|
May 18, 2013
Who is Shyster?
Monthly Archives
May, 2012
November, 2009 October, 2009 September, 2009 August, 2009 July, 2009 June, 2009 May, 2009 April, 2009 March, 2009 February, 2009 January, 2009 December, 2008 November, 2008
Or you can search by:
Most Recent Comments
Sam Zell’s Nightmare Continues (10)
William S. Stevens: 1948-2008 (22) Teixeira’s Options (18) Cole Hamels Meets Talk Radio (23) Appropos of nothing (4) Shyster's Daily Circuit
Rob Neyer
AaronGleeman.com Joe Posnanski Blog Baseball Analysts Baseball Musings Cot's Baseball Contracts It IS About the Money Keith Law Cardboard Gods Baseball Think Factory MLB Trade Rumors Retrosheet Vegas Watch Way Back and Gone Bats -- NYT Baseball Blog The Biz of Baseball The Daily Fungo U.S.S. Mariner Braves Journal Scott Simkus The Common Man Jorge Says No! Baseball Over Here Fack Youk Wezen-Ball Chop-n-Change |
Tuesday, November 17, 2009Great Moments in Transparency: Christina Kahrl’s Rookie of the Year voteIt's too much to ask every writer to be as thorough as Christina Kahrl is in explaining her Rookie of the Year vote, but how nice would it be if every voter actually explained the thought process behind their awards choices?Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 3:59pm Comments
Palooka Joe said...
I guarantee that most votes didn’t have a dissertation like that behind them. It’s a shame too. This seems like a great topic for an off-season article. From the comments: “I haven’t read much of Christina, but just might start. I assume she is a female, but one that knows a lot about baseball…” Bwah!??!?! Posted 11/18 at 08:39 AM
Chuck said...
With the explanations now public for the Verlander first place vote and one of the Hernandez first place votes, I think I’m just as happy at *not* being given a look behind the curtain. What passes for logic can be downright frightening. Posted 11/18 at 09:43 AM
jwb said...
Let’s just say this is several orders of magnitude more deserving of respect than a certain writer’s HOF vote explanation. Posted 11/18 at 10:53 AM
MJ said...
I’ve always heard/read rumors that writers would pull that, [wish I could say I’m] shocked that someone would have the stones to actually admit it =\ Posted 11/18 at 01:31 PM
MJ said...
[not trying to start a debate]the question is sort of valid, but I can almost 100% guarantee the commentor has no idea why. Posted 11/18 at 01:42 PM
Page 1 of 1
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry. Next Post: My Morning in Exile>> <<Previous Post: It's Greinke | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Could it be that there’s not much thought involved for a lot of writers?