May 17, 2008
![]()
Rich Barbieri John Barten Sal Baxamusa John Beamer Brian Borawski John Brattain Craig Brown Matthew Carruth Derek Carty Alex Eisenberg Mike Fast David Gassko
Lisa Gray
Brandon Isleib Chris Jaffe Josh Kalk Chris Neault Dave Studeman Steve Treder Bryan Tsao Tuck! John Walsh Geoff Young And here's the full roster.
Or you can search by:
StubHub is where fans buy and sell Yankees Tickets, Red Sox Tickets, White Sox Tickets, Mets Tickets and all other baseball tickets. If you are looking for World Series Tickets, ALCS Tickets or NLCS Tickets, you can find them at StubHub! More hot selling tickets include: Cubs Tickets, Astros Tickets, Dodgers Tickets, Angels Tickets and Detroit Tigers Tickets. Onlineseats is the best stop for Red Sox Tickets, Chicago White Sox Tickets, World Series Tickets, Dodgers Tickets, Minnesota Twins Tickets, St Louis Cardinals tickets, Chicago Cubs Tickets and Detroit Tigers Tickets Gear up for baseball season with Chicago White Sox tickets and New York Yankees tickets. LA Angels tickets, Houston Astros tickets, and Atlanta Braves tickets are hot sellers! You can get Boston Red Sox tickets, San Diego Padres tickets or Chicago Cubs tickets for your favorite baseball fan. Coast to Coast Tickets has the best MLB tickets like Minnesota Twins tickets, LA Dodgers tickets, Milwaukee Brewers tickets, New York Met tickets and St. Louis Cardinals tickets. Let the TicketSpecialists help you locate Boston Red Sox Tickets, Cubs Tickets, New York Yankees and Mets Tickets, Texas Rangers Tickets, Angels Tickets, Orioles Tickets and many Other Baseball Tickets
All content on this site (including text, graphs, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a
Creative Commons
License.
|
![]() Saturday, December 01, 2007Looking for a league?I've received several e-mails over the past couple of months asking me the best way to go about finding a competitive fantasy baseball league for 2008. I've e-mailed everyone back with a few suggestions, but here's a potentially better one. Anyone who wishes to play in a competitive league next year and doesn't mind playing with people you've never met before, send me an e-mail informing me of your interest. Once I get enough e-mails (at least 8), I'll put everyone in touch with each other, and you guys can work out the details. If I get a really large response to this, I'll separate you guys into multiple leagues. It can be difficult finding a competitive league to play in that is worth your time and is rewarding to play in and win. If you strictly play with your friends, it's rare you have 10 or 12 who all take fantasy baseball seriously enough. I think this is a good solution, as I think most of our regular readers can be counted on to stay interested the entire year. If you don't plan on sticking with the league, please do not e-mail me. The purpose of this is to compile a competitive league that isn't compromised by people giving up midway through. So if you're serious about it and would like some competition, send me an e-mail, and I'll see what I can do to help. On an unrelated note, I'll probably be back tomorrow or Sunday with a player profile. Posted by Derek Carty at 1:30am Friday, December 07, 2007Player highlight: Felix HernandezSorry for being gone so long guys. I just can't stay caught up with everything, especially with final exams now here. Anyway, today we're going to look at Felix Hernandez of the Seattle Mariners, who has been a popular reader request. Numbers
Felix Hernandez was one of my favorite pitchers going into 2007. While a 3.92 ERA was an improvement, it wasn't nearly what I expected given a 3.76 LIPS ERA the year before and the growth potential of his strikeout rate. In fact, his strikeout rate regressed with a substantially low mark in the second-half. His walk rate did improve, though, and remained consistent in both halves of the year. What really sticks out to me, though — besides the K/9 — is the HR/FB rate that has been over 15% for two years in a row. It isn't uncommon for relatively extreme ground balls pitchers like Felix to put up higher HR/FB rates, but Felix's is really high. Check out this table, which lists the league average HR/FB rates and that of pitchers with expected ground balls percentages above 50% and 53% (given at least 50 innings pitched).
