May 22, 2013
Who is Shyster?
Or you can search by:
Most Recent Comments
Sam Zell’s Nightmare Continues (11)
William S. Stevens: 1948-2008 (22)
Teixeira’s Options (18)
Cole Hamels Meets Talk Radio (23)
Appropos of nothing (4)
Shyster's Daily Circuit
Joe Posnanski Blog
Cot's Baseball Contracts
It IS About the Money
Baseball Think Factory
MLB Trade Rumors
Way Back and Gone
Bats -- NYT Baseball Blog
The Biz of Baseball
The Daily Fungo
The Common Man
Jorge Says No!
Baseball Over Here
Thursday, May 21, 2009
And That Happened—ADDENDUMThe point of ATH is to distill the boxscore and give a quick thumbnail of what went on -- or at least what interesting to me went on -- in a game. Obviously I'm going to miss a lot of interesting stuff in the course of a game with such an approach, so I always love it when someone hips me to something cool that happened.
Last night reader Connor Doyle -- whom some of you may know as Diesel -- had this observation about the second Marlins-Diamondbacks game:
A.J. Hinch may have justified his hiring with this one move: In the bottom of the 11th with the score tied, Tony Peña (in his second inning of work) put runners on 1st and 3rd with no outs. Hinch called on closer Chad Qualls, who had been warm since the inning before, which immediately brought guffaws from the booth (Mark Grace even went so far as to say, "Even if they get out of this ... then what?" as if there were anything more important than getting out of that inning). Qualls proceeded to get two groundballs for a groundout and a double play, which was enough to get the erstwhile critical Gracie to proclaim Hinch a "genius."
I thought the Hinch hiring was as strange as the next guy, but really, let's give the guy a chance to actually manage for more than a week before we bury him. If last night's bullpen usage is any indication, there's a functioning brain under that cap, and that's a good sign for the ballclub.
Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 7:45am
What’s most remarkable about this is that Hinch brought Qualls in in the middle of an inning. We’ve seen managers go to their “closers” before the end of the game in exta-innings situations plenty of times, but they almost invariably come out to start an inning, not to try to get the team out of a jam. Course, Qualls did go on to surrender a run in his second inning of work. This isn’t EXACTLY what the anti-closer sentiment is all about (the ideal scenario would be a manager going to his best reliever in the 8th to face the 3-4-5 hitters of the opposing team and then letting someone else pitch the 9th against the bottom of the order) but it appears to be a step in the right direction.
Posted 05/21 at 09:08 AM
Wooden U. Lykteneau said...
Quite frankly, the idea that a closer is all that special is <u>bullshit</u>. A pitcher’s job—reliever OR starter—is to throw strikes and get outs. Period. It
I’m paraphrasing the late Dick Radatz, of course, but this notion that the guy that gets the save is necessarily the best or most reliever that particular night.
It really shouldn’t be that hard for folks to understand that you want your most effective reliever facing the opposing team’s most dangerous hitter beyond the 6th inning, regardless of how many outs there are. Some guy named Bill James pointed this out about 30 years ago or so, and he may not have even been the first.
That K-Rod is the single-season record holder (and Bobby Thigpen before him) for saves (number of multiple-inning outings in 2008: zero, same as me) ought to be reason enough for folks to question the merit of the statistic.
Posted 05/21 at 09:46 AM
Aaron Moreno said...
Now that Hinch has won Gracie over, he just has to get his own team in line.
Posted 05/21 at 10:58 AM
Slugger O'Toole said...
I personally like Bill James’ habit of referring to the best bullpen pitcher as the “relief ace” and just scrapping terms like “closer” and “Setup man” entirely. I think if more people took this approach bullpen usage would get better. Our language shapes reality as much as reality shapes our language after all.
Posted 05/21 at 11:21 AM