|
May 24, 2013
Who is Shyster?
Monthly Archives
May, 2012
November, 2009 October, 2009 September, 2009 August, 2009 July, 2009 June, 2009 May, 2009 April, 2009 March, 2009 February, 2009 January, 2009 December, 2008 November, 2008
Or you can search by:
Most Recent Comments
Sam Zell’s Nightmare Continues (11)
William S. Stevens: 1948-2008 (22) Teixeira’s Options (18) Cole Hamels Meets Talk Radio (23) Appropos of nothing (4) Shyster's Daily Circuit
Rob Neyer
AaronGleeman.com Joe Posnanski Blog Baseball Analysts Baseball Musings Cot's Baseball Contracts It IS About the Money Keith Law Cardboard Gods Baseball Think Factory MLB Trade Rumors Retrosheet Vegas Watch Way Back and Gone Bats -- NYT Baseball Blog The Biz of Baseball The Daily Fungo U.S.S. Mariner Braves Journal Scott Simkus The Common Man Jorge Says No! Baseball Over Here Fack Youk Wezen-Ball Chop-n-Change |
Thursday, January 15, 2009That’s richNews flash: billionaire plutocrats fly their private planes to exclusive, mountainside resort to lament tough times and advocate for cost cutting.Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 6:30am Comments
TLA said...
Unfortunately, a salary cap would do little to get Bob Nutting’s product (the Pirates) within whiffing distance of .500 on a consistent basis. I mean, come on! I don’t think Bob is having any trouble whatsoever controlling his payroll. And I’m having trouble remembering the last time Pittsburgh had a legitimate offer on the table for any free agent and was outbid by a sizable amount by some bloated big market team. Pittsburgh isn’t even particularly good at developing its own talent. Posted 01/15 at 08:01 AM
GBS said...
I’m fully against a cap, so I have little interest in listening to these exhorbitantly rich fellows with new taxpayer-funded Posted 01/15 at 08:32 AM
Jason @ IIATMS said...
Billionaires whining about millionaires. DUMB. Posted 01/15 at 10:55 AM
Matt Sullivan said...
The salary cap is a horrible idea! It will do nothing to increase parity, which has been good in recent years. It will only alter the way big market teams court free agents from large year by year contracts to smaller contracts with bigger signing bonuses. The teams calling for this are the teams who do little or nothing to put a competitive team on the field. The current system of revenue sharing, designed to do the same thing paid the Marlins owners close to $40M while they only spent about $28M to field their team. The owners want revenue sharing because it will increase team values by cheating the players out of money. This is essentially corporate welfare. It is anti-free market, anti-American and should be illegal under collusion laws. How pathetic can you. Posted 01/15 at 12:12 PM
Pete Toms said...
@ glenn; December 2011 @ Matt; yes owners like caps because they depress player compensation ( btw, so does rev sharing and the Yankee tax ). Also, investment likes the “cost certainty” of caps. In other words, good for franchise values. Cap leagues suck. The NFL was more entertaining without it. Posted 01/15 at 02:14 PM
Page 1 of 1
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry. Next Post: Can they be the California Angels again?>> <<Previous Post: Today at THT | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
hmmm…Looks like this is the beginning of the next work stoppage. When is the current contract up, again?