So... yeah... Felix's HR/FB is really high. Safeco isn't really a park conducive to home run hitters, so I'd be really surprised if Felix posts another extreme HR/FB rate. Expect some good 'ole regression to the mean in 2008. ArsenalFirst, an enormous thank you to Josh Kalk for providing this information. He has a newly improved Pitch f/x tool setup, and he kindly provided me with all the raw data so I could run some other types of calculations. I haven't worked too much with the numbers, so I won't try and draw too many real conclusions for Felix, but this will introduce a new feature to these player profiles that I think has lots of untapped potential. Most fields are pretty self-explanatory. The only one that might not be is "SWG/BALL." This functions similarly to K/BB, dividing Swinging Strikes by Balls. I have no idea if this is credible yet, but logically it seems like this would be a meaningful stat. When we look at the top players, we see guys generally falling where they should. Brandon Webb and Johan Santana are at the top for changeups, John Smoltz is at the top for sliders, Scott Kazmir and Santana are at the top for fastballs, and Tim Wakefield is at the top for knuckleballs (okay, that last one might be a bit biased). Percentage of Total Pitches Recorded by Pitch f/x — 71%
Percentage of Total Pitches Recorded by Pitch f/x — 44%
Right away, we can tell that Felix was very effective using his slider and curveball this year while enjoying roughly average success with his sinker and changeup. One of the things that we were hearing all the time this year about Felix was how often he relied on his fastball/sinker. While 56% is a significant portion, it isn't astoundingly high. Here is a list of guys who relied even more on their fastball or sinker:
The difference, obviously, is that all of these guys — with the exception of Lincecum — have much more effective fastballs/sinkers than Felix does. Felix gets a lot of ground balls with his sinker, but it does look like he could stand to move away from it just a little bit. Another problem is that he relies on it far too often in strikeout counts. Take a look: 0-2 — 56% 1-2 — 55% 2-2 — 45% 3-2 — 74%I'm not going to pretend like I know a lot about pitch selection and batter-pitcher dynamics, because I don't, but just using a little common sense (or what seems to me like common sense), I think he would enjoy at least marginally greater success using the slider and curve more often in these counts. I think reliance on sinkers in these counts could have something to do with his lower strikeout rate this year, since the sinker is the least effective swing-and-miss pitch in baseball (or at least among the classifications given). We can't say for certain that this is the reason without 2006 data, though. This type of thing is what I'm really looking forward to being able to analyze in a couple of years when we have several seasons worth of data to work with. I was hoping to write in this space that Felix became less reliant on his sinker as the year wore on and as he realized that he needed to mix things up. Unfortunately, he actually started throwing more of them in the second-half. Here is his monthly breakdown.
I'd have to think that someone in the Mariners organization will bring this up to Felix and get him to mix in more off-speed stuff, especially with how effective they are for him. With Mel Stottlemyre on board now, he might be just the guy to get through to Felix. Let's hope he is, anyway. Mariners defense
From the look of it, the Mariners defense in 2007 was pretty poor. Felix's BABIP was .338, and this is likely a big reason why. Still, .338 is very high, and a large portion of it came from a pretty ridiculous .346 BABIP in the first-half. The team BABIP was .322, and given Felix's good peripherals I would have expected him to be below even that. There will likely be at least a couple of changes next year, which might further helps Felix's BABIP prospects. The Mariners seem intent on trading Richie Sexson, which could cause them to play Ben Broussard at first. He's no offensive dynamo, but his .780 RZR in 2007 was well-above league average. His .107 OOZ/(BIZ+OOZ) was worse than Sexson's, but it's not like Sexson was all that rangy anyway. Of course, I've also read that Broussard has been included in some trade talks. The M's will probably turn right field over to Adam Jones in 2008 (assuming he isn't traded) with Jose Guillen signing with the Royals. There's talk Raul Ibanez could be traded as well, which means Jones could play left. Either way, I think there's a good chance he'll be an improvement over what they had in the corners this year. There's been talk Geoff Jenkins could be signed if Ibanez is traded, and he too would be an improvement, bringing a much improved .894 RZR and an identical .154 OOZ/(BIZ+OOZ). All in all, this is a very blurry situation right now and a lot of things can happen between now and April, but the M's figure to be at least marginally better in 2008. With Jones in a corner, Broussard (maybe) at first, the potential for improvement from youngsters Yuniesky Betancourt and Jose Lopez, and the possibility of a free-agent signing or two, I'd have to think the odds are in favor of improvement. I think a .310 BABIP for Felix would be a good guess, putting all of this together. 