November 23, 2009

Who is Shyster?


Order Now


The Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2010 is now in development and will ship in mid November! This year's book will feature articles by THT's staff as well as Bill James, Rob Neyer, Tom Tango and Craig Wright. If you use this link to purchase the Annual, you will be in the first group to receive it and you'll be supporting THT.
Roll mouse over dates
Daily Posts
December 2008
S M T W T F S

1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31






Player Search:
Plus our Statistical Definitions

Monthly Archives



Or you can search by:


Gear up for baseball season with Chicago White Sox tickets and New York Yankees tickets. LA Angels tickets, Houston Astros tickets, and Atlanta Braves tickets are hot sellers! You can get Boston Red Sox tickets, San Diego Padres tickets or Chicago Cubs tickets for your favorite baseball fan. Coast to Coast Tickets has the best MLB tickets like Minnesota Twins tickets, LA Dodgers tickets, Milwaukee Brewers tickets, New York Met tickets and St. Louis Cardinals tickets.
Find premium Chicago Cubs tickets and other Chicago tickets at JustGreatTickets.com.
Chicago Cubs Tickets
Chicago Tickets



Creative Commons License
All content on this site (including text, graphs, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Most Recent Comments

Shyster's Daily Circuit


Baseball. Blogging. Whenever.

Friday, December 12, 2008

And speaking of gambling . . .


. . . Darren Rovell reports that the Wilpons had money tied up with the spectacularly-disgraced Bernard Madoff:

It’s believed Madoff and the Mets owners have been connected for at least 20 years . . . The question now is how much money was invested? If we’re talking hundreds of millions of dollars, which is not out of the question, you’d have to think it could affect the Mets ability to further itself this off-season beyond the pitching moves they’ve already made.

Memo to K-Rod: ask to be paid in cash.

(Thanks -- again -- to Pete Toms for the link)




Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 1:31pm (2) Comments

Muera Las Vegas!


Mark Anderson of the Las Vegas Review-Journal polled a handful of Winter Meetings attendees about the viability of major league baseball in Sin City:

But even though Major League Baseball isn't coming to the valley anytime soon, that doesn't mean it shouldn't be here. Boston Globe writer Nick Cafardo, who was in town this week covering baseball's winter meetings at the Bellagio, is all for a franchise in Southern Nevada.

"I've always been shocked there isn't a team here," said Cafardo, who covers the Red Sox. "It's a popular place for players. A lot of players live in this area or live in Arizona. I know it's a fun place for them to be. I know there's the issue of the gambling, but if you want to gamble, you can gamble anywhere in this day and age.

"There's a lot of interest in baseball in this area, a lot of transplanted people from places where baseball's important. Again, I'm just flabbergasted there isn't a team here" . . .

. . . The Sporting News baseball writer Gerry Fraley: "This is my first time here. I'm a little taken aback. It looks like the economy is hurting here. I don't know if a tourist-based town can support a baseball team because of the fluctuations of the economy."

My long-held position on this is that the big leagues in Vegas is a dicey proposition even in the best of times for the city and the nation as a whole. Unlike football and boxing, baseball is not driven by big events. There are 10 times as many home games. Getting people to show up in numbers to 81 games is going to require attracting the locals who will come on Tuesday and Wednesday nights, not the folks who drive up from L.A. on the weekend. And remember, a healthy portion of the locals work nights in the gaming, restaurant, and entertainment industry. Who's going to a midweek Vegas-Oakland game in April?

Even if you get past that, I think you have a problem with the casinos. No, not because baseball is historically wary of gambling. The presence of the Winter Meetings there -- not to mention the common sight of Mohegan Sun and Foxwoods ads in east coast stadiums -- puts lie to that old concern. No, the bigger problem with the casinos is that they have no incentive whatsoever to play ball with baseball. Think about it: why would Mandalay Bay want to encourage its patrons to leave the gaming floor and go to a ballpark between, say, 6:30PM and 10:30PM each night? Hell, the reason they have cocktail waitresses and comped drinks is that they don't even want you to get up to walk to a bar during those times.

