The Hardball Times

Barry Bonds, circa 1997

by Geoff Young
January 31, 2008

So, I was flipping through the STATS 1997 Baseball Scoreboard and came across a fun article about Barry Bonds on pages 73-75. The question asked was this: "What will the rest of Bonds' career look like?"

As a reminder, here is what Bonds had done through 1996:

GABRH2B3BHRRBIBBSBBAOBPSLG
1583553711211595333513349931082380.288.404.548

The article then used Bill James' Brock6 system to project the remainder of Bonds' career. Here's a year-by-year look at Brock6's projections in 1997 versus what Bonds actually did (I'm including only the stats that were provided in the original article):

1997
 ABRHHRRBIBBSBBA
Brock65261131493810913134.283
actual5321231554010114537.291

Looks about right to me. The projection is peering only one year into the future, so most of the inputs are known and we should expect it to be reasonably accurate.

1998
 ABRHHRRBIBBSBBA
Brock65201101443610813833.277
actual5521201673712213028.303

The projection underestimates Bonds' batting average, but otherwise this is pretty spot on.

1999
 ABRHHRRBIBBSBBA
Brock65061081383410513832.273
actual355919334837315.262

Okay, here's the drop in batting average. This isn't surprising given Bonds' age—he's 34 years old now, so some slippage should be expected. Same with the stolen bases. The projection does nail homers (though Bonds reaches the predicted total in 151 fewer at-bats).

2000
 ABRHHRRBIBBSBBA
Brock6492102132329813230.268
actual4801291474910611711.306

Nice rebound season for Bonds. The power spike in '99 was legitimate, and his batting average is back to where it was in '98. Again, stolen bases are declining, which is fine for a guy in his mid-30s.

2001
 ABRHHRRBIBBSBBA
Brock647695126309313028.265
actual4761291567313717713.328

I love the fact that James nailed the at-bats. The rest of these numbers are pretty far out of whack. Conditions change, and the best forecasting systems may not be able to account for this.

2002
 ABRHHRRBIBBSBBA
Brock645990120288812727.261
actual403117149461101989.370

A year after breaking the single-season home-run record, Bonds wins his first NL batting title, at age 37.

2003
 ABRHHRRBIBBSBBA
Brock644384114268112323.257
actual39011113345901487.341

The huge disconnect between projection and reality continues.

2004
 ABRHHRRBIBBSBBA
Brock642679107247612022.251
actual373129135451012326.362

Bonds wins the second of two career NL batting titles and demolishes the single-season record for walks. He is now 39.

2005
 ABRHHRRBIBBSBBA
Brock641074101227111720.246
actual4281251090.286

Bonds is hurt.

2006
 ABRHHRRBIBBSBBA
Brock63926895206611318.242
actual367749926771153.270

At age 41, Bonds finally begins his decline phase. This is roughly the season that Brock6 predicted for Bonds in 2002, when Bonds won his first batting title.

2007
 ABRHHRRBIBBSBBA
Brock6327557814529514.239
actual340759428661325.276

The projection has Bonds declining further, while reality has Bonds repeating his '06 performance.

2008
 ABRHHRRBIBBSBBA
Brock62263753935669.235
actualreply hazy, try again

If he gets the chance, Bonds will beat this projection.

Career
 ABRHHRRBIBBSBBA
Brock6107402136295264719752512670.275
actual98472227293576219962558514.298

This is a remarkably accurate career projection. Brock6 nailed the hits, RBI and walks, and it wasn't too far off on runs scored. It missed badly on homers, stolen bases and batting average.

In hindsight, it probably was a bit much to expect Bonds to continue stealing 20+ bases a year into his late 30s. As for the jump in home runs... I have a theory, but it's not particularly original. In fact, you've probably heard it from every single person on the planet already, so we'll just leave it at that.



Geoff Young covers the San Diego Padres at Ducksnorts and is a contributor to Baseball Prospectus. Feel free to send Geoff comments via email.

<< Return to Article