Order Now


The Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2010 features articles by THT's staff as well as Bill James, Tom Tango and Craig Wright. Please support THT and use this link to purchase the Annual.


And here's the full roster.
Got a question for our fantasy baseball experts? Email us:

Heater Magazine

Add 10 MPH to your fantasy team — see for yourself
  • In-depth team pages
  • Players organized by position and league
  • Next Week Forecasts
  • Playing-time trackers
Plus Derek Carty's "LABR Diary" & daily emails of The Rundown

HEATER MAGAZINE
Winner, 2008 CBS Sportsline Fantasy League of Experts





Plus our Statistical Definitions

Most Recent Comments

Monthly Archives


Sports Tickets

Gear up for baseball season with Chicago White Sox tickets and New York Yankees tickets. LA Angels tickets, Houston Astros tickets, and Atlanta Braves tickets are hot sellers! You can get Boston Red Sox tickets, San Diego Padres tickets or Chicago Cubs tickets for your favorite baseball fan. Coast to Coast Tickets has the best MLB tickets like Minnesota Twins tickets, LA Dodgers tickets, Milwaukee Brewers tickets, New York Met tickets and St. Louis Cardinals tickets.
Find premium Chicago Cubs tickets and other Chicago tickets at JustGreatTickets.com.
Chicago Cubs Tickets
Chicago Tickets
Championship Tickets



Creative Commons License
All content on this site (including text, graphs, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

K/BB ratios: Does it matter how a pitcher does it?

Posted by Derek Carty at 12:02pm

We all know that K/BB ratio is a good skill indicator for pitchers. It has some small flaws, namely that strikeouts and walks are weighted equally despite having different effects on a pitcher's ERA. Still, it measures two of the greatest skills a pitcher can possess. I've always been curious, however, as to whether or not it matters how a pitcher achieves a good K/BB.

Obviously the 4.52 K/BB (supported by both a strong K/9 and BB/9) of a guy like Johan Santana is excellent, but is the 4.16 K/BB of control pitcher Greg Maddux better than the 2.31 K/BB of power pitcher Tim Lincecum? Or is it better to be like Roy Oswalt and post a 2.57 K/BB without excelling at strikeouts or walks?

Well, I ran a few numbers and found that there does seem to be a noticeable ERA difference among pitchers with good K/BB rates but differing skill sets.

While this might not be the most scientific way of examining it, I think that this should provide a clear, visual depiction of the difference. For the purpose of this exercise, I consider a K/BB over 2.00 to be 'good'. In actuality, it is league average, but I consider a 2.00 K/BB the cutoff for draftable pitchers except in the deepest of fantasy leagues, so that's what I used.

National League

Low strikeout pitchers
Qualifications: 2.00+ K/BB, 5.00- K/9, 50+ IP
YearQualifiedIPERAK/BBGB%
2007101159.04.262.5549.15
2006101170.34.302.5346.31
2005101262.34.252.5644.34
20047834.03.942.7146.86
Total374425.74.212.5846.59


Solid in both
Qualifications: 2.00+ K/BB, 2.75+ BB/9, 7.00- K/9, 50+ IP
YearQualifiedIPERAK/BBGB%
200791017.74.462.0637.64
20069943.04.342.1743.39
20059992.04.252.1936.49
200481146.34.112.1841.91
Total354099.04.282.1539.88


High walk pitchers
Qualifications: 2.00+ K/BB, 3.50+ BB/9, 50+ IP
YearQualifiedIPERAK/BBGB%
2007171881.33.572.3237.21
2006201842.34.242.2837.68
200510808.03.662.3739.11
20049913.03.812.5140.44
Total565444.73.852.3538.19


As you can see, the 'high walk pitchers' have the best ERAs. Not only that, they have lower overall K/BB rates and lower ground ball rates. If we were do this more scientifically and account for these things, the ERA gap would presumably be even larger.

