|
June 20, 2013
Who is Shyster?
Monthly Archives
May, 2012
November, 2009 October, 2009 September, 2009 August, 2009 July, 2009 June, 2009 May, 2009 April, 2009 March, 2009 February, 2009 January, 2009 December, 2008 November, 2008
Or you can search by:
Most Recent Comments
Sam Zell’s Nightmare Continues (11)
William S. Stevens: 1948-2008 (22) Teixeira’s Options (18) Cole Hamels Meets Talk Radio (23) Appropos of nothing (4) Shyster's Daily Circuit
Rob Neyer
AaronGleeman.com Joe Posnanski Blog Baseball Analysts Baseball Musings Cot's Baseball Contracts It IS About the Money Keith Law Cardboard Gods Baseball Think Factory MLB Trade Rumors Retrosheet Vegas Watch Way Back and Gone Bats -- NYT Baseball Blog The Biz of Baseball The Daily Fungo U.S.S. Mariner Braves Journal Scott Simkus The Common Man Jorge Says No! Baseball Over Here Fack Youk Wezen-Ball Chop-n-Change |
Baseball. Blogging. Whenever.Friday, February 27, 2009U.S. v. Bonds: Ppd.No makeup date scheduled:And so the Barry Bonds saga rages on. With little end in sight. My prediction: this never goes to trial. There's no way the feds win this appeal, and if they don't think they can win the trial now, nothing is going to change later. The appeal will be briefed and argued, Bonds will win, and the feds will drop this case. Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 9:09pm Comments
Craig Calcaterra said...
He’s free. He hasn’t technically acted in contempt of court until he’s called to the stand and refuses to speak. If he had wanted, he could have told everyone in the world that he wasn’t going to testify, and then showed up next week and sung like a bird. Posted 02/27 at 10:51 PM
Aaron Moreno said...
Well, looks like we’ll see things blow over into the baseball season, and then the case will quietly disappear. Posted 02/27 at 11:08 PM
mark b said...
Craig, Just wondering if you saw this article from Lester Munson: http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/columns/story?columnist=munson_lester&id=3940981 He claims this is a good move by the government and the judge should get overturned on appeal. From everything I’ve read (not just you) this seems unlikely. Myself, being a law student, it seems unlikely to be overturned. My favorite part is how Munson doesn’t begin to discuss the value of going forward in this case. Anyways, just curious to hear your thoughts. Posted 02/27 at 11:10 PM
Craig Calcaterra said...
I think Munson is on crack. I’m going to post an update shortly to address why. Posted 02/27 at 11:13 PM
themarksmith said...
Kangaroo Court time? Oh wait, we already hanged him ... oops. Can you continue to prosecute a dead man? Posted 02/28 at 12:33 PM
Page 1 of 1
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry. Next Post: A Contrary View>> <<Previous Post: Anderson to stay mum | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Does Anderson stay free meanwhile? I mean, he doesn’t have to sit in prison while this thing gets delayed and delayed, does he?