July 4, 2009

Who is Shyster?


Roll mouse over dates
Daily Posts
July 2009
S M T W T F S



1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31




Player Search:
Plus our Statistical Definitions

Monthly Archives



Or you can search by:

StubHub is where fans buy and sell Yankees Tickets, Red Sox Tickets, White Sox Tickets, Mets Tickets and all other baseball tickets. If you are looking for World Series Tickets, ALCS Tickets or NLCS Tickets, you can find them at StubHub! More hot selling tickets include: Cubs Tickets, Astros Tickets, Dodgers Tickets, Angels Tickets and Detroit Tigers Tickets.

Gear up for baseball season with Chicago White Sox tickets and New York Yankees tickets. LA Angels tickets, Houston Astros tickets, and Atlanta Braves tickets are hot sellers! You can get Boston Red Sox tickets, San Diego Padres tickets or Chicago Cubs tickets for your favorite baseball fan. Coast to Coast Tickets has the best MLB tickets like Minnesota Twins tickets, LA Dodgers tickets, Milwaukee Brewers tickets, New York Met tickets and St. Louis Cardinals tickets.



Creative Commons License
All content on this site (including text, graphs, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Most Recent Comments

Shyster's Daily Circuit


Baseball. Blogging. Whenever.

Friday, July 03, 2009

My Morning in Exile

No work today, so I blogged from home. It's nice, though I'm not sure if it's less stressful than blogging from the office or not. On the one hand, I don't have to shower, shave, drive anywhere, answer the phone or work around meetings and stuff. On the other hand, in many important ways its easier to balance legal work with blogging than it is to balance things like Hot Wheels car parades, fights over which cartoons to watch and wives and fathers asking me to do things around the house. Upshot: if I ever convince someone to let me write from home full time, I'm going to rent an office.

  • This was here and not at NBC, but many people miss late night posts so I thought I'd bump it.


  • Baseball will raise awareness of -- and money for -- ALS during tomorrow's games. Good for baseball.


  • Weisman and Simers seem to get this stuff right, but everyone else at the L.A. Times is out to lunch when it comes to Manny Ramirez. The latest: they want you to boo him. Classy.


  • More on the Texas Rangers bailout. DuPuyspeak: the Rangers didn't need money for payroll, they're just trying to "help assure a stable environment" for the team. One wonders how unstable things would be if no one got paid today.


  • Scott Boras wants to use Japanese baseball as a bluff to enrich Stephen Strasburg. It ain't gonna work.


  • Marchman says Francoeur should be in the All-Star Game. Why you gotta hate like that, Tim?


  • Finally, the Indians are on pace to lose 100 games for the seventh time. Only seven? I would have lost that bet.


  • And with that I'm done for the Fourth of July weekend. Probably, anyway. If something strange or major happens -- of it I just have too many beers and get some time on my hands -- I may check in with some other stuff. If I don't, however, have yourself a merry little Independence Day.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 11:19am

    And That Happened

    Astros 7, Padres 2; Look, between my two bloggy spaces and the water cooler at work I have probably talked about Manny Ramirez more than anyone in the past couple of weeks. And I'll admit, my reasons for bringing him up are often tenuous at best. But nothing I've written about the guy is as tenuous as this bit from the game story, describing how a swarm of bees descended on Petco Park in the ninth inning: "The bees arrived more than 24 hours before Manny Ramirez makes his comeback from a 50-game suspension for violating baseball's drug policy, when the Los Angeles Dodgers open a three-game series against San Diego on Friday night." Did anyone get Manny's comment on the bees? Where does Plaschke stand on all of this? I WANT TO KNOW, DAMMIT!

    Mets 9, Pirates 8: In town for a makeup game, the Mets overcome Tim Redding getting shelled (2.1 IP, 6 H, 5 ER), and then overcome K-Rod blowing the save in the ninth (though he did vulture the win). Jerry Manuel: "We could have just said, `Let's pack up and head to Philly, it's a short flight, let's get this out of the way.'" "They chose to fight and I thought that was what was most impressive." I don't much like Jerry Manuel so I appreciate that maybe I'm being too hard on him here, but really, could your team have chosen to just pack it in, Jerry? Is that a potential option in the current Mets universe such that their choice not to do so is laudable?

    Reds 3, Diamondbacks 2: Joey Votto was the hero, going 4 for 6 and hitting the game winning single in the 10th. The Dbacks have lost ten of twelve. They dead? Yep, they're dead.

    Cardinals 5, Giants 2: Are we sure this was only a four game series? It feels like they've been playing for two solid weeks. Anyway, Todd Wellemeyer offers a bit of an F.U. to everyone in St. Louis who has been screaming for him to be sent down or disappeared or shot or whatever (7.1 IP, 7 H, 2 ER, 6K). A couple of RBI for Ryan Ludwick who, according to Rick Sutcliffe on Wednesday, needs to start hitting before Albert Pujols can expect to start seeing anything to hit. It was a moderately useful insight the first seven times he made it, but it declined in utility over the next dozen or so times it was repeated.

    Braves 5, Phillies 2: The Bravos sweep the phirst place Phils, bringing them within two games of first themselves. Or, put differently, making them three games more likely to do some stupid deal to try and contend this year instead of loading for bear in 2010. My view of things is that if they can contend with what they have, wonderful, I'll enjoy it. But any deal apart from unloading Jeff Francoeur is probably a bad move. As for this game, someone better check Bobby Cox for banned stimulants. He used 18 players in this one, and I don't think he's done that since Clinton's first term.

    Mariners 8, Yankees 4: Ichiro, Branyan and Chris Woodward of all people join in the Mariner hit parade, ending the Yanks' seven game winning streak.

    Cubs 9, Brewers 5: Derek Lee bangs in seven runs on a three run homer and a grand slam, as the Cubs shell Greenbrier East alum Seth McClung. Stupid Greenbrier East. Woodrow owns you, Spartans! Hells yeah!

    Angels 5, Orioles 2: Bobby Abreu flashes back several years and shows that yes, he is capable of hitting home runs. Two actually. Meanwhile, John Lackey flashes back to the non-2009 portions of his career to show that he can still pitch like an ace (8 IP, 4 H, 2 ER, 7K). Nothin' much doin' for Baltimore outside of a Luke Scott home run. Game story: "Orioles' 3B Ty Wigginton replaced Melvin Mora in the lineup. Mora asked for the night off after the trip to the West Coast." OK. For what it's worth, even my old man sucks it up and plays through jet lag when he visits my brother in San Diego, and he's 65 and flies coach. What, Mora couldn't have gotten a few winks on the plane?

    White Sox 4, Royals 1: Bruce Chen? Really? In the same season the Royals ran Horacio Ramirez out there? What, was Terrell Wade not available? Jung Bong won't return your calls, Dayton? Aw, don't look at me like that, whaddaya gonna do, ban me or someth----

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 5:35am

    Thursday, July 02, 2009

    Tiger Stadium Snuff Film

    I never thought I'd cry while watching an Eminem video, but the waterworks started at about the 3:05 mark of his new one.

    Detroit natives of a certain age may get a little misty through the whole thing.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 10:08pm

    Rany is banned by the Royals (NOW WITH UPDATE)

    Last week, Rany Jazayerli sent a heat-seeking missile in the direction of the Royals' medical staff. The Royals read it. As a result, the Royals have banned him. Banned him from what is not exactly clear inasmuch as Rany lives and works in Chicago and isn't exactly a constant presence at Kaufman Stadium, but banned he is.

    I'd be lying if I said I wasn't jealous.

    UPDATE: I've given this more thought.

    I'm still trying to get my brain around this. I mean, the Royals organization obviously reads Rany, or else they wouldn't have gotten mad at what he wrote. However, if they do read Rany, surely they realize that he's one of the best fans in the history of fandom. For years and years he has been optimistic about the Royals, giving them way more benefit of the doubt than they were probably ever entitled. No, it's never been blind faith -- Rany is not some mindless fanboy -- but he has long avoided the cynicism and hopelessness that tends to take over your more critically-minded followers of historically poor performing teams. More importantly, Rany is one of the team's most high-profile fans. In that capacity he gives voice to what many thousands of fans are thinking.

    In light of this, when Rany levels criticism, it's safe to assume that (a) it's serious criticism, not a cheap shot; and (b) many, many people who buy Royals tickets are thinking the same way. This doesn't mean you roll over, of course. To the contrary, when a guy like Rany says what he said, the Royals' first impulse should have been to ask themselves whether he had a point. If he did, great, it was a worthy comment. If he didn't, that's fine too. Call him a sonofabitch in the privacy of the team office and make it clear to anyone who matters (i.e. the trainer Rany went after) that he has the team's support and no one cares what this blogger thinks.

    But they didn't do that. They got defensive and pissy in a very public way. And by doing that, the Royals sent a signal to an important segment of their fan base -- the plugged-in segment -- that they can't tolerate reasoned criticism. And if one can't tolerate reasoned criticism, one isn't going to act on it.

    Which raises the question: In light of this, why on Earth would anyone with a brain continue to be a Royals fan?*

    UPDATE II: This is not the first time the Royals have acted so petulantly.

    UPDATE III: It's over, and while the Royals are apparently still barring their employees from appearing on Rany's radio show -- as is their right -- they have rescinded their threat to bar team-access to any station that airs Rany's show (got that?). Of course, as J.C. Bradbury noted on his Facebook post "They recanted only b/c they got caught." Specifically, because an Internet #### storm happened and everyone saw how ridiculous the Royals were being.

    None of this changes what I said above about the Royals. There's no escaping that they're focused on the wrong things. There's also no escaping that, if this how they respond to external dissent, there's no reason to believe that they're making the right decisions internally either, because all good decisions are made in a setting where people can feel free to say anything without fear of reprisal.

    This was probably stated too strongly and/or inartfully. I did not mean to say that Royals fans are stupid. I understand that fandom is not always a rational thing. The comment was merely intended to make even ardent Royals supporters think hard about their support for their team in light of this little development. I probably could have stated it better.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 3:16pm

    Meet Selena Roberts (and an actually worthy person too)

    Here's an event for you, at least if you're in Brooklyn this evening:

    Gelf's Varsity Letters sports reading series returns on Thursday, July 2, at 7:30 p.m., with a night dedicated to baseball. At this free monthly event in DUMBO, Brooklyn, hosted by Gelf and Jan Larsen Art, Scott Price, Selena Roberts, and members of the New York Daily News sports investigative team will read from and talk about their work, and take questions. Price has the wrenching tale of the life and death of [Mike Coolbaugh]. Roberts will speak about her controversial biography of Alex Rodriguez. And the Daily News team will discuss its exposé of Roger Clemens and steroids in baseball.

    Admission is free. Go to mock Selena Roberts, but stay to listen to Scott Price, whose Coolbaugh book sounds really, really good.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 2:30pm

    Hicks in hock

    The Rangers' financial woes continue:

    Amid increased internet chatter Wednesday that Tom Hicks’ sports group - Hicks Sports Group - financial woes are deepening and that the club has borrowed money from MLB’s rainy-day fund, team officials took a strange approach.

    They went silent.

    The chatter arose Wednesday after a local blog reported hearing on a national radio broadcast the team had borrowed $15 million from MLB to make its most recent payroll obligations and to fund ongoing operations. Asked about the reports, Hicks referred questions to team spokesman John Blake, who said the team would have no comment on the financial situation.

    It's only a matter of time before the Rangers' become baseball's General Motors.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 1:37pm

    Jason Bay to become a U.S. Citizen

    I think I read about this a couple of weeks ago, but today's the actual ceremony:

    Red Sox left fielder Jason Bay has long played America's pastime and will now be able to call himself an American. The 30-year-old player from Canada becomes a U.S. citizen Thursday afternoon in a ceremony at Boston's historic Faneuil Hall. Bay is from British Columbia and is the first Red Sox player to be naturalized since Dominican-born David Ortiz was sworn in last summer in Fenway Park.

    Sure, he'll tell you that it's because he's married to a U.S. citizen and that he plans to make his home here and all of that, but if you don't think this is a move borne of lingering embarrassment over the circumstances of the British North America Act, well, you're just crazy.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 1:10pm

    Jim Leyritz continues to impress

    Beautiful:

    Former major leaguer Jim Leyritz was arrested Thursday in South Florida on charges of domestic battery against his ex-wife, just two months before his trial on a DUI manslaughter charge was set to begin.

    Leyritz, 45, was arrested at his home in Davie, a Fort Lauderdale suburb, a police report said. He was being held in the Broward County Jail.

    Leyritz's ex-wife, Karrie, gave conflicting reports of what happened, according to a police officer who responded to a domestic disturbance at the house. She first told police they were arguing over child support when he struck her twice in the face and pushed her to the ground for writing a check without his permission. She later said her ex-husband dragged her out of bed and pushed her against the wall.

    This would be the ex-wife who, according to Leyritz's weepy interview last month, "moved back in to help with expenses and the kids" when he was in desperate straits following the fatal accident.

    You're welcome, jackass.

    UPDATE: Yes, I note the conflicting reports, and I also note that the article itself says that Leyritz told police that his ex-wife was drunk and hurt herself to retaliate for him trying to evict her. I have no idea what actually happened, but (a) it was apparently ugly either way; and (b) I've been calling Leyrtiz a jackass since October 1996 and I have no plans of stopping now.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 12:44pm

    Minnesota Ice

    I love Joe Mauer, but I'm guessing he's got no flow:

    Joe Mauer is from Minnesota. He is white. He plays Major League Baseball. He is considered something of a pretty boy. None of these four things outlaws him from practicing his secret hobby. All of them combined into one 6-foot-5, sideburn-wearing, .400-flirting catcher, however, makes for the unlikeliest rapper in the history of rap.

    “We know he loves it,” Minnesota Twins closer Joe Nathan says.

    “He does it in a studio in his house,” Twins outfielder Michael Cuddyer says.

    “I’ve heard stories,” outfielder Denard Span says. “I’ve heard he buries himself in the studio. But never heard the finished product with my own ears. Looking at him right now, I’m guessing it’s a cross between Vanilla Ice and Cypress Hill.”

    When I started my new job back in February, I made one or two off the cuff comments about "Watchmen," and suddenly I was transformed into the office comic book geek. Never mind that, aside from a handful of well-known graphic novels, I own virtually no comic books. For me it's basically "Watchmen," some assorted Batman stuff and that's it. But when people don't know your personal habits very well, they tend to latch onto the first semi-defining trait of which they hear. I mentioned a comic book, so I'm the comic book guy, and that's just how it kind of goes in offices. Which is one of the many reasons why you don't even joke about some crap at work.

    This strikes me as one of those deals. Mauer probably had one too many Sheep Head Ales, beatbox into a tape recorder, and the rest is somewhat inaccurate history.

    (thanks to YankeeFanLen for the link)

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 12:22pm

    My Morning in Exile

    Things I wrote while trying to decide whether it would worse to be a lawyer handling the Michael Jackson estate or a lawyer having to tell this woman's family that, no, there probably isn't a viable products liability lawsuit coming out of this. Wait, that's crazy. Guys will be lining up to file that lawsuit, and this time next year your thermostat will have a 36-point font:

  • The Cubs: Jimmy Stewart :: Jeff Baker: Kim Novak


  • Don't be ridiculous, of course you're going to cheer for Manny Ramirez.


  • Can anyone refresh my memory as to why Braves fans would boo Gary Sheffield? And don't say "because he's a d*ck," because Jason already said that.


  • There's another possibility we might consider. Raimus might be trying to defect.


  • Mommy's alright, Daddy's alright, they just seem a little weird . . . surrender, surrender . . .but don't give yourself away.


  • I shall call him . . . Mini-me!


  • Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 11:38am

    And That Happened

    A pinch is a device which creates, like, a cardiac arrest for any broadband electrical circuitry. Better yet, a pinch is a bomb - now, but without the bomb. See, when a nuclear weapon detonates, it unleashes an electromagnetic pulse which shuts down any power source within its blast radius. Now that tends not to matter in most cases, because the nuclear weapon usually destroys anything you might need power for anyway. But see, a pinch creates a similar electromagnetic pulse, but without the fuss of mass destruction and death. So instead of Hiroshima, you'd be getting the 1960s with Koufax on the mound.

    I think one of those things was set off last night, as there were all manner of pathetic offensive/excellent pitching performances, characterized by multiple 1-0 games. Many of these games can be broken down into three categories: the pitcher who pitched great and won; the pitcher who pitched great and got boned; and the blind pig of a batter who managed to find the one stinkin' truffle of a run that made the difference. Oh, and there's a nice Monty Python bit down in the Yankees-Mariners recap and some totally uncalled for Canada bashing down in the Blue Jays-Rays item. Enjoy!

    Dodgers 1, Rockies 0: Won: Ramon Troncoso, but he was a reliever. Clayton Kershaw started but couldn't hang around for the win because he walked too many guys and threw 97 pitches in five innings. Boned: Jason Hammell (8 IP, 5 H, 1 ER, 5K), who pitched way better than Kershaw but had no blind pig on his side. Blind Pig: Rafael Furcal with an RBI single.

    Reds 1, Diamondbacks 0: Won: Johnny Cueto (6 IP, 1 H, 0 ER 8K); Boned: Jon Garland (6 IP, 6 H, 1 ER); Blind Pig: Joey Votto with an RBI single.

    Mets 1, Brewers 0: Won: Mike Pelfrey (7.2 IP, 6 H, 0 ER, 6K). Boned: Yovani Gallardo (7 IP, 5 H, 1 ER, 12K). Blind Pig: Ryan Church, RBI single.

    OK, so it was only three, but I don't recall any days in the past couple of years with even that many 1-0 games. Anyway:

    Yankees 4, Mariners 2: Bring out your dead! Bring out your dead!

    Buster Olney: Here's one-
    Cart-master: Ninepence.
    Alex Rodriguez: (feebly) I'm not dead!
    Cart-master: (surprised) What?
    Buster Olney: Nothing! Here's your ninepence....
    Alex Rodriguez: I'm not dead!
    Cart-master: 'Ere! 'E says 'e's not dead!
    Buster Olney: Yes he is.
    Alex Rodriguez: I'm not!
    Cart-master: 'E isn't?
    Buster Olney: Well... he will be soon-- he's very ill...
    Alex Rodriguez: I'm getting better!
    Buster Olney: No you're not, you'll be stone dead in a moment.
    Alex Rodriguez: I feel happy! I feel happy! (2-4, HR, 2 RBI)

    Red Sox 6, Orioles 5: Back atcha, Baltimore! The O's blow a 5-1 lead in the ninth and woof it away in the 11th. "I thought today was a great opportunity for our bullpen to come show the league what we're really made of," Papelbon said after the game. "I think we answered that with flying colors." And that answer is that the bullpen is made out of mixed metaphors until the cows come home to roost.

    Braves 11, Phillies 1: Following up on yesterday's comment, I did tell Bill at Crashburn Alley that the Braves would lose the Hamels-Jurrjens game, so I was technically wrong. Still, I predicted Atlanta winning two of three, so they can vindicate me with a loss tomorrow. Jair Jurrjens pitched better than the guys up in the 1-0 games (7 IP, 1 H, 1 R, 6K) and the Braves actually got some offense for a damn change.

    Cubs 4, Pirates 1: That's three straight wins for Randy Wells (7 IP, 6 H, 1 ER). Some other good news: Aramis Ramirez is ready to rehab, and now the Cubs get to see how he plays in Peoria.

    White Sox 6, Indians 2: Oh come on cut the rah rah sh*t Taylor! Year after this I go free agent. Plus me and my agent got a couple of plans for life after baseball. So I am not about to risk major injury or displace this property for a collection of stiffs!

    Athletics 5, Tigers 1: This is kind of how the A's drew it up in the offseason: Bombs from Giambi and Cust, a solid start from Dallas Braden and a nice win at home. Two facts from the game story: (1) "The 38-year-old Giambi, who has been dealing with sore legs . . ."; and (2) "[Giambi] was in a 2-for-28 stretch before the homer after striking out in his first two at-bats." How in the hell are his legs getting sore? Turning on his heel and walking back to the bench too hard?

    Twins 5, Royals 1: Joe Mauer was 3 for 3, knucklebaler R.A. Dickey was perfect for an inning and a third, the Twins won, and Justin Morneau experienced tightness in his groin. Only one of these facts is truly significant in the grand scheme of things, but good for Mauer and the Twins and bad news for Morneau all the same.

    Marlins 5, Nationals 3: From the game story: "Asked to explain Florida's baffling mastery of the Washington Nationals, Marlins manager Fredi Gonzalez offered the simplest explanation. 'We've been lucky,' he said." Wait. Since when did beating the Nationals on a regular basis constitute "baffling mastery" as opposed to "utter inevitability?"

    Cardinals 2, Giants 1: Both Adam Wainwright (9 IP, 6 H, 1 ER, 12K) and Matt Cain (7 IP, 6 H, 1 ER) were kinda boned in what I'm choosing to call Game 3 of "Molina Fest." Worth noting in light of my little anti-La Russa bit on Tuesday, that this is exactly the kind of game where an extra bat or two off the bench -- as opposed to three or four pitchers you have no intention of using down in the bullpen -- might come in handy once in a while. And for the record, I had this on in the background and found Sutcliffe somewhat less annoying than he was when I ranted about him last week. I can only assume that I either missed all of the obnoxious parts or else the pod people got hold of him the other day and replaced him with a less-assaulting replica.

    Rangers 9, Angels 7: This looked like a wild one, at least from the box score. How wild? Jarrod Saltalamacchia struck out yet still scored in the sixth inning.

    Astros 7, Padres 1: Not much interesting here, but this is interesting "The Padres say Friday night's game against Manny Ramirez and the Los Angeles Dodgers is a sellout." But . . . but . . . Bill Plaschke said we shouldn't approve of Manny Ramirez's vile and wicked ways!

