June 19, 2013
Who is Shyster?
Or you can search by:
Most Recent Comments
Sam Zell’s Nightmare Continues (11)
William S. Stevens: 1948-2008 (22)
Teixeira’s Options (18)
Cole Hamels Meets Talk Radio (23)
Appropos of nothing (4)
Shyster's Daily Circuit
Joe Posnanski Blog
Cot's Baseball Contracts
It IS About the Money
Baseball Think Factory
MLB Trade Rumors
Way Back and Gone
Bats -- NYT Baseball Blog
The Biz of Baseball
The Daily Fungo
The Common Man
Jorge Says No!
Baseball Over Here
Friday, May 22, 2009
Great Moments in Class RelationsA scene from Yankee Stadium:
The combination of food and security collided inside the Stadium Wednesday night. This had nothing to do with high-profile broadcasters or players' wives. This was a rebellion of the rich. In that expensive area downstairs - the one with the empty seats - there are seemingly more waiters and waitresses, serving free food, than there are patrons.
Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 8:55am
Hey, after we gave all those bankers $12 trillion of our tax dollars, we should be grateful that they’re giving us a little bit back.
Seriously, though, wouldn’t it be nice if there were a modern day Robin Hood?
Posted 05/22 at 09:04 AM
If this is what it takes to keep the streak going, bring the cream pies as well
Posted 05/22 at 09:18 AM
You know what I enjoy about this? The guy in the rich seats saying “I paid for this food, I can do with it what I want!” Way to not end your sentence with a preposition, rich guy; impressive grammar skills.
Posted 05/22 at 09:24 AM
Matt A. said...
$400 seats, $1500 seats just amazes me for a regular season baseball game. What was the pricing structure at old Yankee Stadium that led them to believe they were leaving dumptrucks of money on the table in underpriced seats?
Posted 05/22 at 09:45 AM
Sara K said...
Can nacho-scalping be far behind?
Posted 05/22 at 09:53 AM
Will “let them eat ice cream sandwiches” ring through the centuries as the battle cry of the average fan revolt.
Posted 05/22 at 10:07 AM
Maybe they should just put up a sign that says, “Do not feed the peasants”.
Posted 05/22 at 02:41 PM
Grammar Police said...
Last I checked, “it” was not a preposition.
Posted 05/22 at 07:48 PM
I believe “to” would be though.
Posted 05/22 at 10:42 PM
Grammar Police said...
Actually, in the obvious case of rewording the sentence to end in “to”, one would be implying the verb “to do”, e.g., “I can do with it what I want to [do].”
In that context the word “to” is a grammatical particle, not a preposition. The preposition here is “with”, and there’s really no way to place it at the end the sentence and still expect anyone to understand your intent. While it’s certainly an annoying habit to constantly place one’s objects before the verb that act on them, it doesn’t really demonstrate grammatical prowess to do so at the expense of clarity. If anything, it makes you sound like a douchebag.
Posted 05/23 at 01:53 PM