|
May 26, 2012
THT Essentials: Now AvailableThe Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2012, an annual "must buy" for all baseball fans, is now shipping. Read this article to learn more about it.
THT's latest bookThird Base: The Crossroads is THT's new e-book, available for $3.99 from the Kindle store. The good news is that anyone can read a Kindle book, even on a PC. So enjoy the best from THT in a new format.![]()
Lucas Apostoleris
Rich Barbieri John Barten Brian Borawski Vince Caramela Chris Jaffe Brad Johnson Mat Kovach Kevin Lai Myron Logan Chris Lund Bruce Markusen Jeff Moore Troy Patterson Harry Pavlidis Dave Studeman Steve Treder David Wade And here's the full roster.
Or you can search by:
![]() All content on this site (including text, graphs, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Part of the USA Today Sports Media Group |
![]() Saturday, August 25, 2007Waiver Wire: National LeagueMuch more to talk about in the National League than the American League this week. Rafael Soriano | ATL | CL - With the Braves designating closer Bob Wickman for assignment, Rafael Soriano should see most of the save opportunities for a while. He might go back to 8th inning duty once Octavio Dotel comes back. Recommendation - Should be owned in all leagues. Octavio Dotel | ATL | CL - Should be back within a week and could take over closing duties for the Braves. Stash him until then. Recommendation - Should be owned in all leagues. Bob Wickman | ATL | DFA - Wants to close, but I don't see any team giving him that shot. If he doesn't latch on as a closer somewhere, he loses all of his value. His 1.75 K/BB is just poor. Recommendation - Should be avoided in all leagues. Matt Belisle | CIN | SP - Was recalled today to start against the Marlins. If he stays up, he could be a decent pickup. 4.02 LIPS ERA and 1.33 DIPS WHIP before he was sent down were nice. He doesn't have a great ballpark or defense to work with, though, so use caution. Also, his 6.07 K/9 is below league average and might not be very useful. Recommendation - Should be owned in 14-team mixed leagues. Should be owned in 12 and 14-team NL-only leagues. David Wells | LAD | SP - For the past few years, Wells has relied upon his low walk rate to compensate — somewhat — for his low strikeout rate. This year, though, he's walking a lot more batters. Since the All-Star break, he's walked as many as he's struck out. He just isn't a good pickup. Recommendation - Should be avoided in mixed leagues. Should be considered in 14-team NL-only leagues. Craig Monroe | CHC | OF - Might provide a few home runs, but his batting average won't be very good and he won't get on base very much. Monroe should get some at-bats while playing left field until Alfonso Soriano returns, but then will likely only be used against lefties in right field after that. Recommendation - Should be avoided in mixed leagues. Should be strongly considered in 12 and owned in 14-team NL-only leagues. Moises Alou | NYM | OF - While healthy, Alou is able to hit .300 with relative ease. Should also get a few home runs. He hits a pretty good amount of fly balls and has some pop in his bat. Also, he's a Met and has David Wright and Carlos Delgado ahead of him, so he should get some RBIs. In addition, he should score some runs given his good on-base percentage and decent hitters behind him. Recommendation - Should be owned in deep 10, 12, and 14-team mixed leagues. Should be owned in all NL-only leagues. Mark Reynolds | ARZ | 3B/2B/OF - Reynolds is a guy in the Jack Cust mold, but less extreme. .383 BABIP will come down. With an adjustment to a .310 BABIP (reasonable given his 8% walk and 20% line drive rate), his batting average would be just .225. The drop off might not be that dramatic, though, because Reynolds is due for a power spike. His current 44% fly ball rate is great, and his 15% HR/FB is good, but it should be much better. Of the 10 home runs HitTracker has data on, 8 have went further than 400 true feet. His three furthest went 445, 459, and 467 true feet. With an adjustment to a 24% HR/FB (and .310 BABIP), he would be left with a .252 batting average and 18 home runs. Will have to do better than a 63% contact rate to ever get that average up. Recommendation - Should be owned in 12 and 14-team mixed leagues. Should be owned in 10, 12, and 14-team NL-only leagues. Matt Kemp | LAD | OF - Kemp has been picking up regular at-bats over the past 10 days. There are still four outfielders in the picture for LA, though, so that might not continue. Will play against nearly all lefties and some righties, so he has a little value. Batting average won't be very good given his 75% contact, 6% walk, and 17% line drive rates. Also has decent power, and if he adds a little muscle in the off-season it looks like he could be a pretty good power threat next year. Batting third for the Dodgers occasionally boosts his value a bit. Recommendation - Should be owned in 14-team mixed leagues. Should be strongly considered in 10 and owned in 12 and 14-team NL-only leagues. Brian Fuentes | COL | CL - If you haven't picked him up yet, do it. He should be closing again in a week or two. Recommendation - Should be owned in all leagues. Posted by Derek Carty at 3:48pm (1) Comments Sunday, August 26, 2007A look at Troy TulowitzkiWe haven't done a player profile in a while, so I thought today might be a nice day to do one. If you guys have any suggestions for future player profiles, feel free to let me know! Troy Tulowitzki was drafted in the 24th round—on average—in 12-team expert leagues this season. Well, it's nearly September, and the Rockies rookie is currently the number No. 8 shortstop in fantasy baseball. If we look at his first half and second half splits, we see that he has been even better since the break. He had a .286 batting average with nine home runs in the first half, and a .314 average with nine (in half the at-bats!) in the second half. Let's decide what we should expect in the coming five weeks and in 2008. 