    Blue Jays 5, Rays 0: Ricky Romero (8 IP, 4 H, 0 ER, 7K) can join the 1-0 All-Stars along with Jurrjens. Oh, and yesterday was Canada Day, too. For those of you who don't know, Canada Day celebrates the anniversary of the 1 July 1867 enactment of the British North America Act, which defiantly declared Canada's independence from the evil British and promised that blood will be shed in the interests of Canadian freedom if necessary. Wait . . .what's that? Oh, I'm sorry, I got that wrong. The Act actually declared that Canada was requesting to form a federation, with said request being gradually granted by British fiat over multiple ensuing decades. All while being overseen by Canada's Governor General, who, to this very day, remains in place as a viceregal representative of Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II, who still goes by the title The Queen in Right of Canada. Inspiring, when you think about it.*

    *Before Jonah Keri, Pete Toms and the ghost of John Brattain come after me for this gratuitous anti-Canadian rant, please know that both of my maternal grandparents hailed from the Great White North. Maybe that's a weak (and in and of itself offensive) defense for my thinly-veiled American exceptionalism, but I'm hoping that this, combined with my general tolerance/occasional enjoyment of Rush, my love of Tim Hortons Timbits, and the fact that my family hosted a visiting table tennis player during the 1984 Canusa Games will get me off the hook. Though, in the interests of full disclosure, I feel obligated to say that we all hated that table tennis kid and were happy when he went back home to Hamilton.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 5:30am

    Wednesday, July 01, 2009

    Just shut him down now

    Grady Sizemore's gonna need surgery:

    Indians All-Star center fielder Grady Sizemore will likely undergo postseason surgery on his inflamed left elbow, trainer Lonnie Soloff said Tuesday.

    Soloff said "there's a high index of suspicion" that Sizemore will need an operation at some point. Soloff, speaking before the last-place Indians hosted the Chicago White Sox on Tuesday night, said Sizemore will have to play with soreness in his elbow for the remainder of the season.

    Sizemore would likely have an arthroscopic procedure on his elbow, which has bothered him since spring training. Sizemore has synovitis, an inflammation of the joint lining.

    I'll defer to Will Carroll or a doctor or something on this, but it strikes me that it's best to avoid using inflamed body parts in most situations. In light of this, why not just perform the surgery now and (a) avoid any risk of aggravating the condition; and (b) ensure maximum effectiveness for games that actually matter?*

    *This advice makes the safe assumption that nothing else that happens with the 2009 Indians matters.



    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 3:05pm

    Mariano the Tiger

    Inspired by my post about Mariano's potential trade to the Tigers, Grand Cards investigates exactly what such a thing would have meant:

    Let's say that trade goes through and Rivera becomes a Tiger in 1995. Other than altering the course of NY Yankees history, what does it do for the Tigers? For Rivera?

    I started to jump to conclusions i.e., no way Rivera reaches 500 saves, it makes no difference to the Tigers who suffered from poor pitching, hitting and defense in addition to closer issues (although Todd Jones was more than serviceable in his better years), they would have screwed it up and traded Rivera in 1999 for Sterling Hitchcock, so why bother etc.

    However, I thought that I would pull a few numbers to see what I could make of it.

    Click through for the data.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 2:56pm

    My Morning in Exile

    Signs you blog too much: you get angrier at a sluggish Internet connection than you would at, say, a punch in the face or an insult of your mother or something. "I only have SEVEN Firefox windows open!!! Why won't this page load faster!!!"

  • No one wants to play for Ozzie Guillen. Ozzie Guillen doesn't care. Neither of these things are surprising.


  • The Yankees thought about trading Rivera to the Tigers once. Thank God they didn't, because then the world never would have known the joy of Todd Jones' mustache.


  • Roger Clemens has suffered yet another legal setback. This is not surprising. Well, not to anyone except this wonderful NBC commenter:


  • Because Clemens tried to defend himself against the claims of Mcnamee that makes him stupid according to this clown Calcaterra? What a dumb article written by a complete idiot and this isnt the first one he's written thats been this bad either. I ask the writer of this BS, how would you like him to defend himself? Mcnamee should be responsible for what he said and should not get any kind of protection by the feds, yet more proof the legal system is a joke.

    If you think I simply took the high road and let that stuff pass, well, you're simply not familiar with my work.

  • Believe it or not, Manny Ramirez returning to the Dodgers presents an opportunity for the Rockies.


  • High anxiety


  • Finally, a cost benefit analysis of a players' PED use with math and everything, though I didn't post it for the math.


  • I'm not totally punting the rest of the day, but I will be quiet for the next couple of hours as I get caught up with other things. Check back this afternoon for more bloggy goodness.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 11:32am

    Jack Clark taunts the Mets

    Baseball fans of a certain age (i.e. my age) will recall the Mets-Cardinals rivalry of the mid-to-late 1980s as just about the best in baseball. It's been a long time since then so you have to figure the bad blood has subsided. In the case of Jack Clark -- who was interviewed on Cardinals radio yesterday -- you'd figure wrong. Here's Clark on playing with Mets in the All-Star Game:

    “I wanted to let them know I wasn’t glad to be there with them and their teammate, didn’t want to be on any team or be a teammate with them, and we were going to battle.

    Here's Clark on Gary Carter:

    "[He] talked his way more into the Hall of Fame than deserving it . . . [it was] pretty sickening and disgusting to everybody else."

    Here's Clark on Howard Johnson's allegedly corked bat:

    “That just goes to show those guys were trying to cheat and, you know, it didn’t end up working for them anyhow. So if his was corked, I’m sure a few other guys’ over there were corked, also.”

    I think the only way to resolve this is an old-timers series between the 1985-87 Cardinals and the 1985-87 Mets. Anyone have Bob Forsch's phone number?

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 9:25am

    New and improved IIATMS

    Longtime friend-of-the-blog Jason at IIATMS has new digs with a radically-different look, only a slightly different URL, and the same excellent content. The new site can be found here.

    Adjust your browsers accordingly.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 8:57am

    And That Happened

    I have a book review and a brief due today, two opinions on pending legislation due tomorrow, and it's my 14th wedding anniversary. By all rights, I should have punted the box scores last night and tried to get a head start on some of that other stuff (and maybe taken some time to think about how to spend my 14th wedding anniversary). But then my palms started itchin' and my fingers started twitchin' and whatever it is that forces me to sit down and crack wise about baseball games every damn day just sort of took over. At least that's what I'm going to tell my editor, my boss, and my wife when they all track me down later today to yell at me. Think they'll understand?

    Orioles 11, Red Sox 10: John Smoltz pitched better (4 IP, 3 H, 1 ER) but had to leave when the rains came. I wouldn't worry about the short outing, however, because Francona may want him in the bullpen. Why? Because Boston blew a 10-1 lead after their half of the seventh. Among the big blows was an Oscar Salazar pinch-hit three run homer and a Nick Markakis two-run double off of Papelbon after being 0-7 against him entering the game. It was the biggest comeback in Baltimore Orioles history, and one that had to be particularly sweet for Os fans who have had to put up with so many interlopers in their ballpark for Sox games in recent years.

    Pirates 3, Cubs 0: Ross Ohlendorf and Freddy Sanchez got to the ballpark, realized that they were the only two Pirates not traded yesterday, and went about their business, Bugs Bunny vs. Gashouse Gorillas-style: Ohlendorf shut out the Cubs over seven innings (pasting those pathetic palookas with his powerful, paralyzing, perfect pachydermous percussion pitch) and Sanchez scored one run and drove in the other two for Pittsburgh. Most people thought Sanchez would be out on that run he scored in the fourth because Ted Lilly had the ball and was waiting for him at home plate. Then again, most people probably didn't count on Sanchez having that 1940s pinup in his back pocket to distract Lilly either.

    Braves 5, Phillies 4: I told Bill at Crashburn Alley that the Braves would take two out of three in this series. So far, so good. I never would have bet on the Bravos coming back in extra innings after coughing up two late homers like they did in this one, however, because they just don't do that. Martin Prado was 4-5 with four RBI, including the game-winner in the 10th. My guess is that puts Kelly Johnson on the bench until the day Bobby Cox is buried in the cold, cold ground.

    Rays 4, Blue Jays 1: I was gonna get all cute and quote some song lyrics here, but I couldn't decide if I should go with "Running to Stand Still," or "Hold On, I'm Comin'." I suppose that all depends on how the Red Sox and Yankees do. Either way I have this feeling that the AL East is going to be redonkulously exciting in the second half.

    Diamondbacks 6, Reds 2: Danny Haren's teammates have failed to show up for him so many times this season that he would have been forgiven if he had picked up a bat and beat them silly. Lucky for everyone involved Haren is a clearer thinking guy than I am and decided to simply take the bat to the opposition, going 2 for 2 with a homer and a double. Oh, and he pitched seven innings of one run ball while striking out nine. He then drove the team bus back to the hotel, watched game film, set the lineups for the next week, called Billy Beane and asked what he'd want for Matt Holliday and started spitballin' ideas for next season's promotional calendar.

    Giants 6, Cardinals 3: You had to figure Chris Carpenter was going to come back down to Earth eventually. You just didn't figure on it happening all at once (5 IP, 11 H, 6 ER), especially against an offense like the Giants'. Despite the loss, Pujols had his requisite two home runs.

    Brewers 6, Mets 3: That's five losses in a row for the Metropolitans, capping off a lovely 9-18 June. Though that's maybe not as important as the fact that, on June 1st, they were 2.5 games out of first and now, on July 1st, they're only 3 games out. My God, the NL East is horrifying this year.

    White Sox 11, Indians 4: Crisco. Bardol. Vagisil. Any one of them will give you another two to three inches drop on your curve ball. Of course if the umps are watching me real close I'll rub a little jalapeno up my nose, get it runnin', and if I need to load the ball up I just [wipe] wipe my nose. Hey, I haven't got an arm like you, kid. I have to put anything on it I can find. Someday you will too. [note: all Indians losses are going to get "Major League" quotes until Eric Wedge is fired or they win three in a row, whichever comes first].

    Twins 2, Royals 1: The game story breaks out the first "hapless" I've seen in at least a year. It also notes that the Royals "are among the AL's worst in hitting, runs, slugging percentage and on-base percentage." Anyone ever make a movie about the Royals? Maybe I should be quoting that instead.

    Marlins 7, Nationals 5: I called the Cardinals a one man gang the other day. So too are Hanley's Fish (2-4, 4 RBI).

    Rangers 9, Angels 5: Marlon Byrd homered twice and drove in five runs. Let's hear it for Victor Conte's supplements, everyone!

    Yankees 8, Mariners 5: Mariano Rivera threw out the game's first pitch, yet somehow came back in in the ninth to get the save. Don Wakamatsu, showing lots of class, decided not to protest the game.

    Tigers 5, A's 3: Armando Galarraga walked six guys. It's not everyday that you can do that and win, but then again, it was the A's he was facing and they are notably poor at making anyone pay for anything. The A's have plugged in Gio Gonzalez into the rotation three or four or maybe fifty times this season, but pretty soon that experiment has to end, right? Because he's, like, terrible. Yesterday he gave up three runs on seven hits in five innings, and you can make the argument that that's his best start of the year.

    Padres 4, Astros 3: Padres win, but Adrian Gonzalez got hurt. Hard to tell if it's major. Gonzalez doesn't know himself: "Sometimes I feel something and I wake up the next morning and I feel great. Then sometimes I wake up and something aches that I didn't feel the night before." I'm not sure why, but upon reading that I almost immediately got a sonic image of that statement being sung by Kevin Cronin over slowly ascending chords and making an almost perfect REO Speedwagon song.

    Rockies 3, Dodgers 0: Jason Marquis pitches the game of his life (CG, SHO, 2 H, 3 K, 0 BB), and only needed 86 (!) pitches to do it. And Jim Tracy is the best quote in baseball: "In the seven-plus years I've sat behind a desk like this, that's the first time I've seen a starting pitcher throw a nine-inning, complete-game shutout and do it with less than 90 pitches." He watches games from his desk? I've heard of hands-off managers before, but that's ridiculous. In other news, I was finally getting used to the idea that Manny coming back on Friday would be anti-climatic because the Dodgers simply didn't need him too bad. This skid they're on is changing my mind back again.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 5:41am

    Tuesday, June 30, 2009

    Why I can’t stand Tony La Russa

    Buried in this story about Khalil Greene going back on the DL is this nugget:

    The Cardinals purchased the contract of 24-year-old righty Clayton Mortensen from Triple-A Memphis. That move restores pitching staff to 13 after one day with a dozen following the acquisition of Mark DeRosa from the Indians.

    "Restores." And one whole day with a twelve-man staff? Whatever did the Cardinals do to survive such dire straits? Oh wait, they didn't. They got killed by the Giants last night. I'm sure the thirteenth man in the pen would have made the difference.

    There was a time -- I think it was a week ago Thursday -- when teams managed to get by with something less than thirteen men in the pen. The greatest trick that Tony La Russa ever pulled was convincing baseball that such a thing was unthinkable.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 4:34pm

    Faster than the speed of Wikipedia

    It's being reported that the Nats and Pirates are about to consummate a Nyjer Morgan for Lastings Milledge trade. Reader MooseInOhio emails to tell me that someone in Nyjer Morgan nation has already updated his Wikipedia page to reflect that the deal is done:

    Nyjer Jamid Morgan (born July 2, 1980, in San Francisco, California) is an American Major League Baseball outfielder with the Washington Nationals Organization . . . On June 30, 2009 Morgan Was Officially Traded To the Washington Nationals For Outfielder Lastings Milledge. Morgan occasionally refers to himself as "Tony Plush", which he says is his gentleman's name.

    The world moves too damn fast sometimes.

    Wait, what was that about "Tony Plush" again?

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 3:32pm

    Deep Thoughts

    The other gig gives me access to the AP and Getty photo wire, each of which contains thousands upon thousands of pictures. And I can pick anything I want. Without realizing it, however, I posted pictures of two mulleted pitchers today, and made specific mention of Tommy Hanson's mullet yesterday (I had a pic of it up, but decided to go with Brandon Phillips at the last minute).

    Someone tell me: is this evidence that the baseball mullet is making a comeback, or do I just have some unconscious fetish that's seeking the rare ones out?

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 3:06pm

    Great Moments in Selection Bias

    Yesterday, the Chicago Tribune's Phil Rogers opined -- ridiculously, I noted -- that the Cubs should waive Carlos Zambrano. Tribune readers agree:

    Your team wants Carlos Zambrano? Go ahead, take him.

    That's what I proposed after Zambrano turned in another knuckleheaded performance on Sunday at U.S. Cellular Field. I suggested Cubs GM Jim Hendry put him on waivers and essentially give him away if any team would take on his salary.

    It struck many as a radical idea, but not most.

    To my great surprise, I am in the majority on this one. The Tribune received more than 11,000 responses to a reader poll, and 57.2 percent of you agreed with me.

    I wouldn't crow if I were you, Phil. To vote in that poll, you had to have read to the end of your column first. Such a sample is, by definition, unscientific inasmuch as it ensures that only blithering idiots will respond.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 2:43pm

    My Morning in Exile

    In terms of posts it was a slow morning, but the morning itself was anything but slow. In the wake of that alleged list of the 2003 steroid test positives, I put on my reporter hat and actually called sources and cross checked and wrote stuff down and everything. That's hard work! Someone please remind me of that the next time I slam a reporter for something. For now I'm returning to blogging because that is WAY easier.

  • Roto Info's list has been officially debunked. Someone may have done it before me, but I did my own independent debunking here.


  • My dad is a retired weatherman for the National Weather Service. His oldest joke is that he picked the perfect profession because where else can you be so wrong all the time and still get paid? Answer: you can be Scott Boras.


  • Behold my second -- and last -- use of the term "Lincecawesome." At least for a while.


  • Finally, I really didn't want to think about Jeff Francouer's underwear this morning, but I'll be damned if I didn't anyway.


  • And in case you're curious: my "reporters' hat" is a throwback Braves number with the lowercase "a" and a "press" card taped to the brim.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 12:23pm

    Great Moments in Bloggy Ethics

    So, Marchman posts a link to a guy who claims to have a list of the 2003 drug test failures. Then Jay wonders whether Marchman posting the link is a hypocritical move based on stuff Marchman has said in the past about trafficking in this kind of stuff. I scanned through the list quickly, and then, just as I was trying to figure out whether I would be committing any ethical violation by linking to it, it disappears.

    Hurm.

    So to sum up: we have an intermittently invisible list of unsubstantiated names creating a hypothetical blogger ethics problem.

    In other words, just another day at the office in the steroids era.

    UPDATE: I was able to get the list again, but I personally don't feel comfortable reproducing it unless and until it has some sort of confirmation. If you're really curious you can work your way through the above links and try your luck with the wonky link to the actual names. My only comment: if the list is accurate, there are maybe 2-3 names on it that will raise an eyebrow but no one (I don't think, anyway) whose name on the list will cause anyone to alter their perception of baseball history or anything. I think the biggest surprise is the number of fat and out of shape guys listed. The sort of names who make you wonder whether PEDs actually do anything for anyone.

    UPDATE II: It's been suggested by those who have seen the list that I am perhaps underselling the names on it. I think there's some truth to that. My point, though, wasn't that there aren't big names. There clearly are. It's that there are very few names who would surprise you if someone told you today that they used steroids. Only one seems like both a big name and a surprise in that regard. That's all I meant.

    That said: I am not going to link it and I'm not going to discuss any names on it unless and until there is some confirmation. For what it's worth, though I'm not a reporter, I'm seeking some at the moment.

    UPDATE III: Still not discussing names ON the list, but MatthewA makes a good point in the comments: Jason Grimsley's name is NOT on the list, and by all accounts it should be. We'll see what shakes out of all of this, but that omission is a major blow to the list's credibility.

    UPDATE IV: Further basis for doubt, from reader Peter:

    The list is obviously in Divisional order going from East to West, AL to NL - but testing was reportedly random, a few players at a time, and over the course of the season. So tests would be stored either in the order they were tested or in some other easily sortable data model - like alphabetical ordering, or something that made any empirical sense. This list is a guy who went through the rosters of each team, picked out the names he thought sounded good, and pruned it down to the number he wanted. And there aren't NEARLY enough fringe players here - we've heard repeatedly that the pressure is for people to take drugs to make the leap to the show.

    you shouldn't have to be a lawyer to have a little sense of prudence.


    Good point, though it's possible that either (a) the person who got it was working from a hard copy and sorted it or (b) the list was at one point compiled in team order for reporting back purposes, be it to union reps or the ballclubs, or what have you. That said, yes, prudence and skepticism is in order.

    UPDATE V: I have spoken with someone who is definitely in a position to know about the veracity of the list and that person says -- definitively -- that the list is a fake. There are multiple names that aren't on it that would be if this was the real McCoy and vice-versa.

    Case closed. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm off to beat the living crap out of the blogger who made it up. It's rough out here for a blogger, and we sure as hell don't need anyone else doing things to discredit the medium.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 8:57am

    And That Happened

    White Sox 6, Indians 3: Nice Indians' debut for Chris Perez: He hit the first two batters he faced, walked the bases loaded and then gave up a fielder's choice, an RBI double, a wild pitch and run-scoring single. One of the guys he hit -- Alexei Ramirez -- took it in the head and had to leave the game. Congratulations, Mark Shapiro and Eric Wedge! After fifteen years of respectability, you have finally brought the Indians back around full-circle to "Major League" territory, complete with Rick Vaughn on the mound.

    Cubs 3, Pirates 1: Rich Harden was impressive, striking out nine and giving up only one run -- while scattering nine hits -- over seven innings. Phil Rogers will likely call for the Cubs to waive him tomorrow. In other news, this may have been the perfect Craig day at the ballpark: small crowd, weekday game, not too hot, good pitching, done in 2:17. Really makes me wish I was there. I can almost taste the Yuengling.

    Rays 4, Blue Jays 1: Roy Halladay came back and was good (6 IP, 5 H, 2 ER, 7K), but not good enough. Carl Crawford hit a two-run homer, got another hit and stole a base. Pat Burrell too. The homer I mean. If he stole a base I probably would have led with that.

    Red Sox 4, Orioles 0: Jon Lester was fantastic (7 IP, 5 H, 0 ER, 8K) and J.D. Drew homered, tripled, and singled, driving in two. "Baltimore citizenry welcome Boston conquerors: 'we kept your rooms just the way you left them'." The Red Sox are 22-9 at Camden Yards since the end of 2005 and have won eight straight there.

    Giants 10, Cardinals 0: Holy crap, Tim Lincecum is good (CG, SHO, 2 H, 8K, 0 BB). Clayton Mortensen hitting Aaron Roward on the knee with a pitch in the seventh was the hardest hit the Cardinals had all night.

    Marlins 4, Nationals 2: Florida vs. Washington, on a Monday night in Miami, with a rain delay. It says that paid attendance was over 10,000. What do you suppose the real attendance was. Seventeen? Thirty?

    Brewers 10, Mets 6: According to the Journal-Sentinel's Tom Haudricourt, Gary Sheffield was booed heavily each time he came to bat. Sheffield was traded away from Milwaukee over seventeen years ago. Sure, he left as a very, very unpopular Brewer, having called out the team's pitchers and allegedly tanked plays at third base on purpose. Either way, though, seventeen years is a long time to hold a grudge, isn't it? Willie Randolph was the starting second basemen and Jim Gantner was the starting third baseman on Sheff's last Brewer club. Rick Dempsey was on that roster. Maybe they should let it go, ya know?

    Royals 4, Twins 2: Luke Hochevar has had one dawg of a start since his recall on June 6th, but the others have been aces, including this one (7 IP, 2 H. 0 ER). Like J.D. Drew in the Red Sox game, Miguel Olivo came a double short of the cycle, driving in two runs.

    Angels 5, Rangers 4: The Angels are starting to pull away from Texas. This saddens me because I think I may have been the only person in the free world who picked Texas to win the west before the season started and I don't want to see them slide out of contention. Kendry Morales and Juan Rivera did the damage for Anaheim, driving in a pair each.

    Astros 3, Padres 1: Roy Oswalt's still got it (CG, 2 H, 1 ER 8K), as he continues to own San Diego.

    Athletics 7, Tigers 1: Rick Porcello was beat up by an A's offense that doesn't beat up many, giving up five runs on nine hits. This is one of the better passages from a game story this year: "After Porcello was chased, left-hander Fu-Te Ni struck out Giambi in his major league debut. Ni didn't know who Giambi was, and he raised his eyebrows in surprise when told of Giambi's achievements."

    Dodgers 4, Rockies 2: The Dodgers win it on a walkoff homer by Andre Ethier, but it sure took a while to get there. The Dodgers used eight pitchers, so Joe Torre is probably going to be sore today from all of that walking back and forth to the mound.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 5:41am

    Monday, June 29, 2009

    Even more self-promotion

    Here I am talking Phillies-Braves (mostly Braves) over at Crashburn Alley.


