|
May 21, 2013
Who is Shyster?
Monthly Archives
May, 2012
November, 2009 October, 2009 September, 2009 August, 2009 July, 2009 June, 2009 May, 2009 April, 2009 March, 2009 February, 2009 January, 2009 December, 2008 November, 2008
Or you can search by:
Most Recent Comments
Sam Zell’s Nightmare Continues (11)
William S. Stevens: 1948-2008 (22) Teixeira’s Options (18) Cole Hamels Meets Talk Radio (23) Appropos of nothing (4) Shyster's Daily Circuit
Rob Neyer
AaronGleeman.com Joe Posnanski Blog Baseball Analysts Baseball Musings Cot's Baseball Contracts It IS About the Money Keith Law Cardboard Gods Baseball Think Factory MLB Trade Rumors Retrosheet Vegas Watch Way Back and Gone Bats -- NYT Baseball Blog The Biz of Baseball The Daily Fungo U.S.S. Mariner Braves Journal Scott Simkus The Common Man Jorge Says No! Baseball Over Here Fack Youk Wezen-Ball Chop-n-Change |
Monday, January 05, 2009Wait, are we this dumb?This has nothing to do with baseball or even sports, but since a lot of sciencey types read THT, I thought it worth noting. From an AP story about the size of our galaxy:Take that, Andromeda! For decades, astronomers thought when it came to the major galaxies in Earth's cosmic neighborhood, our Milky Way was a weak sister to the larger Andromeda. Not anymore. The Milky Way is considerably larger, bulkier and spinning faster than astronomers once thought, Andromeda's equal. When was the last time you saw even the most basic science story describe the concept of mass as "like weight"? Mass is mass and weight is weight, and the last I checked, it was a concept that was taught in grade school. Heck, when was the last time you saw a science story that felt it necessary to explain the concept of mass at all? Posted by Craig Calcaterra at 10:14pm Comments
Levi Stahl said...
Yeah, um, mass is like weight like Juan Pierre is like Rickey Henderson . . . which is an admittedly feeble attempt to make this baseball-related. Ready to have it topped with the next comment. Posted 01/06 at 12:05 AM
Ken Dynamo said...
last time i checked the USA Today, yes, we were in indeed that dumb and then some. at least they didn’t attempt to define gravity as a heavy type of snake. Posted 01/06 at 12:14 AM
Andy said...
I saw this earlier, too. Unbelievably bad article. Posted 01/06 at 01:40 AM
AMusingFool said...
Well, in a country where the average male doesn’t read a complete book after finishing high school, it’s quite likely that we are. Posted 01/06 at 07:51 AM
Sandra said...
In the comlpcaited world we live in, it’s good to find simple solutions. Posted 09/20 at 12:14 PM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sabermetrics, which is like numbers and stuff…