2006 minor league numbersFirst, let's check out his minor league numbers from last year. His 83% contact rate was only all right, but his 10% walk rate was nice to see. His batted ball numbers, though, were a little less than inspiring. His line drive rate was a little below 14%, but low line drive rates don't seem to be uncommon among minor leaguers, even the top ones. In 96 major league at-bats last year, he put up a 21% line drive rate. Given his nice power numbers this year, we might expect to find a better HR/FB than 12% for Tulowitzki in Triple-A. His 34% flyball rate was even worse to see. While his Triple-A numbers were noticeably unspectacular, they weren't completely devoid of promise, especially in light of his brief major league experience in 2006. Last year, he put up just a 74% contact rate, but his 9% walk and 21% line drive rates were very encouraging. While he hit only one home run, it did go 442 true feet, according to HitTracker. 2007 first half numbersGoing into this season, it was completely reasonable to think Tulowitzki might struggle. While he didn't dominate, he did hold his own in the first half of the year. He put up a respectable 78% contact rate, but his 9% walk rate was very nice for a rookie. His 20% line drive rate was also quite good. His power—on the surface—was only okay with an 11% HR/FB and 35% fly ball rate, but there was reason to expect an improved second half. Of the eight homers HitTracker had data on, five went further than 400 true feet. The furthest went 471 true feet, and another went 444. 2007 second half numbersWith 455 major league plate appearances under his belt, Tulowitzki was ready to make a jump in the second half. He improved his contact rate to 81%, and his walk rate remained relatively steady at 8%. His line drive rate improved a little to a very good 21%. He made some (seemingly) nice strides in power, but they really weren't unexpected to the alert fantasy owner. His 40% fly ball rate might not have been predicted, but it was certainly welcome. His HR/FB rose to 18%, as we had thought it would, and the spike in fly balls only helped to emphasis Tulowitzki's good power. Of the eight home runs HitTracker has data on from the second half, five went further than 400 true feet (and one was just shy at 399). Future expectationsTulowitzki's .342 BABIP on the year is too high, but with a reasonable adjustment to .315, his batting average would still be .275. If we adjust his power, it gets even higher. Let's say we expect an 18% HR/FB given his HitTracker data. That would raise his batting average to .289, not much lower than it currently is. As Tulowitzki progresses, he could put up a HR/FB even higher than that, and when you realize that his contact rate could eventually improve a little (remember, it was 83% in Triple-A last year), Tulowitzki could be a legitimate candidate to hit .300 in 2008 and beyond. I don't think there's much doubt over the legitimacy of Tulowitzki's abilities, but does he have the lineup to allow him to produce RBIs and runs? It'll depend on where the Rockies decide to hit him next year, but he has some quality players in the lineup (assuming none get traded in the off-season) with the likes of Matt Holliday, Todd Helton, Garrett Atkins, Brad Hawpe, and Ryan Spilborghs. Even Kaz Matsui and Willy Taveras would be able to help Tulowitzki a little with RBIs if they batted ahead of him. There's certainly plenty of talent in Colorado, and even if it isn't used 100% efficiently, Tulowitzki still figures to be a pretty good bet for RBIs and runs. His good power and patience only improve his prospects. Concluding thoughtsWe typically expect rookies to put up worse peripheral numbers than they did in the minors, and Tulowitzki's mostly paralleled his Triple-A numbers from last year. Still, he has been pretty consistent this year, not dropping off in the second half, so he could certainly sustain his numbers. I'd say to be wary of his power, but the HitTracker data really don't lie. He has crushed some balls, and I don't see how that is a fluke. Be cautious, but I could see Tulowitzki jumping onto the list of the top five shortstops next year. He will probably be a good guy to hold onto in most keeper leagues, and will might come at a bit of a discount in redraft leagues. Posted by Derek Carty at 8:27pm (0) Comments Monday, August 27, 2007Checking in on Pedro MartinezI'm sure you all know the background of the Pedro Martinez situation. One of the best pitchers in baseball, a huge signing for the Mets franchise in 2005, had rotator cuff surgery in the offseason and hasn't pitched this year. Well, with Pedro likely one rehab start away from returning to the Mets, I thought we might look at what type of fantasy production we should expect from him in September. Rehab startsFirst, let's check out how he's fared in his four rehabs starts. 