    This is by far my most humiliating day as a blogger. I posted very few things, and what I did post consisted of two interviews of me and a post about my mail. If I had a publicist I'd give him a raise right now, but I don't have a publicist so I'm going to go home and drink off the overexposure.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 4:44pm

    Programming Note

    Sorry for the slow afternoon, but the day job is kicking my butt today. As such, I may not have anything new this afternoon.

    In the meantime, know that this morning's Bucky Dent mystery has been solved. The cards, it seems, were sent by Josh Wilker's publisher. Wilker, as you all know, is the proprietor of the wonderful Cardboard Gods, and that Cardboard Godly goodness is being turned into a book, due out next fall. The cards were to whet the appetite. Though I tend to be dismissive of viral marketing, this one wasn't terribly viral, wasn't too over the top in terms of marketing, and in my view was a lot of fun. So consider my appetite whetted and consider Josh's publisher absolved of aggravated marketing.

    Enjoy the rest of your afternoon, folks.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 2:41pm

    More Self Promotion

    I was interviewed by Russ Smith over at Splice Today, and the results are up here.

    Among the covered topics: the future of the Orioles, the future of the Braves, the future of PED scandals, Eric Wedge's lack of a future, and whether, if forced to choose, I'd rather watch a national FOX broadcast or a national ESPN broadcast. Unfortunately, suicide was not an option, so I had to pick one.

    Thanks for the use of the room, Russ.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 11:45am

    My Morning in Exile

    Bucky Dent is nice, but I was really hoping for a Joe Shlabotnik . ..

  • Contrary to popular belief, Matt Wieters is not omnipotent. Indeed, he's not even monopotent these days.


  • Milton Bradley may cause a lot of problems, but trying to draw walks doesn't seem like it should be listed as one of them.


  • The Cubs should release Carlos Zambrano. In Bizarro World.


  • Call me crazy, but I like to be aware that a baseball game is happening when I go to the ballpark.


  • Mets and Yankees fans have forgotten how to taunt.


  • Finally, Gary Matthews Jr. isn't a deadbeat dad, but he's certainly not that generous a one either.


  • Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 11:15am

    Mystery

    I got a letter in the mail on Saturday addressed to "Craig Calcaterra, Shysterball." Inside was a mint condition 1978 Topps Bucky Dent card. No return address. No note, no nothing else accompanying it. New York City postmark. Typewritten address label. Hurm.

    I haven't died in the last 48 hours, so I'm ruling out anthrax attack. Bucky Dent hasn't died in that time either, so, for the time being at least, I'm (sadly) ruling out a baseball-themed serial killer tipping me off to his victims as part of an elaborate cat-and-mouse game. It could be some kind of occult thing in which someone has substituted the Cardboard Gods for the traditional tarot deck with Bucky Dent as the Death Card, but anyone who would take the time to do that would probably not have used a business envelope and probably would have sealed it with wax because that's just kind of how those people roll. Out of an abundance of caution, however, I have sent the police to Josh Wilker's house.

    I appreciate the card, actually. It's kind of cool, and if whoever sent it intended it as a gift, thank you. I worry, however, that someone sent it to me in an effort to anger me, mistakenly thinking that I'm a Red Sox fan. If that was the intent, you have failed. I met Bucky Dent at spring training in 1982 and he was really nice to my brother and I. He also spent some time in Columbus managing the Clippers, and by all accounts was a nice addition to the community. I've got no ill-will towards Dent, so I do hope no one's deviousness was wasted.

    Part of me doesn't want to find out who sent it because mysteries are fun. But I must admit that I remain perplexed this morning.

    UPDATE: Pinto got a George Scott the other day. The folks at Purple Row got a Bucky Dent too. As David mentions in the comments, this smells like viral marketing. Without looking it up, I wonder if a book is coming out about the Yankees-Red Sox rivalry.

    UPDATE II: Will Carroll got a Steve Swisher. Maybe this is viral marketing for Wilker's book?

    UPDATE III: Add Rich Lederer and Jon Wiesman to the list of card recipients.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 9:00am

    And That Happened

    Reds 8, Indians 1: It was Brandon Phillips' birthday and he beat up his old team to celebrate (3-5, 3 RBI). But he overplayed it: "It's good to have a game like I did today, especially on my birthday and against the guys you used to play for. Today, I was like, 'I'm going to show the Indians what they missed out on.'" Please, Brandon. They gave you 462 major league plate appearances and you gave them .206/.246/.310. They also gave you parts of four seasons in Buffalo, and you gave them 269/.329/.411. It's nice of you to show them what they missed out on, but maybe if you had showed some of it, oh, 5, 6, 7 years ago, you'd be the starting second baseman for the Indians today. But happy birthday anyway.

    Braves 2, Red Sox 1: Look, you can spin it any way you want to, Boston fans, but you got beat by a kid with a mullet yesterday. But he's a good kid. Hanson's last three starts: 17.1 IP, 9 hits, 0 ER. And that ain't against no tomato cans, neither: that's against the Red Sox, the Yankees, and the Reds in that playpen they call a ballpark.

    Yankees 4, Mets 2: Mariano Rivera got his 500th save. More impressive: he drew a bases-loaded walk, giving him his first career RBI in 15 seasons. Francisco Rodriguez gave it up, which in some cosmic way illustrates the vast gulf between those two pitchers in my mind. How do you walk Mariano Rivera? Nerves is all I can think, and you can bet your ass that if the situation was reversed, Rivera would never have walked Rodriguez, because Rivera's body temperature runs at a constant 57 degrees.

    White Sox 6, Cubs 0: Jon Danks shut out the Cubbies over seven innings, and the bullpen handled the last two. One of the few reasons I'm sad that the interleague season is over is that it will provide fewer opportunities for Ozzie Guillen to talk smack to Cubs' fans. Here he was over the weekend: "White Sox manager Ozzie Guillen was asked why attendance was so low at the Sox-Dodgers series, and said: “Because our fans are not stupid like Cubs fans. They know we’re (expletive).” Guillen said Cubs fans will go watch any game at Wrigley Field because “Wrigley Field is just a bar.”

    Phillies 5, Blue Jays 4: You hate to throw this out there on a day he won, but to me it's the most interesting thing that came out of this game: Jamie Moyer, who allowed three home runs, has now allowed 483 in his career, passing Phil Niekro for third all-time. He's a lock to pass Fergie Jenkins, who is in second place at 484, but he's almost certainly going to need to go into next season to beat out Robin Roberts for that all time lead at 505. He's under contract for 2010, and I'd be lying if I said I didn't want to see him hold on and take the record.

    Royals 3, Pirates 2: Greinke wins his 10th and, thanks to a rain delay, gets a bit of a rest too, coming out in the seventh after throwing only 80 pitches. The Pirates' highlight of the day didn't come in Pittsburgh: "Ian Snell, the former Pirates' No. 2 starter who was demoted Thursday after deciding he needed a change of scenery, struck out 13 in a row after walking the leadoff batter Sunday for Triple-A Indianapolis against Toledo. He finished with 17 Ks and two hits allowed in seven innings, throwing 70 of 108 pitches for strikes. Indianapolis won 2-1 in 10 innings." I think that (a) he probably needs to come back to Pittsburgh; and (b) if I struck out 17 guys in a game and got a no-decision I'd be pretty damn pissed.

    Nationals 5, Orioles 3: Adam Dunn hit a home run that reached the B&O warehouse on the bounce, traveling an estimated 442 feet. The Nats got another run when Josh Willingham scored on a single. He was dead to rights at home plate, but Matt Wieters dropped the ball, missing the tag. Which leads to a theological question: Can Matt Weiters allow himself to make an error? If so, then it seems that he could cease to be omnipotent. But if not -- if he is somehow precluded from allowing himself error -- perhaps he is not omnipotent to begin with. Think about that one for a minute and get back to me. Either way, though, the answer to this question is less important than the act of asking it. You see, Matt Weiters is sitting at .234/.289/.390, which means that I have to use up all of these Wieters = God jokes quickly, because they're rapidly approaching their expiration date.

    Tigers 4, Astros 3: I made fun of Russ Ortiz quite a bit early in the season, but he just finished with a 1.90 ERA for June. I even added the dude to my Scoresheet team, though that probably tells you more about the quality of my Scoresheet team than it does Russ Ortiz. He got a no-decision here, but for that he can blame Edwin Jackson and the Astros' bats. Brandon Inge hit a two-run homer off Jose Valverde with two outs in the ninth inning to win it.

    Rays 5, Marlins 2: David Price bounces back after a hellish outing against the Phillies, this time holding the Marlins to one run on two hits in six and a third. That makes five straight wins for the Rays, who after seventy some-odd games of fooling around now look ready to make a serious run in the second half.

    Twins 6, Cardinals 2: The extent to which the Cardinals have been a one man gang this year was illustrated by the fact that their new addition -- super ute Mark DeRosa -- hit cleanup in his first game with the team. Mark DeRosa has been a lot of things in his career, but a cleanup hitter has never really been one of them. In fact, before yesterday, he had only started four games as a cleanup hitter in his entire career. Of course, three of those came this year with the Indians, which tells you the dire offensive straits they've been in as well.

    Mariners 4, Dodgers 2: L.A. has lost four of five, but they can get away with it with their lead. More interesting "the Dodgers hadn't decided whether they'll discipline reliever Ronald Belisario after the 26-year-old rookie was arrested early Saturday morning on suspicion of DUI in Pasadena." I anxiously await the Bill Plaschke column in which he decries the horrible example set by Belisario and declares that whatever punishment the Dodgers mete out to him is insufficient. Because clearly Plaschke thinks that drunk driving is worse than steroid use, doesn't he?

    Rockies 3, Athletics 1: The A's have dropped five in a row. As for the Rockies, Aaron Cook has been somethin' special recently, giving up a single run in four of his last five starts.

    Angels 12, Diamondbacks 8: A straight steal of home by Gary Matthews, Jr. was pretty spiffy. Four Arizona errors were not. The Angels finish interleague play 14-4, including an 8-1 mark in NL parks.

    Padres 2, Rangers 0: Chad Gaudin allowed one hit over eight innings for the Padres. The box score says it was 99 degrees at game time. Seems like it's always hot down there, no matter when you come. It's the kind of heat that holds you like a mama holds her son. Tight when he tries to walk, even tighter if he runs.

    Giants 7, Brewers 0: Ryan Sadowski (who?) stymies the Brewers in his major league debut (6 IP, 4 H, 0 ER). He's bumped Jonathan Sanchez to the pen. Sanchez must have been mad: he plunked Prince Fielder and then struck out the side in his one inning of work.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 12:02am

    Friday, June 26, 2009

    Great Moments in Self-Promotion

    I was on News-Talk 1400 WDWS AM's SportsTalk show this afternoon talking baseball with host Brian Moline. You can hear the broadcast -- in fancy podcast form -- here. I come in at the four minute mark, and we talk about blogging, the Cardinals, the Cubs, Geoff Baker, Sir Sidney and a few other things.

    Oh, and I sort of mumble more than I thought I did.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 9:23pm

    Sidney Ponson the victim of a cruel hoax

    They claim that Sir Sidney tested positive for a stimulant:

    Kansas City Royals pitcher Sidney Ponson tested positive for a stimulant during the World Baseball Classic and has been banned from international competition for two years.

    Major League Baseball will not suspend Ponson. Under the drug rules, he will be treated as a first-time offender and is subject to a medical review and fine.

    The 32-year-old Ponson pitched well for the Netherlands last March in the WBC and later signed with Kansas City. He is 1-5 with a 7.27 ERA for the Royals, and is currently on the disabled list because of a strained right elbow.

    The International Baseball Federation said Ponson tested positive for Phentermine, a stimulant and appetite suppressant.

    Someone obviously spiked his urine sample, because there's no way Sidney Ponson has ever been on an appetite suppressant in his life. Stimulants also cause increased physical activity, and there's no evidence of that with him either.

    The only non-natural substances in Ponson's pee-pee are Yoo-Hoo and failure. If I were him, I'd demand an investigation immediately.

    (link via Jason)

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 4:28pm

    Great Moments in Notes Columns

    From Heyman:

    Albert Pujols, for all his heroics this year, has one hit with a RISP and two outs (1 for 14, with 15 BB and 10 IBB), and as Joel Sherman of the New York Post (and SI.com) pointed out, Mets' youngster Nick Evan passed Pujols with two in two days vs. Pujols' Cardinals.

    I sure hope this is offered as a complete refutation of the importance of two-out RISP stats as opposed to an attempted knock on Pujols. Because if it's the latter, it's like watching Superman fly around the world to reverse time and than criticizing him for stopping at 3:15 PM instead of 3:26.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 4:00pm

    Dead Center Camera

    Slate has a good article up arguing the superiority of the dead-center camera over the traditional, slightly-offset camera. I'm in favor of the dead-center, which ESPN toyed with for a year or two and which the Red Sox, Cardinals and Twins use now. This dissent from the article is understandable, however:

    There are also television folk who believe that the offset shot is simply better. Tom Adza, who directs Oakland A's telecasts for Fox Sports Bay Area, says the old-fashioned viewpoint offers a more intimate view of the game. "When ESPN started doing [the dead-center shot], the distance from the top of the pitcher's head to the plate was fairly great sometimes," he says. "It was a really wide shot with a lot of dead space. As a viewer, you're kind of looking at it going, I feel the need to be closer. The offset shot is more compact and fits the screen beautifully."

    I'll admit, I certainly felt disoriented by the dead-center view when I first saw it for exactly those reasons. It's a composition thing. When watching it, I felt like I was looking at my friends' vacation photos and was wishing I could teach them how to properly frame a shot. I got over it, of course, and right now I'd prefer it if everyone went to the dead-center shot. In addition to location, you can see movement on a pitch better. Finally, and this may seem a little weird, you can time pitches better (please don't tell me I'm the only one who occasionally rips off a practice swing while watching a game).

    I guess the big question is what the casual fan thinks. Are they watching enough baseball to get past the compositional problems? Do they know or care enough about the game to appreciate the subtleties of pitch movement and location and stuff?

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 2:39pm

    My Morning in Exile

    I'm going to spare everyone the big Michael Jackson post I was going to write because (a) it represented mission creep even for me; and (b) it wasn't coming together all that well. Jonah has a good one up if you're curious. I'll just say this: Michael Jackson and his handlers probably spent most of the past decade trying to figure out how to convince people to look past all of his strangeness (and worse) and focus on him as a beloved entertainer once again. They never figured it out. Since yesterday afternoon at about 5pm, however, every single radio station I've turned to -- including the classic rock and college stations -- has been playing old Michael Jackson songs. There's been a pretty obvious fatwa on Michael Jackson on the part of radio stations in recent years, and having it lifted so suddenly has been an almost joyus revelation. I mean, have you listened to "Don't Stop 'Till You Get Enough" or "Wanna Be Starin' Somethin'" recently? Holy crap, those are amazing songs.

    I guess what I'm saying is that if Jackson had figured out how to get his 20+ years of outstanding music in front of people earlier, it might have gone a long way towards addressing his massive image problems.

  • Is the investigation of Manny's doctor a sign that BALCO v2.0 is afoot, and this time with a Latin twist?


  • Pirates win the Nady trade now, right?


  • The Royals to sell off their "non-core" players, which probably includes everyone but Greinke.


  • Hit me, Meat!


  • Hooray for Mannywood!


  • Finally, The Big Hurt is about to announce his retirement. Not that he really has to.


  • Oh, I'm also just saying Mama Se, Mama Sa, Mama Coo Sa; Mama Se, Mama Sa, Mama Coo Sa.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 11:40am

    MLB on Jackson

    Does this give me license to go off topic and dive into a Posnanskian-length Michael Jackson essay when I get some time later today?

    The year was 1976.

    Farrah Fawcett had the poster that was on walls everywhere.

    Michael Jackson was fronting "The Jacksons" -- as the band started off on its own a year after leaving Motown.

    Johnny Bench and Cincinnati's Big Red Machine repeated as World Series champs, and this time it wasn't even close -- a powerhouse sweep of the Yankees, following a three-game sweep of the Phillies for the National League pennant.

    American icons.

    Farrah is gone now. She passed away Thursday from cancer.

    Michael is gone now. He passed away at almost the same time due to cardiac arrest.

    Sparky Anderson's team was one of the mightiest in Major League Baseball history, arguably in the top five, loaded with legends and a Hall of Fame manager.

    She was a symbol of beauty and then courage for so many. He was the King of Pop, fallen from this decade but nonetheless an icon for countless millions who always held hope he would find a graceful comeback, somehow, that would make us watch him again. You remembered or you were looking it up on Thursday, as hearts ached.

    Nationals center fielder Willie Harris' heart ached. He was the reason that Michael Jackson's music filled Nationals Park throughout his team's 9-3 victory over Boston Thursday night. It was a somber and sad celebration, just as there will be Michael music during the Dodgers' Friday Night Fireworks event.



    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 9:42am

    And That Happened

    In the wake of Michael Jackson's passing, all of the players in yesterday's games wore one glove in his memory. . .

    Yankees 11, Braves 7: Buster Olney went all Jerod Morris on A-Rod yesterday (query: does the fact that Rodriguez tested positive for steroids six years ago, and a year before the institution of punitive testing give one license to play the "one never knows" card all these years later? Geoff Baker -- can I get a consult here?). Less problematic than the steroids speculation garbage was the quoting of scouts and wringing of hands to the effect that Rodriguez has suddenly become a poor decrepit old man who will likely not survive the length of his contract let alone produce during its duration. Jesus. The guy rushed back from hip surgery, played too much, and still isn't 100% right. Is that really the best time to declare someone's career dead? Especially someone who raked like hell just last season? I bet Buster liquidated his 401K in March too. Anyway, reports of Rodriguez's death are greatly exaggerated (3-5 HR, 4 RBI).

    Tigers 6, Cubs 5: Geovany Soto pinch hit and struck out. When he was not playing, he regaled Carlos Zambrano with tales about this one amazing killer bong he saw in Iowa City that one time. He ought to straighten up that hophead attitude of his and fly right, though. Look at Magglio Ordonez. That fine young man has shed those hippie locks (and the stoner lifestyle that necessarily accompanies long hair) and not surprisingly he's back on track (1-4, HR, 2 RBI). If only every player could emulate those clean cut and clean living stars of yesteryear!

    Pirates 3, Indians 2: Cliff Lee has to be looking around that locker room and feeling like Michael did while looking around the Jacksons' dressing room circa 1979. He's better than these guys, they're doing nothing to help him, and they bring nothing to the party. In fact, I'm going to call Ben Francisco "Tito" for the remainder of the season.

    Reds 7, Blue Jays 5: It felt so good to watch Joey Votto break out the whuppin' stick (4-5, 2B, HR 3 RBI). By the way, as I did on Monday, I watched a good 45 minutes of this game on a treadmill at the gym. Unlike Monday, however, I didn't change the channel. Why? Because George Grande and Chris Welsh, while certainly no luminaries, understand that there's a ballgame going on in front of them and actually talk about what's happening in it from time to time. Something else learned from this game: Scott Rolen comes to the plate to Joan Jett's "I Love Rock and Roll." I guess it's a play on "Rolen," but at bottom, isn't that song about a guitar chick lusting after a teenage boy?

    Mets 3, Cardinals 2: Good pitching matchup, as Santana beats Carpenter and the Mets take three of four from the Cards. The crowd was the largest in Citi Field's young history. According to the article "New York had offered 50 percent discounts on some tickets." With eight dollar beers and all of the rest you'd think that any team with empty seats would cut prices like Crazy Eddie, promote the crap out of it and be confident that they're making it all up in grub, suds and merch.

    Marlins 11, Orioles 3: There are some Baltimore Orioles truthers out there who insist that I have decided to not say anything nice about their team. I'll make you a deal, guys: they do something worthy of praise, I'll praise it. In the meantime I will throw you a bone and note that Nick Markakis went 4 for 4 and drove in Z-game. Unfortunately it was 11-2 in the ninth inning at the time. As for the Marlins, Hanley Ramirez went 3 for 5 and knocked in five runs in what turned out to be a laugher.

    White Sox 6, Dodgers 5: Chad Billingsley let a 4-0 lead slip away and actually stood to be the loser when he left the game after six. He got bailed out, but the Sox pulled it out in 13. Weisman makes an excellent observation regarding Torre's bullpen use in extra innings: "Torre chose to save Jonathan Broxton for a save situation rather than ensure he'd get an inning out of him. It's an old philosophical bug: the idea that your best pitcher is more useful when you can afford to give up a run, rather than when you can't afford to."

    Mariners 9, Padres 3: I'm not sure what surprised me more yesterday: the news that Michael Jackson died or the news that Mike Sweeney was still alive. Good game for him though (4-4, 2B, 2 RBI), as well as Ichiro and Beltre, who combined to go 7-10 with four runs scored. The Mariners now set off on a death march against the Dodgers, Yankees and Red Sox, all on the road. We'll certainly know what this team is made of in about nine or ten days, won't we?

    Rays 10, Phillies 4: It's sort of not fair that the Rays can lose a guy like Evan Longoria and then have his replacement -- Willy Aybar -- hit a homer and drive in three runs. More evidence that the universe is unfair: the Marlins Rays beat the Phillies in this series, are playing much better baseball overall, and have a lineup that could bash them across the country and back, yet Philadelphia remains in first place and the Rays are in fourth, six games back.

    Nationals 9, Red Sox 3: Smoltz got pounded (5 IP, 7 H, 5 ER), but he struck out 5 and walked only one. Eh, dude's allowed to warm up a bit. I'm sure someone will analyze his start more closely than I have, but whatever that shows, my gut tells me that he's going to be alright pretty soon and will pitch extremely well until the very moment his shoulder or elbow explodes again.

    Astros 5, Royals 4: Lance Berkman launched two dingers and drove in four. The game wouldn't have been as close, though, if it weren't for a bunch of Astros errors leading to three Royals' runs.

    Rangers 9, Diamondbacks 8: Chris Davis had four hits, including a two-run homer in the 12th to win it. He wouldn't have had a chance to hit that one if Miquel Montero had held on to a two-strike foul tip the pitch before.

