|
May 26, 2012
Who is Shyster?
Monthly Archives
November, 2009
October, 2009 September, 2009 August, 2009 July, 2009 June, 2009 May, 2009 April, 2009 March, 2009 February, 2009 January, 2009 December, 2008 November, 2008
Or you can search by:
Most Recent Comments
Mike Hargrove Interview (7)
Cole Hamels Meets Talk Radio (21) Just another ten-percenter (his mind is like an ocean) (5) The Waiting Game (10) Rules = Destiny (1) Shyster's Daily Circuit
Rob Neyer
AaronGleeman.com Joe Posnanski Blog Baseball Analysts Baseball Musings Cot's Baseball Contracts It IS About the Money Keith Law Cardboard Gods Baseball Think Factory MLB Trade Rumors Retrosheet Vegas Watch Way Back and Gone Bats -- NYT Baseball Blog The Biz of Baseball The Daily Fungo U.S.S. Mariner Braves Journal Scott Simkus The Common Man Jorge Says No! Baseball Over Here Fack Youk Wezen-Ball Chop-n-Change |
Friday, October 09, 2009Deep ThoughtsHow many beers does C.B. Bucknor owe Phil Cuzzi for taking the heat off him?Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 10:50pm Comments
David said...
Umpiring System Overhaul Signatories —— Even though I assume everybody’s probably had a belly full of this conversation (including me!) I’ll quickly respond to the general point made by Greg and John: I never insulted anybody first, only after they hated my comments about baseball so much that they decided to insult me. I know this because it’s not in my nature to insult total strangers unless they’re lying or they’ve insulted me first. I just don’t feel like that. Lastly, I’m not necessarily promoting any sort of computertized umpiring system (especially for balls and strikes.) In fact, I think that the colossal expenditure of time and money that’d be necessary for creating, for example, some sort of radar or laser system to determine fair and foul balls is totally unnecessary: just do what tennis and common sense would have us do, use replays. Simply have a trio of umpires in a booth with HD monitors who have veto power over certain on-field calls. There could be a red light that flashes on the scoreboard when they’re overturning the on-field umpires calls. (That’d be an awesome way of cutting these power-tripping, god-complex-having umpires down to size!) Also, there must be accountability when umpires make flagrantly bad calls (whatever their motives are). Selig and MLB famously broke the umpire’s union a few years ago, making them their bitches. And yet they’ve only used their now-godlike powers over the umps to cut their pay, not to increase quality, as the quality this year was the worst I’ve ever seen, bar none (so much that, obviously, I strongly suspect mass corruption). Posted 10/13 at 03:55 PM
Jason B said...
David - I think you hit on one of the key things that’s so exasperating to everyone who witnesses poorly called game after poorly called game. Sometimes the umps ‘fess up, sometimes not; but where is the accountability? Perhaps these matters are handled behind closed doors by the MLB powers-that-be, but there’s probably an incentive for the umps to elevate their games a bit if there’s a chance that they will be publicly called out and swiftly and effectively disciplined by their superiors. Public shaming should have some deterrent effect, no? (Let’s ask the judge who makes people hold up a sign saying that they’re a convicted drunk driver / shoplifter / pedophile / whatever.) Then again, if being ridiculed and second-guessed on every sports talk show / newspaper column / game write-up doesn’t do it, I don’t know that your boss bad-mouthing you and adding to the cacaphony will have any real impact.
Posted 10/13 at 07:16 PM
Jack Marshall said...