08/08/07 | R | 3 IP | 67 Pitches | 5 K | 0 BB 08/14/07 | R | 4 IP | 60 Pitches | 3 K | 1 BB | 5 days rest (+20 pitches in the bullpen afterward) 08/20/07 | A+ | 5 IP | 72 Pitches | 4 K | 1 BB | 5 days rest 08/27/07 | A+ | 6 IP | 88 Pitches | 4 K | 2 BB | 6 days rest The strikeouts and walks aren't ultra-important, especially considering it's only against rookie and A-ball talent. We're looking for signs that Pedro's arm strength is back and that he is healthy. The 88 pitches were a good sign, but that he waited six days between his third and fourth start isn't. Still, he was supposed to pitch on Sunday in Double-A and was bumped to Monday so he could pitch in Florida, so I don't think that should be too much of a concern. He was ready to go after five days. Still, five days between starts isn't exactly pushing it. He'll make one more rehab start before joining the Mets, so it'll be interesting to see how it goes. Let's see what Pedro is saying about his rehab and his health. After his start Monday night: "I felt good overall. I feel like I used all my pitches, and I was getting more confident as the game went on. The first two innings I felt a little out of whack." VelocitySome are concerned that his velocity isn't quite there yet. Reports indicate his fastball was working in the 84-88 mph range Monday. It's been said that it was at 89 mph in his third start. Pedro's response: "I'm not trying to overdo anything. Whenever velocity is needed, I'll click it. After the last game, we decided we were going to work on the cutter and the changeup. At this stage, when you are coming off an injury, you can't really work on all of your pitches at once. You just want to take one at a time." As Pedro doesn't rely on—and hasn't thrown too many—mid-90s fastballs in recent years, I think that part of his game should be fine. After one more start, he should be able to work consistently in the 87-89 mph range, mixing in a couple in the 90-92 range. I'm not too concerned about his velocity. He has succeeded in recent years at a level very similar to where it is now. FocusWhat will be key for Martinez is, first and foremost, his ability to remain healthy and continue building up arm strength. After that, he will simply need to have good command of his pitches to be an effective starter. As he doesn't need to crank his fastball up much higher, he will need only to regain his old control and his old approach, which I think is a much smaller problem than many rehabbing pitchers face. It seems Martinez agrees with this setiment, and it's encouraging to see that this is his focus: "It's more about me getting command of my pitches than who I'm facing." In one situation where the manager wanted him to walk a batter, he wanted to test himself: "No, this is the situation I want, to see if I can make pitches, test myself. That was actually the key for the whole workout." It's great to see that Martinez is working on his different pitches and is expressing pleasure with his progress. There's not much more you could hope to see before he actually returns. Here's another quote from after the game: "My arm feels great." Don't get too excitedWhile he threw all of his pitches, there are signs that he is still not completely confident in them. He'll reportedly throw his next bullpen session as if it were a simulated game, and make one more start against live batters before joining the Mets. In regard to his start Monday and the coming bullpen session, he had this to say: "I'll continue to work on my changeup and my cutter, especially the back-door ones." Those were the pitches he was working on Monday night, and I guess he still doesn't feel that they are where they need to be. Closing thoughtsOverall, I have confidence in Pedro. His head seems to be in the right place. Hopefully, that will evolve into results—namely command of his pitches. He isn't there yet, but I think he is well on his way. After his next rehab start, we'll look at the numbers he has put up in the past and the ones we expect him to put up in the rest of the regular season. For now, he needs to be owned in all leagues. The upside is there for him to be a dominant starter, at least for three starts. If he is still available and you need a starter who could help in four categories, pick him up. Posted by Derek Carty at 10:55pm (1) Comments Tuesday, August 28, 2007Is it cheating? A possible collusive trade and its aftermathIn my high stakes league we had a series of transactions that were outright cheating. At least in my opinion. The involved owners vehemently disagree. What do you think? This is an 11-team league, with seven hitting categories (BA and OBP are combined and counted double) and fve pitching categories (ERA and WHIP and saves are double). The maximum point total is 176 in each league, and 352 overall. I have never seen a team over 300; last year's champ was in the 260 range, and this is a pretty standard point total for the winner. At the time of this collusive trade I had 290 points, give or take (this was two months ago; right now I have 285). Here is the deal. The numbers and letters after the salary are contract statuses with my explanation: Team A trades: Derek Lowe $20s2 (can be kept for next year), Derrek Lee $26 s1 (cannot be kept next year without $10 increase), Willy Taveras $7s1 (cannot be kept without $10 salary increase), John Lackey $14L1 (can be kept next year at $10 increase), Victor Martinez $24 s3 (can be kept for two more years), Jose Lopez 4 s2 (can be kept for another year). Team B trades: Chase Utley $13 L2 (is signed for next year at 13), Ryan Freel 18 s3 (can be kept for two years but won't be), Cha Baek 0L9 (rookie-once he loses rookie status he is $7 and can be kept for one year), Robinson Cano 19 s2 (can be kept for next year), Ross Gload 0 L9 (rookie), and Matt Garza 9s3. When the trade was posted Team A announced that it would not accept counter offers for any smaller part of the deal, namely for any individual player or group of players. Given the tight trading restrictions we have it was not possible at the time for any other contending team to counter offer the entire deal. We have a tight salary cap and a salary minimum and because of earlier trades the other contenders couldn't do it. Nevertheless there was no lack of trying. The key to my opinion that the trade was collusive is that both owners were smart enough to know exactly what they were doing. They knew that no team could make a viable counteroffer for the entire deal. Team A further announced that he had a "busy" work schedule and would have limited time to talk about counter offers. Here is my prima facie case of cheating. Feel free to tell me if you think I am way off base: 1. Team A was out of it. 2. The two owners are co-owners together in another high stakes league. 