    Twins 6, Brewers 4: I live in a city that has a massive (and probably justified) inferiority complex, and one of the funniest things about it is that Columbus can't ever seem to decide which other city it should feel inferior to. Chicago? That's just silly, but you hear it sometimes. Charlotte? Austin? Nashville? Those all make sense for various reasons, but none are perfect. Anyway, as I was staring at the box score of this game and failing to find anything really interesting to say about it, I wondered: does Milwaukee compare itself to Minneapolis? To Chicago? Or is it a city that is comfortable in its own skin, never giving a thought to other places (except when making fun of the elitists in Madison)? The thought gripped me for a while so I decided to Google it a few different ways and came up with this:

    Is Milwaukee, with its rich industrial legacy, however small it is compared to its heyday, headed toward a manufacturing heavy Detroit, a financial services hub that Minneapolis is, or something altogether different? Bill Bonifas, an executive vice president with The Polacheck Co. Inc., says the answer to that question illustrates two points: Why Milwaukee is different than Detroit and Minneapolis and where the city’s headed.

    “You can’t say Milwaukee is going in the direction Detroit is because to begin with Detroit has a more spatial dynamic whereas the money is located in Milwaukee.

    “Though I think our momentum matches that of Minneapolis, I don’t think we’ll end up like that city either because that’s such a regional center for finance that Milwaukee is, and will have to be, a combination of the two.”

    Detroit never occurred to me, though I have to admit, there are some basic similarities. An industrial past, Great Lakes access, a snobby little overeducated town a short drive to the west. It works if you squint a little.

    I know there's no purpose to this, but does anyone have any ideas here? Lar? And if you don't know a thing about Milwaukee, does your town engage in this neurotic behavior, or is it just a Columbus thing? Does every Springfield have its Shelbyville?

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 5:32am

    Thursday, June 25, 2009

    Geovany Soto is a viper

    Or at least he was during the WBC:

    Cubs catcher Geovany Soto tested positive for marijuana use while playing for Puerto Rico during the World Baseball Classic last March, the International Baseball Federation announced Thursday.

    Soto released a statement saying he was "embarrassed by my lapse in judgment."

    "While I full acknowledge my inappropriate behavior, I want to assure my fans and my family that this was an isolated incident," he said.

    Soto will be banned from international play for two years, but the positive drug test does not have any impact on his major league career.

    And before anyone says anything, I am 100% in favor of legalization of marijuana and not just for medical purposes. Why anyone gives a hoot and a half about an occasional joint is beyond me. As for baseball, I only care about reefer insofar as it compels a player to eat too many nachos afterwards, thus causing the guy to be out of game shape.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 3:21pm

    Are you not entertained?

    T.J. Simers doesn't get all of the Manny outrage, but he's not even pretending to be objective about it. In today's column he fields the emails of those angry at him for being a Manny apologist. He doesn't duck the charge at all. For him, it's all about the entertainment factor:

    "Your idolatry of Manny is ludicrous," is the way Shirin Patel put it in an e-mail, rewriting an earlier headline in The Times, but hey, if Manny needs me to be his mule so he can keep going like he did a year ago, I'm here for him.

    "Let me understand your warped logic," writes Dan Howard. "It's OK to be a cheating drug user if you are charismatic, talented and interesting like Manny."

    It also helps to hit home runs.

    "Now I get it," e-mails Jack Tracy. "Persecute GaryMatthews, but kiss Manny's [behind]."

    It's such a satisfying feeling when people finally get it.

    I like someone, I'm far more forgiving. I don't, and I'm going to treat them like Kobe.

    I know what Dodgers games were like before Manny arrived, and I wouldn't wish that on any paying customer or someone obligated by employment to attend . . .

    . . . "OK, I will tell you, you have it all wrong," writes DavidCook. "Manny is a drug user, a cheat, and a liar. He is laughing in the faces of all Dodger fans. Manny should be traded, or better yet, fired from the Dodgers. . . . Manny's replacement, Juan Pierre, has done an outstanding job, and all he has to show for it is a 'thanks, but now it's back to the bench so we can bring the drug cheat back.' "

    Would you rather watch Juan every night, satisfying your moral outrage, or Manny?

    Granted, Simers' schtick is to poke people and see what happens when they're poked, but that doesn't mean that he hasn't got a point here. It ties in with the "Comment of the Day" post from yesterday: No matter how much time some of us spend hashing out the behavior of ballplayers -- and lord knows I do -- these guys are still just entertainers. For the most part, then, the stakes are pretty low. At least if you're not expecting athletes to be role models for kids, which I don't. So when Simers says something like this:

    Here's the dilemma, and I wouldn't be surprised to learn later on it led to the split of Jon & Kate: Do you continue to grill, grind and grouse about Manny's reluctance to come clean, or do you revel in the added entertainment he brings to every game? Manny has made a mistake in not appearing more repentant, in not being more forthright, and in not throwing himself on the mercy of Dodgers fans who embraced him unconditionally. But it's not going to happen, so does the grudge become more pressing than the entertainment escape his play provides?

    I have to answer "no." Manny is by no means my favorite player in the world, but there's all manner of crap Ramirez could still do that wouldn't keep me from enjoying his game. And if your answer is "yes," -- if you're going to let your problems with Manny outweigh the entertainment of it all -- don't you have to ask yourself if you're really watching baseball for the right reasons in the first place?

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 2:55pm

    Psycho Pspeaks Pstupidly

    Via Sons of Steve Garvey, here's Eric Collins and Steve Lyons during last night's Dodgers-White Sox game:

    Lyons: Do you follow some of the other whacked-out statistical categories that are nouveau to the game of baseball?

    Collins: I do. It's —

    Lyons: What are they?

    Collins: Well, you got defensive — for the first time ever you have —

    Lyons: The WHIP —

    Collins: For the first time ever you have categories that measure defense. The UZR: Ultimate Zone Rating. It makes a difference. Everyone talked about it last year. Tampa Bay making it to the post-season because of pitching and defense. Defense matters nowadays.

    Lyons: It's fictional.

    That's just a taste, my friends. Read the whole transcript and ask yourself whether you would have any chance at keeping your job if you exhibited such hostility to the developments in your field. Not harmless ignorance, people, hostility.

    (Thanks to Jon M. for the link)

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 1:13pm

    Gallo’s Humor

    I don't read the New York tabloids that often, so until YankeeFanLen sent me this link the other day I had never seen any of Bill Gallo's sports cartoons, at least not that I know of.

    Mercy.

    On one level I appreciate the effort and the artistry involved. And it certainly takes one back to newspaper days of old (really old: check out the dancing girls with the "cha cha" music playing in the background here), so good for Gallo to keep plugging away at this.

    But really, can you find much if any difference between these and the "Kelly" cartoons at The Onion? The obvious labels, the obvious (hmmm . . .how should I put this . . .) elder-sensibility. It's right on the nose, isn't it?

    Tuck! -- are you in the same union as Gallo? Can you mention to him that ballplayers don't go out cha-cha dancing anymore?

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 12:57pm

    Marlon Byrd gets his supplements from Victor Conte

    Rangers' outfielder Marlon Byrd is either really brave, really stupid, really trusting or some combination of the three:

    Marlon Byrd wouldn’t be pulling down $3 million as a Major League baseball player without getting a second chance from an obscure community college after he nearly had a leg amputated more than a decade ago. So shrugging off Victor Conte’s reputation as a notorious steroid pusher, he says, isn’t difficult for him.

    Conte has provided the Texas Rangers center fielder with a variety of pills and powders for 18 months. Not once has Byrd asked Conte whether any of it could trigger a positive drug test.

    “I didn’t need to,” Byrd said. “From our conversations, there was no need to ask."

    I can't imagine that Victor Conte is so stupid that he would go back to peddling designer steroids to high-profile athletes after doing federal time for that very thing. But still, if you're Marlon Byrd, is teaming up with Conte the smartest thing you've ever done? Byrd's drug tests are probably the highlight of the year back at MLB central. The Feds probably own five houses near Conte's just so they can be more comfortable during surveillance.

    All of that said, the article contains all kinds of details about Byrd's relationship with Conte and the stuff he's taking, so it's interesting reading. My only other shallow observation: I don't understand the world of supplements at all, but upon reading this I can't help but wonder how much of that business is about selling confidence and the placebo effect as opposed to these outrageously complicated-sounding compounds actually making a ton of difference from a physiological perspective.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 10:45am

    Todd Snider is basically awesome

    Singer songwriter Todd Snider was on NPR last night, and though I always kind of liked him before, I really, really, like him now. Here he is talking about a song on his new record:

    "America's Favorite Pastime" is a song for the unprepared. It was inspired by the Pittsburgh Pirates baseball player Doc Ellis, who, in 1970, pitched a no-hitter under the influence of LSD.

    "I felt connected to that, because many times I have come to work unprepared and still done OK," Snider says. "I think Doc Ellis gives unprepared people everywhere someone to look up to. He didn't do it on purpose — he thought he was pitching the next day."

    There's no moral to this story except not to judge a book by its cover.

    "You don't always know who's going to be able to deliver or have the solution. You can't rule somebody out just because of what you know about them," Snider says. "You can't judge a book, and not even if you'd read it."

    You can hear the whole song here. It's pretty damn spiffy.

    Also, in a portion of the interview that didn't air on the program, Snider goes on a bit more about baseball. You can hear it here. Among the highlights:

  • Snider, a guy who has experienced some adversity in his life, understandably counts Steve Sax as his favorite player;


  • His favorite team is the Royals, mostly because of Kaufman Stadium, which he loves because it "feels like the 50s," and because it's always empty. I know how he feels. Maybe it's heresy, but I just love going to an empty ballpark and watching games that don't really impact the pennant races all that much;


  • Finally, whenever he's on the road, he tries to go to ballgames. He likes sitting way up high in the upper deck and looking out over strange cities, which is also something I like to do.


  • I guess what I'm saying is that, aside from the musical talent, history of drug abuse and bipolar disorder, Todd Snider and I are the basically the same person.

    But definitely listen to that song.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 8:55am

    And That Happened

    Marlins 5, Orioles 2: Ricky Nolasco has been a completely different pitcher since his little jaunt to New Orleans to get his pyloric valve opened or whatever the hell is was. In his four starts since his return, he's given up two earned runs, two earned runs, one earned run and last night zero earned runs. Good thing too, for if he did not find a job, he no doubt would have been arrested for vagrancy.

    White Sox 10, Dodgers 7: Randy Wolf had nada and Cory Wade's "relief" pitching was anything but. By the time they were done it was a 9-3 game that was for all practical purpose over. But this loss is morally justified. I mean, how dare the Dodgers be allowed to play when Manny Ramirez should be suspended? It's a slap in the face, that's what it is. If a kid gets suspended from school, do they not burn the building down as a lesson to others? If a soldier is caught hording rations, do the generals not summarily execute the whole platoon? I know it's in the rules that the Dodgers still get to play ballgames, but it shouldn't be. They should all have their contracts voided and be forced to sell linoleum at Color Tile or something. Won't someone think of the children?

    Mets 11, Cardinals 0: Let me get this straight: David Wright -- the guy who went 4 for 4 last night and is sitting at .356/.444/.510 is a guy Mets' fans have been complaining about for a good portion of the season? I'll never understand New York baseball. Cardinals pitchers, by the way, combined to strike out exactly zero Mets.

    Rays 7, Phillies 1: Pat Burrell's two-run homer in the second proved to be all of the offense the Rays needed, but he picked up an another RBI anyway. I'm not sure what Phillies' fans think of that, but I'd kind of like to think that they're happy that Matt Stairs is getting some playing time now, which he wouldn't be if Burrell had hung around. Who doesn't root for Matt Stairs?

    Pirates 10, Indians 6: Workers on the "Carl Pavano for Comeback Player of the Year" campaign feel today how the folks at the McCain campaign felt the day after the Katie Couric-Sarah Palin interviews aired.

    Blue Jays 8, Reds 2: Aaron Hill, Adam Lind and Vernon Wells all homered off of Bronson Arroyo in the first and Scott Richmond pitched seven strong innings in what was never really a contest.

    Red Sox 6, Nationals 4: Papi went 2-3 with a homer and 3 RBI -- including the 1000th of his career -- as the Red Sox take the second game in this home-away-from-home series (41,000+ once again, and most of 'em weren't Nats' fans). Red Sox' hitting coach Dave Magadan was ejected for arguing balls and strikes. How does that even happen? If you're Francona, don't you tell Magadan to sit down and shut up? Or was it one of those deals where Magadan just called the ump that name you're not allowed to call umps from the dugout?

    Brewers 4, Twins 3: Great moments in defensive decision-making: The Twins are ahead 3-2 in the eighth when J.J. Hardy singles and Jason Kendall hits a double scoring Hardy. Except the relay throw skipped by Joe Mauer, so Kendall went to third. Nick Blackburn was backing up Mauer, and rather than just eat the ball and face the pitcher's slot in the order, whips the ball back towards third to try and get the advancing Kendall. Ball goes wide, Kendall goes home, and that's basically the ballgame.

    Tigers 5, Cubs 3: That's six straight for Detroit, as they extend their lead to five games over the Twins. Contrary to what I said yesterday, Magglio Ordonez did get the start, and before the game he pulled a Vlad, cutting off his hair. Result: 2-4. Screw science, I say causation, not mere correlation.

    Yankees 8, Braves 4: Things were going smoothly for Atlanta until Kawakami was nailed on a comebacker off the bat of Joba Chamberlain. I missed it -- I was reading "Tip-Tip, Dig-Dig" to ShysterBoy at the time -- and I'm kind of glad I did. He was hit on the base of the neck, which as recent history has shown, is a pretty dangerous place to be hit. Jeff Francoeur hit a homer for the Braves, but don't worry, he still sucks.

    Royals 4, Astros 3: Miguel Olivo may be on pace for 168 strikeouts against six walks, but he hits a homer once in a while too, and the one he hit in the 11th inning last night won the game.

    Rangers 2, Diamondbacks 1: Danny Haren can't buy a break, as he once again pitches well with little run support. The Rangers snap their losing streak at five and remain in first place by the skin of their teeth.

    Mariners 4, Padres 3: Brandon Morrow the starter had his longest and best go of it yet (5 IP, 6 H, 3 ER, 4K). Yuniesky Betancourt injured his hamstring and will be out for a while. The game story casts this a negative. I have this feeling some Mariners fans may not feel quite the same way.

    Giants 6, A's 3: The Unit, who gave up one run on six hits, struck out six and walked one in seven innings, looks pretty good sandwiched in between Lincecum and Cain these days. I don't know that the Giants have enough offense to get there, but they could be a dangerous team to face in a short series should they snag the Wild Card.

    Angels 11, Rockies 3: Just yesterday, Rob Neyer said that Jason Marquis was about to turn into a pumpkin due to his poor strikeout rate. Looks like it's midnight (3.1 IP, 9 H, 8 R). Yeah, he struck out four in those 3.1 innings, but it's probably because the Angels were coming out of the shoes to swing at that hittable stuff. Vald-the-bald, by the way: 2-5, 2B, HR, 3 RBI. Let's hear it for short hair!

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 5:43am

    Wednesday, June 24, 2009

    Even more Manny outrage

    Another outraged column about Manny's rehab assignment, this one from Bill Plaschke. I'm struck by this:

    Manny Ramirez playing for the triple-A Albuquerque Isotopes is as weird as the word "isotope." . . . When Manny Ramirez is old and gray and sitting outside the locked doors of Cooperstown, he might reflect on this summer as the best 50 games of his career. Or is it 42 games? Or, really, was he ever gone? It's all Isotopes to me.

    Is there a field besides sports writing where it's acceptable to flaunt your ignorance like this? Just checking.

    Beyond that, not much new apart from the fact that Plaschke has gone beyond those who are outraged that Manny isn't being punished enough to actually suggesting that Manny is benefiting from his suspension:

    During the suspension, Ramirez had reaped all the rewards of being a Dodger without any of the responsibilities.

    He has been allowed clubhouse and training room and field access without ever explaining how and why and when he violated baseball's drug policy. The Dodgers have taken care of his every need -- from cough syrup to batting-practice baseballs -- without once asking him to be accountable to the community that they once considered a priority.

    The Dodgers so value Ramirez's comfort above all else that they actually sent employees to Albuquerque to help him and protect him from the unwashed masses who would dare bother the great man during his courageous comeback from a female fertility drug.

    I guess that's cheaper than hiring a midwife.

    The dude was fined $7 million for violating a work rule. How that's "reaping the rewards" is beyond me, but Plaschke sure as hell doesn't mention that fact. Would Plaschke be given a proportional penalty if he was found to have committed plagiarism? I kinda doubt it.

    What all of these columns seem to boil down to is anger at the fact that there has been no sturm und drang associated with Manny's suspension. That there have been no tears. That there has been no grovelling or self-flagellation. Which is hilarious when you think about it, because for years columnists criticized baseball for first ignoring and then taking an ad-hoc approach to this stuff, comparing it unfavorably to the NFL's orderly and businesslike PED program. The minute baseball actually discovers and penalizes a major star in a drama-free and orderly fashion, however, everyone gets bent out of shape.

    Mercy.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 4:56pm

    Comment of the Day

    I think that, with this comment, J.W. gets at the core of a good third of the baseball debates that go on around here and elsewhere:

    I agree that Manny doesn’t deserve adulation or admiration. Neither does A-Rod (for cheating on his wife, etc.) But this brings us to a difficult question regarding entertainment. Can we divorce entertainment from the men and women who play the role of entertainer? Can we like Woody Allen movies and still disapprove of his conduct towards his wife and one-time step-daughter? Can we watch and enjoy Roman Polanski films? Can we listen to Chris Brown’s music? Michael Jackson’s?

    I, for one, find it difficult to enjoy the products of people that I know are less than admirable. I had always been a staunch A-Rod supporter until the issues with his wife arose. Now it’s harder for me to watch him bat. And yet, I enjoy baseball and am a Yankees fan. So when he gets a big hit, it’s hard for me not to feel some satisfaction. I happen to enjoy Woody Allen films, but am definitely not completely comfortable watching them. I think Manny Ramirez is not worthy of cheers. But I think that people have the right to want the Dodgers to win, and he’s going to be a part of that and in that capacity—baseball player, hitter, part of a winning team—he’s going to be cheered. It’s a complicated situation, with definite gray areas. The people who send comments to blogs that read “Manny Manny Manny,” are probably morons. But they’re probably morons for reasons other than and in addition to their love of Manny Ramirez. In my opinion rooting for Manny Ramirez, while not something I would do, does not necessarily make you a bad person. Trying to excuse domestic abuse, well that does. I’m not sure it’s fair to equate those two actions.

    I can usually ignore the personal baggage and enjoy the entertainment. Usually. "Chinatown" and "Annie Hall" are two of my favorite movies, but I have a much harder time watching "Manhattan" and "Tess." I guess what that means is that if the performance is really, really good, I'm willing to put aside the baggage. Or heck, maybe it's all just the performance talking because "Chinatown" > "Tess" and I don't know that I need to reference Polanski's issues to not like the latter as much as the former.

    But it is worth thinking about. Do those who disapprove of Manny, Manny, Manny (and others) disapprove of the transgression or of the person? Is there even a valuable distinction to be made there? More relevantly, is it possible to enjoy baseball while disapproving of those who play it?

    My answer to that last question is an obvious yes, within limits. Steroid use really doesn't bother me that much from an enjoyment-of-the-game perspective. I enjoyed 1998 and 2001 and all of that stuff, and I'm not now going to pretend I didn't. I'd have a hard time watching Roger Clemens pitch today, but that's because of the Mindy McCready business, not the juice. Not that philandering baseball players in general bother me -- no one knows what goes on in anyone's marriage so it's probably best not to judge too harshly unless you have all of the facts -- but Clemens was messing with a kid on an emotional level at the very least.

    Let's see what else: I have no tolerance for domestic violence, so the Brett Myers and Bobby Chouniards of the world can die in a fire as far as I'm concerned. Some of my favorite artists and just about all of my favorite writers were drunks, so while I'd wish people wouldn't do that to themselves, it's not going to keep me from enjoying what they do. Pete Rose turned out to be a piece of crap, but if he were playing in 1973 form today and all of that stuff hit the fan I'd enjoy his game until the moment he was banned. Basically, if you avoid violence, cruelty and the mistreatment of kids, I'm probably going to still buy your product even if I wouldn't seek you out at a party.

    I guess that still leaves me conflicted about Polanski. But man, there's no way I'm going to give up one of my favorite DVDs. Forget it Jake; it's "Chinatown."

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 3:07pm

    Marlins-Yanks

    On Monday, I suggested that the Yankees' protest of Sunday's New York-Florida game was a waste of time that, if successful, could cause them more trouble than it would be worth. Yesterday, the league saved the Yankees from themselves.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 1:45pm

    Eric Wedge on the firing line

    The Indians finally broke their losing streak last night, but it's not like a close and shaky win over the Pirates is going to silence the rumors about Eric Wedge's impending termination. Neither will this:

    With the Indians stuck in last place in the AL Central, Wedge's status is becoming a daily topic of discussion among the team's fans. Of more concern to Wedge, general manager Mark Shapiro is expected to talk about Wedge with Indians president Paul Dolan and team owner Larry Dolan, if he already hasn't, in the next few days.

    One of the most important things I've learned in my life is that you never want to be an agenda item at a meeting to which you're not invited.

    At present, the Dolans are on record as providing something less than support for Wedge, while Shapiro is in his corner. The only problem is that Shapiro is himself under fire and the Dolans own the friggin' team and have watched attendance plummet as the Indians have mounted depressing performance after depressing performance.

    I'm not a betting man, but if I were, I'd bet that the purpose of the Shapiro-Dolan meeting is to get everyone on the same page regarding Wedge. That would be the owners' page, which means that the Indians are about to turn the page on Eric Wedge.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 1:02pm

    Meet the new boss. Not the same as the old boss.

    The putative new boss of the players' union seems like a very different guy than the departing old boss:

    Every week, [Michael] Weiner and his trademark blue jeans stride down to his basement classroom and teach Sunday school to one of the few congregations less orderly than major league baseball owners . . . An anchor role in baseball’s often nasty pastime-or-business identity crisis will almost certainly test Weiner’s reputation for being a stunningly regular guy. He wears blue jeans and Chuck Taylor All-Stars to all but the most solemn of affairs. He is the son of a New Jersey construction worker. He suspects that the last time he combed his unruly and increasingly occasional hair was before his sister’s 1998 wedding.

