December 12, 2013
Who is Shyster?
Or you can search by:
Most Recent Comments
Mike Hargrove Interview (13)
Can they be the California Angels again? (9)
Another great moment in mass transit? (7)
Just another ten-percenter (his mind is like an ocean) (7)
Great Moments in Half-Baked Populism (8)
Shyster's Daily Circuit
Joe Posnanski Blog
Cot's Baseball Contracts
It IS About the Money
Baseball Think Factory
MLB Trade Rumors
Way Back and Gone
Bats -- NYT Baseball Blog
The Biz of Baseball
The Daily Fungo
The Common Man
Jorge Says No!
Baseball Over Here
Friday, March 20, 2009
The Marlins get a step closerOne down, one to go:
Miami City Commissioners approved a plan to build a $639 million Florida Marlins ballpark Thursday, nudging the long-debated stadium one step closer to reality.
As for the "debate" leading up to the vote, Neil deMause at the excellent Field of Schemes blog put it best: "People in suits: in favor. People in casual clothes: opposed."
The people in suits won, of course. It kind of always works that way, doesn't it?
Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 7:30am
Maybe the people opposed should wear suits too.
Posted 03/20 at 08:04 AM
David Pinto said...
That’s because the people in casual clothes vote for the people in suits, because the people in suits promise them everything they want.
Posted 03/20 at 08:56 AM
Pete Toms said...
Didn’t read the links (I will later) but IIRC the construction worker unions were well represented at the hearing and obviously in favor. I doubt they were wearin suits. The NAACP, in conjunction with councillor Spence-Jones, successfully lobbied for $$$ for the depressed Overton area as well as a guarantee that 15% of the construction work would be done by black owned companies. Anyway, all that to say that this was about more than “the man” getting what they want.
Posted 03/20 at 09:43 AM
i was thinking - the fact that there are so many big time baseball fans that are against stadium funding just goes to show how fair and smart we are. these stadium subsidies benefit people like us far more than the casual fan and vastly more than a non fan. selfishly, we should be for these subsidies. yes, its lining the owners’ pockets, but its also strengthening MLB as a whole. yet somehow how we have the decency to recognize its not right to screw over all the people who will have to pay for these stadiums that dont need or want them.
is there no end to our awesome magnanimity?
Posted 03/20 at 10:06 AM
Aaron Moreno said...
What makes you think the head of a union can’t afford a suit? Anyways, it’s the baseball bat you should be worrying about…
Posted 03/20 at 10:43 AM
Page 1 of 1
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
Next Post: A bar near Wrigley? That's it, I'm moving!>> <<Previous Post: Wiffle House