November 22, 2009
Order NowThe Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2010 is now in development and will ship in mid November! This year's book will feature articles by THT's staff as well as Bill James, Tom Tango and Craig Wright. If you use this link to purchase the Annual, you will be in the first group to receive it and you'll be supporting THT. ![]()
Rich Barbieri
John Barten Brian Borawski Craig Brown Evan Brunell David Gassko Jonathan Hale Brandon Isleib Chris Jaffe Max Marchi Bruce Markusen Harry Pavlidis Jeff Sackmann Dave Studeman Steve Treder Bryan Tsao Tuck! Dan Turkenkopf Colin Wyers Geoff Young John Brattain And here's the full roster.
Or you can search by:
Gear up for baseball season with Chicago White Sox tickets and New York Yankees tickets. LA Angels tickets, Houston Astros tickets, and Atlanta Braves tickets are hot sellers! You can get Boston Red Sox tickets, San Diego Padres tickets or Chicago Cubs tickets for your favorite baseball fan. Coast to Coast Tickets has the best MLB tickets like Minnesota Twins tickets, LA Dodgers tickets, Milwaukee Brewers tickets, New York Met tickets and St. Louis Cardinals tickets. Find premium Chicago Cubs tickets and other Chicago tickets at JustGreatTickets.com. Chicago Cubs Tickets Chicago Tickets ![]() All content on this site (including text, graphs, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. |
Players Articles
Following are the one hundred most recent articles for the category
Players
.
11/19/2009: TUCK! sez: Here come the Halladaysby Tuck11/18/2009: Out come the freaksby Geoff Young11/16/2009: The Babe at Fenway and other home run storiesby John Walsh11/12/2009: TUCK! sez: Winner gets the centaur paintings?by Tuck11/11/2009: Lidge of sighsby Geoff Young11/05/2009: TUCK! sez: Fuzzy mathby Tuck11/04/2009: Players worth remembering, 1925-1946by Geoff Young11/04/2009: Get rid of the DLFby Joe Distelheim10/15/2009: TUCK! sez: Legendary inve$tment$?by Tuck10/08/2009: TUCK! sez: What, me worry?by Tuck10/06/2009: Man vs. computerby David Gassko10/01/2009: Pick your favorite rookieby Jeff Sackmann09/30/2009: Ryan Madson’s deal with the devilby Dan Novick09/24/2009: TUCK! sez: Temper, temper (Part 2)by Tuck09/23/2009: Yes, but it’s an empty .300by Geoff Young09/18/2009: Oh, Hanley!by Craig Brown09/11/2009: The extinction of Zito’s hard curveby Max Marchi09/10/2009: TUCK! sez: Temper, temperby Tuck09/09/2009: When .360 just isn’t good enoughby Geoff Young09/09/2009: Player Profile: Jonathan Sanchezby Mike Silver09/03/2009: TUCK! sez: Media runs on Duncanby Tuck09/02/2009: Player Profile: Brett Andersonby Mike Silver09/02/2009: Something about Everthby Geoff Young08/28/2009: Making their markby Craig Brown08/28/2009: This annotated week in baseball history: Aug. 23-Aug. 29, 2009by Richard Barbieri08/27/2009: TUCK sez: Goin’ all Garry Templetonby Tuck08/26/2009: Hampton, Zito, Davisby Geoff Young08/24/2009: Top 20 second half flops: Nos. 10-1by Jim Anderson08/20/2009: Revisiting Bill Hall’s long-term dealby Jeff Sackmann08/20/2009: TUCK! sez: Play ball. Please!by Tuck08/18/2009: The virtual 1961 Cleveland Indians (Part 2)by Steve Treder08/17/2009: Top 20 second-half flops: nos. 11-20by Jim Anderson08/14/2009: Marco Scutaro’s little thingsby Max Marchi08/12/2009: Player Profile: My street accident, B.J. Uptonby Mike Silver08/12/2009: Ten who hit 500by Geoff Young08/11/2009: The pieces are coming togetherby Paul Singman08/11/2009: The virtual 1961 Cleveland Indians (Part 1)by Steve Treder08/06/2009: TUCK! sez: Roid Sawxby Tuck07/30/2009: Picking up the paceby Dan Turkenkopf07/30/2009: TUCK! sez: Guess againby Tuck07/29/2009: Players worth remembering, 1947-1968by Geoff Young07/23/2009: TUCK! sez: Arrghby Tuck07/22/2009: The gentle art of prospect promotionby Geoff Young07/15/2009: Players worth remembering, 