May 19, 2013
Who is Shyster?
Or you can search by:
Most Recent Comments
Sam Zell’s Nightmare Continues (10)
William S. Stevens: 1948-2008 (22)
Teixeira’s Options (18)
Cole Hamels Meets Talk Radio (23)
Appropos of nothing (4)
Shyster's Daily Circuit
Joe Posnanski Blog
Cot's Baseball Contracts
It IS About the Money
Baseball Think Factory
MLB Trade Rumors
Way Back and Gone
Bats -- NYT Baseball Blog
The Biz of Baseball
The Daily Fungo
The Common Man
Jorge Says No!
Baseball Over Here
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
Marlins are GoAnd the second hurdle is cleared:
A home, at last, for the Marlins.
I'm done bloviating about all of this. All I'll say is that Marlins' ownership had better hold up its end of the bargain -- well, what would have been a bargain if they had ever shown a care for the public in all of this -- and put the resources and love into this team that the citizens of Miami deserve. If they go all Lerners-with-the-Nationals on this, I hope and suspect that the pitchforks and torches will be generously distributed throughout Dade county.
Check in with Jorge and Neil going forward, as they will no doubt continue to have the best coverage of all of this.
Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 6:15am
Another community squeezed for a half-billion dollars, give or take, by the uber-rich. I love baseball, but I sure do hate these deals.
I’m wondering how soon it will be before the Blue Jays, White Sox and O’s start complaining that their “ancient” parks need to be replaced.
Posted 03/24 at 07:37 AM
Don’t worry, Craig—once the stadium is done, ownership will come up with another reason not to spend any money.
Posted 03/24 at 08:34 AM
So my question is, how definite does this make things? Didn’t Tampa recently approve a stadium too, and isn’t it on hold? Or am I wrong about that?
Posted 03/24 at 09:47 AM
Pete Toms said...
lar, Rays are back to square 1, looking for a site.
Well, I am wrong again. I thought this deal was gonna die at the county level due to financing concerns (bed tax revenues declining due to the recession, borrowing costs in the bond market). But, they did it and the votes weren’t even close at the county. Maybe in the end the recession helped, lots of short term construction work now.
Happy for Marlins fans, should be a good spot to watch a ball game.
Posted 03/24 at 01:51 PM
Jorge Costales said...
Agreed with the sentiments about the onus being on Marlins ownership to live up to the many promises they made in the course of the obtaining public—albeit non-local tax—monies to build the ballpark.
But as a Miamian who supported the stadium and has no illusions about the Loria MLB ownership track record - which is in my opinion:
Good - spent money from 2003 thru 2005 very effectively and established a baseball operation which has allowed them to have a .500 W/L record with minimum wage salaries for the past 3 years.
Bad - Montreal and minimum wage salaries for the past 3 years.
The answer to why someone who is aware of that would support the stadium is that I believe that the stadium ensures us of having a permanent [or at least 20 years?] MLB team in Miami. So even if the Marlins continue at the low-end of the pay scale and the record is bad and attendance does not materialize. Then the smart move is for MLB to push for a sale of the team, not to allow or encourage relocation. Especially in light of the international growth of the sport in the region. It would be, ‘the smart move.’
Posted 03/25 at 10:42 AM
Jorge Costales said...
Re Tampa - forgot to add - please check out this blog - http://blogs.tampabay.com/ballpark/
Blog is by Aaron Sharockman, a local reporter
Any public financing in Tampa has to go thru a public referendum, so local civic leaders are trying to develop a plan which will allow them to present a united front. You have to figure they’ll want to go public as close the World Series memories as possible
Posted 03/25 at 10:46 AM