No, David, I don’t agree to disagree. Conspiracy theorists like you do real, tangible damage to society and our enjoyment of life. They sell a false world of dark and shadowy forces manipulating our lives and choices, making us powerless dupes. They spread paranoia and mistrust, using the same kind of half-truths, logical double-speak and intellectual dishonesty that have long been the staple of Holocaust-deniers, creationists and, more recently, “Truthers” and “Birthers.” A democracy is built on trust, and they destroy trust, ostensibly to save us with “the truth,” but actually to give themselves power. And it’s a destructive power…the power to make us reject our institutions, professions and leaders as sinister. The government is out to kill us. Corporations are evil forces. Lawyers don’t care; doctors don’t care. The Trilateral Commission runs all the big governments, the UN is a sham, the CIA created AIDS to kill African-Americans,LBJ had JFK shot, the moon landing was a fake. And baseball is a lie. I can tell you are sincere, but so are those bearded prophets in Times Square who carry signs saying the world is going to end. They, however, are harmless, beacuse they are obviously deranged. What you do is worse. The “logic” of conspiracy-mongers has helped destroy civil political discourse in the US, encouraged hate, fear, anxiety and desperation, while undermining cooperation, faith, hope and inspiration. Yes there are bad people out there, and frauds, and scams, but good, smart, dedicated people work hard to expose and punish them, and the vast majority of the frauds ARE exposed. Life is not futile; the powerful and rich are not all out to deceive and screw us, and those who are aren’t as powerful as you think. Your ilk are the same people who whisper in young children’s ears that their parents don’t really love them, or persuade a husband that his wife unfaithful. You are Iago, but worse, because you would turn all of us against each other, untrusting, certain that every smile is false, that everyone who extends his hand is hiding a shiv behind his back. As free speech goes, yours is as harmful and without mitigating benefits as any I know. It is like a plague. I’ll concede that you have a right to your comments, which are really a form of hate speech. You hate trust, and want others to hate it too. I love trust; it’s my business and my passion. And it needs to be protected from people like you. Posted 10/14 at 08:05 PM
David said...
Dear Creepy, Impotent, Military-worshiping Neo-con: Leave me alone. Posted 10/14 at 08:09 PM
Jack Marshall said...
See? Now we’re getting somewhere! Keep your mind-rotting, joy-crushing, hate-mongering paranoid fantasies to yourself, and it’s a deal. Posted 10/14 at 08:13 PM
David said...
Checked e-mail anticipating info from my honest, smart, useful partner (not American, naturally). Startled to see government-worshiping evil. Got very angry. I create more than you. My God is in Heaven. I don’t need Viagra to love the way your kind do. Work hard and be honest. My only goals in life. You and yours love murder and lies. You are “happy” because you and yours run America today. Okay. I accept this. Conversation over. Posted 10/14 at 08:20 PM
Jason B said...
Plus he’s probably one of them homos! Cordially, Your homo friend Jason, still waiting for Yakkety Sax to liven up the chronic umpiring mistakes of the 2009 postseason. Someone bring Christmas to me early this year… Posted 10/15 at 01:35 AM
Page 4 of 4 « First < 2 3 4
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry. Next Post: And That Happened: Division Series>> <<Previous Post: Steven Soderbergh to try and make another baseball movie | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David, you can count me among those in favor of some kind of computer umpire. But, and I offer this in all seriousness, wouldn’t a computerized umpiring system be even easier to game than a system that uses human umpires? Let’s say a more advanced version of PitchTrax was used to call balls and strikes, wouldn’t it be susceptible to a little bit of hard-to-detect reprogramming that would allow calls to be changed whenever desired? You don’t need to a respond; I don’t really care one way or another. Even if a conspiracy were proven, I still wouldn’t care very much on a personal level; it’s just a form of entertainment after all. I’d be more willing to put some energy into considering potential government corruption (almost a tautology, all governments are corrupt to one degree or another) but I think I’ll compile my own information on such matters, rather than be drawn in to a debate with strangers on a comment board for a baseball blog. Anyway, just a thought for you to contemplate before deciding digital umps are the way to go.
On another note, I don’t know that it’s wholly fair for you, David, to complain of personal attacks when you yourself engage in such tactics. You were compared to someone (the person Barney Frank compared to a table) who was portrayed as unwilling to listen to others’ perspectives, someone more interested in shouting than discussing. An insulting comparison, perhaps, but no more insulting than telling someone that he or she “worships authority” or implying that he or she is a “sheep.” You are also disqualified from complaining about personal attacks as long as you continue to make offensive and demeaning remarks about an entire section of humanity, specifically those who identify as, or engage in behaviors typically associated with, homosexuals or others within the LGBTQ spectrum. I refer, here, to your use of “homosexual” or “gay” as an insult and your frequent reference to the act of performing oral sex on a man as a negative or cowardly thing. Until such time as all such hate is removed from your comments, it will be very hard to give your comments the attention they deserve.