3. Both owners are former champs of this league so they obviously know what they are doing. 4. Team B was in a tight race for third place at the time and four teams cash. There were four teams within 10 points of each other. 5. Because of contract status and salary, only Utley and Gload were keepers, and possibly Cano, for Team B. Cano was hitting .240 at the time and both owners agreed that he probably wasn't keepable. Happily Cano has at least hit since this trade, frustrating Team B's intent. Freel was hurt at the time of the trade and won't be kept. Baek is a “keeper” only because he can be kept but he has little value, especially once he loses rookie status and carries a $7 salary. Gload is no great shakes either but at least he is theoretically a keeper albeit of little to no value. Of the players this “dumping” team was trading I thought Lowe, Victor Martinez and Jose Lopez were clearly keepers. Team A could also keep Lee or Lackey for one more year by increasing their salary by 10. Lackey is worth it and will likely be re-signed, but not Lee. So much for rebuilding. Team A is not making this trade to set himself up for next year, in my view. 6. On its face the talent going back and forth is not even. 7. Obviously better counter offers were made for individual players in the deal were rejected. For example I offered Tom Gorzelanny and James Shields or Sergio Mitre for Tavares and Lopez, where Gorzelanny, Mitre and Shields were all terrific keepers at less than $10 for the next two years. So, even if Utley and Cano were his targets, he STILL could have gotten them. All he had to do was trade me Tavares and Lopez, and obviously Team B isn't going to back out of this deal over Tavares. 8. Team A asked me only to email him with counter offers. I said that since he was allegedly in a time crunch I would post a few counter offers and he could just "accept" any that were sufficient for him according to our trade posting rule. He declined this offer. I took this to mean he didn't want the league to know what counter offers were out there. Suffice it to say that I knew full well that my counter offers wouldn't be accepted. I purposely made inflated counter offers just to prove that collusion existed. This trade set off an avalanche of counter moves by other owners that now seriously threaten the league's existence. After this collusive trade the following happened. I was not involved in any of these dealings, so I am somewhat unbiased in my allegations: 1. Multiple teams traded more than 20 players in two weeks to each other. This includes Teams A and B, not surprisingly. Virtually entire rosters changed hands in a two-week span among five teams. 2. Some teams made huge trades of multiple players with alleged "trade back" agreements after the season. This is outright bald cheating in my opinion. A trade back is simply a trade where Team X will trade players to Team Y and Team Y agrees to return those players to Team X after the season is over. As far as I am concerned these trades should be subject to the strictest scrutiny in the offseason. No one will know for sure that a "trade back" deal is made unless it is inadvertently revealed, or if another owner blows the whistle (which is what happened here). All the commissioner can do is review the attempted offseason trade back with very strict scrutiny. If I trade player X for player Y with a hidden "trade back" agreement, they needn't be traded back for each other in the offseason. I can technically reacquire player X for player Z with none the wiser. The only protection is the commissioner. 3. A few owners conspired, in a deal for Hunter Pence, to prevent another owner (Team C) from meeting a time limit for posting counter offers. This was done on purpose and was explicitly addressed by the owners involved. It was a blatant attempt to hurt one owner for personal reasons. 4. Team C announced his intention to quit the league, as the victim of the conspiracy above. 5. Team A above announced his putative intent to quit. Good riddance as far as I am concerned, though I doubt it will come to pass. One more data point on the collusion issue. In a deal the week before this collusive deal I was negotiating a deal with Team A. I had a long discussion with Team A about Felix Hernandez and we reached an agreement to make a deal for The King. Within five minutes of it being posted the owner of Team C called me and we posted a better offer, knocking Team A off the clock. When I tried to counter just for Tavares and Lopez Team A essentially told me that he was unhappy about being knocked off the clock so quickly in the Felix Hernandez deal, and without mentioning names said that he and Team B were "upset" about some of the other trades that happened in the league. I understood this to mean that Team A and Team B were in a "we'll show them" mentality. As far as the counter moves, which were at a minimum unethical, other owners saw what was happening and didn't want to be left at the altar. Who wants to stand by and