December 13, 2013
Who is Shyster?
Or you can search by:
Most Recent Comments
Mike Hargrove Interview (13)
Can they be the California Angels again? (9)
Another great moment in mass transit? (7)
Just another ten-percenter (his mind is like an ocean) (7)
Great Moments in Half-Baked Populism (8)
Shyster's Daily Circuit
Joe Posnanski Blog
Cot's Baseball Contracts
It IS About the Money
Baseball Think Factory
MLB Trade Rumors
Way Back and Gone
Bats -- NYT Baseball Blog
The Biz of Baseball
The Daily Fungo
The Common Man
Jorge Says No!
Baseball Over Here
Monday, September 14, 2009
Attendance and insantiyGammons holds forth on the overall decline in attendance this season. This made me go "huh?"
Attendance is not the sole barometer for the sport's economy, but it represents a warning sign. We hear the bold predictions of Teixeira-like money for this winter's premier free agents, such as Matt Holliday and Jason Bay. But in this economy and given the drifting of second-tier free agents last winter, it won't be Christmas before we hear cries of collusion and the first refrains of "(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction."
Who, aside from Jason Bay and Matt Holliday's agents, is seriously suggesting that they'll get "Teixeira-like money?" If Gammons means that they'll receive legal tender similar in form to that which Mr. Teixeira receives then sure, they'll get Teixeira-like money. If he means that they'll get such tender in amounts approaching that which Teixeira is getting then he's crazy.
They're nice players, but Holliday probably played his way out of any interest from AL teams with his performance in Oakland. Bay is two years older than Teixeira. Even if the biggest free agent player in baseball -- the Yankees -- were to go after them, they'd be competing for essentially the same Yankee dollars, thereby lowering the price down further.
Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 2:50pm
APBA Guy said...
Plus, it isn’t just the numbers that Holliday put up in Oakland, it’s also how he arrived at those numbers. He wasn’t Manny-in-Boston bad, but he sure had the “just visiting” sign around his neck for 100 days. Plus, AL pitchers pounded him hard inside and he never adjusted.
So if you look at his and Bay’s market, it is pretty small. Only a few teams have the payroll flexibility to take on the contracts those two would want, and only maybe 2 teams in the AL can afford the risk that Holliday represents.
Posted 09/14 at 02:57 PM
Well, Matt Holliday is a Boras client and so is Mark Teixeira, so not only can I see him saying “Teixeira-like money,” but that Holliday is also the left field second coming of Willie Mays. Jason Bay, on the other hand, is on his own.
Posted 09/14 at 02:58 PM
For a guy with so many connections and years of service in MLB it sure seems like he’s playing out the string lately.
This “scoop” about agents screaming collusion is just an obvious point he’s talking about before anyone else does - primarily because it’s only a few weeks before the playoffs and that talk is generally reserved for the offseason. (Note: I didn’t mention it was a pennant “race.”)
Admittedly I haven’t read/watched much of him lately so maybe he’s still pumping out some good stuff here and there.
Posted 09/14 at 03:08 PM
Sure I’m not the only one who thinks Gammons lost his fastball some time in the 90s.
Posted 09/14 at 03:41 PM
I’m not gonna worry about Gammons when someone actually writes “Manny in Boston bad.”
Posted 09/14 at 04:32 PM
Jack Marshall said...
The key to Gammons was when Gabe Kaplar said to him on TV during the Red Sox WS celebration in 2004, “Come on, you can admit it—-we know you’re a Red Sox fan.” Gammons is miscast as a general MLB analyst…his great virtues have always been zeal, passion and partisanship, not objective commentary. He is at his best when he can root for his team.
Posted 09/14 at 04:35 PM
@Mark - I’ve never understood all the love for Gammons.
Posted 09/14 at 04:47 PM
Craig Calcaterra said...
Point taken, Jacob. Though I am the last person on the planet who can take anyone to task for forced pop cultural references.
Posted 09/14 at 04:54 PM
The Rabbit said...
I agree with Jim U. completely.
Posted 09/14 at 05:19 PM
Mike Jones said...
Overlooked so far is the most annoying bit of Gammons’ commentary, which is feeding the myth that “collusion” is something that comes out because those damn greedy players don’t get what they think they ought to. I don’t know how many times I’ve had to explain to people that the reason the players got a collusion verdict against the owners is that they had *direct evidence* of the owners colluding to hold down salaries. It wasn’t just sour grapes.
Posted 09/14 at 06:08 PM
Bob Rittner said...
Exactly Mike. It is overlooked, but the assumption is there and pollutes all discourse on the subject.
Posted 09/15 at 07:44 AM