Order NowThe Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2010 is now in development and will ship in mid November! This year's book will feature articles by THT's staff as well as Bill James, Rob Neyer, Tom Tango and Craig Wright. If you use this link to purchase the Annual, you will be in the first group to receive it and you'll be supporting THT. ![]() Derek Ambrosino
John Burnson Derek Carty Marco Fujimoto Eriq Gardner Matt Hagen Jonathan Halket Rob McQuown Troy Patterson Mike Silver Paul Singman Michael Street And here's the full roster. Got a question for our fantasy baseball experts? Email us:
Heater MagazineAdd 10 MPH to your fantasy team — see for yourself
HEATER MAGAZINE Winner, 2008 CBS Sportsline Fantasy League of Experts ![]() Plus our Statistical Definitions Most Recent Comments
Waiver Wire Offseason: AL (9)
Waiver Wire Offseason: NL (4) Approaching unconscious competence (25) Waiver Wire Offseason: AL (5) Top 10 prospects for 2010: Tampa Bay Rays and Baltimore Orioles (5) Monthly Archives
November, 2009
October, 2009 September, 2009 August, 2009 July, 2009 June, 2009 May, 2009 April, 2009 March, 2009 February, 2009 January, 2009 December, 2008 November, 2008 October, 2008 September, 2008 August, 2008 July, 2008 June, 2008 May, 2008 April, 2008 March, 2008 February, 2008 January, 2008 December, 2007 November, 2007 October, 2007 September, 2007 August, 2007 July, 2007 June, 2007 May, 2007 Gear up for baseball season with Chicago White Sox tickets and New York Yankees tickets. LA Angels tickets, Houston Astros tickets, and Atlanta Braves tickets are hot sellers! You can get Boston Red Sox tickets, San Diego Padres tickets or Chicago Cubs tickets for your favorite baseball fan. Coast to Coast Tickets has the best MLB tickets like Minnesota Twins tickets, LA Dodgers tickets, Milwaukee Brewers tickets, New York Met tickets and St. Louis Cardinals tickets. Find premium Chicago Cubs tickets and other Chicago tickets at JustGreatTickets.com. Chicago Cubs Tickets Chicago Tickets ![]() All content on this site (including text, graphs, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. |
Most Recent Posts
Saturday, October 11, 2008Not just elite closersPosted by Paul Singman at 1:03amIt's been well-documented that you should avoid drafting elite closers in drafts. Well, when you do not get the elite ones, you are left with drafting the even riskier closers and the cream of the set-up men to fill the relief pitcher spots. There is nothing wrong with that... it is the strategy I advocate. But how reliable are the elite set-up men? Is it worth even a 17th-round selection to draft one? These are some of the questions I explore in this article. This yearThe set-up men drafted the highest in 2008 drafts are as follows, with the average draft position (ADP) after the dash:
Now let's take a look at the top eight set-up men at season's end, sorted by ERA:
Not one name on the first list made it onto the second list. Very interesting. So, of the middle relievers we thought would have the best seasons, none ended up in the top eight in ERA. I'm not saying that ERA is the only or even the best way to judge performance>—certainly other factors like strikeouts and possibly holds should be considered>—but for fantasy purposes, ERA is basically what you're going for. Let's see what how the ERAs of the players from the first list ended up:
Six of the eight had solid seasons, with Betancourt and Howry posting ERAs above 5.00. The rest of the ERAs fell between the mid-2s and mid-3s, which puts them a whole point of ERA behind the league leaders. Although I have the feeling that this trend will continue if we look at the numbers from past years, let's examine them anyway and confirm my inclination. Problem is, I do not know where ADP numbers are for past seasons. (If anyone does, let me know!). I'll probably download and save this year's data, so I'll have a solid collection of past ADPs in the future, but that doesn't help me now. We will have to use a different "stat" to determine who the best middle relievers were in past seasons. I know if I use ERA, I will get yelled at by many readers, so that won't work. I'll instead use FIP, which attempts to factor only the things a pitcher can control, like strikeouts and walks, and ignores things pitchers cannot control, like defense and luck. Many people consider it a great predictor of future ERA—better than ERA itself—so FIP it is! Past yearsWe've already compared 2007 to 2008, so let's compare relievers from two more sets of years: 2005 to 2006, and 2006 to 2007, using FIP as the perceived value and ERA for the actual results. Here are the top middle relievers of 2005 in terms of FIP, the top ERA relievers of 2006, and finally what the original pitchers did in 2006: Player As 05 FIP Player Bs 06 ERA Player As 06 ERA Rudy Seanez 2.15 Dennys Reyes 0.89 Rudy Seanez 4.92 Aaron Heilman 2.35 Cla Meridith 1.05 Aaron Heilman 3.62 Juan Rincon 2.46 Joel Zumaya 1.94 Juan Rincon 2.91 Arthur Rhodes 2.54 Pedro Feliciano 2.09 Arthur Rhodes 5.32 Joaquin Benoit 2.54 Rafael Soriano 2.25 Joaquin Benoit 4.86 Rafael Betancourt 2.58 Rheal Cormier 2.44 Rafael Betancou 3.81 Mike Timlin 2.70 Dan Wheeler 2.52 Mike Timlin 4.36 Jose Valverde 2.73 Scott Cassidy 2.53 Jose Valverde 