May 21, 2013

Who is Shyster?

About Shyster
Email Shyster
Subscribe to ShysterBall

Roll mouse over dates
Daily Posts
<<
 May 2013
>>
S M T W T F S



1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
 

 

Monthly Archives

May, 2012
November, 2009
October, 2009
September, 2009
August, 2009
July, 2009
June, 2009
May, 2009
April, 2009
March, 2009
February, 2009
January, 2009
December, 2008
November, 2008
 



Or you can search by:
Category
Month
Author
 

Most Recent Comments

Sam Zell’s Nightmare Continues (11)
William S. Stevens: 1948-2008 (22)
Teixeira’s Options (18)
Cole Hamels Meets Talk Radio (23)
Appropos of nothing (4)
 

Shyster's Daily Circuit

Rob Neyer
AaronGleeman.com
Joe Posnanski Blog
Baseball Analysts
Baseball Musings
Cot's Baseball Contracts
It IS About the Money
Keith Law
Cardboard Gods
Baseball Think Factory
MLB Trade Rumors
Retrosheet
Vegas Watch
Way Back and Gone
Bats -- NYT Baseball Blog
The Biz of Baseball
The Daily Fungo
U.S.S. Mariner
Braves Journal
Scott Simkus
The Common Man
Jorge Says No!
Baseball Over Here
Fack Youk
Wezen-Ball
Chop-n-Change

Baseball. Blogging. Whenever.

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Today at THT

Deep thought: come July, Jim Rice won't even be the best guy to ever have played left field for the Red Sox to be inducted that day.

  • Though I appreciate and respect the work of hardcore analysts, I'm not an analysis guy and often don't understand how a given analyst has gotten from A to B. This dynamic often results in me parroting things that a given analyst says because it seems so damn persuasive, even if I can't say why. Other times, however, I am skeptical -- again for no concrete reason -- and I quickly assume a contrary note. The common denominator here is that I rarely know what the hell I'm talking about, and like 95% of the population, I'm just trying to seem smart.

    Example: several years ago I was introduced to the concept of the compensatory pick and how that all plays into free agency and arbitration offers. Soon after, I would find myself in random conversations talking about the manifest value of the draft picks. Which is fine, except for the fact that I am certain that at some point over the years I began to drastically overstate this value, and believe that others have too. Really, when you're advocating that a given team let its entire starting nine, its manager, its broadcasters, and 2/3 of its fan base walk, the response of "hey, they're getting picks" just doesn't seem all that satisfactory. If I knew a single thing about how to value these picks, I wouldn't have been flopping around in this land of dogma, hunches, and ultimately uncertainty for long, but I didn't, so here I am.

    Thankfully, folks are working on this stuff, including Victor Wang who has built on the work of other analysts and has a nice piece on it today.


  • Josh Kalk studies the Anatomy of Trevor Hoffman. I can't imagine that Mrs. Hoffman is all that thrilled with him doing that.


  • Treder continues his BL, TR series, this time focusing on catchers. Warning: this entry requires that nice things be said about Tim McCarver, and Steve says them, so if you're the type that gets upset when you have trouble sustaining rage over a given subject, you may want to move along to the next thing.


  • Finally, over at Fantasy Focus, Paul Singman tries to figure out if some hitters are more reliant on BABIP than others. Also, Marco Fujimoto warns us how the recency effect could negatively impact our drafts. I take issue with this: my awful drafting is a function of overvaluing things I observed years ago while ignoring all recent evidence to the contrary. Which is why Eric Gagne and Javy Lopez will have honored spots on my 2009 roster.


    • Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 5:41am

    Comments



    Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

         Next Post:  Great Moments in Generica>> <<Previous Post:  Rickey and Rice