|
May 19, 2013
Who is Shyster?
Monthly Archives
May, 2012
November, 2009 October, 2009 September, 2009 August, 2009 July, 2009 June, 2009 May, 2009 April, 2009 March, 2009 February, 2009 January, 2009 December, 2008 November, 2008
Or you can search by:
Most Recent Comments
Sam Zell’s Nightmare Continues (10)
William S. Stevens: 1948-2008 (22) Teixeira’s Options (18) Cole Hamels Meets Talk Radio (23) Appropos of nothing (4) Shyster's Daily Circuit
Rob Neyer
AaronGleeman.com Joe Posnanski Blog Baseball Analysts Baseball Musings Cot's Baseball Contracts It IS About the Money Keith Law Cardboard Gods Baseball Think Factory MLB Trade Rumors Retrosheet Vegas Watch Way Back and Gone Bats -- NYT Baseball Blog The Biz of Baseball The Daily Fungo U.S.S. Mariner Braves Journal Scott Simkus The Common Man Jorge Says No! Baseball Over Here Fack Youk Wezen-Ball Chop-n-Change |
Wednesday, December 03, 2008The Giants figure out economicsThe Giants may not understand the law of supply and demand when it comes to thirtysomething middle infielders, but they do get it when it comes to ticket pricing:Next season, San Francisco Giants fans buying single-game tickets for an April game against Milwaukee might pay half as much as they would for a weekend game with the rival Los Angeles Dodgers later in the year. Makes sense to me. (thanks to reader Doug C for the link) Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 6:51am Comments
Page 1 of 1
Next Post: It's hard to be a Yankees fan>> <<Previous Post: Another great moment in mass transit? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I know the Mariners do this to some degree: they bump the price up for an identified “Premium Game” and cut the price for an identified “Value Game”. It basically amounts to a tax on Red Sox/Yankee fans and a sort of Chinese Government packing-of-the-stands for Royals games. Both of which are just fine by me.
If the Giants can figure a way to make it even more dynamic I agree with Larry Baer that it could be the future of ticket pricing and be totally awesome. Especially if went the route of what I originally misread the article to say: that walk up prices could go for as low as a quarter. Now that would be change I can believe in.