My Morning in Exile

All of the cool kids are on their way to the SABR convention in D.C., so I’m doing a little extra duty over at the Blue Network this morning:

  • Vin Scully, legend; Bill Plaschke, idiot.
  • Dustin Pedroia will tell you: length doesn’t matter.
  • Nats Park gets more expensive.
  • Dice-K is starting to get the beatdown from the Boston media.
  • The Astros must have borrowed that little tiki necklace from the Brady boys
  • Was Bud just sending up a trial balloon with that Pete Rose business?
  • Moneyball wasn’t a failure; it worked too well.
  • Cliff Lee is about to be dealt to Philly.
  • and if Tyler Hissey is right, it may be a very good deal for Philly.
  • I didn’t want to go to SABR anyway . . .[grumble grumble grumble].

    Print Friendly
    « Previous: And That Happened
    Next: Bit of an afternoon in exile, too . . . »

    Comments

    1. YankeesfanLen said...

      You complain about Columbus and then want to go to Washington at the end of July? The temperature and humidity add up to 200 this time of year.
      Oh……you wanted a beer with Barack.
      Seriously, Vin would only get the proper send-off if he had taken the Yankees offer in ‘64

    2. MooseinOhio said...

      I suspect that for every homerun the Green Monster gives to pop ups that would be warning track outs it takes aways in solidly hit line drives that would clear most left field fences but are doubles in Fenway. 

      I suspect Jim Rice would have had at least 50 more homeruns playing in most any other ballpark.
      Of course, Wade Boggs probably would have had 100 fewer doubles as many of his defensive swings resulted in doubles that hit midway up the wall and probably would have been outs in most ballparks.

      However, isn’t that part of the beauty of baseball as opposed to others sports with uniform dimensions for playing areas.  I love the quirky designs so much more than cookie cutter era that brought us Three River(s)front Stadium.

    3. tadthebad said...

      I’m not sure I dispute the point, but how do YOU know that the Sox brass are using the media as their instrument or that Dan Shaughnessy has long been a mouthpiece for Sox management?  Given your recent little infatuation with the Red Sox, maybe you aim to take that title?  Hmmm, hmm?  Come to think of it, you’re becoming just as cranky with the Red Sox as CHB…that oughtta scare you. 

      I think the epic media beatdown Daisuke receives is due mostly to the slow news time you mentioned, and the fact that most fans, Boston’s included, don’t tolerate “divas” who don’t perform to expectations.

    4. MooseinOhio said...

      I’m not sure I would call Shaughnessy a mouthpiece for Sox management either because pre-2004 WS he tended to take as many opportunities as possible to rip and/or stir up the waters regarding the Sox. 

      If I recall correctly it was his insider information (Lucchino) article regarding the Nomar contract situation that lit the fuse that on that powder keg, resulting in his departure from Boston.  Shaughnessy lost one of his old standby storylines (i.e. Curse of the Bambino) the moment Foulke tossed the ball over to Dougie M ending 86 years of drama. 

      Dan made a living writing about the dysfunction of the Red Sox and if he could get inside scoop that aided in the process all the better.  After John Henry forced Theo and Lucchino to kiss and make up and the Red Sox won another WS it was pretty evident that Shaughnessy no longer had the Sox to kick around.

      As for Craig’s focus on the Red Sox – it’s kind of like the whole Darth Vader luring Luke over to the Dark Side.  Granted Luchhino called the Yankee’s the Evil Empire but the Red Sox and Yankees are just two sides of the same coin. Larry L was just cloaking himself in goodness as part of his evil and sinister plan to drag Craig into the abyss.

    5. Will said...

      And the Pedroia thread appears to be devolving into yet another typical Yankees V. Red Sox pissing contest.
      This is why every year I root for Baltimore and Tampa Bay to place first and second in the AL East.

    6. Wooden U. Lykteneau said...

      Craig – The ballpark deal has not changed, nor has its financing. Fenty is proposing to use a revenue stream other than its intended purpose – in layman’s terms, he’s robbing Peter to pay Paul. Happens all the time in local government, most famously with school superintendents using “building maintenance” funds to pay for school supplies. Oddly enough, taxpayers will say “no” when asked to pay for new textbooks but “yes” when asked to pay for a new roof. Funny how that works.

      Say what you will about borrowing money in the first place, but the fault of how the money gets paid off has nothing to do with *why* the money asked for.

    7. Craig Calcaterra said...

      Wooden—but if they’re taking money that was to be used to service ballpark debt for something else, doesn’t that mean they aren’t servicing ballpark debt?  And doesn’t that, in turn, mean that they have to pay longer, at higher rates, or with some sorts of penalties?

      I don’t mean to equate it with consumer credit like that, but generally speaking, if you take your debt payments and apply them elsewhere, doesn’t your outstanding debt increase?  If it didn’t, why bother ever paying off the debt at all?

    8. Wooden U. Lykteneau said...

      Yes, that’s what it means—but the label of “ballpark” is irrelevant and misleading.

      Here’s an example…

      D.C. borrowed money to build a library, then incurred a library tax to pay for the library building loan, but decided to use the library tax monies for something else, it doesn’t mean it was a bad idea to build the library. It just means that the debt on the library building loan will increase.

      Kevin Reichard, who runs ballparkdigest.com, has a similar love/hate relationship with public monies and stadia albeit at much smaller scale (think $15-50M vs. 500M), but has long remarked that municipalities are better positioned to take out loans than individuals or small developers because they can get a better interest rate.

      Unfortunately, as we can see here, politicians are also better positioned to act irresponsibly about how that debt is paid off, because let’s face it: When the loan is finally paid off, Fenty will be a Wikipedia entry.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    Current day month ye@r *