2008 OutlookSo where do we expect King Felix to go from here? Honestly, I would be shocked to see another sub-8.00 K/9. I know that it was only 7.22 in the second-half, but his track record up until then was very good, and he has so much talent. While it seems like Felix has been around for years now, we also have to remember that he will be just 22 this season. He has plenty of room to improve, especially if he starts using the slider and curve more. And who's to say that his fastball or changeup won't improve? I mean, he's 22 years old. I'm going to put him down for an 8.35 K/9. His walk rate was very good this year, although if he does indeed use his other pitches more, it figures to increase a little. He had the most control of his sinker, so using his other ones would cause him to throw more balls and, consequently, walk more batters. I still see a 2.65 BB/9 as pretty reasonable. The ground ball rate has been very good, but again, with a few less sinkers it will decrease a little. 55-56% sounds about right. I see a healthy increase in innings next year as he ages, and I think 210 is a good estimate. When we put all of our information together, we would expect Felix to post an ERA around 3.50 and a WHIP between 1.20 and 1.25. Given an 8.35 K/9 and 210 IP, Felix would end up with 195 strikeouts. These are all very valuable fantasy contributions. Unfortunately for Felix, though, he might not wrack up a ton of wins. I don't see the Mariners' offense improving all that much, and Felix caught some lucky breaks winning 14 games this year with a decidedly average offense. In fact, he received the 10th highest run support (6.29 runs per 9 innings) of any AL pitcher with at least 100 IP. Extrapolated over a full-season, an offense that potent would score 1019 runs. The Yankees this year, the best offensive team in baseball, scored just 968. The Phillies, who were the second best, scored just 892. Felix certainly will not receive that kind of support next year, and I don't see him winning more than a dozen games unless the M's really make a splash during the remainder of the off-season. Market valueCBS Draft: 13th SP FOX Sports: 14th SP CBS Sportsline: 15th SP Sports Fanatics: 15th SP ProTrade: 32nd SP Yahoo!: Not in Top 20 SP MLB Fantasy 411: Not in Top 20 SP ConclusionI was really looking forward to getting Felix at a discount next year, but it doesn't appear that this will happen. He could easily find himself in the Top 5 pitchers in 2008, but if he repeats 2007, he could find himself in the 25-30 area. Given the rough estimates I projected him for, it seems as though his market value as a top 15 starter is pretty close to where I would place him. Players like this I generally don't end up taking. Why take a player at his full value when there are plenty of others who can be had below their full value? This is a talk for another day, probably January or February when we dig deeper into the principles of player valuation. If Felix does end up falling out of the Top 20 in your draft, as some of the sites suggest he could, you could find yourself a nice bargain with excellent upside. Felix possess that rare combination of good strikeout rates, good walk rates, and good ground ball rates. Very few starting pitchers can do all three, and if he can fine tune his skills as he ages, I could easily see him as one of the top two or three pitchers in baseball for many years. Final thoughtsAgain, guys, I'm sorry for the long delays between posts. I'm going to try and get back on a regular schedule, but that might not happen until the semester ends in a couple of weeks. I've gotten a huge response to the post about helping you guys form competitive leagues, so once the e-mails slow down a bit I'll sort them all out and split you guys up into several leagues. Also, I've had another couple of articles up at MLB Front Office since the last time I mentioned it, so if you're interested you can go and check them out. They deal with DIPS Theory and HR/FB rate, which you're probably familiar with, but if not it would probably be a good idea to read it. I've also been asked by Aaron Gleeman to write a guest article for the Rotoworld Draft Guide, which I believe comes out in late January or early February. I'll be writing about position scarcity and how to use it to properly value fantasy players. If you have any questions or comments, as always, feel free to send me an e-mail. Posted by Derek Carty at 10:55pm Tuesday, December 11, 2007Knowing yourself and your enemyThis year I have to admit I am particularly depressed. Not only did I return to work after vacation (depressing in itself) football is winding down, baseball is far off and now there is the possibility that there will be no new TV shows to tide me over until February! I already am starting to feel the pangs of not seeing new episodes involving the comely ladies of Lost, and should 24 be delayed I may be writing these columns from a cave somewhere. On the good side, I suppose the Hawaii police will be bored without the cast of Lost drunk driving en masse. With nothing else to do and with nothing to interest me aside from watching ladies pole dance in the New York City Subway, this is a good time to do some more reflection on not just my team but on myself. "Those who excel at defense bury themselves away below the lowest depths of the Earth. Those who excel at offense move from above the greatest heights of Heaven. Thus they are able to preserve themselves and attain victory." This is one of my favorite Sun-Tzu quotes and has surprisingly profound applications. But since we are fantasy players we must look at how this applies to fantasy baseball. The import of the quote is clear; the road to success lies in knowing yourself and then taking advantage of your strengths in the best possible way. As Sun-Tzu points out, one who excels at defense will bury themselves below the earth (metaphorically speaking of course), which would make it impossible for them to be attacked. From what better position can such a person defend themselves? You avoid defeat and disaster by taking advantage of your peculiar skills. One who excels at offense moves from the heights of Heaven. The army that moves like this will be like a ton against an ounce. How to take advantage? As