May 24, 2013
And here's the full roster.
Now availableHardball Times Baseball Annual 2013, with 300 pages of great content. It's also available on Amazon and Kindle. Read more about it here.
Or you can search by:
THT E-bookThird Base: The Crossroads is THT's e-book, available for $3.99 from the Kindle store. The good news is that anyone can read a Kindle book, even on a PC. So enjoy the best from THT in a new format.
our CafePress store. We've got baseball caps, t-shirts, coffee mugs and even wall clocks with the classy THT logo prominently displayed. Also, check out the THT Bookstore. Please support your favorite baseball site by purchasing something today.
All content on this site (including text, graphs, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Following are the one hundred most recent articles for the category Umpiring .
05/24/2013: And That Happenedby Craig Calcaterra
05/24/2013: Rick Anderson and pitching to contactby Scott Strandberg
05/24/2013: Fantasy Waiver Wire: Week 8, Vol. IIIby Karl de Vries
05/23/2013: It is inexcusable to release Jon Rauchby Pat Andriola
05/23/2013: The daily grind: 5-23-13by Brad Johnson
05/23/2013: And That Happenedby Craig Calcaterra
05/23/2013: Strength of schedule: Adjusting pitcher valuesby Moe Koltun
05/23/2013: Visualization: Handedness through historyby Dan Lependorf
05/23/2013: The Roto Grotto: targeted z-scoresby Scott Spratt
05/22/2013: The daily grind: 5-22-13by Brad Johnson
05/22/2013: And That Happenedby Craig Calcaterra
05/22/2013: Fantasy Waiver Wire: Week 8, Vol. IIby Jack Weiland
05/22/2013: The hardest thingby Derek Ambrosino
05/22/2013: 20th anniversary: Blue Jays mascot ejectedby Chris Jaffe
05/22/2013: Currently historic: A plethora of new stuffby Jason Linden
05/22/2013: BOB: Owners’ meeting updateby Brian Borawski
05/21/2013: And That Happenedby Craig Calcaterra
05/21/2013: The daily grind: 5-21-13by Brad Johnson
05/21/2013: 50th anniversary: Jim Maloney: a star is bornby Chris Jaffe
05/21/2013: Diamonds in the rough: starting pitchersby Noah Woodward
05/21/2013: Profar could be on a Cingrani-esque scheduleby Jeff Moore
05/21/2013: Is 5/125 the new 5/55?by Greg Simons
05/21/2013: The Verdict: keep your trade secrets to yourselfby Michael Stein
05/21/2013: THT Awardsby John Barten
05/20/2013: Closer watchby Karl de Vries
05/20/2013: The daily grind: 5-20-13by Brad Johnson
05/20/2013: And That Happenedby Craig Calcaterra
05/20/2013: The Hot Seatby Scott Strandberg
05/20/2013: AL Central: state of the divisionby Chris Jaffe
05/20/2013: Fantasy Waiver Wire: Week 8, Vol. 1by Karl de Vries
05/20/2013: Louisville slugging in 2013by Frank Jackson
05/20/2013: 5,000 days since Eric Milton’s no-hitterby Chris Jaffe
05/17/2013: The daily grind: 5-17-13by Brad Johnson
05/17/2013: And That Happenedby Craig Calcaterra
05/17/2013: Gems without whiffsby James Gentile
05/17/2013: 40th anniversary: Bobby Valentine breaks his legby Chris Jaffe
05/17/2013: Strength of schedule: Adjusting hitter valuesby Moe Koltun
05/17/2013: Fantasy Waiver Wire: Week 7, Vol. IIIby Jack Weiland
05/17/2013: Card Corner: 1973 Topps: Mike Andrewsby Bruce Markusen
05/16/2013: The daily grind: 5-16-13by Brad Johnson
05/16/2013: And That Happenedby Craig Calcaterra
05/16/2013: How Scott Kazmir got his groove backby Kyle Boddy
05/16/2013: Three more for eternityby Don Malcolm
05/16/2013: Not exactly definitiveby Don Malcolm
05/16/2013: The all-decade team: the ‘40sby Richard Barbieri