5.84 Kyle Farnsworth 2.75 Brandon League 2.53 Kyle Farnsworth 4.36 Scott Linebrink 2.76 Jonathan Broxton 2.59 Scott Linebrink 3.57 Much of the same for 2005 and 2006. None of the players on list A found their way onto list B, with many if the players on list A imploding in 2006 with ERAs from the mid-4s and up. Middle relievers with ERAs above 4 will find themselves on the free agent wire pretty quickly, unless the general sentiment is they have been getting unlucky. And I guarantee no one thought Mike Timlin's 4.36 ERA was the result of bad luck. Now let's look at the same type of table for the 2006 and 2007 seasons: Player As 06 FIP Player Bs 07 ERA Player As 07 ERA Chad Bradford 2.53 Carlos Marmol 1.43 Chad Bradford 3.34 Justin Duchscherer 2.79 Rafael Betancourt 1.47 Justin Duchscherer 4.96 Juan Rincon 2.84 Rafael Perez 1.73 Juan Rincon 5.13 Dennys Reyes 2.87 Peter Moylan 1.80 Dennys Reyes 3.99 Cla Merideth 2.93 J.C. Romero 1.92 Cla Merideth 3.50 Jason Davis 2.97 Lee Gardner 1.94 Jason Davis 5.84 Kiko Calero 2.97 Heath Bell 2.02 Kiko Calero 5.75 Alan Embree 2.97 Manny Delcarmen 2.05 Alan Embree 3.97 Manny Delcarmen 3.02 Manny Corpas 2.08 Manny Delcarmen 2.05 Jonathan Broxton 3.13 Scott Downs 2.17 Jonathan Broxton 2.85 Finally! A player on the first list made his way onto the second. That player is Manny Delcarmen, who finished 2006 with a 5.06 ERA, and yet a 3.02 FIP. Why such a discrepancy? Delcarmen had an incredibly unlucky 2006 season, registering a .385 BABIP and 65 percent left-on-base percentage. In reality, Delcarmen had the skills of a 3.00 ERA pitcher, not a 5.00 ERA pitcher, evidenced mostly by his solid strikeout and walk ratios. Now, a 3.00 ERA is very different from the 2.05 ERA he boasted in 2007. Just chalk that up to over-regression; one unlucky season followed a lucky one. Besides Delcarmen, it was much of the same, with a couple of last year's best relievers posting solid ERAs while most of the others saw their ERAs skyrocket upwards. I should point out that FIP is not the best statistic for determining perceived value, especially for fantasy baseball purposes. A big reason a person would draft a middle reliever is because the reliever is behind a shaky closer on a short leash, and that is not considered in the FIP formula. Regardless, we can conclude that best set-up men of one year often are not the best the next year. So this brings me back to my original question: Is it worth drafting elite set-up men? My adviceThe biggest reason to continue drafting them is that it costs, what, a 17th-round pick? And that's for the most expensive ones. Most players you would draft otherwise in these rounds are either low-upside role players or high-risk, high-reward types who often don't pan out. Plus, the low WHIP and ERA of a top middle reliever can be surprisingly valuable in roto leagues where these are often the categories with the least diversion. With an elite set-up man, you'll get consistent production with the chance of getting a save or win here and there. Or will you? I'm pretty sure we just established that drafting set-up men can be somewhat of a crap shoot. So ignore my sarcasm in the last paragraph. Here is the plan I advise you to follow: If you are going to select a set-up man, weigh more heavily his chance of becoming the closer than his actual pitching abilities. This does not mean that pitching ability should not enter into the equation. If the incumbent closer does get dethroned, then the low-ability reliever probably won't be selected as the next closer anyway. And even if he is, chances are he will not last long. The most valuable set-up men are those like Joey Devine, Manny Corpas and Carlos Marmol, all of whom have both the skills to be a closer and a solid chance of becoming one as well. A guy like Hideki Okajima, who did own a 2.61 ERA with 60 strikeouts in 62 innings, is not as valuable pitching before one of the most entrenched closers, Jonathan Papelbon. I've ended an article with it before and I'll say it again: Drafting in the late rounds is all about upside. Nothing else, just upside. If you feel like using your 17th or 18th or whatever round pick on a set-up guy with little upside above being a solid ERA, WHIP and strikeout guy, go ahead. But just be aware that players like Aubrey Huff and Mark DeRosa were drafted on average in the 17th round of drafts this year. Although picks like that do not usually prove rewarding, those rare times they do make up for all the failures in between. And if that means avoiding elite setup men along with the elite closers you originally are avoiding, know that surprise relievers like Grant Balfour appear every year and can be picked up for nothing. There is just as good a chance Troy Percival will get injured as any other closer. Paul has been managing fantasy baseball teams for many seasons and writing for THT Fantasy over the past year (and counting). In his first year competing in expert's leagues, he is both surprised and happy to say he finished in the top 30% of his three leagues. He welcomes readers' thoughts at his email here or in the comments below. Commenting is not available in this weblog entry. Next Post: The problem with measuring forecasting accuracy>> <<Previous Post: Player spotlight: Ben Sheets |