December 7, 2013
Who is Shyster?
Or you can search by:
Most Recent Comments
Mike Hargrove Interview (13)
Can they be the California Angels again? (9)
Another great moment in mass transit? (7)
Just another ten-percenter (his mind is like an ocean) (7)
Great Moments in Half-Baked Populism (8)
Shyster's Daily Circuit
Joe Posnanski Blog
Cot's Baseball Contracts
It IS About the Money
Baseball Think Factory
MLB Trade Rumors
Way Back and Gone
Bats -- NYT Baseball Blog
The Biz of Baseball
The Daily Fungo
The Common Man
Jorge Says No!
Baseball Over Here
Monday, December 15, 2008
Trouble at 18th and VineIt's been a long two years for the Negro Leagues Baseball Museum. Buck O'Neil died in October 2006, and since then there has been haggling over (a) an education and research center that O'Neil hoped would be his legacy; and (b) a new Executive Director of the Museum itself. As of late Friday, (b) is solved, and it may very well mean the death of (a):
After a months-long selection process and a sharply divided board vote, the Negro Leagues Baseball Museum has a new executive director.
That whiff of controversy comes from Mellinger's straight report on the Baker selection. Jason Whitlock, however, bypasses the whiff and gets right down to the stinky:
When Pellom McDaniels and Greg Baker met privately with a Kansas City Star reporter Friday, they explained their bizarre, irresponsible and borderline unethical decision by playing up Baker’s “strategic” expertise.
And there's plenty more where that came from. It's probably worth noting at this point that I love Jason Whitlock's stuff, even when I think he's 100% wrong.
Not that I think he's wrong here. Indeed, though I am not acquainted with the specific politics of the Negro Leagues Museum, the dynamic here is a familiar one: a Chamber of Commerce-style politico with many career stops along the way, lauded for his alleged "entrepreneurial" and "strategic planning" credentials is given a high profile job over a lifer from within the organization. Here, the passed-over lifer is a guy by the name of Bob Kendrick, who, according to Whitlock, was O'Neil's right hand man and the guy who has truly run the place for years.
In my experience, the guy in Baker's position usually crashes and burns within two years, mostly because "entrepreneurial credentials" aren't all that applicable to a non-profit organization, and because no one really knows what the hell "strategic planning experience" really is. When the guy is eventually fired, the board then tries to get a do-over by hiring the guy in Kendrick's position. Except that guy, having been passed-over for a lightweight, has since moved on and is no longer interested, leaving the whole organization in the lerch for about five years. In other words, it's the organizational equivalent of signing Barry Zito.
I hope Whitlock is wrong, and that this Baker fellow is the right guy for the job, because the Negro Leagues Baseball Museum is too wonderful and too vital an outfit to be dragged down by this common brand of political drama.
Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 6:50am
Whitlock’s right. This is a bad thing. There is also discussion about moving the museum out to the suburbs, supposedly becasue its in a bad part of town.
And it kind of is. But people aren’t visitng the museum at 11 pm on a Saturday night. And to move it is to deny the heritage that helped create it in the first place.
If Barker was such a great strategic planner, he would have done something to clean up Broadway ant Troost and The Paseo. But he didn’t. And he’ll screw this up also. Its too bad. Its a good museum.
Posted 12/15 at 11:04 AM
Posnanski, of course, has some must-read information about this, too.
Posted 12/15 at 02:54 PM
“In my experience, the guy in Baker’s position usually crashes and burns within two years ... When the guy is eventually fired, the board then tries to get a do-over by hiring the guy in Kendrick’s position.”
Wow. Less than 2 years later… you were spot on. Sad.
Posted 10/29 at 11:23 PM