1969-1989by Geoff Young07/09/2009: Fielding stats for college shortstopsby Jeff Sackmann07/09/2009: TUCK! sez: Bring your own whine and brewby Tuck07/08/2009: They might run more if they could walkby Geoff Young07/01/2009: Adrian takes a walkby Geoff Young06/25/2009: Jenrry Mejia and Other New Prospect Breakdownsby Matt Hagen06/25/2009: TUCK! sez: Really didn’t need a crystal ball for thatby Tuck06/18/2009: Prospect Breakdowns, Notes, and Additions - 6/18by Matt Hagen06/17/2009: Two emerging talentsby Geoff Young06/12/2009: Extreme environmentsby Jeff Sackmann06/12/2009: See the ball, hit the ballby Craig Brown06/09/2009: Historic comparables (Volume 1)by Steve Treder06/04/2009: A tale of two rolesby Dan Turkenkopf06/04/2009: TUCK! sez: Just another manic meltdownby Tuck06/02/2009: Don McMahon (Part 3)by Steve Treder05/28/2009: TUCK! sez: Postively forgottenby Tuck05/27/2009: Critics, criticism, Cloningerby Geoff Young05/26/2009: Backstopping and roaming wide (Part 3: 1970-2008)by Steve Treder05/22/2009: TUCK! sez: Let’s try that againby Tuck05/19/2009: Don McMahon (Part 2)by Steve Treder05/15/2009: Ryan Zimmerman has arrivedby Craig Brown05/14/2009: Apprehensive yet Comprehensive: Personal Strategies and Secrets for Dominating Your Keeper Leagueby Matt Hagen05/14/2009: TUCK! sez: One for Calcaterraby Tuck05/12/2009: Backstopping and roaming wide (Part 2: 1935-1970)by Steve Treder05/05/2009: Don McMahon (Part 1)by Steve Treder05/05/2009: Fingers pointedby Paul Singman04/30/2009: Fingers not pointedby Paul Singman04/28/2009: Backstopping and roaming wide (Part 1: 1890-1935)by Steve Treder04/22/2009: Once upon a shortstopby Geoff Young04/21/2009: The Branch Rickey Pirates (Part 6: 1954-1955)by Steve Treder04/17/2009: A-Rod in the clutchby John Beamer04/16/2009: TUCK! sez: Mariner momentby Tuck04/14/2009: The Branch Rickey Pirates (Part 5: 1953-1954)by Steve Treder04/09/2009: TUCK! sez: (Still) D-railedby Tuck04/08/2009: Book review: Cubs By The Numbersby Joe Distelheim04/07/2009: The Branch Rickey Pirates (Part 4: 1952-1953)by Steve Treder04/07/2009: Projecting playing timeby Victor Wang03/31/2009: The Branch Rickey Pirates (Part 3: 1951-1952)by Steve Treder03/30/2009: 29 players I think the THT projections got wrongby David Gassko03/30/2009: Five questions: San Francisco Giantsby Steve Treder03/21/2009: TUCK! sez: Mu$t be $aving up for $howing off $oftballpark Village at the All-$tar Gameby Tuck03/17/2009: Will Vernon Wells be worth the price?by Dan Turkenkopf03/17/2009: The Branch Rickey Pirates (Part 2: 1950-1951)by Steve Treder03/13/2009: This annotated week in baseball history: March 8-14, 1984by Richard Barbieri03/12/2009: TUCK! sez: But what precious timingby Tuck03/10/2009: The Branch Rickey Pirates (Part 1)by Steve Treder03/03/2009: Casimir Kwietniewskiby Steve Treder02/26/2009: TUCK! sez: Hi Yo Silverby Tuck02/24/2009: The virtual 1965-68 Washington Senatorsby Steve Treder02/20/2009: The quest for respectability, 2009 editionby Craig Brown02/19/2009: TUCK! sez: The other admission this weekby Tuck02/17/2009: The Sunset Leagueby Steve Treder02/17/2009: Consistency meter: Carlos Leeby Paul Singman02/16/2009: Matt Wieters or David Price?by Victor Wang02/12/2009: TUCK! sez: Toldjya so!!by Tuck02/10/2009: Bats right, throws left: The best players in major league historyby Steve Treder02/09/2009: The A-Rod Roundtableby David Gassko<< Click here to return to the category list. |