watch two guys collude to win a high stakes league? By responding in this manner it made the situation much worse as far as the league's existence is concerned. There are many issues here including a failure to respond appropriately by the commissioner that will need to be addressed in the offseason. Overall it was clear to me that the trade was collusive. Playing in high stakes leagues means that there are trades that raise ethical issues virtually every year. When relatively big money is at stake tempers can flare (the owners aren't rich guys, they are all guys who just "moved up" from typical leagues). This season has seen the most egregious examples I have ever seen of nefarious dealings in my 20 years of fantasy baseball. Is it worth it? I am not sure after this year. If you think this is bad, wait until next week... Posted by Patrick DiCaprio at 7:25am (0) Comments Wednesday, August 29, 2007A look at Jered WeaverI'm having a sort of writer's block, so for today I'll post the answer to a mailbag question. This reader asked me about Jered Weaver. He wanted to know whether or not last season was a fluke and the league is simply adjusting to Weaver, or if he is getting unlucky this season (specifically with his 1.42 WHIP), or what the deal with him is. So, here is my answer. 2006 and luckIn 2006, Jered Weaver posted solid peripherals, but was playing well over his head. In the four categories we normally check for luck, he was getting lucky across the board. Please note that the league averages given are approximates to use as a guide. Every year is different, but these are typically the benchmarks.
As you see, in 2006 he was lucky in every category, getting extremely lucky with LOB% and BABIP. The LOB% explains the low ERA (2.56), and the BABIP explains the low WHIP (1.03). Still, he did put up a 7.68 K/9 and 2.41 BB/9. His 3.18 K/BB enabled him to put up a solid LIPS ERA of 3.80, despite some luck with his actual ERA. When you fix the BABIP, his DIPS WHIP was a very nice 1.16. Conclusion? Weaver was lucky, but still quite good in 2006. 2007 and luckKnowing that his 2006 LIPS ERA was 3.80, his 2007 ERA of 3.96 might look reasonable without further dissection. If we look back up at our table above, though, we see that Weaver has also been getting a bit lucky this year, namely with his HR/FB. What's worse is that a guy with an expected ground ball percentage (xGB%) of 34% is in for an even more severe correction. When corrected, his LIPS ERA jumps up to 4.19. He isn't quite as bad as his 1.42 WHIP indicates, although a DIPS WHIP of 1.35 is nothing to cheer about. So how does his DIPS WHIP go from 1.16 last year to 1.35 this year? Quite simply, Weaver's peripherals have worsened a bit. It could be because the league has adjusted to him a little. It could be because of his injury earlier in the year. It could be that he is just having an off year and he'll be better next year. Whatever the reason, his K/9 has dropped to 6.41 and his BB/9 has increased to 2.81, and when you get so few fly balls, you really can't have a 2.28 K/BB (especially in the AL) and still be successful. Looking to the futureWhile we certainly would have liked to see Weaver put up similar or better numbers than he did in his rookie campaign, there is hope for the future. I don't think 2006's peripherals were unrepeatable seeing as how his numbers in the minors were very good. He put up an 11.58 K/9 and 2.76 BB/9 in 101 IP between Single A and Double A in 2005, and put up a 10.87 K/9 and 1.17 BB/9 in 77 IP at Triple A before being called up in 2006. Those are incredible numbers, and make a 2008 rebound all the more likely. While it's not preposterous, I have difficulty seeing a guy who dominated the minors like that only manage a league average strikeout rate on a year-to-year basis. Closing thoughtsOverall, Weaver is having a pretty poor year, fantasy-wise, but figures to do better in 2008. I really don't see him getting any worse than this. His BB/9 could increase a little, but I don't see his strikeouts getting much lower. I would probably bet on him doing at least marginally better in 2008. So as long too many people don't write this season off as a sophomore slump and rebuild Weaver's hype, he might come at a decent discount next year. He is a little risky in keeper leagues, but depending on the situation might be keepable. If you own him in a keeper league and would like my opinion, feel free to e-mail me your league details, and I'd be happy to let you know how I think you should proceed. Posted by Derek Carty at 9:44pm (0) Comments Thursday, August 30, 2007Strategy: Playing - and winning - in an inactive leagueAs I've said, I am struggling with writer's block (in addition to sleep deprivation) recently, so this article would probably be best suited for the off-season or earlier in the season. I do it now, though, to serve as a reminder to those in a league like this: get it fixed next year! Dump the dead weight or seek out a new league entirely. Now is the time to start. If you put it off, you may never get around to making the necessary changes. My situationThe first thing I'll say on this topic is that playing in an inactive league should be avoided at all cost. Sometimes, though, it is simply unavoidable. When this happens, you need to know how to deal with it. Regrettably, I played in such a league this year. Luckily, it was my friendly league and the stakes weren't much higher than bragging rights. There are four of us who have played for years and pay attention to the league throughout the year no matter what place we are in. We have been cycling through people to fill out the rest of the league, but even when some