November 22, 2009

Who is Shyster?


Order Now


The Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2010 is now in development and will ship in mid November! This year's book will feature articles by THT's staff as well as Bill James, Rob Neyer, Tom Tango and Craig Wright. If you use this link to purchase the Annual, you will be in the first group to receive it and you'll be supporting THT.
Roll mouse over dates
Daily Posts
January 2009
S M T W T F S




1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31




Player Search:
Plus our Statistical Definitions

Monthly Archives



Or you can search by:


Gear up for baseball season with Chicago White Sox tickets and New York Yankees tickets. LA Angels tickets, Houston Astros tickets, and Atlanta Braves tickets are hot sellers! You can get Boston Red Sox tickets, San Diego Padres tickets or Chicago Cubs tickets for your favorite baseball fan. Coast to Coast Tickets has the best MLB tickets like Minnesota Twins tickets, LA Dodgers tickets, Milwaukee Brewers tickets, New York Met tickets and St. Louis Cardinals tickets.
Find premium Chicago Cubs tickets and other Chicago tickets at JustGreatTickets.com.
Chicago Cubs Tickets
Chicago Tickets



Creative Commons License
All content on this site (including text, graphs, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Most Recent Comments

Shyster's Daily Circuit


Baseball. Blogging. Whenever.

Monday, January 12, 2009

Rickey and Rice


Twenty-eight voters left Rickey off, so we have both his election percentage and a nice read on the insanity level of the BBWAA.

I've said all I really care to say about it. Feel free to comment until your heart's content in the comments.

Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 2:31pm

The clock strikes 11 for Roger Clemens


In my past life (read: the job I had until a little over a week ago) I occasionally represented clients who were subject to federal criminal investigations. All of these guys were under the microscope for a year or more, having their records subpoenaed, having their phones tapped, and having their friends and neighbors interviewed by IRS and FBI agents. I'd try to keep tabs of the investigations as best I could, occasionally even calling the U.S. Attorney or an agent to try and figure out what, if anything, was going on. Mostly, however, we heard silence from the government.

I later learned that the silence was a good thing in that you usually heard the leaks and the crowing when the feds started getting comfy with the idea of indicting your client's butt. Kind of like what we're hearing from the team investigating Roger Clemens now:

A federal grand jury has convened in Washington, D.C., to determine whether to indict seven-time Cy Young Award winner Roger Clemens for lying under oath to Congress when he denied taking performance-enhancing drugs, ESPN.com has learned.

Witnesses have been subpoenaed to appear before the grand jury as early as this week. The jurors are expected to review evidence presented by assistant U.S. attorney Daniel P. Butler and determine whether there is probable cause to return an indictment for perjury . . .

. . . "We have no knowledge of [the grand jury] one way or the other," Rusty Hardin, one of Clemens' attorneys, said Monday morning. "All I have heard is rumors from people saying something. But we have had no contact with anyone about it, and have no idea.''

Ya never do.

Here's a fun passage from the story:

Barry Bonds, a seven-time MVP, was indicted last year on perjury and obstruction of justice charges stemming from his 2003 grand jury testimony in which he denied knowingly taking illegal performance-enhancing drugs. Bonds is scheduled for trial this March in San Francisco.

If an indictment is returned against Clemens, it could set the stage for high-profile perjury trials for a generation's top hitter and pitcher.

Perjury ain't exactly murder one, but companion Bonds-Clemens trials would be absolutely huge, if for no other reason than it will totally kill the MLB-backed narrative that the Mitchell Report marked the end of the Steroid Era. Sure, the Barry Bonds trial has been on the docket for a long time, but there's something dissatisfying about making him the sole repository for anti-PED sentiment. There's personal baggage for one thing in that since everyone hated him when he played, there will always be a sense that to kill Barry any more than he has already been killed is piling on. There's also the issue of race which, while I don't see any relevance, causes many people to pull their punches, I think.