![]() November 20, 2009Kevin Millwood or Luis Castillo: Who is more valuable?Kind of a weird topic, right? But I have my reasoning.News broke Friday of a potential three-way deal that would send Milton Bradley back to Texas from the Cubs. Chicago would receive second baseman Luis Castillo from the Mets as their reward for shedding the malcontent, with Kevin Millwood heading to the Big Apple to complete the trade. This has been debunked by several sources, such as MLB Trade Rumors, T.R Sullivan and Jon Heyman. However, it's sparked a debate between Heyman and other people on Twitter whether or not Castillo or Millwood is valuable. So, is Castillo valuable? Is Heyman on the mark that Millwood is more valuable than Castillo? The easiest way to find out is to look at Fangraph's valuation of both players in a dollar figure. Castillo was worth $7.2 million this past year, drawing a salary of $6 million. Last year, he was valued at a paltry $2.6 million, going to show how awful Castillo and his contract looked just a year ago. Millwood, on the other hand, posted a very good season with a 3.67 ERA. His FIP was 4.80, so there's cause for concern as to whether Millwood is smoke or mirrors. I'm not putting all my eggs into the FIP basket, to use an analogy, but I'm certainly not relying on his ERA either. Millwood was valued at $10.9 million, so right off the bat there is an easy answer to the question as to who is more valuable. When you think about it, too, isn't it obvious that Millwood is more valuable? Let's toss out some comparisons. Castillo has 2 years and $12 million remaining on his contract. He plays second base, a position where offense is not particularly relied on, and will enter his age 34 season. At this point in his career, all Castillo has going for him is his plate discipline and an ability to hit for an average hovering in the .280-.300 range. He's not adept defensively according to UZR. If I had to select Castillo or Chris Getz to be my second baseman next year, I'd select Getz. (All else NOT equal.) My point here is that Castillo and his production -- with his contract heavily factored in -- is rather replaceable. The only thing Luis has going for him at the moment is that his bad contract can be swapped for another bad contract. (Give me Milton Bradley any day of the week over Castillo, Carl Everett attitude be damned.) Millwood will be 35 and can hit 200 innings pitched a season. He's a solid, if erratic pitcher who will keep a team in the game and will make $12 million in the final year of his contract. He is best used as a No. 3-4, although the Rangers currently cast him as their ace. Millwood is not replaceable. While you might be able to get away with calling up a AAAA player and having him perform to or over Castillo's abilities, you can't say the same of an AAAA pitcher with respect to Millwood. That's where this trade breaks down. A Bradley for Millwood swap makes more sense talent-wise, but Castillo being considered on the level of these two players is fallacy at its finest. If true that Mets GM Omar Minaya overvalues him -- even when trying to trade him -- then you can bet on Castillo being the Mets' second baseman in 2010. Posted by: Evan Brunell October 04, 2009What should we call Rivera’s other fastball?Mariano Rivera is famous for his cut fastball. So famous, in fact, that it's a common misconception that he only throws one pitch. Of course, from PITCHf/x data, as well as some newspaper reports, we know he throws another type of fastball. I've often seen it referred to as a sinker or two-seam fastball, but its spin deflection certainly looks like a classic four-seamer.In a discussion about Dave Allen's post about Mariano Rivera that took place at the Book blog, I had the occasion to look for images of Rivera's two fastball grips. I thought I'd share them here for yuk-yuks with the other two of you in the world who care about what to properly name Rivera's "other" fastball. First, here's his cutter grip, with index fingertip and middle fingertip on the seam. As far as I can tell this is close to a typical cutter grip--a four-seam grip with the ball set a little off center in his hand. (There's a better picture here, but I don't have permission to post the image.)
