|
June 18, 2013
Who is Shyster?
Monthly Archives
May, 2012
November, 2009 October, 2009 September, 2009 August, 2009 July, 2009 June, 2009 May, 2009 April, 2009 March, 2009 February, 2009 January, 2009 December, 2008 November, 2008
Or you can search by:
Most Recent Comments
Sam Zell’s Nightmare Continues (11)
William S. Stevens: 1948-2008 (22) Teixeira’s Options (18) Cole Hamels Meets Talk Radio (23) Appropos of nothing (4) Shyster's Daily Circuit
Rob Neyer
AaronGleeman.com Joe Posnanski Blog Baseball Analysts Baseball Musings Cot's Baseball Contracts It IS About the Money Keith Law Cardboard Gods Baseball Think Factory MLB Trade Rumors Retrosheet Vegas Watch Way Back and Gone Bats -- NYT Baseball Blog The Biz of Baseball The Daily Fungo U.S.S. Mariner Braves Journal Scott Simkus The Common Man Jorge Says No! Baseball Over Here Fack Youk Wezen-Ball Chop-n-Change |
Tuesday, March 31, 2009The HypeMatt Wieters had a paper route as a kid: there were no survivors. When he falls out of a boat, Matt Wieters does not get wet: the water gets Matt Wieters. It only takes Matt Wieters 20 minutes to watch 60 minutes. He is that awesome:Baseball scouts and executives like to blame the media for excessive hype. Reporters like to say they’re just relaying what’s told to them by scouts and executives. Both sides are trying to feed fans’ curiosity and knowledge. Everyone is an accomplice in this. Good stuff from Sam Mellinger. Orioles fans won't want to read the names Todd Van Poppel, Brad Komminsk, and Dewon Brazelton in the same article assessing the Wieters hype, but the fact remains: we don't really know what's gonna happen until someone steps in against Major League pitching, and Wieters won't even be doing that until sometime later this summer. Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 9:00am Comments
Jason @ IIATMS said...
I’d like to nominate Brien Taylor. Posted 03/31 at 09:27 AM
Wooden U. Lykteneau said...
As someone who has actually seen Wieters play in person, he’s got the goods. Big. Tall. Strong Arm (he was relief pitcher in college). Power from both sides. Hits for average. But, he has not been tested above AA. He is Mike-Scioscia slow. His pitch-calling is mediocre, as are his fielding skills. Hasn’t failed at any level, so it’s difficult to tell how he’ll handle it *when* it happens. Posted 03/31 at 09:52 AM
Grant said...
Poor pitch calling? Mediocre fielding? I seem to recall reading that he has had good reviews on his handling of pitching staffs and that his fielding is actually pretty good. The biggest concern that I’ve read is his size making a stay at catcher maybe difficult. And really as an Orioles fan I have two perspectives on this: 1. His bat will most likely play at first if it has to. Posted 03/31 at 10:04 AM
Wooden U. Lykteneau said...
http://www.baseball-intellect.com/Articles/baltimore-orioles-prospect.html Above is the take from a non-Orioles typer. Bear in mind, “mediocre” is par for the course in the major leagues these days, but it was offered in the spirit of “he ain’t perfect.” Posted 03/31 at 10:15 AM
Grant said...
The KC article that Craig linked says he’s a good defender, for what it’s worth. I recall that Keith Law has said the same thing, though I could be mistaken on that. As for pitch calling, I think it might hardly matter. Plenty of teams have the dugout call the game anyway, at least for young pitchers. And then the veterans know what they’re doing for themselves. Also, at least this year, the Orioles pitching is going to be awful no matter what, so it really doesn’t matter who is calling what pitches. I think I’m only half joking on that. That site you linked is giving him above-average defense eventually, which I suppose gibes with the other stuff I’ve read. Posted 03/31 at 10:37 AM
Wooden U. Lykteneau said...
No, it didn’t: “Defense - plus arm, gets into comfortable position behind the plate despite height, still working on pitch calling and the nuances of the position” Having a good throwing arm is only part of the equation. Last year he made 9 errors in 93 games and allowed three passed balls. Considering how poor the official scoring is in the minors—trust me, these guys think the old saw “the only person who wants it to be an error is the pitcher” is the rule—it’s fair to deduce that there were probably a dozen or more calls that were chalked up to the pitcher as a wild pitch or an infielder for not digging out a poor throw. Posted 03/31 at 11:04 AM
Grant said...
Correct me if I’m wrong, but it has him as a 50 on the scale right now - average - with eventually 60, which is above average. Which is what I said. And from the KC article: “Wieters is a switch-hitting, home run-launching, 6-foot-5, 230-pound kid who comes from baseball stock and just happens to be a terrific defensive catcher.” Posted 03/31 at 12:09 PM
gotowarmissagnes said...
I haven’t forgotten Ben McDonald. He had a lot better career than most people understand. Might have had a better career if LSU didn’t think a pitcher’s arm is a sacrificial lamb. Of course, Wieters is not a pitcher and didn’t attend LSU, so not sure why we need to discuss him. Posted 03/31 at 12:57 PM
Andy L said...
A Particle Man joke? Awesome. Posted 03/31 at 03:21 PM
Craig Calcaterra said...
I wish I could say that Particle Man was the inspiration for that, Andy. I mean, I love that song and TMBG in general, but I ripped that off a list of those Chuck Norris jokes. Yes, when I saw it on the list I said “cool! Particle Man,” but I had set out with Norris in mind. Posted 03/31 at 03:24 PM
Page 1 of 1
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry. Next Post: New Dodgertown>> <<Previous Post: Deadbeat Browning | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Don’t forget about Ben McDonald!