Bringing major league professional sports to Las Vegas would, by definition, bring in competition for existing entertainment dollars, and I can't see how roadblock after roadblock wouldn't be thrown up by the gaming and hotel interests.

(special thanks to Keith Law for helping me figure out that "muera" is the opposite of "viva." Keep your eye on that guy. I think he may just make it in this business)

Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 1:15pm (4) Comments

Excellent


It's been a few years since I've watched the Simpsons regularly. Like a lot of people have noted, it lost its fastball years ago. But it's still crafty and knows how to get people out. Like the one from last Sunday, in which the idea of publicly funded stadiums was caught looking. Quoteable moment at the 18:22 mark, as Mr. Burns opens his new basketball arena:

Welcome to the American Dream: A billionaire using public funds to construct a private playground for the rich and powerful!

And there's some bonus Mark Cuban, too!

(dual hat tips: to Atlantic Yards Report for writing about and linking to the whole episode, and to Pete Toms, for letting me know that Atlantic Yards was writing about and linking to the whole episode)

Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 11:53am

William S. Stevens: 1948-2008


So there's this thing just about every first year law student reads called “The Common Law Origins of the Infield Fly Rule.” It's a law review note from the 70s that draws an analogy between the infield fly rule and the Anglo-American common law, each of which were refined with incremental changes over time and each of which can be maddeningly confusing to the average observer. It's quite a famous bit of legal writing, as these things go, and it's dryly funny too. Given its subject, it was one of the few things I read in law school that I actually enjoyed and actually remember. Legal beagles who haven't read it can find it at 123 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1474 (1975).

Sadly, the fellow who wrote it has died:

William S. Stevens, whose slyly humorous law-review note on the relationship between baseball’s infield fly rule and Anglo-American common law became one of the most celebrated and imitated analyses in American legal history, died Monday in Anchorage, where he was working. He was 60 and lived in Narberth, Pa. The cause was a heart attack, said T. Dennis Sullivan, his brother-in-law . . .

. . . Mr. Stevens contributed many articles to The Philadelphia Lawyer, the magazine of the Philadelphia Bar Association, and was a member of its editorial board. None achieved the reputation of the infield fly note, which grew out of his passionate love for baseball and his abandoned plans to write a magisterial multivolume work with the title “Doubleday on Baseball.”

“It has given me far more than the 15 minutes of fame Andy Warhol said I should get,” he told Mr. Jarvis. “With recent flurries of interest in the piece, I am probably up to 21 minutes and 15 seconds.”

He added: “My ego is simultaneously flattered and bruised by the notion that something I cranked out more than 25 years ago would prove to be the highlight of my professional and academic careers.”

He shouldn't have worried much about his ego. Most of us in this profession make no real mark and bring no real joy to anyone. Stevens did both, and for that I'll always have a good thought in my head and a good feeling in my heart for the guy.

(thanks to Jason for the heads up)

Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 9:13am (6) Comments

Good luck with that, Jim


I'm not smart enough know whether bailing out the auto industry is the right move for America, but I do know one thing: if I had just participated in scuttling it, I wouldn't be making a beeline for a public appearance in Michigan. I guess that's just one of the many points upon which Jim Bunning and I differ:

He may be losing his marbles, but U.S. senator and ex-Tiger pitching great Jim Bunning still has big brass cojones.

After all, most of the GOP senators conspiring to kill a House rescue package for Detroit's auto companies wouldn't have the guts to set foot in Michigan this week, much less hawk their autographs to beleaguered Michiganders at $55 a pop.

But Hall of Famer Bunning -- a vocal opponent of the auto loans -- will do both of those things Sunday when he journeys to the deepest heart of UAW country.

He'll sign baseballs ($35), posters ($45) and jerseys or gloves ($55) from noon to 2 p.m. at the Gibraltar Trade Center in Taylor . . .

. . . Taylor Mayor Cameron Priebe, who said he'd written Bunning a personal note imploring him to reconsider his opposition to the auto rescue package, was stunned when I told him Bunning would be in town to sell his signature.