    But just as Weiner’s contemporaries smile at his quirks, they emphasize that he also may be the smartest person they have ever known. It is this duality that makes Weiner, the union’s general counsel, so popular among the players he represents and the management side he negotiates with; whether it resonates with fans will be learned after he is elected and has to call a news conference someday, perhaps to deliver bad news — up to and including a strike.

    Don Fehr simply didn't do laid back and amiable and his longtime second in command, Gene Orza, actually made Fehr look relaxed by comparison. According to this article and other accounts I've heard, Weiner is far more of a consensus-builder and reasonable negotiator than was Fehr, so things could look very different in 2011 when the current CBA is up for renegotiation.

    Or not. Maybe Weiner's thing was to play good cop to Fehr and Orza's bad cop, and now that they're leaving, he'll need to break out the billy club and brass knuckles. One never knows with these things. There can be no question, however, that if Weiner does one day have to deliver bad news to the public about a work stoppage that he'll be somewhat better accepted than the often prickly Fehr, and that's at least some kind of progress.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 12:18pm

    Attention Baseball: put up more nets

    Tyler Kepner is impressed with the safety measures at Turner Field:

    Turner Field is the second ballpark the Yankees have seen this season with protective netting that extends beyond the norm. Every stadium has a tall screen behind the plate to protect the fans from hard-hit foul balls. Here in Atlanta, the Braves also have a shorter screen, maybe eight feet off the ground, running in front of the seats behind the on-deck circles on either side of the plate . . . Such safety measures make sense, and should be in place at every ballpark.

    Kepner cites the death of Mike Coolbaugh as a cautionary tale, and notes how quickly baseball would act if the unthinkable happened and a fan was killed by a foul ball. Such a thing is not unthinkable in my hometown of Columbus, Ohio, however. That's because a thirteen year-old girl was killed by an errant puck during a Columbus Blue Jackets hockey game seven years ago. That incident led to the implementation of mandatory netting at either end of the rink in every arena. Before the incident there were all kinds of arguments against putting up such nets. Afterward, those arguments lost all currency.

    The same applies to baseball. I'm sure people can construct all kinds of arguments as to why they shouldn't extend protective netting down the lines. But in light of how big, strong, fast and, above all else, close Major League batters are to the fans these days, none of those arguments are enough to overcome the sheer logic and prudence which dictates putting up some nets.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 11:28am

    Manny Ramirez enters halfway house

    Now if you turn your attention to the center ring, I give you Manny Ramirez, standing on his head while riding on the back of a flaming horse! Or something!

    Ramirez, easing back into playing shape after a 50-game drug suspension, suited up for the Albuquerque Isotopes as they beat Nashville 1-0. Ramirez wore No. 99 for the Dodgers’ top farm club. He played four innings and was hitless in two at-bats. The capacity crowd of 15,321 was the largest in Albuquerque’s baseball history.

    Fans lined the walkway from the clubhouse as Ramirez entered the field. They gathered near the dugout, clustering for autographs, and they seemed ready to forgive Ramirez for violating baseball’s drug rules.

    “People love me everywhere I go,” Ramirez said before the game. “I’m excited to bring a lot of joy to a lot of people here. I feel good. I’m happy that I’m here.”

    This will no doubt make the haters and moralists mad, many of whom think that Manny shouldn't be allowed to live, let alone rehab in the minors before his suspension is over. On that note, I think I have come across the stupidest argument against Manny being allowed to rehab yet:

    If someone goes to jail for 50 days, they don't get released 10 days early so they can get used to the outside again. They have to adjust after their full sentence is completed. I know baseball and jail aren't exactly similar, but the metaphor fits.

    Except it doesn't. Typically, a prisoner is allowed to leave prison several months before his sentence is over and go to a halfway house, the express purpose of which is for a guy to get used to the outside again. With all due respect to the minor leagues, they are like a halfway house in that, from Manny's perspective anyway, they are not quite freedom while not quite being on restriction anymore either.

    Sorry to get in the way of your Manny hate folks, but facts is facts.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 10:18am

    Boxee to Baseball

    Following my anti-Phillips and Sutcliffe rant yesterday, some discussion broke out regarding the best way to avoid the national broadcasters. One of the suggestions was to run MLB.tv through your television. It sounded complicated to me. Of course, I can't even make iTunes, the DVR or my clock radio work, so what the hell do I know? Thankfully there may soon be another, easier option for morons like me:

    Software start-up Boxee has gained attention as much for its contretemps with Hulu as for its well-received platform for watching online video programs on a television set. This evening, though, the company made news for all the right reasons. It announced a deal with Major League Baseball to integrate the league's online game broadcasts into its software, giving Boxee users an easy, elegant way to tune in online games from distant ballparks on their living-room TVs . . . Its software aggregates online video sites and brings them under a common user interface, enabling people to navigate their offerings with an ordinary TV remote control instead of a keyboard and mouse . . .

    . . . For MLB.tv's subscriber-only service, Ronen said, Boxee customized the site's player to eliminate a number of user-interface features that relied on the keyboard-mouse combo. It also integrated the technology from Swarmcast that adjusts the picture quality of the broadcasts to match the viewer's Internet connection. Most important, he said, the company worked with the MLB.tv to optimize its look for the "10-foot experience" -- in other words, the view from the couch, not the desk. "I think it's a work in progress," Ronen added, with many features still to come.

    I assume there are other options to make this happen as well, but the official imprimatur of Major League Baseball may make this the most attractive one.

    One question, however: doesn't baseball worry that this will cannibalise Extra Innings business? Or is that the idea? I suppose it depends on what the Baseball/cable company cut is for the Extra Innings package.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 9:40am

    Joey Votto Returns

    Joey Votto is back. And we had no idea how far back he had to come:

    The 25-year-old Votto revealed publicly that he was battling depression, anxiety attacks and issues that finally came to the surface several months after the sudden death of his 52-year-old father, Joseph, in August. Those issues led to some panicky moments and two hospital stays.

    "They were overwhelming me to the point where I needed to go to the hospital on two separate occasions -- once in San Diego and once that nobody had been told about, I went to the hospital in Cincinnati when the team was on the road [in early June]," Votto explained. "It was a very, very scary and crazy night where I had to call 911 at three or four in the morning. It was probably the scariest moment I ever had dealt with in my life, and I went to the hospital that night . . . There were nights that I couldn't be alone," Votto said. "The one night I was alone, the very first night I was alone, was when I went to the hospital. I couldn't take it. It just got to the point where I felt I was going to die, really."

    Earlier this month I noted how impressed I was with the way Dusty Baker handled Votto's absence. My admiration for him in this has only increased upon reading this article. It probably goes without saying, though, that I am even more impressed with Votto. Partially for the way he has fought back to some semblance of normalcy, but just as much for the honest and open way he has confronted this issue.

    How easy it would have been for him to close off the world. How much better he'll likely be for not having done that.

    In related news, Khalil Greene is on the way back from similar issues. You can read his story -- written somewhat from afar, but illumination all the same -- here.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 9:01am

    And That Happened

    Royals 2, Astros 1: The legend goes that Zack Greinke fell in love with an Earth woman. Deciding that he wanted to be with her, he chose to undergo the irreversible process of immersing himself in the red Kyptonian sunlight, stripping him of his super powers. After three or four weeks of being mortal, however, he realized that he needed to trek back to the Fortress of Solitude to see if he couldn't get his powers back. It all worked out in the end, as Greinke returned to Planet Houston and defeated his enemies in impressive style (8 IP, 8 H, 1 ER, 5K). Only hitch: Brian Bannister still knew his secret identity when it was all over, so they had to engage in a very awkward kiss to set everything back the way it was.

    Braves 4, Yankees 0: The book on the Yankees is that they are nearly powerless when facing rookie or, at the very least, unfamiliar starters. I don't know if that's actually true, but it certainly seems it, and getting shutout by rookie Tommy Hanson and a gaggle of relievers doesn't help the perception any. Sad thing is that Wang actually pitched better than Hanson in some respects, so at least that's something for the Yankees to build on. In other news, Braves' catcher Brian McCann continues to be astounding (3-4, 2B, HR 2 RBI) and has no business trailing Yadier Molina in the All-Star voting right now.

    Phillies 10, Rays 1: Unlike the Yankees, the Phillies seem to have no such trouble against rookie pitchers, and they roughed David Price the hell up (4.1 IP, 7 H, 10 R). Only five of those runs were earned due to three Rays' errors, but it's not like Price wasn't smacked around, because he clearly was.

    Dodgers 5, White Sox 4: Early Wynn was knocked out of the box, well, early, giving up four runs on eight hits in two and two thirds. Roger Craig wasn't any great shakes himself (7 IP, 10 H, 4 R) but between that and a homer and an RBI single from Hodges, it was enough. Next it'll be the youngster Koufax facing off against Bob Shaw two nights from now back in Chicago. If he can pull it off, the Dodgers will have won their first title since moving to Los Angeles. Turning to business news, General Motors announced today that it foresees profits for the next century at the very least, and anticipates that Flint, Michigan will soon rival New York, London and Paris in wealth, prosperity and opulence.

    Red Sox 11, Nationals 3: Over 41,000 in attendance in Nationals Park on a Tuesday night? Yep, Boston must be in town. Jason Bay (4-6, HR 3 RBI) made the interlopers happy, and Brad Penny continued to show would be trade partners that he's basically a five inning pitcher, even if he's becoming an increasingly effective one. Give up value at your own risk.

    Tigers 5, Cubs 4: Magglio Ordonez got the start after riding the pine for four games, goes 0-2 and is lifted for a pinch runner, and then later the guy who has been starting in his place hits a two-run, come-from-behind walkoff homer. I suspect that it's back to the pine for Magglio.

    Indians 5, Pirates 4: There was an article yesterday about how one could conceivably get pumped up for what looks to be such a blah series between two blah teams. I don't know if I buy a lot of them, but I can definitely buy the Cleveland-Pittsburgh rivalry thing. It's slanted way east in football, but baseball could maybe spice it up a bit, no? After all, Cleveland is way closer to Pittsburgh than it is to its putative interleague rival, the Reds, and Cleveland and Pittsburgh have more in common with one another from a cultural and demographic standpoint than Cleveland and Cincinnati do.

    Marlins 7, Orioles 6: Two counts of bullpen malpractice. Count I: against Danys Baez for allowing five runs on four hits in the seventh. Count II: against a quartet of Fish relievers that immediately turned around and blew that lead in the eighth and ninth. Jorge Cantu singled in the winning run in the twelfth, but that can be blamed on the pen too, as Brian Bass walked Emilio Bonafacio for some strange reason, then uncorked a wild pitch to allow him to get to second before Cantu did his thing. Pfun Pfact: by the year 2017, use of the term "uncorked" in the wild pitch context will exceed its use in the wine context for the first time in recorded history. If you don't believe me, you can look it up.

    Cardinals 3, Mets 0: Joel Pinero shuts the Mets down with a two hit shutout. He had two hits on his own too, which really rubbed the Mets noses in it, no? And the Mets didn't even make him work a little it: he threw 100 pitches even and this one was over in two hours and thirteen minutes.

    Twins 7, Brewers 3: It was a victory just getting this game played at home given the damage last week's flooding caused at Miller Park, so let's call this a split for the Brewers. Joe Mauer goes 0-5, knocking him down below .400 for the first time this season. Apropos of nothing, I'll note that knuckleballer R.A. Dickey is sporting a 2.43 ERA on the season.

    Blue Jays 7, Reds 5: Joey Votto returns. He only goes 1-4, but as I'll write later this morning, he could have taken a golden sombrero and it wouldn't have made a difference, because the mere fact that he's playing ball after what he's gone through is a triumph.

    Padres 9, Mariners 7: With the exception of one inning, Chad Gaudin pitched excellently (7 IP, 4 H, 2 ER, 11K) then had to bite his nails as reliever Greg Burke did his best to throw it all away.

    Diamondbacks 8, Rangers 2: The season may already be lost for Arizona, but Max Scherzer (6 IP, 7 H, 2 ER) and Justin Upton (2-4, 2B, HR, 3 RBI) at least provide a bright future.

    Angels 4, Rockies 3: This win, combined with the Rangers loss, puts the Angels into a first place tie. There was a point in April where that seemed impossible, but it seems that anything is possible in the AL West.

    Giants 4, A's 1: Lincecawesome! (CG, 7 H, 1 ER, 12K). OK, that was probably uncalled for.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 5:36am

    Tuesday, June 23, 2009

    As newspapers turn . . .

    With big evil bloggers threatening their very existence, the newspapers have finally called upon the Judean People's Front crack suicide squad!

    The Newport (R.I.) Daily News will now charge $145 annually to a newspaper subscriber, $245 if a subscriber wants the paper and access to the paper’s web site—and, here’s the key figure, $345 if the subscriber only wants the web site. Yes, you’re reading correctly; this means someone has to pay an extra $100 not to get the newspaper.

    Let me know how that works for you.


    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 4:10pm

    Sandberg on Sosa

    Ryne Sandberg thinks Sammy Sosa won't make the Hall of Fame and believes that he shouldn't make the Hall of Fame. I agree with the first part and, while my mind isn't 100% made up about it yet, I'm inclined to disagree with the second part. Either way, neither Sandberg's position on that or mine is terribly interesting. I do find this kind of interesting, though:

    Sandberg and Sosa were Cubs teammates from 1992 to '94 and from '96 to '97.

    "I was around Sammy for about five years before I retired, and there wasn't anything going on then," Sandberg said. "I did admire the hard work he put in. He was one of the first guys down to the batting cage, hitting extra. I figured he was working out hard in the offseason to get bigger. It was just happening throughout the game, that even myself was blinded by what was really happening, maybe starting in the '98 season.

    I'd like to know if there's any evidence upon which Sandberg bases his "Sammy didn't use until 1998" position, because it seems awful convenient for him to say that nothing untoward was happening until the very moment those two stopped sharing a clubhouse. Sosa was on a 50+ homer pace in 1996 before an injury ended his season. Was it not possible that he was using then too? If he wasn't, isn't it the case that the progression to 66 homers a couple of years later isn't quite as unnatural as it seemed?

    My point here isn't to try and pinpoint when Sammy started taking PEDs -- I don't know that and neither do you and neither does Ryne Sandberg. The point is that comments such as Sandberg's represent an attempt at drawing lines, however subtly, between heroes and villains that does not reflect what actually occurred in the game over the past couple of decades. There were almost certainly people in the Cubs' clubhouse using steroids before Ryne Sandberg retired at the end of the 1997 season, and there were definitely people in the league using steroids before then too. I suspect that Sandberg and other putative non-users knew that on some level, and for them to say they didn't today strikes me as implausible and rather self-serving.

    Jose Canseco did not invent steroids in 1988 and hand them to McGwire and Sosa at a secret summit meeting in the winter of 1997. They were all over and around the game, and if you believe the massive amounts of reporting that has been done on the subject, they were openly discussed by users and non-users, players, ownership and media. If people wish to be serious when it comes to steroids in baseball, it would be helpful if they'd acknowledge that fact rather than scapegoat the big targets and feign ignorance.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 3:52pm

    MetaPiece Theater

    A blogger interviews an online columnist's regular podcast guest. If anyone would have tweeted during the interview I'm pretty sure that time would have folded in upon itself.

    Anyway, from Chop-N-Change's Alex Remington, here's the famous JackO on the Yankees:

    I think Girardi is very lucky that George Steinbrenner is no longer at the helm. I was thinking this week that losing 2 out of 3 to the Nationals would have triggered a legendary Steinbrenner explosion. I could envision post-game tirades and savage quotes in headlines in the New york tabloids. That performance coupled with their record against the Sox might have lead to Joe looking for work. In his heyday, George certainly fired people for less.


    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 3:02pm

    And that happened, bub, boy howdy!

    Today is odd link day, apparently. Here's another one, which I like an awful lot. It's called "1924 and You Are There!!" Upshot: a guy is playing the 1924 season with Strat-o-Matic cards and then writing up news stories about each game in the lingo of the time:

    But Johnson's sweeping arm was a half speed off today, for he was inviting runners onto the sacks at an appalling rate. Les Burke singled off him to begin the Tiger 6th, was bunted to second by Wells, and scored on a Lu Blue double to close the score to 6-5. Two walks and two bloop singles the next inning then re-tied the game, and both starters fought their way out of subsequent pickles until Burke got his third straight single to open the bottom of the 9th. The Train retired the next two men but them Manush lined his fourth hit, a single between McNeely and RIce, to send Burke to third.

    Up stepped Cobb, hands grinding into his bat handle, spikes gouging the batter box earth. Johnson peered into Bennie Tate, got the sign and twirled. Cobb swung fiercely, stroked the sphere over the head of Harris and Burke skipped home with the winner.

    I thought of doing something like that with my old Lance Hafner simulation about four years ago, but figured no one would want to read my daily recaps. Live and learn.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 2:03pm

    Great Moments in Hydrology

    Following last week's flooding at Miller Park, a lot of us said "man, that was a bunch of rain." Vinnie at Yellow Chair Sports, however, said it in far more erudite terms than you ever could.

    Just a quick note: Vinnie uses the term "recurrence interval" in his post. For that reason I was going to slap it with a NSFW tag, but then I realized that he wasn't talking about what I thought he was talking about.

    Don't look at me like that. It's a post about rain, for crying out loud. My mind wanders.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 1:32pm

    Baseball Infographics

    This has been all over the Internets since Friday or so -- and it's so brilliant that I'd be shocked if it wasn't picked up elsewhere before then -- but I somehow didn't see it until this morning. I wish I had this one handy the last time I threw a Wahoo bomb. This would be a good one to mix up and use as a quiz for hardcore fans. This one is simply inspired.

    Say goodbye to your afternoon.

    (thanks to Adam Feit for the heads up -- Adam, in turn, got it from RAB, so thanks to those guys as well).

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 1:04pm

    My Morning in Exile

    A butterfly flaps its wings in South America; a beer truck overturns, losing its precious cargo; Ed McMahon dies. Some may call it chaos. I think that these are directly-related phenomena . . .

  • Clint Hurdle takes Marcellus Wallace's advice regarding pride.


  • The Braves are no longer America's team. Well, they never really were, but they're no longer even pretending that they are.


  • The Diamondbacks are selling pitching.


  • The Phillies are looking to buy some pitching but claim they can't find any. If only there was a blog they could read that could solve their problems . . .


  • Does this make you happy? If so, it can't be that bad.


  • Finally, this is what it's like for Braves' fans to take the brown acid.


  • Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 11:28am

    And That Happened

    Braves 2, Cubs 0: Javier Vazquez somehow managed to allow no runs despite giving up nine hits and two walks in six and two-thirds. Behold! In these Cubs we have found a team more feeble when it matters most than the Braves!

    Rockies 11, Angels 1: Aaron Cook now has the most wins in Rockies' franchise history at 59, which is pretty neat, actually. Colorado has now won 17 of 18.

    Athletics 5, Giants 1: I thought Jonathan Sanchez was supposed to be, like, good. He's 2-9, has lost four in a row and has an ERA of five and a half. Meanwhile, Trevor Cahill hasn't allowed more than three runs in an outing in over a month.

    Mets 6, Cardinals 4: I know it's great sport to make fun of announcers, and it's even more fun to try to out-funny one another when we do it. But when I say this, please understand that there is no snark intended. There is no joke to follow. I do not offer this as a means of piling on. Really, I am being very, very serious, and I hope this is taken seriously by someone in a position to do something about it: Rick Sutcliffe and Steve Phillips -- who were together on the same ESPN broadcast team for some reason -- are truly wretched and should not be allowed in a broadcast booth.

    I am among the biggest baseball fans on the planet. I have devoted thousands of hours over the past few years writing about it and thousands more over the course of my life watching it. I am among those who will watch baseball under almost any circumstances. Scandal. National emergency. Family emergency. You name it, and I'm still wondering when the game starts. Yet after only an inning or two of listening to these men do their best to distract me from the game with their pointless, showy commentary, I changed the channel. I watched a nine year-old "Family Guy" rerun because I could not bear to listen to these disgraces argue about how they'd pitch to Albert Pujols in such a way as to actually interfere in an Albert Pujols at bat. I could not bear to listen to them talk about the legacy of Donald Fehr with an incoherence that was surprising, even for them. I could not stand the cascading cliches, the super-hyped, super-throaty wannabe radio announcer voices, and the seeming unwillingness to let a moment pass without their voices drowning out the sounds of the ballpark and even, on occasion, the play-by-play itself. And before you say "well, I guess we won't pair them up again," know that they do it on their own respective broadcasts too. If these men were next to you at the ballpark or sitting on the next bar stool over going on like they do, you'd yell at them to shut up, and if they didn't, you'd ask them to be shown the door.

    ESPN, for all of your faults, you remain the premier venue of broadcast sports. How, then, you allow Major League Baseball, one of your most valuable properties, to be massacred so thoroughly by the likes of Sutcliffe and Phillips I will never know. You are actively driving fans away, ESPN. You are turning off an entire generation to a product that should, by all rights, be bulletproof. Having Sutcliffe and Phillips broadcasting baseball is the equivalent of giving away water in the desert via infomercial. Why bother? People are begging for your product, yet you seem to almost revel in assaulting them in order to get it. The only possible explanation is sadism.

    I know many people who work for ESPN. Every single one of them is bright, amiable, and above all else, passionate about sports. How, then, you allow guys like Sutcliffe and Phillips to sully their efforts with their terrible, terrible work is beyond me.

    ESPN: dare to give your sport, your viewers, and your employees the respect they deserve. Remove Sutcliffe and Phillips from the booth. Replace them with someone who understands that the game, and not their own mindless prattle, is the product people tune in to see and hear.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 5:35am

    Monday, June 22, 2009

    Fehr to step down

    This is pretty major:

    Don Fehr is stepping down as executive director of the Major League Baseball Players Association, a position he's held since the mid-1980s, a source tells ESPN.

    Fehr will be replaced by general counsel Michael Weiner, pending board approval, the source said. An announcement is expected to be made later on Monday afternoon.

    Fehr, who will turn 61 in July, was voted in to lead the players' union in December 1985.

    Love him or hate him -- and as the reaction starts to come out about this, be assured that it will run about 10% love, 90% hate -- you can't say the guy didn't generally do a good job. In terms of working conditions and pay, baseball players are amazingly better off now than they were when he took over in 1985, and it was largely through Fehr's leadership that the union was able to fend off ownership tactics which bordered on criminal at times, and which could have meant the end of the union if not successfully combatted. Here I'm talking about Collusions I, II and III and the 1994 lockout. If you want an example of how these episodes could have gone without better leadership, you need look no further than the NFL, whose union has repeatedly rolled over for ownership, and the umpires, who were absolutely destroyed by Selig and his friends.