Now, here's the other fastball, the one I tend to call a four-seamer because of how it moves. It's the one others call a two-seamer, though I'm not sure why. If you look at how many seams he's holding, should we call it a one-seamer?
Posted by: Mike Fast September 26, 2009Ichiro strike threeIchiro Suzuki was ejected in the fifth inning of today's game against the Toronto Blue Jays after demonstratively arguing a called strike three. In addition to comments to the umpire, Suzuki drew a line on the ground with his bat to show Brian Runge where he thought the pitch had gone.![]() I grabbed some still shots of the pitch crossing the plate, but with camera angles, it's impossible to tell whether a pitch so close to the edge of the plate was a strike or not. So what did the PITCHf/x tracking system say? ![]() The path of the baseball as tracked by PITCHf/x is shown by the red lines. (The baseball is 2.9 inches in diameter.) PITCHf/x has been shown to be accurate within half an inch, so the gray lines outside the red lines indicate the possible location of the baseball given the margin of error inherent in PITCHf/x measurements near home plate. It's close enough that Ichiro Suzuki probably shouldn't have taken the pitch. The umpire's going to call that pitch a strike to a left-handed batter at least half the time. The cost of a strike in that situation was the second out of the inning with a runner on third base, costing the Mariners something like 0.6 runs on average. The gain from taking a ball, moving the count from 0-2 to 1-2, is miniscule by comparison, something like 0.025 runs on average. In this case, he was bailed out by a wild pitch that scored Adam Moore from third during the next at bat, but it wasn't a good bet on Ichiro's part, nor did he have a particularly good case with the ump. Posted by: Mike Fast July 24, 2009What did Mark Buehrle throw?During the season, Mark Buehrle used his change-up about 15-20% of the time. In yesterday's perfect game, it was his go-to pitch, particularly against right-handed batters, who saw 40 change-ups out of 90 pitches. He notched 15 outs with the change, seven with the four-seam fastball, and five with the cut fastball.In the last three innings, he went even more heavily to the change-up, throwing 24 changes compared to 18 pitches of all other types combined. This while he was ramping his fastball speed from the mid-eighties to the upper eighties, touching 90 mph with his final pitch. After the jump is a chart showing the speed of all his pitches, with the pitch type and result of the at bat indicated. Click for more... Posted by: Mike Fast June 09, 2009Which batters hit the hardest balls in April?With the release of Sportvision's HITf/x data for April 2009, we can look at who hit the ball the hardest in April. Since batted ball speed does not decrease much even when the batter hits the ball off center, it is more instructive to look at batted ball speed in the horizontal plane. In other words, hitting the ball very hard straight up is likely to turn into an out, while hitting the ball very hard straight toward the outfield is likely to turn into a hit. In fact, we find that batting average is maximized at an elevation of 11 degrees, so we'll look at the average batted ball speed for batters in that plane. We should also remove bunt attempts since they purposefully attempt a low batted ball speed.Here are the results for the 303 batters with 20 or more non-bunt batted balls recorded by HITf/x. Average batted ball speed for a non-pitcher was 75.1 mph. When pitchers were batting, their average batted ball speed was 66.1 mph. Click for more... Posted by: Mike Fast Click here for more THT Notes. | ||||