a Fantasy GM you must of course know your strengths and weaknesses. Yet when it comes to self-analysis we can often be our own worst enemy, attributing successes and failures to the vagaries of chance and not to our own faults or skills. It is easy when riding high to believe you are just the second coming of Ron Shandler or John Benson, and when you are riding low it is easy to curse one's fortune. Avoiding this trap is paramount. In fantasy baseball a critical evaluation must be done if there are pretensions at winning serious money or winning against tough competition. What must be done? You must assiduously examine your past performance. Examine your team at the end of the year and see what went right and what went wrong. If you have played this game for a number of years you have no doubt figured out some of your strengths. Some may be astute at discerning value in young developing pitchers. Some may be good at Minor League evaluations and some may be great at auctions but terrible negotiators. This is all useful information. Knowing what your strengths are allows you to figure out with better precision whether a failure or success was built on luck or was the result of astute judgment. This takes a lot of effort. It is not easy to do and you may not be motivated. But even slight effort here can have tremendous gains. Winning isn't easy unless the competition is easy. You must be willing to look at yourself and your decisions critically. Process must be valued over results but that doesn't imply that poor results are merely the result of bad luck, though it is very easy to convince yourself otherwise. If you routinely spend $30 in auction leagues on 33 year old power hitters or 34 year old speedsters with no other skills and never finish in the money you should be able to use this information to evaluate your decisions. Bad luck will always occur but that does not imply that poor results are the result of bad luck. The second item here is that you must realistically assess your opponents. Does your opponent excel at offense or defense? Did an opponent who won have a lucky year or was his judgment just better? In order to figure this out you must know your opponents well. There is an owner I know in my high-stakes league that excels at taking the offensive in the auctions. He is routinely bidding players up, jumping out at the right time, forcing fair value on most players and generally is willing to bully anyone and everyone on any player. Occasionally he gets hurt but more often than not he doesn't. But he doesn't handle his team well during the year and rarely finishes in the money. Some critical analysis here would do wonders. This is a tough one but another item to think about is that often people in all walks of life confuse information with judgment. There are plenty of owners who know all sorts of advanced metrics, can manage spreadsheets like an accountant and can recite fly ball information for any player. Yet this information alone will not make one a winner without being able to use it in a clear logical fashion and in conjunction with a well developed strategy. Against tougher competition everyone will have access to this information and many will also have almost the same degree of knowledge. Where these owners fail is in thinking that because they can differentiate between a $20 player and a $17 player with better accuracy they are in a better position to win. That is usually not the case against tougher competition. Judgment and planning will win out over information in most instances, but it takes both to win. From my own experience, in 2006 in a 12-team mixed league I had a disappointing season. My team was beset with injuries and finished seventh, my worst finish in any of my leagues. Looking back it was easy to see why I failed. I drafted Randy Johnson in the first round and a few other pitchers in the early rounds hoping to capitalize and fully exploit the two start benefit. When these pitchers got hurt and/or didn't perform to expectations my team floundered. This lead me to the exact opposite strategy in 2007, drafting no pitchers in the first six rounds and generally filling out my staff in the later rounds. This led to a division title and a second place finish overall in points. I haven't yet gone through the exercise of reviewing my 2007 finish in great detail, but what I can see and what I know about my past results is that I generally do better when speculating on young pitchers, but do worse when trying for veterans. In 2006 it would be easy to say I was unlucky with injuries, but when you go for older pitchers it isn't exactly unexpected so it is a failure of planning not a bad luck result. The failure in 2006 and the success of 2007 were in line with my strengths and weaknesses and planning successes and failures. Though one might easily see bad luck and good luck, one may also see good thought processes and bad thought processes. Posted by Patrick DiCaprio at 11:50am Wednesday, December 12, 2007Player highlight: Clay BuchholzI mentioned Clay Buchholz last month in my First Pitch Arizona wrap-up, but I wanted to go into more detail today. Let's start off with his minor league stats. Numbers
Those are the numbers of a future star. He never had a K/BB below 4.00, and his K/9 was above 12.00 at both Double A and Triple A in 2007. The walk rate at Triple A is higher than we'd like to see, but it was his first crack at Triple A, he was just 22, and the sample size is relatively small. That will likely be his biggest weakness, at least at first, in the majors. Red Sox defense