    The big exception here is PEDs, where Fehr's instincts to fight tooth-and-nail against ownership ultimately did the union's membership a disservice in my view. Yes, many were responsible for that mess, but it strikes me that it took Fehr too long to recognize that, unlike the often boring minutiae of the usual collective bargaining fodder, there were (a) competing interests within union membership on this issue; and (b) a strong public interest in its resolution. Fehr misread both of those things, and because of it, the players remain stuck in something of a P.R. nightmare and will for some time. I think that angle will be overplayed in the Fehr commentary that will follow in the coming days, but it's not something that can be ignored either.

    Finally, I note that the union's general counsel will be taking over. That must mean that there will be an opening for general counsel. While I have no real labor law experience, my Exile post this morning establishes my familiarity with The Grapes of Wrath, so I do have something of a head start when it comes to issues facing working stiffs like fruit pickers and utility infielders and stuff. As such, I'd like anyone from the MLBPA who may be reading this to consider me an applicant for the job. If you must, I'll provide a resume, but I prefer you just judge me by my firm handshake and my unwavering belief in my own abilities.

    UPDATE: Via Pete Toms, here's Rovell's take. As I suspect, it's all PEDs, no mention of the fact that a rookie made $60,000 a year when he took over and that the game's biggest stars are now making ten times what they made back then. You may not like it, but that was a major part of Fehr's mandate, and he did his job very very well.

    (Thanks to Jason for the heads up)

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 3:38pm

    San Jose punts the A’s for another year

    Given the territorial rights issue, the A's moving to San Jose stands to be a tough sell to begin with, but it's growing even tougher:

    San Jose officials have decided not to seek voter approval of a new A's baseball stadium in November, after the team's co-owner said he'd rather wait for baseball officials to indicate whether the A's would be allowed to move to the South Bay.

    Given the uncertainty over when that decision might come, Mayor Chuck Reed now says he would ask voters to weigh in no sooner than March 2010 — which is also when neighboring Santa Clara could be voting on a San Francisco 49ers stadium deal.

    So, apart from the lack of a financing plan, the lack of the OK from baseball, and the lack of political will on the part of the people and the public officials of San Jose to get moving on this, the freight train that is the A's-to-San Jose idea is just roaring down the tracks!

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 1:52pm

    Ringolsby is mad at Manny’s rehab stint

    Tracy Ringolsby is mad:

    Manny Ramirez was handed a 50-game suspension for violating baseball's drug policy.

    What a farce.

    While Ramirez is not eligible to rejoin the Dodgers until July 3, baseball found a loophole. On Tuesday he will join the Dodgers' Triple-A Albuquerque affiliate. He is allowed 10 games in the minor leagues to make sure he is ready to play the day the suspension ends . . . why should Ramirez be given the privilege of getting to play in minor league games before he has served his full suspension?

    I noted the fact of his rehab stint last week, and our friend Jack Marshall made Ringolsby's argument, albeit a bit more lucidly than did Ringolsby. My response, which Ringolsby acknowledges and then dismisses, was that the rehab assignment, while perhaps undermining the purpose of a 50-game suspension to some degree, is really to the benefit of the Dodgers inasmuch as a player coming straight into action without having worked himself into game shape could pose an injury risk. Maybe we don't care for Manny's sake, but if he got hurt on July 3rd in Los Angeles, that would harm the Dodgers -- including Manny's teammates -- and contrary to what Ringolsby says, I’d argue that the Dodgers aren’t deserving of losing their best player any more than they already have.

    Ringolsby's response: "[t]eams should be held accountable for the transgressions of their players. If teams suffer enough they might be more vigilant in dealing with potential violations" would be more palatable if I honestly believed that he or anyone else for that matter believed that the teams should be held accountable for players' PED violations. The Dodgers got out of paying $7 million to Ramirez. Does Ringolsby believe that they should have been fined that amount instead, and maybe even more on top of it for punitive reasons? Does he believe that the Dodgers should forfeit Manny-powered games? I'm guessing the answer is no, which renders his "the teams are accountable too" stuff mere claptrap.

    I'd be upset if I found out that Manny is being paid his Major League salary for the rehab games, but I'm guessing that he's not. Against that backdrop, I have no problem with him being allowed to get back into game shape in advance of his Major League activation. Not for his sake, but for James Loney's and Matt Kemp's and Joe Torre's sake.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 1:28pm

    As if my man-crush wasn’t big enough

    Dear lord:

    After opening the third inning with a fly out, Pujols returned to the Cardinals clubhouse to review video. There he predicted to assistant hitting coach Mike Aldrete that his next at-bat would ricochet off the yet-to-open Royals Hall of Fame behind the visitors bullpen in left field. “He didn’t say he might hit the Hall of Fame. He said he would hit the Hall of Fame,” Aldrete recalled . . . When Meche finally threw the pitch, Pujols swatted it some 423 feet off a Hall of Fame window.

    Screw LeBron. We are all witnesses to Albert.


    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 12:39pm

    My Morning in Exile

    Anyone know if there's a scientific term for that particularly longing one gets to live in California while watching Angles, Dodgers, Padres, Giants or A's games? It usually only comes up in those contexts. Even the most beautifully shot beach, vineyard, mountain or desert secenes don't do it for me, but cut to a California ballpark, and I'm ready to put Rosasharn in the jalopy and make west . . .

  • The Yankees winning their protest of the Marlins game could actually hurt them.


  • I'm having trouble getting worked up over A-Rod being out late with his girlfriend.


  • The post in which I complain about official scorers' error rulings for the 1,259th time this year.


  • Roger Clemens to write the Great American Novel. Or not.


  • High water rising, six inches above my head; coffins dropping in the street like balloons made out of lead.


  • If Eric Wedge's got to go, it's all right. But if Eric Wedge's got to go, he should go now, or else he's gotta stay all night.


  • I suppose that was one Dylan bridge too far, huh? Eh, it's Monday.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 11:41am

    Moneyball movie won’t go into production

    Look, we're not selling jeans here, and if the suits in the studio have their way, we're not going to be selling tickets to the film adaptation of "Moneyball" either:

    Just days away from the start of shooting, Columbia has taken Steven Soderbergh's baseball drama "Moneyball" starring Brad Pitt off the field.

    Pulling the plug this close to production is extremely rare for studios but sources said Columbia's president of production Amy Pascal wasn't comfortable with the script, which had changed considerably since the movie was greenlit.

    The decision, which was made Friday, mystified many since the picture was crewed up and scheduled to start shooting this week, with some wondering how issues with the script could give a studio cold feet so late in the game.

    The only thing I can think is that Soderbergh was unsuccessful in convincing the producers that Jeremy Brown's nude scenes were artistically justified.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 9:04am

    And That Happened

    Red Sox 6, Braves 5: First time I got to watch the Braves on TBS in like forever, and they just stink up the joint. All of that bad defense combined with weather imported from Scotland made this game about the only bad thing that happened to me on Father's Day. If it wasn't for home plate umpire Bill Hohn's AMAZING mustache, this game would have been a total loss for me.

    Cardinals 12, Royals 5: Albert Pujols (4-5, 2 HR, 2B, 6 RBI) can't be bargained with. He can't be reasoned with, He doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And he absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead.

    Padres 4, A's 1: According to the game story, the fathers of Brian Giles, Edgar and Adrian Gonzalez, Luke Gregorson, Kevin Kouzmanoff, Cla Meredith, Edward Mujica, Joe Thatcher, Tony Gwynn and Kevin Correia threw out the first pitch to their respective sons before the game in honor of Father's Day. Then, in the true spirit of baseball fathers everywhere, they all got drunk and paced behind the backstop while angrily yelling at the coach to put their boys in.

    Marlins 6, Yankees 5: Sabathia left the game early with tightness in his left bicep. He says it's not serious, and given that (a) it was 95 degrees and humid; and (b) Sabathia sweats barbecue sauce, you have to figure it was some kind of heat-induced cramping or something. According to the game story Alex Rodriguez -- playing in his hometown of Miami -- said he reserved about 100 tickets for family and friends. I'm dubious. I read a book last month that said he had no friends, and they couldn't have printed such a thing if it weren't true, right? In other news, the Yankees dropped four of six to the Nats and Marlins in the past week, though I suppose if Girardi's protest succeeds there's a chance to improve that to three of six (note: protests never, ever succeed).

    Rockies 5, Pirates 4: The Rockies begin to rip off another winning streak, winning this one behind Clint Barmes (2-3, 2B, HR, 2 RBI). All of this winning has them doing things like taking one of their more marketable commodities off the market. I still say it's ultimately in vain -- Colorado will be watching the playoffs on TBS and FOX just like you and me -- but in the meantime, mazel tov for the Rockies fans.

    White Sox 4, Reds 1: Mark Buehrle just went out and acted all Mark Buehrle-y: seven strong innings, very little b.s. He looked good, but nowhere near as good as the Sox looked on Saturday night in those blue roadies.

    Tigers 3, Brewers 2: Justin Verlander likes pitching against Milwaukee. The first time he faced them he threw a no-hitter. The second time -- yesterday -- he struck out eight and gave up two runs in seven and two-thirds.

    Rays 10, Mets 6: Upton, Crawford and Longoria went 11 for 16 with seven RBIs, and the Rays have now won eight of eleven. The Mets, on the other hand, are in a one-step-forward-two-steps-back kind of rut, having dropped an awful lot of series lately.

    Blue Jays 9, Nationals 4: Someone finally douses the red-hot Nats. Well, relatively speaking anyway. It was Ricky Romero stepping up for Toronto, giving up two over seven innings on a day when the bullpen needed a rest following a couple of extra innings games.

    Orioles 2, Phillies 1: Man, has Cole Hamels pitched in some bad luck lately. Last time out he got the no-decision after giving up only two runs in six innings, and yesterday it was two runs in eight innings with ten strikeouts. The Phillies lineup -- minus Ryan Howard, who didn't play for the first time in 343 games because he has some nasty sinus infection -- just couldn't do a thing against Jeremy Guthrie, mustering only four hits on the day. Hamels after the game: "I think the key is we're in first place. We're fortunate everyone in the NL East is playing really bad." Man, the Nats can't any props even when things are going good for them.

    Cubs 6, Indians 2: You know, if Jeremy Sowers could figure out a way to fix that little hitch in his delivery, the only thing keeping him from stardom would be his complete and utter inability to get anyone out.

    Astros 4, Twins 1: Despite his teammates' best efforts to kill him -- Darin Erstad lined a ball off Rodriguez’s left side during batting practice on Saturday -- Wandy Rodriguez was pretty spectacular yesterday (7 IP, 2H, 1 ER). “We need to keep playing good baseball. That’s the biggest key for us,” manager Cecil Cooper said after the game. Astute observations like that are why Cooper makes the big bucks.

    Mariners 3, Diamondbacks 2: The game ended when, with two outs and the score tied, first basemen Tony Clark simply dropped a routine throw from the third baseman, turning what would have been out number three into the game-losing error. I've been watching baseball for over 30 years, and I can't recall ever seeing a game end like that.

    Dodgers 5, Angels 3: I can't tell if Clayton Kershaw is trying to grow mutton chops or if he simply has the most pathetic mustache in the history of baseball. He's certainly no Bill Hohn, that's for sure. He can pitch, however, shutting out the Angels over seven innings. Juan Pierre keeps up the good work two, hitting a couple of RBI doubles. At first I thought that Pierre's 50 games in the sun would allow him to rest contently, knowing that he proved a lot of naysayers wrong about his ability to start on a winning team. Now I'm wondering if he'll overplay his hand and demand all kinds of playing time based on his track record once Manny returns.

    Giants 3, Rangers 2: Barry Zito had a no-hitter going until he gave up a two-run homer to Andruw Jones in the seventh, but an RBI single by Randy Winn in the bottom of the inning preserved the win for Zito and the Giants. Watching Zito face Jones in 2009 has to be a lot like watching Flair face Steamboat in 1995. Something that you would have once paid a lot to see, but now you just hope no one gets too terribly injured.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 12:03am

    Friday, June 19, 2009

    A coda to the Ibanez-Morris-Baker business

    While posting was a bit slower the last couple of days, a lot of that had to do with the epic Geoff Baker thread. It certainly captured my reading and thinking attention and, at least for a while this morning and early afternoon, writing attention. At the risk of hyperbole, I think the comments in the thread represent the absolute best the blogosphere has to offer: unrushed, intelligent discussion by intelligent people eager to persuade and willing to be persuaded. I can only laugh when I hear the old cliches which hold that bloggers and their commenters are bomb-throwing sensationalists and that the mainstream media represents the height of professionalism. Read the Baker thread and then watch "Around the Horn" and tell me who the real attention whores are. Great job ShysterBall readers, and thank you very much for stopping by Geoff. I'm really proud of the conversation that went down.

    Anyway, I figure I'll close for the week with a link -- furnished by Sara K -- that sheds a lot of light on the whole Ibanez affair. Here it is. It's about tennis. Rafael Nadal to be precise, and it's a blog post written by FanHouse's Michael David Smith last year. The upshot: An L.A. Times columnist wrote a bit about Rafael Nadal and steroids that went way, way beyond anything that Jeord Morris did. Smith, who is so damn good and so damn prolific that he makes me look like a dilettante, calls him out on it. As far as I can tell, the matter died there. Neither Ken Rosenthal nor his tennis equivalent read the riot act to the guy from the Times. Neither Geoff Baker nor his tennis equivalent were inspired to turn the episode into an ethics class. It sat there. It died. People moved on, as they probably should have.

    When I read that kind of thing -- or any of the many, many articles that end with "unfortunately, such suspicion is inevitable these days" -- I can only conclude one thing, and that's that the Morris-Ibanez thing wasn't about steroids and it wasn't about ethics. At least not blogger ethics. It was an effort to breathe life into a tired blog vs. MSM turf war and old-fashioned media sensationalism. A couple of years ago that observation might have made me angry and might have inspired me to unleash a screed or two. As I sit here this evening, however, I can only shake my head and smile.

    Mencken said that no one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public. It seems to me that the sporting press in the mainstream media is giving it the old college try. For my part, I'd be lying if I said that I thought idiocy and sensationalism would one day be gone from journalism entirely. But I am optimistic, based on what I've seen here and what I've seen on many other blogs in the wake of the Ibanez stuff, that the idiocy will constitute a less prominent place in journalism as time goes on.

    Thanks everyone. Have a nice weekend.

    Craig

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 5:41pm

    Dusty Ryan called up

    I don't really care that the Tigers have a new catcher, and I don't even really care that Ryan is on my Scoresheet team and that I can now actually use him (I have kind of abandoned management of my Scoresheet team and am letting it drift like a ghost ship). No, the reason why I link this is because I got a chuckle out of the way Lee at Tiger Tales wrote this:

    Sources close to Dusty Ryan are reporting that The Tigers have called up the young backstop from Toledo to presumably replace Dane Sardinha as the backup catcher.

    "Sources close to Dusty Ryan?" THE Dusty Ryan? Does he know there's a mole in his entourage? How was the security perimeter breached? In light of it, will the varying factions of the greater Dusty Ryan community now struggle for access and proximity to Ryan's inner circle, and maybe even the man himself? Such intrigue!

    OK, forgive me. I don't mean for a second to make fun of Tiger Tales here -- and good for them for the scoop. I'm just really, really loopy after a very long week with very little sleep, and that phrase just struck me funny.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 3:17pm

    Looking back at the Trop

    Earlier this week I wrote about all of the problems with Tropicana Field. Lar from Wezen-Ball picked up the idea and ran with it. Lar's thing is to go back and read the contemporaneous accounts of events we only now find to be interesting. It's a really good thing, and it's put to use wonderfully here, as he runs down what people were saying about Tropicana Field when it first opened. There's a ton there, so by all means, read it all, but this is the best part:

    "There are some unusual features. The dome roof is sloped and is made of translucent material. Neither is expected to affect play.

    The roof slopes from 225 feet high at its peak over second base to 85 feet at the centerfield wall. It was designed that way to reduce heating and cooling costs, and designers are confident balls will not bounce off it."

    In their defense, it was 1990, and Jose Canseco had only just invented steroids a year or two before.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 2:16pm

    Barajas

    This morning in ATH, I asked why Philly fans hate Rod Barajas. It was explained to me in the comments that it was because Barajas wussed out when he should have been blocking the plate against the Marlins a couple of years ago, allowing a run to score. The great Bob Timmermann -- a librarian, and you don't friggin' mess with librarians -- sends along a news account from that game, revealing that it was actually worse than even the Philly fans in the comments described. From the Knight Ridder report, May 24, 2007:

    Aaron Boone singled to shallow leftfield. Jayson Werth fielded it cleanly and fired home, where Ramirez was out by at least 20 feet. Except Barajas chose to rise instead of block the plate. Ramirez slid under the tag. Home plate umpire Tim Timmons called Ramirez safe; tie game.

    Barajas went ballistic. He got ejected. Manuel soon followed.

    Replays convinced Manuel of Timmons' correctness, though.

    "Ninety-nine times out of a hundred they're going to call that guy out," Manuel
    said.

    Barajas believes he should have gotten the call.

    "I didn't see anything conclusive," Barajas said.

    He didn't see the big deal, either, concerning his tagging technique.

    "I wasn't sure what [Ramirez] was going to do," Barajas said. "I didn't want to be down low and give him a good shot at me, maybe knock the ball loose."

    Manuel seethed over the mental miscues.

    "Those are mistakes that you don't make," he said.

    Barajas' take: "Since we won the game, we can look back and laugh at some of those plays."


    Except you couldn't laugh, at least not if you're a Phillies fan. The inning was supposed to be over, but it went on due to Barajas' mistake. Two pitches later, Brett Myers injured himself on a pitch and would not rejoin the club for over two months. Pitches, the article notes, he never had to throw.

    I suppose it's an open question as to whether it's right or even healthy to hold a grudge like that for two years, but at least now I understand why they hold the grudge.

    (And thanks Bob!)

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 1:49pm

    My Morning in Exile

    For reasons that aren't important, I spent a little time counting last night, and found that since I began this blog, I've written, 2,325 posts at the old Blogspot site, 1,184 posts on THT (including this one), and 318 posts on the NBC site. I guess I'm good and warmed up now, so it's probably time to start blogging in earnest.

  • Tom Glavine says he's done for the year, but I presume that means forever.


  • The Yankees do their fans a solid.


  • I like Bill Simmons' latest column, but let's all acknowledge that baseball has never truly been "pure."


  • Did Ken Rosenthal make the Nationals keep Manny Acta longer than they wanted to?


  • The Cubs are still for sale. Refresh this headline every six months as needed.


  • A glimpse into life in a baseball academy in the Dominican Republic.


  • Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 11:29am

    And That Happened

    Braves 7, Reds 0: Tommy Hanson shuts out the Reds over six innings. Not that he was brilliant or anything. He threw a lot of pitches, got into jams and all of the kind of stuff you see young kids do. But it's all good, because even when he's been getting lit up like a pinball machine, he has continued to play this game with fear and ignorance. No wait, arrogance.

    Padres 4, Mariners 3: The Padres jump on Adrian Gonzalez's back (4-4, 2B, HR, 2 RBI) and finally win an interleague game. Don Wakamatsu on pitching to Gonzalez: "He ends up hitting a home run and a double when we are trying to pitch around him. That is the most frustrating part." Chris Jakubauskas on pitching to Gonzalez: "I wasn't trying to pitch around him." OK, someone's lying and no one is leaving this room until we find out who it is.

    Rockies 4, Rays 3: Jim Tracy on Ubaldo Jiminez: "Ubaldo is a guy who is beginning to find his niche. I still believe there's still another step on the ladder that he aspires to take and that is to become a bona fide ace-stopper type starting pitcher in the Rockies rotation." That was his real postgame quote? It sounds like a book blurb or a marketing statement or something. I think the "in the Rockies' rotation" is what sealed it. It just sounds weird. Does Tracy really talk like that?

    Astros 5, Rangers 3: I was trying to make a funny yesterday when I said that the loser of this series wins the State of Texas. I guess it wasn't too funny, though, because someone emailed me to tell me that I was being both ignorant and disrespectful. That's nothing new, but at least the emailer educated me a bit. The winner of this series wins "The Silver Boot." It's a a 30-inch tall, size-15 cowboy boot cast in silver, complete with a custom, hand-made spur. How very college football of them. I wonder if the Rangers, who once again won the Silver Boot, came running out of the dugout after the game, grabbed the boot and started whooping it up like Wisconsin does with that axe after they beat Minnesota and vice-versa.

    Tigers 6, Cardinals 3: Magglio rode the pine, and will continue to do so "indefinitely" according to Jim Leyland. His replacement, Ryan Rayburn, was 0-3 and struck out twice. Game story: "Albert Pujols grounded out as a pinch hitter for hot-hitting rookie Colby Rasmus in the seventh and played first base the rest of the game and flied out in the ninth. La Russa wanted to get him a day off, plus he has a sore ankle." Two at bats and a couple of innings in the field doesn't sound like much of a day off to me, but then again, I'm not a genius like Tony La Russa.

    Twins 5, Pirates 1: Nick Blackburn (CG, 6 H, 1 ER) was the man, as he basically has been in the Twins rotation all year. After the game, pitching coach Rick Anderson said "He's basically been the stabilizer." So, is Blackburn's new nickname "gelatin" or "carrageenan?" That's a little food additive humor for ya. Additives -- NOT preservatives.

    Nationals 3, Yankees 0: A five and a half hour rain delay? Really? Waiting around for this game to start lasted longer than the travel and suit-up time a makeup game would have taken. This is fun too "about 10,000 people were sprinkled around the ballpark for the first pitch. When the Yankees announced fans could move down, there was a stampede toward the $2,625 seats in the front row. By the end, the upper deck and bleachers were virtually empty." Part of me hopes that the peasants ransacked the manor houses while their owners were away.

    Blue Jays 8, Phillies 7: Rod Barajas hits the game winning home run in the ninth. Apparently Barajas is hated in Philly despite having played there for only one season and despite being Rod Barajas. Anyone care to educate me as to the reason for the ire? Because from where I'm sitting, this is the equivalent of Braves fans hating Paul Bako or Charlie O'Brien or someone. How can the response to a guy like Barajas -- who played all of 48 games for the Phillies -- be anything other than slightly peeved indifference?

