THT Essentials:

Now available


You can now purchase the Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2013, with 300 pages of great content. It's also available on Amazon and Kindle. Read more about it here.


Follow our quick-hitting updates each day on Twitter.

And here's the full roster.

Most Recent Comments

Monthly Archives



Creative Commons License
All content on this site (including text, graphs, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Monday, April 27, 2009

Confessions of fantasy baseball addict:  Who is really the back-up closer in Kansas City

Posted by Eric Hinz at 1:05am

Single league format fantasy baseball leagues, henceforth known as AL-only and NL-only leagues, have proven to be less popular than their younger, more prolific mixed league cousins. Whether this is good or bad is a question of personal taste, as each has its pluses and minuses.

When playing in an AL- or NL-only leagues, one is compelled to know more about every team than one does playing in a mixed league. Exactly who cares about Darin Erstad (anymore) or the necessity of rostering Angel Berroa? How you answer that question is a good predictor of whether you prefer mixed leagues or AL- and NL-only ones.

I want to know about both players and make roster decisions based on each. That is why I prefer AL- and NL-only leagues. The rationale behind adding, reserving, waiving and keeping players of Erstad’s and Berroa’s ilk will be the weekly focus of Confessions of a Fantasy Baseball Expert.

For what it's worth, Erstad’s value derives from the possibility of Michael Bourn repeating as the hitting version of Shawn Chacon (a one-category player whose additional category contributions are complete negatives) and the Astros proclivity for veteran players regardless of on-the-field production.

2004 Shawn Chacon: 35 Saves, 7.11 ERA, 1.87 WHIP, 1 W, 52 K
2008 Michael Bourn: 41 SBs, .229 AVG, 5 HR, 29 RBI, 57 Runs

Friday afternoon brought the announcement, signalled by the previous eight day’s of non-use, that Kansas City Royals’ closer Joakim Soria will miss at the next three to five days to rest shoulder discomfort. While this sent mixed leaguers looking to add Juan Cruz, the AL-only player had to dig deeper as Cruz was taken at the draft as was everyother likely back-up closer.

The challenge presented to the AL-only player is finding the next next in-line closer. This is difficult because most peripheral statistical analysis has already identified the reliever most likely to succeed and become the closer at the first opportunity. Hence, Juan Cruz and his 12.8 K/9 is typically enough. Missed by most fantasy leaguers was Cruz’ declining GB%. The complement, in the geometric sense, of a declining GB% is an increasing LD%/FB%, neither of which are positives for any pitcher much less one who is supposed to preserve wins in the 9th inning.

As one can see, 2009 has continued the trend with early concerns in an increased HR/G and HR/F.

   Year     Tm     LD%     GB%     IF/F    K/G     BB/G    HR/G   *HR/F    P/PA    LOB%
  2004    ATL    20.20%  44.60%  10.30%    9      3.9     0.9    11.60%    4     82.50%
  2005    OAK    19.20%  45.50%  17.10%   8.2     5.3     1.2    17.20%   3.8    54.40%
  2006    ARI    22.90%  39.90%  9.40%    8.3     4.4     0.66   7.90%     4     72.50%
  2007    ARI    18.50%  34.80%  7.90%    12.9    4.8     1.04   11.30%   4.3    74.80%
  2008    ARI    15.70%  26.90%  6.50%    12.8    5.6     0.9    8.10%    4.6    83.60%
  2009     KC    28.60%  28.60%  22.20%   6.5     5.2     1.3    15.40%   4.4    89.30%


So the question is who is next in line? I know this is unanalytical, but Kyle Farnsworth is dismissed out of hand. As a Yankees fan, I know he is reliable for just one thing: a home run at the wrong time. As a matter of fact, the two taters Farnsworth has served this season both resulted in Royals losses.

There exist two additional options that playing in an AL-only league would force one to explore. Both are failed starting pitchers who arrived in Kansas City via horrible environments for starting pitchers. RHP Jamey Wright arrived via free agency after being converted to relief pitching by the Rangers last season, while Robinson Tejada came to Kansas City after Texas gave-up on the then-26 year-old when couldn’t strikeout enough batters to overcome some atrocious control (5.9 K/9 versus 5.1 BB/9).

Tejeda offers the the one peripheral skill most fantasy leaguers desire in a potential closing find: a high K/9. For Tejeda, the move from the rotation to the bullpen had a gamma rays exposure-like effect on his strikeout rate. As a starter, he struck out a fewer than six per nine innings. Once he went to the bullpen, that rate skyrocketed to more than 10 per nine innings with the early 2009 results showing an astronomical 16.3 per nine innings!

That would typically be enough to tilt the typical owner into deciding to add Robinson Tejeda from the free agent pool in a saves gamble. But hold on! Tejeda has not managed to get any control of his walk rate in his move to the bullpen. Apparently, that gamma rays exposure had the same effect on Tejeda as it did on Bruce Banner: incredible strength with minimal control! Nevermind the distressing GB%.