of these people are close friends of ours, we simply can't get them to take the league as seriously as we would like. This year turned out to be the worst year yet. Limited player poolIn the month leading up to the trade deadline, as I was trying to deal, I simply couldn't find a partner. The needs of the most willing person to trade (who, ironically, has been in first place most of the year) and my team just didn't match up. By that point, four teams had stopped paying attention all-together. One owner, while paying attention, claimed his team was already perfect and refused to even talk about trading. Another owner and I had a trade worked out (my Brad Lidge for his injured Miguel Tejada, who would help me in certain categories of need and fill my sub-par SS position), but he mysteriously stopped answering IMs and left my trade proposals on the table for a month and a half (I had to resubmit them every 10 days), even though he was the one who originally suggested the trade. One of the remaining two teams didn't make a single trade all year. This left just two teams to trade with, one of which was the first place team I mentioned earlier. When 70% of the owned player pool is unavailable to you, you're hands are really tied. Still, you play with the hand your dealt. By making some shrewd moves and successfully implementing certain strategies, I currently sit in second place — just two points back of first place. Avoiding an inactive league altogetherThe most important thing you need to do to avoid a league like this is carefully screen members. If a player didn't pay attention last year, don't let him back in. If you can check the records from prospective owners' previous leagues, do it. If not, ask them plenty of questions to make sure that they won't stop paying attention, no matter what. Even once you screen members, though, you can't guarantee that they will all be willing to do a lot of trading. While two of our members payed attention this year, they refused to trade. As I said before, one wouldn't even enter a discussion, claiming that his team was already as good as he wanted it. That is just poor play, as there is always room for improvement for any team. To keep players interested in your league, there are a couple of good options to pursue. The first is to make it a keeper league. If there is more at stake than just this year, teams will be more willing to pay attention and attempt to trade throughout the year, even once they've fallen out of contention. Don't fall into the trap of making it a concrete keeper league, though, where you can only keep a limited number of players. If your league only allows, say, three keepers, teams who fall out of the race who already have three players good enough to keep might lose interest, thinking that they are out of the race this year and are set going into next year. Try setting up a contract system that allows flexibility with how many players you can keep. This also promotes trading, as teams will try to get players they feel are undervalued at their current price. Another way to keep interest is to raise the stakes. If every team in your league is required to pay $300, and the first place prize is $1000, there will be less teams giving up so easily. Succeeding in an inactive leagueWell, let's say you weren't able to implement all of these ideas into your league and you've fallen into an inactive league. Being the competitor you are, you still want to win. Here are some things you will need to do. 1) Have a good draft or auction. In my inactive league this year, there were just five trades made all year. I was involved in three of them. Needless to say, your options are limited if it is difficult to trade. If you don't have a good draft or auction, it will be nearly impossible to win the league, because your only real means of improving will be through the waiver wire. In my draft this year, I found such late round gems as Javier Vazquez, Chris Duncan, and Barry Bonds. I also got guys like Jake Peavy and Adam Dunn for a good discount while not getting burned on my early picks. 2) Avoid injuries. Not something you have a lot of control over, but if you get hit with bad luck in the injury department, it may not be possible to rebound. If you knowingly are going into an inactive league, be a little more prudent when drafting. Avoid guys with serious injury question marks. I didn't know I was going into an inactive league on draft day, but I did have suspicions. I got pretty lucky with injuries, losing Mike Piazza, Ryan Freel, Jason Giambi, Curt Schilling, and Octavio Dotel for a good chunk of time each, but after that I've been pretty solid. I haven't lost any key players, although the Manny Ramirez news recently isn't encouraging. 3) Be active. I lead my league in transactions made this year with 43 (and that's without playing a single match-up, which I don't usually recommend doing). A good chunk of this was juggling closers. I drafted Octavio Dotel as my only closer this year, but am now sitting in fifth place in saves (my goal) and stand to improve a couple points with a staff currently filled with Brad Lidge, Joakim Soria, C.J. Wilson, Rafael Soriano, and Manny Corpas. In addition, I juggled my bench a lot and even ended up with a couple eventual starters this way (Ryan Theriot at MI being my favorite). I also used the "waiver wire efficiency" strategy to grab Luis Castillo for runs, recently. 