Pair Bonds' trial with Clemens, however, and a much more appealing narrative emerges. One in which all of baseball's sins can be more conveniently piled on Bonds' and Clemens' shoulders. One in which hitter is paired with pitcher, villain paired with (until recently) hero. Black paired with white.

It's a story that most writers and historians will be unable to resist.

Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 2:07pm

Cuba has a Bob Feller Too


I don't know that much about Cuban baseball, but given the decline Cuba's economy and quality of life since the collapse of the Soviet Union -- not to mention the defections -- it would certainly not surprise me if the quality and vibrancy of the game had declined as well. Strong social forces are at play! Perhaps an allegory for life in Cuba can be found in the example of Cuban baseball! Quick! Someone! Give me a big fat social treatise on the subject:

Ernesto Morilla, a wiry 86-year-old who played professional baseball in the early 1950s, knows what ails Cuba's national pastime.

"Many players have become lazy," said Morilla, who has spent half his life as an usher in the capital's Latinoamericano Stadium. "I remember I wouldn't eat for days after a tough loss. These guys go drinking and dancing."

Old men complaining about young men not taking the game seriously? Hmm, maybe things in Cuba are exactly the same as they are everywhere else.

Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 1:15pm

The people in my neighborhood


One of the best things about blogging is that I've met a lot of smart and interesting people. Well, sort of met them in that way you meet people on the Internet. Commenters and emailers and folks like that. Even better, is that since I've started this blog, a handful of these folks have started baseball blogs of their own or revived blogs they already had before. In my more immodest moments it makes me feel like The Dark Knight inspiring the Sons of Batman. In reality, it's probably more a matter of "hey, if that idiot can write a blog, so can I." Either way, I like the results.

I link to these guys on occasion, but probably not enough given how much support they've given me. To rectify this, I'm going to start a semi-regular feature in which I take a brief whirl through the general ShysterBallosphere to remind folks that there's a lot of good stuff being written out on there on the long tail. I will probably leave someone out when I run these things, but since it's going to be semi-regular, no sweat -- just shoot me an email and I'll do my best to get to your blog next time. Anyway:

  • Our friend tHeMARksMiTh has closed up shop on his Rounding the Bases baseball blog (which covered current events) and has started a baseball history blog called Way Back and Gone. There will still be some current stuff as the feeling strikes him, but for the most part, Mark plans to look back. Among the offerings, look for a regular "This Day in Baseball History" feature.


  • Prolific ShysterBall commenter The Common Man has a blog by the same name that, while about a lot of things, often touches on baseball as well. Yesterday, for example, he offered his thoughts on the abnormally high number of ADHD drug exemptions for ballplayers. The best part: to get to those thoughts, you get to read about misbehaving royals and the surprisingly bad leadership Megatron exerted over the Decepticons. He must have gone to the Cobra Commander leadership academy.


  • Ron Rollins, who has served admirably as ShysterBall's British correspondent, has been working admirably on Baseball Over Here, his blog about how baseball is viewed internationally (which is a bit different than saying it's a blog about international baseball). Ron raised a good question in a recent post: How does Jerry Royster rate an invitation to Obama's inauguration? Do Gene Garber and Glen Hubbard get to go too?


  • IIATMS is probably too big to include in a link-o-rama anymore, and my including it as a member of the ShysterBallosphere is kind of like the guy who came up with Donkey Kong taking credit for over 20 years of successful Mario games. Sure, it's technically accurate that one inspired the other, but it's not like anyone playing Super Mario Galaxy on their Wii knows where the little guy with the mustache came from in the first place. Be that as it may, Jason made a nice contrary point the other day in light of the Rickey/Corkey Hall of Fame vote business, the point being "If Cal and Gwynn, Babe and Christie, Joe D and Mickey, Ted and Stan, and Jackie and Sandy can't be unanimous, why should Rickey stand above them all?" I guess my answer would be that 17 wrongs don't make a right, but the fact remains that the sun will still rise tomorrow if Rickey Henderson is not a unanimous inductee.


  • Josh Levitt writes the blog Jorge Says No!, and one of the things I like most about it is that he runs a lot of ongoing series. Like his current one, What the Hell Were You Thinking?, which examines recent inexplicable free agent signings, beginning with Carlos Silva.