  Year     Tm      Lg     LD%     GB%     IF/F    K/G     BB/G    HR/G   *HR/F    P/PA    LOB%
  2005    PHI      NL    20.90%  35.70%  13.70%   7.4     5.3     0.52   5.10%     4     75.60%
  2006    TEX      AL    17.50%  37.10%  10.50%   4.7     3.7     1.17   9.10%    3.8    75.00%
  2007    TEX      AL    14.30%  35.00%  13.80%   5.9     5.1     1.45   12.30%   3.9    64.40%
  2008    TEX      AL    30.00%  25.00%  11.10%   5.3     6.6     1.33   12.00%   4.7    46.50%
  2008     KC      AL    17.70%  34.40%  19.60%   10.1    4.7     0.74   8.70%    4.1    66.10%
  2009     KC      AL    0.00%   16.70%   N/A     16.3    9.8      0     0.00%    4.4    88.90%


This leaves Jamey Wright as the logical free agent saves gamble from the Kansas City bullpen. Jamey Wright has one particular skill that makes him the attractive option to close in the event Joakim Soria’s shoulder is more serious than the team is currently letting on. Wright has a GB% in excess of 60 percent.

In addition, his K/9 was an acceptable 6.1 in 2007. So far in 2009, Wright has upped that to 7.1 and decreased his BB/9 from last season’s 3.6 to 1.2. This is the kind of statistical discovery that makes fantasy owners’ days!

  Year     Tm     LD%     GB%     IF/F    K/G     BB/G    HR/G   *HR/F    P/PA    LOB%
  2004    COL    22.30%  49.80%  17.60%   4.4     4.8     0.86   11.40%   3.8    77.20%
  2005    COL    20.30%  52.70%  7.10%     5       4      1.08   13.30%   3.5    66.90%
  2006     SF    18.40%  58.10%  8.30%    4.5     3.7     0.92   15.30%   3.5    66.80%
  2007    TEX    17.20%  54.80%  11.90%   4.6     4.8     0.7    10.00%   3.8    75.70%
  2008    TEX    19.60%  61.90%   N/A     6.1     3.6     0.51   9.60%    3.8    61.20%
  2009     KC    13.00%  65.20%  20.00%   7.3     1.2     1.22   26.90%   3.2   107.10%


Right now, you’ve got one of two reactions depending on your fantasy format preference. Either you feel you have lost 10 minutes of your life that you can never recover or you are readying to click over to your fantasy league website(s) to add Jamey Wright.

Eric writes about the fantasy baseball, mixed and single league formats, at Fake Teams seven days a week and welcomes questions, comments and criticism via email.



Comments

Chris said...

One stat that’s good to check is gmLi - leverage of the game when a pitcher is inserted. This can be found on fangraphs.com

http://www.fangraphs.com/winss.aspx?team=Royals&pos=all&stats=rel&qual=0&type=3&season=2009&month=0

This shows that the highest leverage reliever is Soria, then Mahay, Farnsworth, Cruz, Wright, and then finally Tejada. While not necessarily predicting the closer succession lines- especially this early in the season- it does show how the skipper is using his bullpen and who he trusts. It shows which pitchers are being inserted when the game is on the line- peripherals aside.

In combination with news stories and peripheral stats, this is a good tool for identifying valuable relievers. Even if you don’t get a closer, identifying relievers with high gmLi can get you a better shot at those elusive reliever wins.

Posted 04/27  at  10:32 AM
KD said...

I’m guessing the Juan Cruz table is the result of a cut and paste mistake?  Since it’s identical to the Tejada table and since the teams are all wrong?

Posted 04/27  at  10:51 AM
Eric Hinz said...

KD -

Much better catch than the Dan Murphy-esque cut-and-paste job I did.  It will be fixed.

Thanks,
Eric

Posted 04/27  at  03:51 PM
Eric Hinz said...

Chris -

Thanks for the tip.  I’m unfamilar with the stat, but I notice Mahay is the only lefty in the group.  Given match-up strategies, would this inflate Mahay’s value?

I tend to think there may be something to the lefty inflation of gmLI.  Phil Coke of the Yanks has a 1.76 - .16 higher than Mariano’s, and Marte’s is 3rd beinhd those two.

For the others, I can’t reasonably conclude their is significant difference in the righty pen arms outside of Soria.

Eric

Posted 04/27  at  04:00 PM
Chris said...

I think there is something to lefty inflation, so that is one thing to keep in mind.

If they are the only lefty in the pen, I think the skippers would definitely shy away from using them in a closer role.

It’s worth looking into to see if they’re being routinely used for 1 out appearances, or allowed to finish the inning (which they need to do to get in line for a win).

Posted 04/27  at  04:05 PM
Derek Carty said...

With the topic of gmLI brought up, I thought I’d pass along an article I wrote for those who are new-ish to THT Fantasy: http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/fantasy/article/using-leverage-index-to-identify-closer-candidates/

Not a perfect tool, but absolutely worth a look.  Just as Chris said, it can tell you who the manager seems to trust.

Posted 04/27  at  06:44 PM
Page 1 of 1

Leave a comment:

Name (required):

Email (required):

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?



     Next Post:  Roster Doctor: 4/27/09>> <<Previous Post:  Roster Doctor - 4/24/09