|
May 24, 2013
Who is Shyster?
Monthly Archives
May, 2012
November, 2009 October, 2009 September, 2009 August, 2009 July, 2009 June, 2009 May, 2009 April, 2009 March, 2009 February, 2009 January, 2009 December, 2008 November, 2008
Or you can search by:
Most Recent Comments
Sam Zell’s Nightmare Continues (11)
William S. Stevens: 1948-2008 (22) Teixeira’s Options (18) Cole Hamels Meets Talk Radio (23) Appropos of nothing (4) Shyster's Daily Circuit
Rob Neyer
AaronGleeman.com Joe Posnanski Blog Baseball Analysts Baseball Musings Cot's Baseball Contracts It IS About the Money Keith Law Cardboard Gods Baseball Think Factory MLB Trade Rumors Retrosheet Vegas Watch Way Back and Gone Bats -- NYT Baseball Blog The Biz of Baseball The Daily Fungo U.S.S. Mariner Braves Journal Scott Simkus The Common Man Jorge Says No! Baseball Over Here Fack Youk Wezen-Ball Chop-n-Change |
Baseball. Blogging. Whenever.Thursday, May 28, 2009Milton Bradley is NOT getting bonedLast week I suggested that someone who know something about Pitchf/x to analyze Milton Bradley's claims that he's being squeezed. Dave Allen stepped up and knocked it out of the park. Thanks, Dave. You rock.I'm a Pitchf/x moron, but it strikes me that while its highest and best use is probably inside a baseball's front office to analyze players and stuff, this kind of snooping is its best use for fans. Maybe it's me, but I tend to glaze over when I read a general "Let's look at Player X's outing via Pitchf/x" article. When there's a very specific question directing things, however, even my feeble mind closely follows and greatly appreciates the analysis. Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 2:55pm Comments
Jeff said...
I too have a terrible time with the pitch f/x stuff. They use regularly on RAB and though I see that the data it produces is valuable, I have the hardest time understanding what the heck it is showing. It seems like the way of the future for analyzing pitchers/at bats. Maybe I should have taken a few more math classes and a few less social history courses in college! Posted 05/28 at 04:09 PM
Richard in Dallas said...
The only legitimate complaint would be from the pitcher’s side. There seem to be AT LEAST as many grey dots IN the boxes as there are black dots OUTSIDE the boxes. Unless we want to go to all-electronic ball and strike calling, SHUT UO, MILTON! There’s a reason that the solid hitter is no longer a Ranger, and I suspect that being a nut job might be it…... Posted 05/28 at 04:09 PM
p.w. said...
If you read the body of the article and the discussion of the regression analysis you can clearly see that there is no statistical difference in size of strike zones. the different locations of the strike contours is almost certainly due to chance, it is however a possible piece of evidence against the notion that strike zones are consistent across umpires or even for the same ump. Posted 05/28 at 04:14 PM
p.w. said...
@Jeff on RAB they usually use f/x graphs to chart pitchers release points and and pitch movement to look for variations that might be useful in analyzing a pitcher’s performance. they did this with wang earlier this season when he was struggling so badly to show how his release point had changed and was less over the top and how last night he was back where he should be, albeit for only a couple of innings. Posted 05/28 at 04:20 PM
Adam said...
The highest and best use of PitchFX would be to add realism to baseball videogames. Posted 05/28 at 08:55 PM
Page 1 of 1
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry. Next Post: Quote of the Day>> <<Previous Post: The Ultimate Road Trip | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I don’t know, it’s looks to me like they are calling more low-and-away strikes on him than last year. Just from looking at the graph, that could be a legitimate complaint.