  • And finally, though Neate Sager is not properly a member of the ShysterBallosphere -- he's an actual pro who has been writing on his blog and other places a hell of a lot longer than I have -- I can't think of anywhere else to put this, so here it is: On Thursday, Neate wrote a piece for the Ottawa Sun about former Syracuse point guard Josh Wright winding up in Canada. The same day, WTVH, a television station in Syracuse runs a virtually verbatim version of Neate's story. Though they stuck "reprinted from the Ottawa Sun" at the bottom, the byline reads "by WTVH Sports" and there is no attribution to Neate at all. Here's Neate's comprehensive rundown of the two articles.


  • Bloggers are often accused of being derivative and we all do our fair share of blockquoting. That said, I've never seen a blogger simply lift an entire story like that with essentially no attempt at giving attribution or obtaining permission. The folks at WTVH and others like them who would take the work of others and pass it off as their own had best be careful. The Sons of Batman are watching.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 11:59am

    Last pre-results post on the Hall


    They're going to announce the inductees shortly. For what it's worth, I will be happy to see Rickey make it, I'd be happy to see Blyleven make it -- even if I can't bring myself to characterize his exclusion thus far as a grave injustice like so many have -- and I'm realistic enough to know that Trammell won't, probably ever. I figure Rice will make it, and that will make me frown a bit, but I'm simply not going to get worked up over it like so many have in the past year or so. I don't figure Jack Morris will make it either, and I feel pretty much the same about him as a I do Jim Rice. Blah if they're in there, but it's not going to keep me awake at night if they are.

    The reason for my lack of strong feelings in either direction comes from the realization that the Hall of Fame is not perfect, never was, and never will be. From Sam Mellinger's latest article:

    Whatever, there are all-time greats who need to buy a ticket like the rest of us to get in — 21 men who made eight or more All-Star Games and are eligible for induction are not in. There are guys who won multiple MVP and Cy Young awards who remain unelected, some barely getting a look.

    Bill Freehan made 11 All-Star teams, won five Gold Gloves and was second in MVP voting the year his Tigers won the World Series in 1968. He received just two votes for the Hall of Fame and was dropped from the ballot.

    “I would’ve loved to get more consideration,” Freehan says now. “Everybody looks at offense and nobody looks at defense. My concentration was always defense.”

    How much stock can we place in an institution that casts Bill Freehan out with just two votes? Not a lot, so forgive me if I am reluctant to engage in an argument over the reasonableness or lack of reasonableness of a vote in either direction. Great for Rickey, sad for Alan, but at the end of the day they loom no less large in my consciousness based on what some scribe thought of them five years or more after they quit playing.

    I have a Hall of Fame in my head. Everyone in it belongs there, including Bill Freehan. Everyone who isn't does not, and I tolerate no lobbying whatsoever. It's pretty simple, really.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 10:45am

    Manny and Rickey


    Jack Curry notes that, before Manny was Manny, Rickey was Rickey:

    Before Manny was Manny, Rickey was Rickey. If ever there were two players who were kindred spirits, they are Manny Ramirez and Rickey Henderson. Henderson was talented and distinctive, a walking, talking baseball entertainer. Ramirez does not talk as much, but he entertains in his own goofy way, too . . .

    . . . When Mattingly was Ramirez’s coach last season, he saw some of the traits he used to see in Henderson. Ramirez has the same type of plate discipline, work ethic and confidence. In addition, Mattingly said Henderson and Ramirez are both much more intelligent players than they are perceived to be.

    Henderson played left field while Ramirez plays left field. Henderson won two World Series rings. So has Ramirez. Henderson sometimes aggravated managers. Ramirez annoyed an entire organization. Henderson had his head first slide and his signature snatch-catch. Ramirez treats home runs like New Year’s Eve.