05/16/2013: Of Uggs and Ugglaby Derek Ambrosino
05/15/2013: The daily grind: 5-15-13by Brad Johnson
05/15/2013: And That Happenedby Craig Calcaterra
05/15/2013: Running hot and coldby Shane Tourtellotte
05/15/2013: The Phillies should retool but not rebootby Brad Johnson
05/15/2013: Fantasy Waiver Wire: Week 7, Vol. IIby Karl de Vries
05/15/2013: Currently historic: 300 strikeouts?by Jason Linden
05/15/2013: Mike Moustakas’ holeby Noah Woodward
05/15/2013: BOB: How bad is the Marlins’ attendance?by Brian Borawski
05/14/2013: And That Happenedby Craig Calcaterra
05/14/2013: The daily grind: 5-14-13by Brad Johnson
05/14/2013: How much do hot/cold starts matter?by Greg Simons
05/14/2013: 25th anniversary: The Jose Oquendo Gameby Chris Jaffe
05/14/2013: Jonathan Schoop and the value of role playersby Jeff Moore
05/14/2013: THT Awardsby John Barten
05/13/2013: The daily grind: 5-13-13by Brad Johnson
05/13/2013: And That Happenedby Craig Calcaterra
05/13/2013: 30th anniversary: Reggie’s 2,000th Kby Chris Jaffe
05/13/2013: NL Central division update: May editionby Jason Linden
05/13/2013: Fantasy Waiver Wire: Week 7, Vol. Iby Jack Weiland
05/13/2013: Last remaining teammatesby Chris Jaffe
05/13/2013: The Hot Seatby Scott Strandberg
05/12/2013: The curious case of Vernon Wellsby Matt Filippi
05/12/2013: 60th anniversary: Whitey Ford’s near no-hitterby Chris Jaffe
05/10/2013: The daily grind: 5-10-13by Brad Johnson
05/10/2013: And That Happenedby Craig Calcaterra
05/10/2013: Cooperstown Confidential: What really happened with Fritz Ostermueller and Jackie Robinsonby Bruce Markusen
05/10/2013: Fantasy Waiver Wire: Week 6, Vol. IIIby Karl de Vries
05/10/2013: Still life, after allby Azure Texan
05/09/2013: Oh Dustyby Pat Andriola
05/09/2013: And That Happenedby Craig Calcaterra
05/09/2013: 40th anniversary: back-to-back first homersby Chris Jaffe
05/09/2013: The Roto Grotto: rates versus opportunitiesby Scott Spratt
05/09/2013: Swing rates: the John Farrell effectby Moe Koltun
05/09/2013: Winning, TWTW, and the purpose of baseballby Matt Hunter
05/08/2013: And That Happenedby Craig Calcaterra
05/08/2013: The daily grind: 5-8-13by Brad Johnson
05/08/2013: Fantasy Waiver Wire: Week 6, Vol. IIby Jack Weiland
05/08/2013: What nobody is talking aboutby Greg Simons
05/08/2013: Currently historic: A truly rare achievementby Jason Linden
05/08/2013: Craig Anderson’s greatest dayby Frank Jackson
05/08/2013: BOB: Stadium updatesby Brian Borawski
05/07/2013: And That Happenedby Craig Calcaterra
05/07/2013: The daily grind: 5-7-13by Brad Johnson
05/07/2013: Fun with minor league leader boardsby Jeff Moore
05/07/2013: 90th anniversary: Casey Stengel goes bonkersby Chris Jaffe
05/07/2013: THT Awardsby John Barten
05/07/2013: A.J. Ellis: hardly swinging, hardly missingby Noah Woodward
05/07/2013: Baseball Press: a fantasy secret weaponby Jack Weiland
<< Click here to return to the category list.
April 23, 2012
Run Ryan, runThe last out of Philip Humber’s perfect game brought some controversy as an umpire’s call was questioned. The last pitch was on 3-2 count involving a called third strike on a checked swing.
The problem, though, was missed. The controversy should not be about the call itself, but Brendan Ryan’s reaction. Down to your last out in a 4-0 game, instead of attempting to get on base, you argue the call instead of running to first base?!? I think Ryan, if he would have run, probably would have been safe at first.
