December 6, 2013
Who is Shyster?
Or you can search by:
Most Recent Comments
Mike Hargrove Interview (13)
Can they be the California Angels again? (9)
Another great moment in mass transit? (7)
Just another ten-percenter (his mind is like an ocean) (7)
Great Moments in Half-Baked Populism (8)
Shyster's Daily Circuit
Joe Posnanski Blog
Cot's Baseball Contracts
It IS About the Money
Baseball Think Factory
MLB Trade Rumors
Way Back and Gone
Bats -- NYT Baseball Blog
The Biz of Baseball
The Daily Fungo
The Common Man
Jorge Says No!
Baseball Over Here
Friday, July 17, 2009
Maddux = ZeroMy most favoritist ballplayer ever is getting his number retired tonight, so today we get one of those "what made Maddux tick" stories, the likes of which have come once or twice every year since the mid 90s. I'm taken with this passage:
Players and coaches always described Maddux’s baseball acumen as almost a sixth sense. Maddux might watch a hitter even as the hitter watched Maddux, but the pitcher always seemed to see more.
Having it put just like that makes me realize that both my favorite baseball player and one of my all-time favorite fictional characters have something in common. To wit:
Now, a few words on looking for things. When you go looking for something specific, your chances of finding it are very bad. Because of all the things in the world, you're only looking for one of them. When you go looking for anything at all, your chances of finding it are very good. Because of all the things in the world, you're sure to find some of them.
I always say that the essence of my work relies fundamentally on two basic principles: objectivity and observation, or "the two obs" as I call them. My work relies on my ability to remain absolutely, purely objective, detached. I have mastered the fine art of detachment. And while it comes at some cost, this supreme objectivity is what makes me, I dare say, the greatest observer the world has ever known.
I don't know why I never put those two two guys together, but it all makes perfect sense now.
Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 3:46pm
One point for for a Zero Effect reference. One hundred points for a baseball-inspired Zero Effect reference doesn’t use The Case of the Man Who Lied About His Age.
I still can’t believe Greil Marcus didn’t discuss the film at all in his Bill Pullman essay.
Posted 07/17 at 04:07 PM
I had high hopes that your link was going to take me to Sherlock Holmes’ Wikipedia page. Alas, it did not.
Posted 07/17 at 05:55 PM
As Bunk would say, you have to have soft eyes.
Posted 07/17 at 07:48 PM
Are you saying that Maddux is a speed freak!??!!!
Posted 07/18 at 02:21 AM
I was sure the first quote was from one of Douglas Adams’ Dirk Gently novels ( “Dirk Gently’s Holistic Detective Agency” and “The Long Dark Teatime of the Soul”). Both are really funny books, which pre-date Zero Effect by 10 years.
And after reading the Wiki summary of “The Zero Effect”, it sounds like there is more than a little of Rex Stout’s Nero Wolf character in Zero too—the brilliant, reclusive detective with the more worldly sidekick to do the legwork.
Regardless, Kudos to Maddux!
Posted 07/20 at 11:45 AM