    Biggest difference: I don't recall Henderson ever quitting on his team like Manny did last season. And no, I don't consider a game of hearts after one is out of the game to be quitting on one's team.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 9:40am

    Swinging telephone poles


    I missed this when it ran last week -- probably because I don't get the MLB Network and thus ignored much of the discussion of it out of spite -- but King Kaufman had some really interesting observations about the Don Larsen game and hitting in the 1950s:

    The biggest difference I noticed was the approach of the batters. They were all over the place in the box before the pitch. Hitters today tend to be very still. They have their wiggles and timing devices, but for the most part, once the ball is coming, the best hitters waste little motion. They shift their weight, rotate their hips and -- wham! -- whip the bat through the strike zone.

    So it was startling for me to watch Yogi Berra literally walk around in the batter's box as the pitch was on its way. He'd sometimes take a little stutter-step backwards, away from the plate, with each foot as he loaded up his swing. Almost every hitter practically wound up before getting his bat moving forward.

    Those bats were enormous pieces of lumber compared to what players swing today. They had to load up.

    Watching these Yankees and Dodgers struggle to get those logs through the strike zone, I wondered why it took so long -- until the '80s and '90s -- for the baseball world to figure out that lighter bats are more effective. Didn't they have physics teachers back then? Couldn't somebody have convinced someone like Billy Martin that the bat speed he'd gain with a lighter bat would make up for the mass he'd lose?

    In this same vein, I wonder why wool in the summer lasted so long.

    (link via someone's comment in this BTF thread on another excellent King Kaufman article)



    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 8:49am

    Power on the Padres


    Jeff Moorad purchasing the Padres is a weird looking deal. For one thing it came together so fast. The Tribune Company couldn't even change the toner on the printer that spits out the Cubs' offer sheets in the time it took this whole deal to materialize.

    A second odd thing is that despite this being characterized as a sale in every article I've read, John Moores is still going to be running this team for some time:

    John Moores will remain as majority owner of the Padres for three or four years, even if the ongoing negotiations with a Jeff Moorad-led group yields an agreement, according to major league sources.

    Moorad eventually would assume the largest financial stake in the club, but not for a matter of years, the sources said. However, at some point this year, Moorad would assume a powerful decision-making role within the front office, with the added clout of being the majority owner in waiting and a minority owner in the near term . . .

    . . . Beyond the financial details, one motivation fueling plans to set a lengthy transition is to ensure Moores remains active both on major league committees and as a member of the inner circle to Commissioner Bud Selig.

    A reformist who has worked to level the playing field for low-and mid-revenue clubs, Moores would benefit the Padres by continuing to help MLB shape future terms relating to industry resource allocation, according to persons close to him . . . Selig, 74, plans to retire after the 2012 season, and some executives expect Moores primarily will represent the Padres with MLB through that time.

    So Moores is still going to call the shots and still be Selig's man in San Diego. I'm no expert, but from where I'm sitting, this is less a sale than it is a simple cash infusion for the Padres. I wonder if Moorad's bid would have been approved if he actually wanted to run the team now. I kind of doubt it, and all of this strikes me as Moorad being allowed to enter a kind of ownership training program in exchange for bailing out the cash poor Moores. As everyone knows, the impetus for the sale is Moores' divorce. In light of Moores selling but kinda not really selling, I wonder if the Mrs. Moores divorce attorneys won't try to blow up or at least slow down this deal so that they might determine if any financial shenanigans are involved.

    So if Moorad isn't going to come in and sit in the owner's suite on day one, what will he be doing? I'm not sure, but you can bet it will look a lot like what Sandy Alderson does right now:

    Major league executives expect CEO Sandy Alderson to leave the Padres at some point this year if Jeff Moorad takes over the front office.

    Moorad has said he well regards Alderson, but major league executives doubt Alderson will stay beyond 2009 if Moorad comes aboard because the two are used to doing similar jobs.

    Alderson is a freakin' genius, so that's a real shame. People more familiar with the Padres can opine on the practical fallout of his departure better than I can. I will say, however, that blogger/assistant GM Paul DePodesta had best be careful. My old supervisor had no problem with my blog, but all that changed when a new guy came in. DePo is a cool guy. It would be a shame for him to get Dooced.