Yes, Ryan could have ended a perfect game by being safe and also the 27th out, since Humber would have been credited for the strikeout. In fact, if Ryan would have run, the discussion of Brian Runge’s call on the checked swing would have been muted immediately.
The real problem was Ryan’s lack of hustle.
Given that, I still want to take a look at Runge’s call. Interesting enough, it was one of the Fox national games, opposite the Red Sox and Yankees. Significantly, this means the game’s camera coverage was increased a bit.
We—at least, I—have not yet seen a first-base angle replay of the check swing. This leads some people to speculate that MLB is just trying to hide the fact that Runge’s call was incorrect. Most likely the reason for a lack of replay is less sinister.
The center field camera was used to record the pitch, and a normal set of cameras was prepared to cover the live action. Any remaining cameras available to record the batter and different angles probably were used to record the reaction of the White Sox’s dugout, Humber, etc.
Since checked swings are not a reviewable call, the production team has the option not to record it at every angle. Watching a replay of the last pitch and the events surrounding it, it is pretty clear the Fox production team was scrambling a bit. It was a fairly unique circumstance.
But here lies the problem with a fan’s expectation of replays and the reality of the production of a televised baseball game. If something is not reviewable, the production team is under little obligation be able to produce replay material for it. As I believe happened in Humber’s perfect game, Fox used extra cameras for entertainment value.*
*This is why, in a previous post about instant replay, I included uniform standards across games and stadiums for instant replay specifically so something like this could not happen on a reviewable call.
Like most people, Fox did not anticipate a called third strike on a checked swing where the catcher missed the ball and the batter argued before running to first.
Thus, we circle back to the real problem: Brendan Ryan didn’t run.
Posted by: Mat Kovach
March 12, 2012
Harry Wendelstedt career highlightsLast week, former umpire Harry Wendlestedt died at age 73. He was one of the longest-serving umpires in baseball history, arriving in the majors in 1966 and staying until the end of 1998. Along the way, he served in exactly 4,500 regular season games, 74 postseason ones, and a quartet of All-Star contests.
When someone notable in the baseball world passes, one thing I like to do here at THT is recount his career highlights, the greatest and most important games the guy served in and the memorable occasions he was on hand for. Umpires are, of course, part of the story, and a long-time umpire like Wendlestedt can end up serving in a remarkable and unusual number of memorable games. For instance, he personally worked home plate for five different no-hitters.
Thusm the list below, though long, is still but a smattering of the games Wendelstedt arbitrated.
Click for more...
Posted by: Chris Jaffe
June 02, 2011
A very non-statistical look at umpires and strike zonesMike Fast at Baseball Prospectus has done a good job, in two articles (here and here), looking at the nuances of the umpires' strike zones and pondering about why umpires get things wrong. Even the PITCHf/x data are almost a hindrance to discovery; based on how they are is collected and what is missing.
One big missing piece is where, exactly, the umpire is standing when the pitch is delivered. Umpires are taught to stand behind the catcher and position themselves to look high and inside to the batter. If the umpire is positioning himself to get his best view of high and inside, this would lead, based on how the eyes work and process the flight of a ball, to a low and outside pitch being one of the hard ones to follow. It makes perfect sense that those types of pitches cause the most questionable calls.
It also leads to the impression that if a ball is difficult to follow but it appears to go directly where it should (it hits the catcher’s mitt), it must be a good pitch. Some people would say that it's a "gut feeling’’ that the pitch is right when the eyes are confused.
Also, if we know the location of the umpire, we can understand if he is make a prediction on where the pitch might go. Of course if the umpire is attempting to predict the location of the pitch, it would be interesting to see how he calls the pitch if he guesses wrong.
It is this lack of information that make me shake my head and people talk about the need for more gut feelings in baseball. That type of decision-making can be affected by many things, including if you have recently eaten or not.
Note: Always schedule your parole hearing right after a food break. It also might be a good idea to make sure the umpires are fed well between innings.
So, not only do you have to worry about the statistical side of an umpire’s strike zone, but behavioral economics might be involved.