"I doubt he'll have many takers at $35," Priebe said. "But as soon as I get off the phone with you, I'm going to call the UAW and see if I can't arrange for 5,000 of his biggest fans to be there when he arrives."


It's been nice knowin' ya, Jim.

(thanks to Neate Sager for the link)




Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 6:30am (14) Comments

Today at THT


Raymond Chandler once wrote that "The law isn't justice. It's a very imperfect mechanism. If you press exactly the right buttons and are also lucky, justice may show up in the answer. A mechanism is all the law was ever intended to be.”

The way I see it, if it's all just luck and the operation of machinery, I can afford to spend a lot of my day away from my cases talking about baseball.

  • Richard Barbieri's This Annotated Week in Baseball History looks at how the A's of the 1950s simply bent over for the New York Yankees. You know, today's Kansas City baseball club seems to make just as many bad moves as those old Kansas City A's teams. Thing is, unlike the A's ownership back in the day, Glass and Moore are not trying to rig it in anyone else's favor. In light of that, you'd have to say that the Royals' decision makers, while not corrupt like Arnold Johnson was, are more incompetent than anything before seen in Kansas City. Somehow, I think Royals fans would deal better with corruption because at least corruption makes some sort of sense.


  • With all of the talk about Sabathia, Lowe, and Burnett, Craig Brown doesn't want us to forget that there's a second tier out there, and nothing is more "second tier" than Oliver Perez.


  • In light of all of the week's activity, the guys at Fantasy Focus have been going without sleep to keep up. Late yesterday Victor Wang analyzed the Joyce-for-Jackson deal. No, Tiger fans, he doesn't make it look any better for you than you first thought. Also, Derek Carty takes a two-part look at the Putz-and-11-other-guys trade. Me? I just like to say Putz. Putz, Putz, Putz, Putz. Finally, Carty looks at the fantasy impact of the Sabathia signing. I think the biggest fantasy in all of this is the idea among Yankee fans that this will enable the Bombers to win the World Series.

  • Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 6:00am (2) Comments

    Teixeira’s Options


    Boswell explores the mind of and options facing Mark Teixeira:

    Three things matter to Teixeira, who has a clean-cut, almost corporate, image: family, business and winning. His dilemma: He can't get all three in the same place. Boston is 400 miles from Severna Park. But the Nats and Orioles are 400 miles from the World Series. Which team can negate the distance and how? The Red Sox can't move Boston south. But the Nats and Orioles can claim that their position in the standings will move north.

    Interesting article, but I think Boswell oversells the appeal of the Nats and Orioles and dismisses the Angels far too quickly. If I were a betting man, I'd say Teixeira stays in Anaheim. There he has the same shot of winning he has in Boston, with little of the pressure and none of the historical baggage the Red Sox represent for him. If the Angels' money is close, I think he stays put.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 5:45am (12) Comments

    Like the Great Depression, but different


    The economic downturn hits the bush leagues:

    At the minor league job fair and trade show, the topic on many minds was the floundering economy, which was expected to have a far more pronounced effect on baseball’s lower levels than on the major leagues. Many minor league teams are searching for creative ways to save money but keep fans heading out to ballparks, and job seekers are finding few openings. Some of the cost-saving measures will affect fans, and others will reach the field . . .

    . . . Teams are looking beyond uniforms for savings. The Round Rock Express, the Houston Astros’ Class AAA affiliate, has often bought new in-game entertainment features for fans from one season to the next. Next season, however, the team plans to run the same video entertainment on the outfield screen between innings.

    “It will be the same cap shuffle video instead of changing the whole thing, like we’ve done in years past,” said Clint Musslewhite, the team’s director for ballpark entertainment. “We are not going to have them redo it. We’re going to strategically change our entertainment; the number of inflatable things we’ll rent will decrease.”

    I suppose things are tough all over, but it's hard for me to get worked up about fewer rented inflatable things and repeats on the cap shuffle.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 5:33am (2) Comments