While the Sox have some definite liabilities, they also have a few guys who are substantially above average with the glove. The good news is that most of these guys — Kevin Youkilis and Mike Lowell in terms of fielding and Julio Lugo in terms of range — play the infield, which benefits Buchholz because he should post an above-average ground ball rate. The Sox don't figure to make many changes this off-season. They might lose Coco Crisp, but Jacoby Ellsbury would likely be an adequate replacement. They could also try and get a new shortstop, but I haven't heard anything to this effect, and I think they'd be comfortable giving Lugo another shot. Overall, these factors seem to suggest that Buchholz will give up fewer hits on balls in play than the average pitcher. Playing timeMy biggest concern with Buchholz is playing time. Take a look at the current Red Sox starting pitchers: 1) Josh Beckett 2) Daisuke Matsuzaka 3) Curt Schilling 4) Tim Wakefield 5) Jon Lester 6) Clay BuchholzI also hear that the Sox are trying to bring in some guy from Minnesota who's supposed to be pretty good. I, personally, think Buchholz will be better than all of these guys except for Beckett and possibly Matsuzaka. He is the youngest, though, and the most inexperienced, and that places him on the outskirts by default. However, Theo Epstein, ladies and gentleman, is no fool. He realizes just how good Clay Buchholz is, how much he deserves a spot in the rotation, and how much he could help the team. I just hope he's not content in waiting one more year with the other guys he has. There's been talk of going to a 6-man rotation to accommodate everybody, although I'm not sure how likely that is. I feel pretty safe in saying, though, that Buchholz will find a healthy amount of major league innings in 2008. If Lester is swapped for Johan it might be more difficult, but I just can't see the Red Sox relegating him to minor league duty all year. Still, the possibility for these situations need to be accounted for in our innings pitched projection. We also need to account for the various situations in which he'll only pitch in the majors for part of the season. On average, I think we should expect Buchholz to pitch 150 innings in 2008. It should also be noted that I would bump that up should the Sox fail to acquire Santana. 2008 outlookI expect Buchholz to be quite good in 2008. A lot of the guys in Arizona said how they like Buchholz now more than they liked Tim Lincecum, Yovani Gallardo, and Philip Hughes at this time last year. I have to agree with them. While I liked all three back then, none put up numbers like Buchholz has. It would be nicer if Buchholz pitched more at Triple A or in the majors, but we do have a usable sample size. My biggest cause for concern (which I hinted at earlier): 3.38 BB/9 in 61.1 IP across Triple A and the majors. That isn't a terrible, but it also shows that Buchholz is fallible and shouldn't be counted on to be a monster right out of the gate. He showed excellent control at the lower levels, so a major league BB/9 higher than 3.50 would surprise me this year. As far as his strikeout rate goes, it was 11.30 in those same Triple A and Major League innings, so I would expect continued strength in that area. I certainly won't put him down for an 11.30 K/9 in 2008, but 8.75 seems like a reasonable guess. A 46% ground ball rate should also add some value. When we put all of this together, we would expect Buchholz to post an ERA right around 4.00. His WHIP would likely fall in around 1.30. Given 150 innings and an 8.75 K/9, Buchholz would secure 146 strikeouts. The Red Sox offense will help him with wins, but the low innings count will depress the total a bit, especially if a few of those innings come in relief. I think 11 or 12 wins is about right. Of course, if he gets a regular spot in the rotation, the wins and strikeouts would go up dramatically. Market valueMock Draft Central Expert Mock Draft: 40th SP FOX Sports: 56th SP CBS Draft: 76th SP CBS Sportsline: 100th SP Yahoo!: Not in Top 20 SP MLB Fantasy 411: Not in Top 20 SP Sports Fanatics: Not in Top 50 SP ProTrade: Not in Top 100 SP ConclusionsIt seems like much of the market is sour on Buchholz. Maybe they think he's too young. Maybe they're afraid to be stuck with a guy who ends up without a job. Maybe they're just being conservative. Whatever the reason, all of these sources — with the exception of the experts draft and FOX to a large extent— are really low on him. This means that he should provide pretty good value. If you can get him as the 75th pitcher off the board, you're making a quality selection. In the CBS draft that he went 76th, it was a 12-team league where he was chosen in the last round. If I get Buchholz in the last round of any of my drafts this year, I am going to be ecstatic. I'm going to talk more in-depth about this concept in the future, but taking a high-risk guy like Buchholz in the finals rounds of a draft (or for a couple of bucks at auction) is always superior strategy to taking a solid, unspectacular, low-risk guy. Keep that in mind, and I'll be sure to bring it up again as draft day approaches. Concluding thoughtsFor those of you that are really serious about winning your leagues, it might be a good idea to purchase a premium account over at Mock Draft Central. They compile the results of all of their mock drafts and sort them into easy-to-use Average Draft Position (ADP) Reports. This is another fantastic way to gauge the market value of players, as you'll be seeing how they are valued by players like yourself. Now is a great time to check it out if you're in a competitive league because the guys doing these mock drafts also take it seriously. I mean, they're mock drafting in December. I would expect them to be similar to the competition you'll be facing, and therefore a good guide as to how player value will shake out. Also, I have a new article over at MLB Front Office dealing with LOB% that should be up sometime today. And, as always, if you have any questions