    Orioles 5, Mets 4: Francisco Rodriguez and his tired act came into the game to lock things down in the ninth, except they didn't get locked down. Matt Wieters doubled to kick things off. Dave Trembley then sent in a pinch runner for him, and was amazingly allowed to live. The pinch runner scored, so maybe it was all willed by Wieters that way to begin with. In any event, an Adam Jones bases-loaded walk followed by an Aubrey Huff liner ended the proceedings.

    Cubs 6, White Sox 5: A wild come from behind win by the Cubbies. Down 5-1 in the eighth, Derek Lee hit a three-run homer followed by a solo shot from Geovany Soto to tie things up. In the ninth it was Alfonso Soriano with an RBI single. If he didn't get that, I wouldn't have been surprised to see Piniella give him the Magglio Ordonez treatment.

    Marlins 2, Red Sox 1: They called this one early due to rain. Because it was the Red Sox, however, the game still took three hours and twenty-six minutes.

    Diamondbacks 12, Royals 5: After two great starts following his second callup, Luke Hochevar reverted to May form, giving up seven runs on nine hits in four innings. Danny Haren, meanwhile, held the Royals to two runs on seven hits, struck out six and didn't issue a walk in seven innings.

    Dodgers 3, A's 2: Randy Wolf pitched well but got another no-decision. Pfun Pfact: Vin Mazzaro is the first A's pitcher with two sacrifices in one game since Ken Holtzman on Aug. 27, 1972. I hate the DH.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 5:34am

    Thursday, June 18, 2009

    “The President George W. Bush Owners Suite”

    Eh, if a guy like Comiskey can have two ballparks named after him and a guy like Yawkey can have a Way, then I certainly don't have any problem with this:

    The Rangers are renaming the owner's suite at Rangers Ballpark in Arlington after President George W. Bush.

    Bush, the 43rd president of the United States, was the Rangers' managing general partner from 1989-94 before becoming Governor of Texas. The suite, located directly behind home plate, will be named the "President George W. Bush Owners Suite."

    What gets me the most though is this:

    Bush was the head of an ownership group that bought the team from Eddie Chiles in 1989 and eventually sold the team to Hicks in 1998. Bush was elected president in 2000 and did not return to the Ballpark until he threw the ceremonial first pitch on Opening Day this season.

    The dude spent something like six weeks every summer of his presidency on a ranch 120 miles away. I know he was probably busy and everything, but the guy is the biggest baseball fan to ever hold the office. You tellin' me he couldn't have had the chopper take him to a game or two? Hell, if I were president I'd use the office to get me into so many ballgames that they'd impeach me after the first summer of my term.

    "Hey John? Yeah, it's me, President Calcaterra. Hey, I just thought I'd come up to Fenway this weekend to throw out the first pitch . . . Well, yes -- , um yes, yes I know I did it last weekend . . . and, yeah, on Opening Day too, but . . . uh-huh . . .well, I just thought you'd like the President to be there, that's all . . . yes, I HAVE heard of StubHub you smartass . . . well maybe I WILL call Hal. And by the way, your antitrust exemption is revoked . . . yes, just yours! [click]"

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 1:51pm

    Reminder

    I'd just like to remind everyone once again that there is quite a fascinating, high-level, and mature conversation going on in the Geoff Baker Redux thread. Fascinating because Geoff Baker has been showing up for a couple of days and, to his enormous credit given what I've written in the past week or so, taking on all comers. High-level because there's talk of ethics, sharp analogies, and reasoned argument. Mature because, contrary to popular belief, the blogosphere just lends itself better to adult conversation than do newspapers and television.

    Put differently, ShysterBall commenters kick ass, and there's great evidence of this on display in the thread.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 1:33pm

    My Morning in Exile

    Things I wrote while wondering how on Earth a basketball arena could cost nearly half a billion dollars. Titanium floors instead of parquet? Title banners woven from saffron?

  • Jose Canseco says he's going to sue Major League Baseball. Good luck with that.


  • The Dodgers and Sox to soon get Manny and Smoltz back. Respectively, that is. It's not like they have some weird player-sharing thing going on.


  • The Cubs have a pathetic offense and its getting worse by the day. They also happen to have the best starting pitching in baseball. You'd think, then, that they'd be out scouting hitters. They're not.


  • Congress is investigating Sammy Sosa for perjury. As we touched on here yesterday, I really don't think that's going to go anywhere.


  • How do rumors get started? They're started by the jealous people and they get mad about somthin'theyhad, and sombody else is holdin'.


  • Omar Vizquel: King of Venezuela.

    (thanks to Lar for the Orlando Arena link)

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 11:19am

    And That Happened

    Orioles 6, Mets 4: Matt Wieters hits the first of what the prophecies have foretold will be a thousand career home runs, each more majestic than the last. The real story was the middle of the O's order -- Markakis, Huff and Mora -- who combined to go 8 for 11 with four RBI.

    Blue Jays 7, Phillies 1: I sat back on the couch and watched this game, hoping to relax after a long day. But then Sutcliffe and Co. start talking about the Jerod Morris/Raul Ibanez affair. Look, I don't come into your house and talk about your work when you're off, so what makes you think you can do it to me?

    Nationals 3, Yankees 2: Wang pitched, but he was way less responsible for the Yankees losing than was John Lannan (8.1 IP, 4 H, 2 ER). Five run game, three of them scored on homers.

    Angels 4, Giants 3: Six straight wins for the Angels, who hung around long enough to finally get to Tim Lincecum. It's nice when you can pinch hit Vlad Guerrero and Torii Hunter late in the game.

    White Sox 4, Cubs 1: Piniella after the game: "Danks pitched a good game, they executed a good squeeze bunt, and we didn't do much offensively. That's about it. That's the ballgame in a nutshell." Hey Lou, I do the recaps around here, got it?

    Reds 4, Braves 3: Micah Owings' three run homer was the big blow of the game. If he played for the Braves, he'd be the team's second best outfielder in terms of OBP. Javier Vazquez has pitched better than anyone could have hoped entering this year, but the dude is still only 4-6 because, I dunno, the universe hates him or something.

    Red Sox 6, Marlins 1: The Brad Penny trade deadline audition continues, with the commodity in question giving up 0 ER on three hits in five innings, though he had to make 100 pitches and gave up four walks in the process. David Ortiz walked twice, got a hit and scored all three times on base. Pedroia had a big game too. The team made a big deal out if it being the 500th straight sellout, including the fans in all kinds of fun. The game story doesn't say whether or not anyone dangling their free tape measures or gawking at the giant "500" mowed into the outfield realized that the sellout streak is why they had to sell a kidney in order to buy their tickets on StubHub.

    Cardinals 4, Tigers 3: A couple of Curtis Granderson homers aren't enough for Detroit, as the Cardinals and Tigers trade little jabs all night.

    Pirates 8, Twins 2: Andrew McCutchen over his first 13 games: .339/.381/.492. That's better than Nate McLouth is doing, both on the season and since the trade. Are Pirates fans still supposed to be mad about this?

    Rockies 5, Rays 3: David Price has to pitch in Coors Field. That's bad. But he lasts a bit longer into a game than he has been lately. That's good! He still gives up ten hits and five runs and loses the game. That's Bad. But he gets more economical with his pitches, walking no one. That's good! The postgame spread contains sodium benzoate . . . That's bad. Can I go now?

    Rangers 5, Astros 4: The battle for Texas rages on! So far, Houston is down 2-0. If they don't turn things around soon, they're going to be stuck with Texas.

    Diamondbacks 12, Royals 5: Greinke's return to Earth continues, as the Dbacks rough him up for six runs over six and two-thirds (four earned).

    Brewers 9, Indians 8: Trevor Hoffman blew his first save of the season, but the Brewers pull it out in extras. And really, it's the Indians' bullpen that should be ashamed of itself, having given up 21 hits, 14 walks and 18 runs in 14 innings against Milwaukee.

    A's 5, Dodgers 4: Trevor Cahill started wild, but settled down and then somehow managed to survive three errors by his mates which led to three unearned runs. The A's will take it.

    Mariners 4, Padres 3: Rob continues to claim that the American League is "playing a different game" and "a better game." And he may be right. But how much of that difference is attributable to the Padres alone? I mean, jeez, they've lost 13 straight games to the AL, and that sort of skews things a bit, doesn't it?

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 5:39am

    Wednesday, June 17, 2009

    Great Moments in Rain Delays

    Fun time in Cincinnati last night! First it was Jeff Brantley professing his admiration for Ted DiBiase, then some fine folks from my town decided to go all Rick Dempsey on us:

    During a lengthy rain delay at Tuesday night’s Cincinnati Reds game, two men jumped from the stands onto the field – one of them flopping onto the tarp covering the infield and sliding on his belly. Cory Allen, 20, of Columbus and Casey Allen, 25, of Hilliard, Ohio, are facing charges of criminal trespassing and obstructing official business. If they are related was not clear. About 8 p.m., one of the men ran onto the field, reports said. He executed the belly flop to loud applause and tried to run away, but slipped on the wet outfield grass and was apprehended. He was led away in handcuffs. The other man ran onto the field, jumped back into the stands, but later ran on the field again. He again jumped back in the stands, but was surrounded and apprehended.

    Each man faces up to 120 days in jail if convicted.

    Put differently, these men could conceivably get four times longer in jail than Donte Stallworth is getting for killing a guy while drunk driving.



    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 4:03pm

    Quote of the Day

    Buster Olney's contribution to the post-Sosa world, couched in the notion that the clean players like Raul Ibanez should be outraged at the steroid users:

    Ibanez and others should say out loud that as far as they're concerned, cheating should not be tolerated. Insist that the drug-testing penalties be given sharper teeth. Demand that one positive test means a voided contract and a year out of baseball, and a second strike means a lifetime ban.

    Question: given all of the below-market early deals these days, might such a thing not actually create an incentive for some players to take steroids, at least for one season? Would Evan Longoria -- who's scheduled to make $550,000 this year -- be better or worse off financially if he had his current contract voided, spent the rest of this summer and next spring playing for the Long Beach Armada (note: Longoria is from Long Beach) and was allowed to re-enter the game as a free agent just before the 2010 All-Star break? Sure there's some risk there, but I submit that he'd stand to make a minimum of a hundred million dollars more by getting his current contract voided and sitting out a year than he would be to walk the straight and narrow with the Rays. So too would many other 0-6-year players, actually, at least assuming that "voiding the contract" didn't mean that the team still retained control over the player. Which it would pretty have too, wouldn't it?

    Of course, I may be overestimating the extent to which Buster is thinking this one through . . .

    UPDATE: To be fair, this quote came in the course of Buster's thoughts on the Jerod Morris--Raul Ibanez affair, and to his credit, I think Buster gets it right for the most part.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 3:23pm

    Comment and response

    This morning I wrote a post that, among other things, lauded the legal counsel Sammy Sosa appears to have been given in advance of his Congressional testimony in 2005. I said this:

    [Sosa] said "To be clear, I have never taken illegal performance-enhancing drugs." He said "I have never injected myself or had anyone inject me with anything." He said "I have not broken the laws of the United States or the laws of the Dominican Republic. I have been tested as recently as 2004, and I am clean." All of those statements allow for the possibility that he used substances that were legal in the Dominican Republic that would have been illegal to use in the United States.

    I've said in the past that, contrary to the naysayings of others, Sosa was well-advised to have used an interpreter during his Congressional testimony. In light of yesterday's news, this is even more true, because it now appears that he needed to thread a very tiny needle to keep himself out of legal jeopardy. From what I can see, he threaded it brilliantly, and as a fellow shyster, my hat is off to whoever advised Sammy back in 2005 for pulling off what I can only call a work of legal art.


    In response, the always able, always game Jack Marshall offered this:

    A point and a question, Craig.

    The point is that Sosa’s statement at the hearing was so obviously threading a rhetorical and legal needle that it was one of the main reasons people (like me) became convinced that Sosa was a user and a liar. That’s legal art only if you are the kind of analyst who thinks “it depends what the meaning of ‘is’ is” is a slam-dunk rebuttal. Sure, it avoids perjury—-so does taking the 5th on the stand. But they both make you look guilty as hell. (Sosa’s statement is also deceit—-making a statement that is literally true but designed to deceive casual listeners into thinking it means something very different from what it really does mean. This is, as I’m sure you know, specifically designated as ethical misconduct for a lawyer in Rule 8.4 of the Rules of Professional Conduct if a lawyer does it personally. It is a form of dishonesty.)

    Now the question: has anyone ever explained WHY a steroid user would take that 2003 test? To find out if the test works? If that was the point, then the union was actively attempting to assist players in cheating. Maybe a player was unsure if he was using steroids? No, even Manny isn’t THAT stupid. To make sure one’s name was on a list that was sure to end up in the hands of the Feds if the union didn’t destroy it seconds after it was compiled? The fact that there were “only” 104 players who volunteered for this only indicates to me that there were 104 morons using steroids, and the non-morons had the sense to take a pass.

    I said in the comments that I'd offer a response, and for purposes of clarity (and not mucking up an already longish comments thread) I'll offer it here. While it comes as a direct response to Jack, anyone and everyone is encouraged to chime in, of course.

    I guess I'd start by once again saying that I am not particularly shocked that Sosa, apparently, tested positive in 2003. Moreover, while I can't say I levelled any heavy judgement on Sosa at the time of his testimony, neither was I of the view that he was being particularly deceptive. McGwire's words made it pretty obvious that he had used, but it was only a few weeks later when Rafael Palmiero was busted that I considered that Sosa would have the chutzpah to lie to Congress. I wasn't blogging then, so I didn't make a point of parsing his words. I think the most I did was make a mental note to wonder what would happen if he, like Palmiero, came up with a positive test. That happened yesterday, and it represents the first time I looked back at his statements. As I said in the earlier post, those statements all allow for the possibility that he (a) took steroids in the D.R. and (b) was still telling the truth. It wasn't a moral approval of the tack he took before Congress. It was merely an appreciation that, technically speaking, that tack may have saved Sosa from committing perjury. I called it "art," which is what I assume set you off.

    But to answer your charge, I don't find the "art" in Sosa's statements in their success at providing "a slam-dunk rebuttal." They don't, as anyone who parses language for a living like we do readilly understands. We now know, with yesterday's news, that Sosa was being verry careful in front of Congress, and someone walking that tightrope hasn't really rebutted anything, let alone in slam dunk fashion. But like I said, his words did, I feel, prevent him from committing perjury, and keeping him clear of a perjury rap and/or drug rap and out of dutch with Baseball was what his lawyer was hired to do in that situation. Let his P.R. people deal with whether or not we think Sosa is a bad person or a liar in the general sense. The lawyer did his job, however much we may not like his job and all it entails. You mention the Fifth Amendment -- I submit that if Sosa's PED use was limited to legal drug use in the D.R., any assertion of the Fifth Amendment would itself be improper, but maybe that's another conversation.

    As for the ethical argument you do raise: we could argue whether "making a statement that is literally true but designed to deceive casual listeners into thinking it means something very different from what it really does mean" is the actual definition of "deceit" for purposes of Rule 8.4, but I don't think that's necessary. First off, as you note, that rule applies to lawyers, not lay persons, so it's meaningless in this context. Second, Sosa was testifying before Congress, under oath. Congress has counsel and most congressmen are lawyers themselves, all of whom had carte blanche to challenge Sosa about anything he said, and the ability to back it up with criminal sanctions if they felt he was being untruthful. That's not "the casual listener" as far as I'm concerned. I'm going to assume that, like you, several members of Congress and their counsel heard some questionable qualifying from Sosa that day. The fact that no one pressed him on it suggests that no one felt like they were being deceived by anything.

    The question of why a player would take the test in 2003 was answered in the other thread, but to save people from clicking back, the 2003 survey testing was "voluntary" only to the extent that the Players' Union agreed to the program and its consequences. Under it, every player was tested druing spring training -- twice, actually -- and then an additional control group of 240 players was tested later in the season. As many players admitted at the time, there was a P.R. calculus to this in that, if the percentage of positives were low, the people going around and claiming that large percentages of players were using could be shouted down, and if the numbers were high and thus mandatory testing kicked in, hey, at least there was some rational basis for it beyond media hysteria. However cynical a calculation it was in the first instance, the fact that players knew the tests would come in March and more than 5% still tested positive indicates just how deluded some of these guys were.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 1:56pm

    My Morning in Exile

    Things I wrote while struggling to come up with any ballplayer who, if implicated as a PED user, would truly surprise me. Maddux, maybe. Bob Horner. Lolich.

  • Sammy Sosa: the leaking is way worse than the 'roiding.


  • A roundup of Sosa opinion in the greater blogosphere.


  • Rizzo says that Manny Acta is the Nats' "current" manager. If you think that's a vote of confidence, call the woman you love your "current" wife or "current" girlfriend and see how that works out for you.


  • Johan Santana's knee is just fine, thank you.


  • Finally, baseball is held to a higher PED standard than football, and I'm not sure I have a problem with that.


  • Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 11:44am

    The Sosa connection, or lack thereof

    Will Carroll said something really interesting about the Sosa stuff over at Prospectus last night:

    I've always followed the steroid story as something of an epidemic. It often follows the same models, centering around hubs and nodes. The hubs are players like Jose Canseco or Bill Romanowski in the NFL who were evangelists for the substances, but the nodes are usually the drug distributors. The Bay Area had BALCO, Baltimore had their "star", and Dallas had their Hollywood connection, while the NFL had doctors in Pittsburgh and Charlotte, among others, who were willing to supply. Chicago, however, doesn't have this issue or at least hasn't. Looking at the Cubs roster in 2003 and a year previous, there's *no one* that tested positive or that has even had much speculation surrounding their production. It will be interesting to see if the 2003 list shows such a cluster existed or if Sosa was one of few singular users.

    If I had to guess, I'd say that there is a Dominican Republic cluster, as by all accounts, steroids are far more readilly available down there than here. As you'll recall, almost all of the Mitchell report users were revealed via their American dealers. It's quite possible that there were and are many steroids users who obtained their PEDs from pharmacies in San Pedro de Macorís as opposed to the Kirk Radomski's of the world.

    Which leads to another interesting thing: the perjury angle. As you'll recall, Sammy Sosa testified to Congress a few years ago. Today, many are wondering whether he will be subject to criminal scrutiny for saying, under oath, that he didn't do steroids.

    Except he never said that. He said "To be clear, I have never taken illegal performance-enhancing drugs." He said "I have never injected myself or had anyone inject me with anything." He said "I have not broken the laws of the United States or the laws of the Dominican Republic. I have been tested as recently as 2004, and I am clean." All of those statements allow for the possibility that he used substances that were legal in the Dominican Republic that would have been illegal to use in the United States.

    I've said in the past that, contrary to the naysayings of others, Sosa was well-advised to have used an interpreter during his Congressional testimony. In light of yesterday's news, this is even more true, because it now appears that he needed to thread a very tiny needle to keep himself out of legal jeopardy. From what I can see, he threaded it brilliantly, and as a fellow shyster, my hat is off to whoever advised Sammy back in 2005 for pulling off what I can only call a work of legal art.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 9:23am

    Geoff Baker Redux

    Note: I'm giving this post from yesterday a bump for two reasons: First, it was posted kind of late, and a lot of people don't scroll back past ATH on a given day, so it's "new" to a lot of readers; Second, because Geoff Baker his ownself waded into the comments thread last night. I think that's kind of cool and think that maybe some folks would like to read that too.

    Geoff Baker got mad last week when a blogger waded into waters he feels that only professionals like Geoff Baker should be wading. Today he wades into my waters:

    Here's a primer on U.S. libel law and how it relates to blogging, in case you're interested. It should be required reading for any blogger in this country.

    If you get sued for libel, your defense can be "the truth -- that what you wrote is true -- or that, even if what you wrote was false, you did not act with malice. In Canada, where I began my career, the law is much tougher and states that your stuff had better be true, or you're in hot water. It's a bit more lax here in the U.S. with the whole "malice thing.

    The U.S. Supreme Court has defined malice as publishing something with "either knowledge of falsity or in reckless disregard for its truth or falsity.''

    I was going to write about 1000 words aping his piece from last week, substituting the dangers of amateurs engaging in the business of lawyering for his take on amateurs engaging in the business of professional journalism, but I couldn't keep a straight face. I'm actually fine with Baker writing about this stuff because (a) it's not rocket science; and (b) he's right. Like I said last week, you've got to get your facts right if you're going to get into the accusation business. That goes for bloggers too, and like Baker, I am similarly not impressed with the argument that a blogger can be looser with things if he's only writing for a small, friendly audience (not that Jerrod Morris was being "loose" in my estimation).

    But beyond that, Baker remains off his nut. Last week I (and many others) noted that Baker himself seemed to be doing far worse than Jerod Morris was doing when he suggested that the entire 2003 Seattle Mariners team had been on steroids. Today he defends himself:

    Now, this may seem like the same thing to a lot of you, but there are important differences. The most obvious is that no individual was singled out. Believe me, this was intentional. There are ways to approach topics like this, to hint at stuff that may or may not have been going on, but it requires subtlety, not a sledgehammer.

    What I wrote still gives every player on that 2004 team an "out'' in which they can say: "It wasn't me he was talking about.''

    I suppose that's fine if all you care about is avoiding legal liability for defamation -- and even then I'm not sure that the Mariners as a team wouldn't have an action for some sort for business disparagement or something -- but certainly that's not the operative ethical standard, is it? Anything is fair game as long as there's an "out?" That's not what Baker seemed to be all worked up about in his original piece. It was all about being tough and accountable and writing with integrity and credibility and all of that. Something greater than mere lawsuit avoidance, at any rate. If anything, Baker's pained rationalization of his February piece directly contradicts his stated belief that looking one's target in the eye matters. His accusation of non-specific Mariners with an "out" built-in is exactly the opposite of looking someone in the eye. It's cowardly ass-covering.

    Baker's next point is the freakin' cake topper:

    Some of you have asked why I -- and my colleagues -- failed to denounce Rick Reilly for publishing similar things about ballplayers that Morris did. Well, the first answer is, many of my colleagues did denounce Reilly several years back when he challenged Sammy Sosa to take a drug test. Many thought he was unfairly singling Sosa out.

    My second answer would be: Jerod Morris is not Rick Reilly.