4) Use the Waiver Wire effectively. Not always the easiest thing to do, but you will need to pull it off. Without being able to make trades, the Waiver Wire is the only place you'll be able to improve your team, making it exponentially more important to use it effectively. This year, I was able to pick up guys like Ryan Theriot, Khalil Greene, Tim Lincecum, all of my current closers, Alan Embree, Bengie Molina, Mark Reynolds, and Kenny Lofton, all of which contributed a decent amount to my team at some point in the year. Other guys, like Akinori Iwamura, Edwin Encarnacion, Joaquin Benoit, and Jason Frasor weren't as helpful. What's different about these guys was that I cut bait at the right time, when I thought someone else was an improvement. Also, while these guys were, by no means, studs, they really didn't hurt that bad. 5) Be persistent. As I said, I was involved in 50% of my league's trades. Constantly talk with the members of your leagues about trades, or just about baseball in general. Soften them up, constantly dropping little hints that you want to trade or by hyping up your players (even those you don't wish to trade). The more you talk, the more trades will ultimately become available to you. Have some tact, though. If you are annoying when doing this, owners who take things too personally will be less likely to deal with you. 6) Be patient. As recently as the beginning of July, I was sitting in eighth place out of ten. I knew my players were getting unlucky, though, so I didn't panic. I dumped a couple that I no longer liked, but those that I did, I kept. They have rewarded me since, propelling me to second place. Also be patient when waiting to make a trade. Be persistent (#5) and flexible (#9) too, but don't make a move just for the sake of making a move. It's a fine line to walk, but those who do it well will be successful. 7) Make good trades. Easier said than done. You will be limited in the number of trades you make, so make sure the ones you do make are good ones. You will lose on some — sometimes due only to poor luck — but the key is for the majority of them to bring back positive value. I believe I did that with every trade I made in this league. Here is the list of my trades. Note: The second set of players came to my team.
I needed runs and steals without killing my other categories and had plenty of pitching. Plus, I was set in ERA, WHIP, and K and Lincecum isn't great for wins. It actually would have helped the other team too, but he was pretty far out of the race and unlikely to come back and bite me. We had all but agreed on it, then he seemed hesitant, and then he left for a vacation and was incommunicado for a week (past the deadline). If something like this happens to you, first do everything in your power to get in contact with the other owner and make it happen. If you can't, keep your composure. Seek out another option, even if it is an inferior one. Don't be obsessed with what could have been. If you can help yourself, stay rational and do it. In the case of Ichiro above, there just wasn't enough time as it was the day before the deadline and no one else was interested in trading. That's why you need to do your work a few weeks before the deadline. In this league, though, it proved to be nearly impossible (you still have to try, though!). 9) Be flexible and creative. In an inactive league with unwilling trade partners, you won't always get as lucky as I did with finding nice trades. Sometimes, you're going to need to make the pieces fit. When someone is willing to trade, you need to beat that horse until it is dead... and then a little more (unless of course you make the trade!). Also, don't be afraid to jump ship on certain players. Be creative. If you can get good value from someone, but there's a problem (maybe you already have the position filled), ask around the league and see if you can't spin off the player you already have for a position of need. I had been in talks with the guy I got Atkins from for the whole season about Atkins (persistence!), and for a couple of weeks about Bill Hall. When he heard that I was trading Hall for Glaus, he said he liked Glaus even more, and we were able to work out a very nice trade (for me, anyway). Keep all options available and always keep your ears open and your mouth moving. Concluding thoughtsNeedless to say, my league will undergo some serious changes this off-season. We're switching to a keeper league setup with a complex (and fun!) contract system. We're going to spend the winter scouting out potential new members, so hopefully by this time next year we'll have a much improved (and deeper) league. If your league is similar to mine, put the effort into fixing it. If you have a competitive league with a system that really makes you think and strategize, it is lots of fun. Posted by Derek Carty at 6:13pm (0) Comments Friday, August 31, 2007Waiver Wire: American LeagueThis week's American League version is all about pitching. Problem is, none of it is really very good. Esteban Loaiza | OAK | SP - Certainly can't keep up his 1.84 ERA, but is he still usable? Despite a 30% line drive rate, his BABIP is an absurd .198. Of course, we're only looking at two games. His peripherals aren't good in these games, weren't much better in his rehab starts, and weren't very good last year for the A's. I don't see him outperforming his 2006 4.77 LIPS ERA by too much. Recommendation - Should be owned only in very deep mixed leagues. Should be considered in 12 and owned in 14-team AL-only leagues. Ian Kennedy | NYY | SP - Struck out over 10 batters per game at both Single A (54.2 IP) and Double A (48 IP), but his control wasn't as good as you'd like (3.46 BB/9 in A+, 3.19 BB/9 in AA). He also pitched 27.3 innings at Triple A this year, holding his own with strikeouts (8.89 K/9) and improving his BB/9 to 2.96. I still see a BB/9 closer to 4 in the bigs, though. He might be able to post