about anything, feel free to shoot me an e-mail. Posted by Derek Carty at 1:00am Tuesday, December 18, 2007What is the most important auction skill?When it comes to auctions in leagues with tough competition and where the same owners are involved year after year, it is of vital importance that fantasy owners cultivate one skill that is usually overlooked. We are not talking about a general plan or strategy, but about the actual conduct of the auction. What is the most important characteristic needed for success? Typically many owners consider it to be accurate projections. The problem with projections is that there are not great differences between good sets of projections. Ron Shandler has written that even the simplest systems will be accurate around 65% of the time, and no system will be accurate for another 20-25% of the player population. So what is at issue among various systems is the relatively small remainder. That is not to say that projections are unimportant, far from it. A good projection set is a necessity. But the fact is that against better competition almost every owner will have good projections. This gives them limited value. My first time in a high stakes league I thought I was in great shape with my Baseball Prospectus book and its projections until I showed up and nine other guys had the same ones. Another is a good plan in terms of which players to bring up and when. This tactic is of great value in certain particular instances especially late in the auction when dollars are low and small bids can go unchallenged. But overall it will not make a huge difference in your overall results unless you snag that one player you covet late in the day. The effort should always be there, but the end result may or may not happen. In my view the most important skill to cultivate is one that has an effect in virtually every aspect of auction planning and strategy. In auctions that is the skill of unpredictability. Not only will it bear fruit in every auction its utility is seen in virtually every aspect of an auction. An auction against tough competition is one of the great joys of fantasy baseball. But success requires a combination of many different skills. As an example of how things can go awry, in my high stakes league there was a team last year that had the best keeper roster (by acclaim) coming into the auction. Not only did the owner have a strong keeper roster with lots of profit already in hand, he had a lot of money available. What should have been a strong auction and a strong chance at first place rapidly went south almost from the get go. His team eked out a fourth place finish, barely cashing. His auction was a disaster and set the stage for a disappointing season. The cost to him was very high in real dollars as well as in his team's results. There are many facets to an auction where you must be unpredictable. The list below is not exhaustive, but I wanted to address a few illustrative scenarios: 1. With regard to bringing up players you often read hoary advice such as "don't bring up players you want." While often good advice the flaw should be fairly obvious. If you never bring up a player you want then when you bring up a player your opponents will be confident you will not go the extra dollar. This is especially important in the middle and late rounds. 2. I am often guilty of this one: there are situations where other owners know that I will not typically go for $30 for any starting pitcher and rarely for any player. So when the bidding gets hot and heavy players can often know where I stand. I changed this last year, and went to $30 on a few players, ending up with a $30 Jake Peavy, a $32 Jimmy Rollins and a $35 Carl Crawford. In the future my opponents can not have any certainty as to what I will do, yielding additional profit (I hope). 3. You must make a point to get involved in almost every bid. Even if it is a player you do not want, get in there! Occasionally you will get stuck with a $15 Nick Punto (as I did last year!) but with all of this activity comes the fact that your opponents will have no idea about your overall strategy. If they do not know it they will not be able to stop it. If you think that owners do not actively try to scuttle the plans of others then you should be involved in tougher leagues to get a flavor for what goes on. In the leagues I am in this is a common occurrence, and some owners make it a badge of honor to disrupt others' plans. Being involved in lots of bids makes you unpredictable by definition unless your opponents are mind readers. Sam Walker's wonderful book Fantasyland had some good anecdotes about owner's trying to disrupt opponents' plans, by psychology as well as auction bidding. 4. Make sure you are not beholden to your dollar values. If you show up with a certain projection set every year, your more astute opponents will not only notice but will try to use that against you. If you have the Baseball Prospectus book in your possession every year then others will know that you are likely using their projections and will have a good idea of your values (and your strategies). Of course, getting involved in lots of bids as mentioned above will make it very difficult for others to pin you down. In no way is this list exhaustive. Cultivating unpredictability in all facets of auctions is of great vitality against better opponents. This is simply because the better your opponents the less value the common and typical strategies have. Keeping opponents from knowing your plans is step one to accomplishing them. These examples may not seem significant at first, but if you are in a league with a few tough owners, making sure they cannot scuttle your plans may well be the difference between cashing and failing. Posted by Patrick DiCaprio at 7:09am Sunday, December 23, 2007Player highlight: Dustin McGowanSorry I've been away so long, everybody. Finals were killer this year, and on my first few days of vacation I was only able to get a few minutes of internet per day. I've received a few requests for Blue Jays starting pitcher Dustin McGowan, so let's use today to take a look at him. Numbers