The 'solid in both' and 'low-strikeout pitchers' have very similar ERAs. The 'solid in both' guys, though, have lower K/BB rates. This should be no suprise, though, given the the cutoff points used. A pitcher who is barely 'merely solid' in both categories (7.0 K/9, 2.75 BB/9) would have a K/BB of just 2.54, which is less than the average K/BB of the 'low-strikeout' pitchers. Still, despite the lower K/BB rates and lower ground ball rates, the 'solid in both' pitchers manage to put up essentially the same ERAs.


American League

Low strikeout pitchers
Qualifications: 2.00+ K/BB, 5.00- K/9, 50+ IP
YearQualifiedIPERAK/BBGB%
200781270.34.502.7341.82
2006111503.04.802.5143.89
2005152419.34.182.9243.42
20047962.74.222.5448.45
Total416155.34.402.7143.99


Solid in both
Qualifications: 2.00+ K/BB, 2.75+ BB/9, 7.00- K/9, 50+ IP
YearQualifiedIPERAK/BBGB%
20076730.34.492.1843.24
200671144.74.682.1240.99
20056862.04.132.1041.21
200491176.34.542.1540.40
Total283913.34.482.1441.29


High walk pitchers
Qualifications: 2.00+ K/BB, 3.50+ BB/9, 50+ IP
YearQualifiedIPERAK/BBGB%
2007141310.34.172.4342.24
200611741.33.912.3340.38
20058657.33.222.3942.82
2004111014.73.422.5241.80
Total443723.73.752.4241.85


The 'low strikeout pitchers' tend to do worse in the AL than the NL despite a higher K/BB. Goes to show how much more difficult it is to pitch in the AL. Overall, though, we see very similar results. A little more pronounced, but our judgments should be the same. Pitchers who achieve their K/BB rates using pinpoint control and poor strikeout rates are not nearly as good of a bet as those who achieve their K/BB rates by getting a high number of strikeouts, even if they have below-average control.

As a small caveat, it should be noted that a pitcher with good control and a not-so-good strikeout rate can still be successful if he also manages to induce a lot of ground balls. Take a look at these two tables that I posted in an article for MLB Front Office last week. The numbers in yellow are the overall ERAs of pitchers with at least 50 innings pitched (using data from 2004-2007).

GB% Greater Than 50%


 K/9
5.0-6.5+
BB/92.25-3.832.74
3.0+4.533.87


                       
GB% Less Than 40%


 K/9
5.0-6.5+
BB/92.25-4.833.36
3.0+5.484.42


Concluding thoughts

Our overall impression from this article: All K/BB rates should not be treated equally.

Now, of course, most of this isn't all that earth-shattering, but I do think that this stuff is interesting and important to note. You're probably already going after guys with high K/BB ratios and high K/9 if for no other reason than because strikeouts are a category in-and-of themselves in most fantasy leagues. This just lends more support to this approach. In addition, it further emphasizes the need to look at the complete package of a pitcher, not just one stat.

If you're looking for some more stuff on strikeouts and walks, try checking out the team pages in the 2008 Hardball Times Baseball Annual. In the tables that list the players, you can see the relative run impact of every pitcher's non-batted balls. In other words, you can see the relative runs given up/saved by every pitcher's strikeouts and walks. Interesting stuff.


Derek Carty is a 22-year old fantasy baseball analyst residing in New Jersey. In addition to writing for THTF, his work has appeared at Rotoworld (NBC), Sports Illustrated, FOX Sports, and Heater Magazine. In his two years competing in expert leagues, he has won 2 titles with 4 top three finishes, including a LABR NL title in 2009, making him the youngest person to ever win a major expert league title. Derek is a proud graduate of the MLB Scouting Bureau's Scout Development Program and is a firm believer in the importance of combining stats and scouting. He welcomes questions via e-mail.


Comments

Leave a comment:

Name (required):

Email (required):

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?



     Next Post:  Fantasy fallout: Johan Santana to the Mets>> <<Previous Post:  Moving On