December 8, 2013
Who is Shyster?
Or you can search by:
Most Recent Comments
Mike Hargrove Interview (13)
Can they be the California Angels again? (9)
Another great moment in mass transit? (7)
Just another ten-percenter (his mind is like an ocean) (7)
Great Moments in Half-Baked Populism (8)
Shyster's Daily Circuit
Joe Posnanski Blog
Cot's Baseball Contracts
It IS About the Money
Baseball Think Factory
MLB Trade Rumors
Way Back and Gone
Bats -- NYT Baseball Blog
The Biz of Baseball
The Daily Fungo
The Common Man
Jorge Says No!
Baseball Over Here
Monday, January 26, 2009
The next RaysFanHouse's Andrew Johnson proclaims the Rangers to be the next Rays:
Trying to find the next Tampa Bay Rays a year after their meteoric rise to the top of the American League is a bit of an insult to what the Rays accomplished in 2008. Going from worst to first in one season just doesn't happen very often in baseball.
I think Andrew is right that the Rangers are going to be very good very soon, but I kind of hope this "The Next Rays" thing doesn't become a new meme in baseball. You know and I know and Andrew knows that good teams don't arise overnight, but there's a wide swath of fandom and mediadom that probably doesn't understand that. I'd hate nothing more than for baseball to become like football, where people expect some team to come out of nowhere every season, with the identity of that team serving as the offseason's primary parlor game. Such a dynamic creates impatient fans and is a disservice to the scouts and front office folks who put a lot of damn work into turning losers into winners.
Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 11:00am
Jason @ IIATMS said...
The Rangers have a nice farm system, but where is the pitching that’s going to carry them? We’ve seen various iterations of a Rangers team make the playoffs only to fall short due to the lack of a talented/deep rotation.
Kenny Rogers, Millwood, etc. are not the aces who can bring you to the Promised Land.
TB at least has/had some great young arms to balance the club’s talented positional staff.
Posted 01/26 at 12:08 PM
Indeed. There are also a lot of people that think that the Rays got so good solely because of their high draft picks, not shrewd trades like:
* Grant Balfour from the Brewers for Seth McClung, July 207
Posted 01/26 at 01:26 PM
I’ll do my best to keep this brief and to the point, Shyster. Further, I don’t think your point is as much The Rangers as the concept
Offhand, I don’t see that The Rangers making the playoffs, or doing really well this season, should be regarded as a Meteroric Rise. They actually held their own in 2008, and while their final record was pedestrian, they played some brilliant baseball last year. A lot of that might be the division they played in. Nonetheless, the only team in the AL that gave them fits were the Angels. Here is my summary (that, nobody has asked for…):
Posted 01/26 at 02:07 PM
weird that a guy calling himself a BaseballHack would only predict 12 added wins considering the red unis and “Nolan’s beefed-up conditioning”....that’s more like 18 wins…
Posted 01/26 at 02:34 PM
It took 95 games to win the wild card last year, Royce, and that was with the Indians and Tigers completely out of the picture. It’s unlikely that it will take 95 games to win the wild card this year, but 91+ is a pretty good bet.
I like the Rangers going forward, but 91 wins is going to be tough in 2009. There’s a better chance that Anaheim falls hard due to the losses of Teix and KRod, attrition, and worse luck (they outperformed their pythagorean record by 12 wins) and Oakland doesn’t put it together. That’s a very winnable division, especially if Texas gets a moderately healthy Ben Sheets.
Posted 01/26 at 02:36 PM
I only mention the return of the red uniform because abandoning them and returning to the white/blue garb was not well received in the ranks of Rangers fandom- we saw it kind of like drinking Jo-Bu’s rum. We can only hope that their return ignites a maelstrom of good vibes and sound fielding.
Posted 01/26 at 05:41 PM
damn, there’s a REDRUM joke there somewhere….I just can’t figure it out.
Posted 01/26 at 06:28 PM
You’re right..! Probably is…also probably funnier just knowing it lurks in there under the surface…
Posted 01/26 at 06:50 PM
I imagine if the Rangers pull it off, then everyone after them will be “the New Rangers” just like the Rays were the “new Braves”.
Posted 01/26 at 11:45 PM
Page 1 of 1
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
Next Post: I'm waiting for the Chester A. Arthur "Redstockings" model>> <<Previous Post: Tal Smith moonlights