    Sorry, I don't cotton to any system with exceptions that so thoroughly swallow the rules as the one Baker sketches out, and that's even when the rules are weak moving targets like those he's proposing. If we are to take Baker seriously, there's a bogey that all of us writing about baseball need to hit -- about thirty years of puff pieces, if I reckon correctly -- and once we hit it, anything is fair game. If I'm wrong about this -- if, for example, I get my license to be irresponsible at, say, 25 years -- I hope that Baker lets me know, because I have a lot of garbage I want to fling at people.

    Finally, Baker responds to criticism of his "White Jays" piece from a couple of years ago:

    I've had people write in to ask me about my so-called "White Jays'' series of three stories written for the Toronto Star six years ago. What those stories were supposed to be about was how the Blue Jays, after years of pipelining talent from Latin America, had suddenly become a team with the fewest amount of minority players in baseball. At a time when the number of Latin Americans in the game was exploding.

    But the reasons behind that story were lost because of a terrible "White Jays'' headline, substituted at the last minute as a front page teaser to the stories, without my consent, or input, or that of the editors working closest with the story.

    I'm somewhat sympathetic here, because his "White Jays" story, while not his finest hour, wasn't as bad as a lot of people made it out to be. But his explanation of this is instructive: other chefs in the kitchen screwed it up, not Geoff Baker. Kind of undercuts that whole notion he's pushing about the importance and value of all of those editorial layers that separate the pros from the amateurs, doesn't it?

    Baker goes on and on and so could I, but we'd never come to agreement on everything. I do hope, however, that we can agree on this: people who write non-fiction for a living need to be accurate and take responsibility for their words no matter who they are and where they write.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 8:20am

    And That Happened

    Red Sox 8, Marlins 2: David Ortiz continues to heat up, adding a homer and a two-run single to his increasingly improving statline. Tim Wakefield was strong too. From the game story: Wakefield is now two starts and five home wins behind Roger Clemens for the most in Red Sox history in each category. I suppose that's something Boston fans were mostly aware of, but you could stump a decent number of Midwesterners and West Coasters with that, I imagine.

    Reds 7, Braves 2: This one had a long rain delay, and when that happens, Marty Brennaman and Jeff Brantley take calls. I caught a bit of it last night. This is paraphrased, but it's pretty close to how one call went down:

    Marty: Hello, you're on Reds radio!

    Caller: Hey Marty, being from North Carolina, could you tell us who your favorite professional wrestler is?

    Marty: Well, I um, er . . .

    Brantley [interrupting, with extreme urgency and certainty]: No question about it, my favorite wrestler was The Million Dollar Man, Ted Di-Bi-ase. He was absolutely the best.

    Marty and Caller: stunned silence.

    I wish to God I was making that up.

    Yankees 5, Nationals 3: Cano went 4-4 and had the tie-breaking hit in the seventh. More game story fun: "[Alex] Rodriguez greeted fans in Monument Park before the game. One spectator told A-Rod he was a Phillies fan but he liked him." I was going to scoff at the inclusion of this, but then I realized that, yes, someone publicly admitting that they like A-Rod does probably qualify as newsworthy.

    Rangers 6, Astros 1: Pudge v2.0 ties Pudge v1.0 for most games caught, but this was the Ian Kinsler show (3-4, 2 HR, 2 RBI). And Kevin Millwood (7 IP, 4 H, 1 ER) is quietly putting up his best season since his he broke out all awesome-like ten years ago.

    Cardinals 11, Tigers 2: Verlander proves human after all, posting his worst start since April 17th (4 IP, 8 H, 5 ER). In other news, with a 2-1 lead (1934 & 2006 to 1968) the Cardinals can put this series away with a win this week.

    Twins 8, Pirates 2: Some Twins fans took me to task on the NBC blog yesterday for saying that the Tigers looked to be solidly atop a weak division. I still think the Central is fairly weak, but I think I should have waited to declare Detroit solidly atop anything. The Twins are two games back and they have a force of nature on their team. I repeat: The Superman exists, and he's Minnesotan.

    Royals 5, Diamondbacks 0: Mechetastic! (SHO, 4 H, 6K). GWRBI from Miguel Olivo. What?

    Blue Jays 8, Phillies 3: Ryan Madson blew the save in the ninth, and Clay Condrey barfed the game away in the tenth, allowing five of the six batters he faced to score. Madson and Condrey? Weren't they the original Midnight Express? I'll have to ask Brantley . . .

    Mets 6, Orioles 4: Bad defense -- including a dropped popup to Aubrey Huff with which I'm guessing Luis Castillo could sympathize -- doomed the O's.

    Brewers 7, Indians 5: Gallardo wasn't efficient -- he threw 61 pitches in the first two innings -- but the Indians didn't cash in on it like they could have and Yovani gutted his way to five and the win. So much enthusiasm for this Indians team in March has devolved into wondering who will trade for Mark DeRosa. Not exactly how Mark Shapiro drew things up.

    Quick rundown of the late games because I'm jammed up with other stuff this morning:

    Angels 8, Giants 1: Mike Napoli had a three-run homer and three other hits.

    Dodgers 5, A's 4: Torre ties Sparky Anderson on the all-time wins list. Anderson still leads Torre in guest starring spots on WKRP in Cincinnatti.

    Mariners 5, Padres 0: King Felix rules: Two-hit shutout. Kevin Correia was pretty good himself (8 IP, 2 H, 2 ER), but you can't win if your homies don't score.

    Rays 12, Rockies 4: Colorado's winning streak ends. How much longer until the deulsion that they're contenders does too? Transaction junkies want to know.

    White Sox at Cubs: Postponed: I can only imagine that having to sit in the Wrigley Field clubhouse during a rain delay makes Ozzie want to puke even more than being in the dugout during a ballagme.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 5:37am

    Tuesday, June 16, 2009

    Report: Sosa tested positive in 2003

    It's basically the A-Rod deal:

    Sammy Sosa, who joined with Mark McGwire in 1998 in a celebrated pursuit of baseball’s single-season home run record, is among the players who tested positive for a performance-enhancing drug in 2003, according to lawyers with knowledge of the drug-testing results from that year . . .

    . . . Sosa, who is sixth on Major League Baseball’s career home run list and last played in 2007, had long been suspected of using performance-enhancing drugs but until now had never been publicly linked to a positive test.

    This is not exactly shocking news. But unlike all that has come before on the subject of Sosa and PEDs, it is actually news, so the anti-Sammy Sosa dogpile finally has some sort of official imprimatur.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 6:12pm

    Wilstein nominated for Hall

    This is interesting:

    Steve Wilstein, the reporter who broke the story of Mark McGwire’s drug use, might be in the Baseball Hall of Fame before the 12-time All-Star.

    The retired sportswriter was among those nominated for the Hall of Fame’s J.G. Taylor Spink Award, 11 years after noticing the supplement androstenedione in McGwire’s locker and getting him to acknowledge his use of the product, which already had been banned in Olympic sports.

    Wilstein confirmed yesterday he was nominated by the Seattle chapter of the Baseball Writers’ Association of America and will be up for consideration for the award that recognizes “meritorious contributions to baseball writing.”

    Wilstein, you may recall, was roundly criticized for what many people felt was his raining on the dinger parade when he broke the andro story back in 1998. As Mike Bianchi recounted in his notable 2004 column about Wilstein, "Cardinals Manager Tony La Russa tried to get Wilstein banned from the locker room. McGwire accused Wilstein of 'snooping' around his locker. One lapdog baseball writer accused Wilstein of 'inventing a scandal.' Another tried to denigrate Wilstein's story by calling it a 'tabloid-driven controversy.' Many others called him 'unprofessional.'"

    It's hard being the first to do anything, but it's good to see that the writers are doing what they can, however belatedly, to recognize Wilstein's contributions to what everyone will agree has been baseball's biggest story in the past decade.

    (thanks to Pete Toms for the link)

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 3:04pm

    Smoltz looks beyond 2009

    John Smoltz, to WEEI:

    The reason I had surgery was not to just come back for one year. Having surgery certainly quality of life was part of it, but I could have waited to have that. To have surgery at this point, when I did, and not try to milk anymore of the rest of that season, the reason I did that was to pitch well beyond.

    Yeah, well Tom Glavine had big plans too.

    Look, I'd love nothing more than to see Smoltz (a) get shelled by the Braves on Friday; and then (b) pitch several more wonderful years after that. But how about he throw at least one pitch in a Major League game this year before we start talking about next year, OK?

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 1:40pm

    The Rangers downsize

    On the field the 2009 season is shaping up to be a great one for the Texas Rangers. They're winning and looking pretty good in the process. Off the field, however, things aren't as rosy:

    Despite being in first place and having increased attendance at the ballpark this year, the Texas Rangers cut several staff members from their front office on Monday.

    Team spokesman John Blake said the job reductions were less than 10 percent of its staff and that affected employees were offered a severance package. Before the job cuts, the Rangers had about 275 employees in their organization, not including the baseball team.

    Just the latest consequence of Tom Hicks' disastrous, debt-heavy business plan for the Rangers, which has been haunting them for several months now.

    Reasonable people may disagree as to whether sports are recession-resistant. They're not idiot-proof, however, and the plight of the Rangers is some of the best evidence of that.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 1:09pm

    Salt-n-Hammer

    From the Boston Globe's Sox notebook this morning:

    The Sox have agreed to terms with Wilson and two other picks, director of amateur scouting Jason McLeod said: fifth-round choice Seth Schwindenhammer, a high school outfielder from Illinois, and eighth-round pick William Wilkerson, an outfielder from Augusta State. The players need to pass physicals and drug tests before the deals become official.

    From reader Mooseinohio, who sent me the link:

    The Red Sox are oft mentioned as potential trade partners with the Rangers to get Jarrod Saltalamacchia . . . Wouldn't it be cool to someday have both him and Schwindenhammer on the same team? Would the folks who put the names the uniforms negotiate a 'per letter' contract to get more money? What team has been fielded with the most letters or syllable in their names? The least? How badly would Harry Caray butcher their names?

    I'm not sure that Harry would have even been able to handle "Seth" or "Jarrod" without adding extra syllables, God live him.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 12:35pm

    My Morning in Exile

    I post a lot for a quasi-amateur blogger, but there are people out there who are really busting their tails. The next time you think you're too tired to do something, you think of that woman. Anyway:

  • Pudge Rodriguez is a Hall of Famer no matter what Jose Canseco or you or anyone else says.


  • Attention Hanley-pining Red Sox fans: Dry your eyes mates. I know you want to make Theo see how much this pain hurts, but you've got to walk away now. It's over.


  • Can't chop the top off the Trop.


  • Was Cliff Lee jinxed? No, that's silly, because there are no such things as jinxes. I just wrote it that way because question-headlines get more click-throughs. Is that true?


  • The Tigers will be buyers at the deadline, and there are lots of guys who may look good in the English D. Wait, even Pete Incaviglia looked good in the English D, so that's a pretty meaningless statement.


  • Francisco Cervelli may be the future, but Posada and Molina are the present, and nothing matters more in New York than today.


  • Wait. Lunch matters more, both in New York and in Columbus. I'm going to go and get me some, and then I'll be back.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 11:42am

    And That Happened

    Things a borderline obsessive box score reader does on a night, and following morning, when there are hardly any box scores to read:

    1. Mope.

    2. Wander around the house, open random book, read a page or two, then close book.

    3. Eat mint chocolate chip ice cream right out of carton (note: this sometimes happens on busy baseball nights too).

    4. Wonder what 14 year-old cat thinks about, now that death is presumably near.

    5. Buy four baseball t-shirts online (two Tigers, one Braves, one Giants; don't read too much into that; I just liked the shirt).

    6. Try to ignore nine year-old cat who doesn't respect his elders.

    7. Click on the Brewers-Indians game, realize how ugly it is, and click it off again because life is too short to watch ugly baseball. Consult the boxscore anyway and wonder if Ben Francisco, Jhonny Peralta and Mike Cameron feel like losers for being the only guys not hitting tonight.

    8. Listen to son snore on baby monitor. Wonder why nearly four year-old son still has a baby monitor. Remember that listening to his son snore on baby monitor is one of the most wonderful things in the world. Vow to keep monitor in son's room until he's 12.

    9. Look out window and see neighbor -- who used to be law firm co-worker -- get home really late from work. Remember how much I hated law firm.

    10. Fantasize about living on west coast so that I could get "And That Happened" completely written before I go to bed each night. Curse myself for having such pathetic fantasies.

    11. Wonder whether Annie was right when she said that the world is made for people who aren't cursed with self-awareness. Think about it a bit and realize that this is probably so. Spend many more minutes reading the list of "Bull Durham" quotes I referenced in order to get the Annie quote right.

    12. Notice that the Angels-Giants game has started. Wonder how much money I could have won if I had offered to bet someone that Zito would have a lower ERA than Lackey come June 15th.

    13. Stalk some junior high school friends on Facebook. Think about the ethics of this, and then realize that with a name as distinctive as "Calcaterra" more people are probably stalking me than me them. Continue stalking. Find no one interesting to stalk. Move on with life.

    14. Notice that the Indians-Brewers game ended, with the Brewers winning 14 to 12. Think that Indians should have managed clock better so that there would have been time for an onside kick and a chance for a field goal.

    15. Set coffee pot up to grind and brew at 5:20 AM. Brush teeth. Turn out light in dark-fearing daughter's room (dark fear ceases once she falls asleep). Go to bed.

    16. Wake up two-minutes before alarm -- which is set for 5:25 -- goes off. Realize that this happens most mornings anymore. Wonder what happened to the night person I used to be. Wonder how late I'd sleep if I didn't have a blog to update each morning. Remember that I like the blog more than I like sleeping late and banish the thought.

    17. Notice that the Angels beat the Giants 9-7. Wonder if the four teams playing last night decided that they needed to score enough for all 30. Note that, as of this morning, Lackey's ERA has inched lower and Zito's higher. I will not be taking bets on their relative positions as of July 15th.

    18. Begin my morning stroll around the baseball pages and begin forming the day's bloggy thoughts.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 5:32am

    Monday, June 15, 2009

    Max Patkin v2.0 to retire

    A whole article about the San Diego Chicken and not one mention of "The Baseball Bunch?" Johnny Bench must have some powerful lawyers.

    For 35 years, Ted Giannoulas has jumped and run — and flattened Barney — at ballparks across America, climbing into a feathered costume to go to work as the San Diego Chicken.

    “It’s the one magic elixir that keeps me young,” he says.

    Yet the bumps and bruises on Giannoulas don’t heal nearly as quickly as they used to. He is in the twilight of a long and lucrative career playing to audiences large and small, and acknowledged that this could be the San Diego Chicken’s final season. The gigs aren’t there like they used to be. Nearly every team in the NFL, NBA, NHL and MLB have their own licensed mascots — a trend inspired in part by the San Diego Chicken’s popularity so many years ago — and Giannoulas has cut back his schedule in recent years. Down from a high of about 250 games each year in his heyday, Giannoulas said he’ll leave his San Diego home for just 50 appearances this summer.

    “At the end of this season I’ll make a determination if I think I can go another season. I can’t say for certain. I’ll just see how my body feels, what my energy level might be going forward,” Giannoulas said. “The fun and energy is still at the ballpark. I still get a charge out of it.”

    He still makes a ton of money doing it too. Those 50 appearances this year are going to make Giannoulas six figures, according to the article. And it's not like there can be a ton of overhead. I mean, it's pretty much man + chicken suit, right?

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 4:28pm

    For Dad

    Nothing says "I love you Dad," like stinky lockers and used carpeting:

    With only seven days remaining until Father's Day, Yankees-Steiner Collectibles, the exclusive provider of game-used memorabilia from the original and current Yankee Stadium, introduced a second lot of unique and iconic pieces of baseball history in the "Yankee Stadium Legends" online auction. People can now find once-in-a-lifetime gifts, perfect for sports-enthusiast Dads. The newest additions to the auction include:

    Official lockers of current Yankees superstars, including Alex Rodriguez, Andy Pettitte and Hideki Matsui;

    World Championship carpeting removed from the front offices at the original ballpark. Every unique piece of carpet displays a different year of each of the franchise's 26 World Championships.

    Cast off the lockers! Follow the carpet! No! Let us gather lockers together!

    Also available are 1'x1' pieces of live sod ($120) and "Final Season Crystals with Genuine Dirt from the original Yankee Stadium" ($80). I hope they come with certificates of authenticity, because I'd hate it if someone tried to sell me fake dirt from the Bronx.

    A little memorabilia never hurt anyone, but I simply don't get this level of fetishism.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 4:11pm

    The Nats = the 1962 Mets

    As we sit around waiting for Manny Acta to be fired, the guys at USA Today point out something I did not realize:

    Sunday's loss to the Rays completed a series sweep by Tampa Bay and dropped the Nationals to 16-45, the exact same record the '62 Mets had after 61 games.

    Yes, they're bad, but they haven't felt historically bad to me this year. I mean, if you go back and check, I bet I said way more bad things about Washington in last year's ATH recaps than this year's. They've lost a lot of games, but the stink has been of a certain type -- lots of blown games by the bullpen and some generalized dread -- but hadn't, in my mind at least, worked its way down to a 1962-Mets level. Or even a 2003 Tigers level. But numbers don't lie.

    Well, often they do, but in this case the don't.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 3:50pm

    Valentine to the Nats?

    That's the speculation from Jon Heyman anyway:

    Manny Acta appears to be on his way out as Nationals manager, and while respected ex-big league manager Jim Riggleman reportedly will be installed as the interim manager, team higher-ups also have begun internal discussions about permanent candidates. One of those candidates to replace Acta, according to National League sources, is Bobby Valentine, who is currently in his seventh season as manager of the Chiba Lotte Mariners in Japan.

    I think Valentine is as good a candidate as any, and to be sure, his contract situation with Chiba Lotte is such that he is probably looking for a Major League offer. But please, can someone tell me what "National League sources" are? If it's someone on the Nats, that could be news, but presumably Heyman would say a "Nationals source" if he had one. Isn't anyone else in the National League speculating just like anyone else?


    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 2:46pm

    Wrigley: Shrine, dump, or false dichotomy?

    This morning I linked Ozzie Guillen's colorful take on Wrigley Field. Last week Deadspin did its Deadspiny thing with the place. Of course, neither Ozzie nor Deadspin can be said to represent mainstream sentiment (the latter hates everything; the former lives for chaos), so this morning Stu Courtney of the Sun-Times takes up the subject. After noting the pros and cons (its a hard place to work but a magical place to play; its a good place to watch a ballgame, but when you have to use the word "urine" to describe the ambiance, something is amiss) he asks the fans' opinion:

    What's your take on Wrigley: shrine or dump? Is it an enjoyable place to watch a game? Would you like to see it modernized with a Jumbotron, an automated scoreboard and more family-friendly features that would make it easier to bring the kids? How would you rate it compared to other big-league ballparks, such as the Cell?

    Taking everything into consideration, what's your vote on Wrigley Field: thumbs up or thumbs down?

    OK, maybe Courtney is trying to stir up crap too, because no one in their right mind wants a Jumbotron, dot races, a plethora of kids' promotions, and all of that jazz, do they?

    How about this: a structural rehab, whatever can be done to expand clubhouses and make them more comfortable, and a minimalist, conservative approach to any expansions or upgrades a la what has happened to Fenway Park over the past handful of years. If it means that the Cubs play on the south side, in Milwaukee or, hell, in Grant Park for a year, fine, but the goal should obviously be to fix what's broken, not "modernize" it in the aspirational sense of the term.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 1:45pm

    “Satchel”

    The new Satchel Paige biography sounds really, really good:

    How fast could Satchel Paige throw a baseball? It’s hard to know because there were no radar guns to measure ball velocity when Leroy Paige, better known as Satchel, became a pitching star of the Negro Leagues in the 1930s. In his discerning, empathetic and hype-free new Paige biography, Larry Tye cites the eyewitness account of one of the white reporters who finally began paying attention to Paige in 1934: “All you can see is something like a thin line of pipe smoke" . . . Mr. Tye’s willingness to come to these or any other level-headed conclusions about his subject is made remarkable by the elusiveness of hard facts . . .

    . . . radiates an obvious affection for Mr. Paige, but his is not a fan’s unquestioning love. He sees the aloofness beneath the crowd-pleasing charm, the caginess behind the exaggerated sang-froid and the selfishness behind the self-promotion. “Satchel” succeeds in putting these attributes into perspective. “Why did Satchel feel the need to inflate?” Mr. Tye asks about all those apocryphal Paige stories. “He did it because reshaping history was intoxicating and empowering.”

    I could read tall tales about Paige all day, but it will be really really nice to read a levelheaded account of the man's life that gives us some insight into Paige the man as opposed to heavy helpings of Paige the myth.

    Only 29 shopping days until my birthday in case anyone, you know, is hurting for ideas.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 1:25pm

    My Morning in Exile

    Apologies if I seem a bit distracted today. My daughter, who will start kindergarten in the fall, begins "Safety Town" today, and it has me all nervous and anxious. Not because it means she's growing up and ever-so-slightly leaving my control and supervision, really, but because I found a page in the printer tray in the den this morning that read "The first rule of Safety Town is that you do not talk about Safety Town. The second rule of Safety Town is that YOU DO NOT TALK ABOUT SAFETY TOWN."

    Dear God, what are they doing there?!

  • Manny Acta allowed to fly to New York with the Nationals. This means that (a) the travel-by-bus cutoff is somewhere below 225 miles; and (b) that he still had a job. At least until around 3pm or so, which is when offday firings tend to take place.


  • Brian Bruney should not have apologized to K-Rod because K-Rod already said he didn't care about this kind of stuff. Confused? You won't be, after this episode of "Soap!"


  • Memo to Boston: push Smoltz to Friday and give Dice-K the day off. By doing so, he gets to face the Braves, which would be great fun. It may actually help from a baseball perspective too.


  • I heart Ozzie Guillen.


  • Irabu and Lima Time: one of them is pitching in Long Beach for the love of the game, the other because he thinks he's on the comeback trail. You guess which is which.


  • Finally, baseball teams up with the IBAF to make a pitch for the 2016 games. Personally, I'm rooting for squash and rugby sevens, whatever the hell that is.


  • I am Jack's general dissatisfaction with the quality of the National League Wild Card race.

    Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 11:53am


    Comments

    Tell the Shyster what you think: