December 5, 2013
Who is Shyster?
Or you can search by:
Most Recent Comments
Mike Hargrove Interview (13)
Can they be the California Angels again? (9)
Another great moment in mass transit? (7)
Just another ten-percenter (his mind is like an ocean) (7)
Great Moments in Half-Baked Populism (8)
Shyster's Daily Circuit
Joe Posnanski Blog
Cot's Baseball Contracts
It IS About the Money
Baseball Think Factory
MLB Trade Rumors
Way Back and Gone
Bats -- NYT Baseball Blog
The Biz of Baseball
The Daily Fungo
The Common Man
Jorge Says No!
Baseball Over Here
Tuesday, December 09, 2008
K-Rod to the MetsWe knew it was going to happen, but details are now emerging:
Considered by many the top reliever on the free-agent market, Rodriguez saved 62 games for Anaheim last season. The Angels offered just more than $30 million over three years to retain the 26-year-old right-hander . . .
GOTCHA! That text was lifted from this November 2005 article announcing the signing of Billy Wagner, with the specific facts changed to fit K-Rod. Wagner had more money over more years. The term "suspect bullpen" has been inserted to replace "struggling closer Braden Looper." Not much else has changed.
The lesson: you can sign that bigtime closer, but it ain't necessarily gonna solve your problems.
Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 10:36am
You’re not wrong, but that’s not a particularly good example. The Mets put together a really excellent bullpen in 2006, in no small part because of the Wagner signing; the bullpen carried them to the NLCS in spite of an old, injury-ravaged starting rotation.
The real reason the Mets are in such a bind now is Minaya’s handling of the 2006-07 offseason, when he traded away several young relief arms (Henry Owens, Heath Bell, Royce Ring, and Matt Lindstrom) for talent that never panned out, decimating the team’s bullpen depth in 07 and 08.
Posted 12/09 at 11:56 AM
Craig Calcaterra said...
I guess it depends on whether signing the big name closer leads to the decisions to get rid of bullpen depth. If not, no worries. But if having K-Rod (or Wagner before him) causes Omar to think “well, the bullpen is sorted, I’ll now forget about that and move on to other things,” then it is a problem.
Posted 12/09 at 11:58 AM
Chris H. said...
Craig, those of us Cub fans who remember Mel Rojas certainly agree with your sentiment. Especially as K-Rod may not even be the best closer available (klaw sez that Kerry Wood has better stuff, and it’s not all that close).
Posted 12/09 at 12:25 PM
Im not sure Omar really believes this will completely solve the pen. There’s been talks about trading Heilman for more bullpen help. More arms are coming on the way
Posted 12/09 at 12:31 PM
Now you’re just playing with my emotions. I don’t know I’ll ever be able to trust you again.
Posted 12/09 at 01:12 PM
What jumps out to me aren’t the similarities but rather the things you had to change from Wagner’s deal. 3 years instead of 4. Less money overall. You also had to change 33-year old to 26-year old.
Posted 12/09 at 03:16 PM
I posted this on Braves Journal, but… You can always predict how the Mets’ thought processes will work. They will weigh all options, then do whatever is most expensive.
Posted 12/09 at 04:15 PM
Not in the draft.
Posted 12/09 at 05:43 PM
i’m surprised by this deal. it’s obviously expensive, but to get him for three years instead of the allegedly wanted 4 or 5. the Mets played that one well by waiting it out and getting their man and a relatively do-able cost.
Posted 12/09 at 11:46 PM
God I hate closers.
Posted 12/10 at 02:11 PM
Page 1 of 1
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
Next Post: Thank God for corruption!>> <<Previous Post: The Yankees and Mets return to the trough