundskeeping improvements?