For a little bit of perspective, I wanted to see how called strikes, swinging strikes, balls, and the rest (hits, foul balls, etc.) were affected by the height of the pitch. I reasoned that the boundaries of the strike zone are biased toward the batter's ability to hit the ball. Just a simple bias about basic human limitation: if it is a borderline pitch that can't be hit, it is a ball. (This assumption does not have to be TRUE, but just a common assumption people make.)
I grabbed about 75,000 pitches from this year that were over the middle 12 inches of home plate. Then I split them between right- and left-handed batters and by the previously mentioned categories. This is an approach Mike discussed in his second article.
Between 0.6 feet and 3.8 feet, more than 1,000 pitches are present for each 0.2 feet in height. It should be noted that there is ONE 4.8 foot swinging strike. I suspect that is either a switching pitch-out or a misreported pitch. Sample sizes restrict accurate information from other height ranges. I had an average strike zone bottom of 1.6 feet and an average strike zone top of 3.4 feet.
A lot of things make sense.
At first look, the height of the pitch affects things very much as one would expect. Throwing to the middle of the plate in or around the strike zone is more likely to get you a ball in play or a strike, but generally a called strike. There are still a percentage of balls called, but upon some investigation those balls are due much more to varying heights of batters than to questionable calls by the umpire.*
* I did some minor corrections, normalizing batter strike zones and giving some variance for park corrections, and only about 1 percent of the ball calls between the top and bottom of the strike zone could be considered questionable. But it was a very quick and dirty method, so non-statistical that a statistician would rather remove his left foot with a dull butter knife than review it.
Umpires are calling a rather defined strike zone.
The real question is, does the graph above represent a real strike zone, as Mike suggested, defined by the players, or does it reflect the size of the strike zone as defined by the rules of baseball. Granted, the current size of the strike zone is smaller than written in the rule book, but if we changed the rule book strike zone would we change the size of the reflected strike zone?
Looking back at my graph, just around the average strike zone top and bottom swinging strikes increase and balls in play decrease. This seems to follow exactly what would happen if a batter swings at pitches near the edge of strike zone. We also see balls increasing and called strikes decrease (well, called strikes increase a bit, then tail off). This follows when a batter holds off at pitches near the edge of the strike zone.
Right around the strike zone there are two fairly clearly defined patterns; swinging or not swinging at pitches near the edge of the strike zone.
I say that the strike zone is defined by the batter results. If batters are swinging and missing at more pitches, the locations will be considered a ball. If batters are hitting the balls, swinging and missing less, the location will be considered a strike. Even if the size of the strike zone changes, the boundaries enforced by the umpire will be defined by that simple bias.
If a player has trouble putting the bat on the ball, it is a ball. If he swings and hits it, it is a strike. The strike zone is defined by the rule book, largely refined by the players and enforced by the umpires.
Posted by: Mat Kovach
April 13, 2010
Red Sox-Yankees slow gamesThe New York Yankees and Boston Red Sox have garnered a lot of attention for their slow games, particularly their three-hour, 46-minute affair on opening day. I've been thinking about this since then, but Joe Posnanski's post today gave me the push I need to crunch the numbers. He compared the average times for intra-division games in the American League. The Yankees and Red Sox led the way with the longest games in 2009, while the Mariners-Rangers matchups were the shortest.
I compiled the numbers for 38 Yankees-Red Sox games and 41 Mariners-Rangers games for which we have pitch time data from 2008, 2009 and 2010. Here is the breakdown.
Boston-New York Seattle-Texas Event Each Per Game Each Per Game Time between innings 2:50 45:13 2:31 40:54 Pitching changes mid-inning 3:29 8:38 3:23 6:37 Time between at-bats, runners on 0:55 32:39 0:50 27:19 Time between at-bats, bases empty 0:43 15:55 0:38 14:05 Time between pitches, runners on 0:30 54:40 0:26 40:39 Time between pitches, bases empty 0:22 44:32 0:18 34:26 Other (rain delays, untimed pitches) --- 8:59 --- 4:20 Total --- 3:30:35 --- 2:48:19Thanks to MLB Advanced Media and Sportvision for providing the detailed pitch time data.
Posted by: Mike Fast
Click here for more THT Notes.