a K/9 over 7.00 (maybe over 7.50), although I know some people are worried that Kennedy is the type of guy who succeeds in the minors but can't fool enough big league batters. It's not really looking like he'll stick in the rotation more than one start, but if he does he could be moderately useful, especially with wins. Recommendation - Should only be owned in deep mixed leagues. Should be considered in 12 and owned in 14-team AL-only leagues, for now. Mike Mussina | NYY | SP(?) - Not as bad as he has seemingly been pitching, although a 4.38 LIPS ERA isn't good either. His poor year can be attributed to a sharp decline in strikeouts (5.53 K/9 compared to 7.84 in 2006 and 7.11 in 2005). The good news is that his K/9 is up to 6.13 since July 20, although it's been 4.67 in his last 4 starts. Overall, Mussina has a pretty good chance of regaining his spot in the rotation and could help with wins, but after that he is a pretty risky play. Recommendation - Should considered in 14-team mixed leagues. Should be owned in 12 and 14-team AL-only leagues. Carlos Silva | MIN | SP - Before his last game, Silva had allowed just 7 earned runs in 36 innings. Then he blew up for 6 earned runs in 3.2 innings. Silva is Aaron Cook minus the elite ground ball rate but with a little better control. His K/BB is over 2.00, but with so few strikeouts (3.85 K/9, which is actually his best ever as a starter), he really just isn't that good. Has posted a 4.77 LIPS ERA so far. Won't even help much with wins, either. Recommendation - Should be avoided in mixed leagues. Should be owned only in the deepest AL-only leagues. Jeff Weaver | SEA | SP - Very unspectacular. He is a fly ball pitcher than consistently puts up a strike rate a little below league average, but enjoys marginal success due to good control. Getting unlucky (66% LOB% at work) to the tune of a 5.62. LIPS says it should be 4.62. Still, nothing to go out of your way to acquire. If you're looking for wins, he might be able to get you some, which would bump up his recommendation if you're in need. Recommendation - Should only be owned in deep mixed leagues. Should be strongly considered in 12 and owned in 14-team AL-only leagues. Radhames Liz | BAL | SP - Has shown a good ability to strike batters out in the minors, but his control has been very worrisome. I don't think he'll be able to do very well in that area in the majors, making him a shaky pickup. He also doesn't have a guaranteed spot, although he will be pitching tonight against the Red Sox. The trade of Steve Trachsel makes it more likely he'll stay, but nothing is for certain. The recommendation is based upon his having a spot in Baltimore's rotation. Recommendation - Should be avoided in mixed leagues. Should be considered in 14-team AL-only leagues. Garrett Olson | BAL | SP - I haven't heard yet who will be the Orioles' #4 and #5 starters since the Trachsel trade, but it seems like Liz and Olson might be the most likely candidates. Brian Burres could move back into the rotation, though, so we'll have to see what happens. I think Olson has the most talent between him and Liz, but Liz might have the inside track for the #4 spot. The recommendation is based upon his having a spot in Baltimore's rotation. Recommendation - Should be owned in deep mixed leagues. Should be owned in 12 and 14-team AL-only leagues. Akinori Otsuka | TEX | RP - Likely done for the year, Otsuka can be dropped in redraft leagues. Even if he comes back, it might only be for a week or two and he probably won't get many save opportunities. This improves C.J. Wilson's value, although Joaquin Benoit is still in the picture. Recommendation - Should be dropped in all redraft leagues. Asdrubal Cabrera | CLE | 2B/SS - Has a terrible walk rate (1.6%), but his 22% line drive rate has allowed him to post a .308 BABIP. His 87% Contact rate is also quite good, although higher than I'd originally expected. Could be in for a little regression. Still, he seems to have overtaken Josh Barfield as the second bagger for the Tribe and has been batting second, so he has some value. His batting average should be decent if he keeps up these numbers, but with a power decrease it might be closer to .280 than .290. Still might be good for some steals, but without the walks it will be difficult to score runs, even hitting in front of Travis Hafner and Victor Martinez. Recommendation - Should only be owned in deep mixed leagues. Should be owned in 12 and 14-team AL-only leagues. Jack Hannahan | OAK | 1B/3B - With Eric Chavez out for the year, Hannahan should have third base for the rest of the season. Takes a lot of walks (19% in AAA this year!) and hits a lot of line drives (24% in AAA this year!), but his contact rate was only 73% in AAA. Interesting, the contact rate was his lowest in the past three years and his walks and line drives were the highest. He's played in AAA for three years, though, and he is 26, so his numbers aren't quite as impressive in that light. His power was also sub-par until this year (10% and 9% HR/FB in 2005 and 2006), but improved to 19%. Age 26 and 27 are considered to be breakout/peak years, so maybe Hannahan is just now putting it all together. Batting between 7th and 9th won't help him much with RBIs and runs, but his good walk rate should provide some run opportunities, and if he can post even a 12% HR/FB he could help out a little with homers. His batting average might be .275 if he puts up decent power; he's already displaying his usual good walks and line drives. Recommendation - Should only be owned in deep mixed leagues. Should be owned in 12 and 14-team AL-only leagues. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||