|
June 19, 2013
Who is Shyster?
Monthly Archives
May, 2012
November, 2009 October, 2009 September, 2009 August, 2009 July, 2009 June, 2009 May, 2009 April, 2009 March, 2009 February, 2009 January, 2009 December, 2008 November, 2008
Or you can search by:
Most Recent Comments
Sam Zell’s Nightmare Continues (11)
William S. Stevens: 1948-2008 (22) Teixeira’s Options (18) Cole Hamels Meets Talk Radio (23) Appropos of nothing (4) Shyster's Daily Circuit
Rob Neyer
AaronGleeman.com Joe Posnanski Blog Baseball Analysts Baseball Musings Cot's Baseball Contracts It IS About the Money Keith Law Cardboard Gods Baseball Think Factory MLB Trade Rumors Retrosheet Vegas Watch Way Back and Gone Bats -- NYT Baseball Blog The Biz of Baseball The Daily Fungo U.S.S. Mariner Braves Journal Scott Simkus The Common Man Jorge Says No! Baseball Over Here Fack Youk Wezen-Ball Chop-n-Change |
Tuesday, October 06, 2009Strasburg Debuts and other businessIt's going to take me a while to figure out how the hell to structure my mornings without recaps. I might just link the NBC stuff as it goes live, foregoing the "Exile" post. I may make the mornings more of a series of quick links to other stuff as opposed to full blown posts. Heck, I may just turn this into a blog dedicated to hardcore Whig-party poltical rants (we're coming back, baby, and this time we're electing someone who won't die in office!).I'll at least start out with option two, and note that Stephen Strasburg made his professional debut yesterday. He gave up a run on three hits in two innings, thowing 25 pitches in Arizona action. Boras immediately demanded that his contract be renegotiated, noting that there are Hall of Famers who averaged more than 12.5 pitches per inning. "If a major league team were to plug Stephen into their rotation tomorrow," Boras said, "they could dispense entirely with the expense of bullpen salaries." The Nats are considering it. Stay tuned, because later this morning I will be posting a fire-breathing screed regarding the Nullification Crisis and Jackson's actions with respect to the Bank of the United States. No, we haven't forgotten, King Andrew, nor will we ever. Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 8:38am Comments
Craig Calcaterra said...
The Whigs abhor autocratic executive rule, yet love the Bank of the United States. Thus, when an executive goes to great lengths to reconstitute the Bank of the United States, we don’t know what to do so we all get coffee and talk about how if we had gotten Henry Clay elected everything would have worked out fine. In fact, no matter what happens on the national scene, we end up talking about Henry Clay. Whigs don’t get a lot done is what I’m saying. Posted 10/06 at 09:20 AM
YankeesfanLen said...
Well, maybe the Whigs would do a better job without the Fed coming in, but by joining you’d have to be an ALEXANDER (Hamilton) hater and the Blue Network gang would get after you if you debased AHam Posted 10/06 at 09:23 AM
Grant said...
I know nothing about the political activities in which I participate! What nativist party? I have no idea what you’re talking about! Posted 10/06 at 09:23 AM
Rob² said...
The real problem with the Bank of the United States is that it requires the nation to implicitly support the Military-Industrial Complex so as to maintain a standing army. Armies don’t like to stand around without invading something once in a while, hence the whole bru-ha-ha with our kindly neighbors to the south. Posted 10/06 at 09:40 AM
Patrick said...
I love you all so much.. You know, Craig, almost nothing you could do would warm the cockles of my heart more than posting just such a screed. Posted 10/06 at 10:06 AM
KR said...
I’d vote for a Whig. Can’t possibly be worse than the choices we get now. Posted 10/06 at 10:16 AM
Craig Calcaterra said...
KR: maybe you can: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Whig_Party Note: I just pass this along for information. I consider the new Whig party to be a bunch of splitters, like the People’s Front of Judea and the Judean People’s Front. Posted 10/06 at 10:19 AM
Brian said...
Remember, Lincoln was a Whig before the party essentially disintegrated in the 1850’s. You could do a lot worse. Posted 10/06 at 10:32 AM
Kevin S. said...
Damnit Craig, after your first post in the comments I was all ready to make the joke that the Whigs were the modern-day derivation of the People’s Front of Judea, and I get to the bottom and find out you’ve already tied them together. I guess I can console myself with the old “Great minds think alike?” Posted 10/06 at 10:38 AM
Kevin S. said...
“Remember, Lincoln was a Whig before the party essentially disintegrated in the 1850’s. You could do a lot worse.” So… no Habeus Corpus? Not going to lie, did not see someone of Craig’s professional persuasion taking that position. Posted 10/06 at 10:39 AM
Jacob said...
I’ve always regretted I didn’t get a chance to vote for Clay and Frelinghuysen back in ‘44. Posted 10/06 at 10:50 AM
YankeesfanLen said...
Craig, consider a campaign in ‘11 against Voinovich on the Whig party platform. Perhaps you’ll carry Chillicothe! Posted 10/06 at 11:03 AM
Mode:Theif and Lair said...
No, you’re going about this all wrong. The new party should be the Wig party. Only those with removable hair can be elected. Who wouldn’t vote for a Ted Danson / David Lee Roth led party? Posted 10/06 at 11:39 AM
MooseinOhio said...
Be careful with the political banter as Ralph Nadar Of course, it could be a nice diversion until the ATH returns in April. Posted 10/06 at 11:45 AM
Bob said...
The Modern Whig Party was revived by Iraq and Afghanistan veterans, a few of whom should garner some sympathy for being lifelong Cleveland Indians and Browns fans. But if the Whigs are splitters, can perhaps in time the Modern Whigs will invoke the fear of the “crack suicide squad.” Posted 10/06 at 11:52 AM
Jason B said...
F*** the PFJ! Posted 10/06 at 01:49 PM
jlive said...
Well, as long as we’re all agreed, “Andrew Jackson = Worst President Ever,” I think I’m happy. Posted 10/06 at 06:22 PM
blaze said...
What, exactly, am I supposed to do from 5:40-6 a.m.? Posted 10/06 at 08:15 PM
smsetnor said...
Easy now. I have the Nats (with Alex K who has since quit on me (jerk)) in a sim league. So please, less mocking of THE Strasburg and more making fun of Miguel Cabrera or something. Posted 10/07 at 01:56 AM
Page 1 of 1
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry. Next Post: Cabrera has been down this road before>> <<Previous Post: The cops release the Miguel Cabrera 911 tape | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yeh, Millard Fillmore as your parting shot must leave a bad taste in the mouth. Surely you guys could have done better than that.
Couldn’t you?
But at least the Bank of the United States has been reconstituted. It’s called Goldman Sachs now. Do the Whigs back it?