    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 6:45am

    Team player


    The Rangers asked Michael Young to move to third to make room for prospect Elvis Andrus. Since Young is a team leader, a team player, and a gamer, he gladly obliged, and vowed to move his locker next to Andrus' so that he could mentor the lad as he makes his way through his first season in the bigs.

    Just kidding, he flipped out and demanded a trade:

    The Texas Rangers are exploring trade options for five-time All-Star shortstop Michael Young at the player's request after he became upset about the team's plan to move him to third base . . .

    . . . The Rangers would like to move Young to third to make room for highly touted prospect Elvis Andrus at shortstop. The 20-year-old Andrus came to Texas in July 2007 in the trade that sent Mark Teixeira to Atlanta.

    Daniels said he and manager Ron Washington met with the 32-year-old Young last month about the direction of the team and moving to third base.

    "Reluctant, reluctant," Daniels said, describing Young's reaction. "He explained to us that he's worked extremely hard to make himself a shortstop. Obviously in 2004, he volunteered to move from second base to shortstop. That kind of shows the team-first character that has been a stable of his personality and really has made himself an outstanding player."


    Guess that's not the case anymore. Hmmm . . . I thought the reason the Rangers hired Nolan Ryan was so he could beat the snot out of players who misbehave like this.

    Anyway, my guess is that Young's change of heart is based on the Gold Glove he was inexplicably awarded last season and that he now believes his own press clippings. That's meaningless of course -- the GG voters once gave one to a DH -- but if Young believes that such hardware makes him too valuable to move, maybe some GM out there believes it makes him valuable too and will thus be willing to take Young and his obscene contract off Jon Daniels' hands.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 6:00am

    Today at THT


    As I enter my second week of unemployment, I am starting to disconnect from reality. My beard is bushy and mighty. I've created fanciful fictitious lives for the people I see walking dogs in my neighborhood, and I'm thinking about creating lives for the dogs as well. One note of practical concern is that I'm beginning to lose track of the days, so if it's Sunday and I've just forgot, consider all of today's posts as a nice little bonus as opposed to a monument to my growing cabin fever and insanity, deal?

  • On the day Rickey Henderson's election to the Hall of Fame will be announced, Chris Jaffe provides several illustrations as to just how special, spectacular, and downright unusual a ballplayer Rickey truly was. One thing I like about is is how Chris focuses mostly on steals. This may sound strange, but when you're in the sabermetric cocoon I and many of you have been in for the past decade or so, it's easy to forget how amazing a base stealer the guy was. I say this because the majority of stathead Rickey-talk focuses on his walk rate and runs scored because, objectively speaking, those are the most valuable skills Rickey brought to the table. But Rickey got famous for stealing bases and Rickey is going into the Hall for stealing bases, and the fact that I and so many others think of his walk rate before anything else about him explains a lot about why the general baseball public has a dim view of statheads. It's kind of like appreciating Ann Margaret for winning an Emmy for her outstanding portrayal as Blanche DuBois in the 1984 TV production of"A Streetcar Named Desire" rather than being ga-ga over the way she shook it in "Viva Las Vegas."


  • Evan Brunell runs down last week's transactions. You all know about the big ones, so let me focus on the Astros' signing of rightfielder John Gall. Look, I used to work for that guy, he's a great lawyer, and a really cool dude, but seeing as he's 63 years-old, I can't feature him having much range out in right.


  • Finally, over at Fantasy Focus, Victor Wang gives us a list of rules to remember when making a fantasy trade. The chief rule is surprise . . . surprise and fear . . . fear and surprise . . . and ruthless efficiency . . . OK, the three rules are fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency, and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope. Wait, the four . . . amongst the rules are such elements as fear, surprise . . . wait, I'll come in again.


  • OK, in the time it took you to read all of that, I've realized that (1) yes, it is Monday; and (2) now that Bob Barker is retired there is absolutely nothing to look forward to about being at home on a weekday.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 5:24am