December 12, 2013
Who is Shyster?
Or you can search by:
Most Recent Comments
Mike Hargrove Interview (13)
Can they be the California Angels again? (9)
Another great moment in mass transit? (7)
Just another ten-percenter (his mind is like an ocean) (7)
Great Moments in Half-Baked Populism (8)
Shyster's Daily Circuit
Joe Posnanski Blog
Cot's Baseball Contracts
It IS About the Money
Baseball Think Factory
MLB Trade Rumors
Way Back and Gone
Bats -- NYT Baseball Blog
The Biz of Baseball
The Daily Fungo
The Common Man
Jorge Says No!
Baseball Over Here
Monday, December 22, 2008
Deep ThoughtOne of those writing projects I mentioned in the previous post is a book review I'm doing for the New York Post of Allen St. John's book about the Super Bowl called The Billion Dollar Game. Really good book, by the way, and I'll link the review here when it runs. But something in it is driving me absolutely crazy.
In Chapters 8 and 9, St. John talks to the FOX Sports director and executives in charge of the Super Bowl broadcast. They all make a really good point: despite the Super Bowl being the biggest game in the world, from a broadcast perspective, you simply can't add 50 cameras over and above what you'd have in a regular season game even though everyone expects you to. It's expensive for one thing in that if you add a camera, you have to add a tape machine, and a video editor, etc. etc. It's also technically complicated, in that you still basically have a single director in charge of calling the show, and he can only see so many shots at a time. The better rule, the FOX guys believe, is to keep things relatively simple and go with the approach that got you through the previous 20 weeks or so. All of the extra cameras, bells and whistles "are really the meringue," one of them says. "We need to make sure the pie is right, and the pie is a production of the game where everyone can see what goes on and knows what the hell just happened."
Here's a question: is it possible for these guys to get switched off of FOX's football crew and reassigned to baseball? Because 90% of FOX baseball broadcasts are meringue, and I would really like some freakin' pie next October.
Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 11:01am
“Because 90% of FOX baseball broadcasts are meringue, and I would really like some freakin’ pie next October.”
Posted 12/22 at 12:28 PM
Scott Simkus said...
I couldn’t agree more. With all the extreme close-ups, cut-aways to the dugout, sound effects, graphics…We learn more about a guy’s nose hair issues and freckles than the action on the field. I miss watching baseball on TV, and on FOX, we’re not seeing much baseball…
Posted 12/22 at 01:18 PM
Pete Toms said...
I think HD is driving some of this. HD is all about the close up. Anybody else think cheerleader shots are up the past year or two? ( I’m not objecting ) Anyway….anybody seen sports in 3D yet? It’ supposed to be the next step…
Posted 12/22 at 02:14 PM
And give us some freakin’ cheesecake while you’re at it.
Wait, what were we talking about? I think it’s lunch time.
Posted 12/22 at 04:38 PM
Dr Paisley said...
First, take a rolling pin to Joe Buck and Tim McCarver . . .
Posted 12/22 at 11:43 PM
Michael Prater said...
Having enjoyed MLB’s Extra Innings package this past season, I know there are plenty of good candidates who can more than aptly fill Buck and McCarver’s seats in the broadcast booths, both for regular and postseason games.
Posted 12/23 at 01:10 AM