Note: Minor league stats came from Jeff Sackmann's excellent website MinorLeagueSplits.com. *For minor league numbers, straight ground ball rate is given instead of expected ground ball rate. Right off the bat, I'm going to call McGowan's breakout for real. Look at the improvement in his control. He went from walking over 5 batters per game between Triple A and the Majors in 2006 to walking a little over 3 per game in 2007, improving from the first-half to the second and again over the final two months. The above-average strikeout rate has always been there, and complementing it with improved control makes McGowan a solid pitcher. His ground ball rates aren't quite in the Francisco Liriano/Felix Hernandez range, but they are well-above average and give McGowan an extra advantage over most power pitchers. The best news of all? Over the final two months, his peripherals got even better as he posted an 8.79 K/9 and a 2.72 BB/9. ArsenalThis is the same setup used for Felix Hernandez's profile, except I've thrown in BIP/SWG. This measures the number of balls in play the pitcher allowed per batter swing, the lower the better. I've also changed the name of SWG/BALL to SS/BALL. It still measures the same thing, swinging strike to ball ratio, but distinguishes it from BIP/SWG. Again, I haven't done a lot of research with these numbers (although I plan on it in the coming weeks), but this data is just too interesting to ignore. Percentage of Total Pitches Recorded by Pitch f/x — 68%
Percentage of Total Pitches Recorded by Pitch f/x — 44%
As you can see, McGowan has a very powerful arsenal working for him. His fastball is right around average in nearly every category, despite the fact that it clocked in at over 96 MPH on average. That's second only to Ubaldo Jimenez among starters who threw at least 100 heaters while Pitch f/x was watching. While the fastball itself is only average, it's likely that it is a big factor in McGowan's above-average changeup. He gets a lot of swings and misses on the change while showing decent command. McGowan's best offerings, though, are his curve and slider. Both are significantly above average in each of the most important categories (which, right now, I'm considering SS/BALL, SWG/BIP, SS%, BALL% as such), with the exception of the curve's Ball Percentage, which is right around average. His curve is his best pitch, ranking second in baseball in Swinging Strike Percentage, third in Swinging Strikes per Ball, and third in BIP per Swing (among starters with at least 100 thrown). The only thing we could say negative about McGowan's Pitch f/x data is that he doesn't have great control over certain pitches and that his cutter isn't very good. As I said last time, I'm not an expert on batter/pitcher dynamics and how pitches interact, but in a vacuum, the cutter appears to be a poor pitch. One last thing I wanted to check with McGowan is the monthly breakdown of his tracked pitches. I thought maybe he looked so good because the majority of his pitches were taken from August and September, when his peripherals were so good.
The majority of the pitches were from the second-half (59%), and 47% were from the final two-months. Still, our projection of McGowan should look much more like his second-half than first, so I think this exercise was worthwhile. This very nice repertoire makes me even more confident than McGowan could be primed for a second, even larger breakout in 2008. Blue Jays defense
McGowan's .276 BABIP looks low out of context, but this amazing Blue Jay defense probably contributed a decent bit to it. The BABIP is still too low, but combine McGowan's solid skills with this excellent defense, and a better than average BABIP should be no surprise. The addition of David Eckstein [.783 RZR, .135 OOZ/(BIZ+OOZ)] will significantly hurt the defense next year. He'll be taking John McDonald's spot, and he was actually worse than McDonald's primary backup, Royce Clayton, in 2007. Unless a trade is made, we might not see much of Adam Lind in 2008 with Reed Johnson and Matt Stairs (below average with both the glove and range in LF in 2007) the top candidates for left, although Stairs could also play some first. Regardless, unless Lind plays as much as he did last year the defense will probably suffer a bit. The rest of the diamond figures to remain relatively unchanged, but I think it's safe to say that the Jays' defense will be worse in 2008. A BABIP around .295 looks about right for McGowan. 2008 outlookI definitely think McGowan is primed to take another step forward in 2008. He was once a big-time prospect, and at the age of 26 seems to be living up to that billing. I could certainly see his K/9 jumping above 8.00, but we'll put his average expectation down for 7.90. If he ever gets the BB/9 to around 2.50 with a K/9 over 8.00 he could be a beast, but for 2008 let's put that walk rate down at 3.20. The ground ball rate should again be around 50%. Put all of this together, and we could expect an ERA in the 3.85-3.90 range and a WHIP around 1.30. Given a reasonable jump to 190 innings pitched (and with a 7.90 K/9), McGowan would finish with a helpful 167 strikeouts. I could see the offense being a little better with the addition of Eckstein, and 13 wins should be reachable. Market valueProTrade: 36th SP FOX Sports: 47th SP CBS Sportsline: 51st SP CBS Draft: 52nd SP Sports Fanatics: 54th SP The Fantasy Man: 61st SP MLB Fantasy 411: Not in Top 20 SP Yahoo!: Not in Top 26 SP ConclusionMcGowan is a guy who I think a lot of guys might peg as a sleeper, but because he gets so much "under the table" hype, he actually becomes overvalued. That ProTrade rank, which is determined by actual players and not writers, really scares me. I like McGowan a lot and think he could be an excellent player in 2008, but the chance is definitely there to lose value if you have to reach for him. Watch him closely, and if the rest of your league is following the mindset of CBS, the Fantasy Man, and the like, you could have a steal on your hands. Final thoughtsI won't be posting tomorrow or the next day, but I'd like to wish everyone a Merry Christmas. If you're traveling, be safe. I'll be back after the holiday with some cool stuff planned, so be on the lookout. Posted by Derek Carty at 11:28pm Wednesday, December 26, 2007The mirage of “value”This may be a controversial topic. Most fantasy owners get so hung up on the concept of value that they do not realize it is a bit of a mirage. Let's assume that when we discuss the concept we are talking about value as "the produced worth in excess of projected worth" for a given player. We can quibble about the definition but the concept is accurately denoted by the definition I posited. "Worth" is just the dollar amount that the season generates. In a vacuum this is an easy concept to understand. Yet, in practice it is as elusive as my continuing search for those Lost pillow fight pictures I frequently mention (sad I know, shouldn't I have better pursuits?). There is a fundamental flaw in the overall concept of value. Can we assume that there is an objective measure of what a player is worth? I don't think we can. There are far too many variables to consider. For example in keeper leagues, do you take into account inflation when defining value? How about positional scarcity, and positional inflation? What about the needs of your team versus the rest of the league? Does everyone agree that a forecast is worth x dollars? The mirage arises in that in every projection system you have a dollar value that represents the supposed worth of a players forecasted projection. That worth has some nebulous relation to value, but in practical terms you can only have subjective value. There is simply no such thing as objective value. An example: lets say that Miguel Cabrera should be worth $30. So at what price does he have "value?" I think that there is no objective answer to this question. In the absence of an objective answer then the concept of value only has a subjective definition. The problem lies with the nature of a forecast. What we are saying with a forecast is that a certain statline is worth a certain number of dollars. But the dollar value is simply a shorthand symbol; it merely reflects or "shows" the worth of the stats but it does not define it (a concept drawn from Wittgenstein, and I am sure that you are all sick and tired of hearing about Wittgenstein and his relation to fantasy baseball but bear with me on this). When we say Cabrera's statline is "worth" $30 what we are really saying is that his production is expected to be worth somewhere between $25 to $35 or some other reasonable range. The dollar value of $30 only shows or reflects what the statline represents but that is not the same thing as saying the statline is worth $30. There is too much noise and variation for us to attach any objective reality to that $30 forecast. So the subjective nature of the concept of "value" is seen by the fact that everyone's projection may differ, and hence the amount of "value" derived will differ. But in the absence of an objective, concrete worth of a projected statline we cannot at the time of the auction say with any certainty at all whether we have achieved value or not in a given instance. Going back to Cabrera, let's say that at the auction we get him for $32, and have him projected for $35. By most definitions we have achieved $3 of value or profit. But if his $35 projection really means that he will produce somewhere in the range of $27-$40 we may not have gotten any value! At the time of the auction we only have some various probabilities of a $27 season, a $30 season or a $40 season. So we may even take a loss on his season, a loss that should be fully within the realm of expectation for his forecasted statline. The problem is worse when we are dealing with the middle of the auction and later. These players will have much wider ranges of production on the low end than a guy like Cabrera (obviously). So on these players it is more likely that you will take a loss even though you may think you have gotten value. As an example, I auctioned James Shields last year in my high stakes league for $9. Given his history I thought he could be worth $10-$15. But if he flopped there was a good chance he would be worth zero or less. Could I have said at the time of the auction that I got "value" out of that $9? I don't see how. What is more is that there were no projected dollar values in anything I saw that had him worth double digits. So based on traditional concepts of "value" in no way could I have said that I thought he was a good value. In fact, if you look at the traditional method of acquiring players my bid was probably the worst possible! In the range of $9 or $10 I have a chance at some small profit but also an equal or better chance at a large loss. So how did he end up on my team if he had no projected value or profit? The answer will be forthcoming. Am I saying the concept of value is worthless? Of course not. I am saying that the inexorable pursuit of "value" is a concept that will unnecessarily hamstring an owner, especially if you are facing tougher competition that is experienced at auctions. More on this in the next column. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||