The All-Expansion Team World Series

Daniel Murphy helped propel the Mets to the first ever all-expansion team World Series. (via Arturo Pardavila III)

Daniel Murphy helped propel the Mets to the first ever all-expansion team World Series. (via Arturo Pardavila III)

In 1901, baseball as we know it was born when the American League joined the National League to form America’s two major leagues. Over the decades, the sport has undergone numerous changes from free agency to the designated hitter rule, but the overall consistency of the sport since the turn of the 20th century is remarkable: 90 feet between the bases, three strikes you’re out, and, well, pretty much the entire first 15 minutes of Ken Burns’ Baseball. As a result, if we were mystically granted the ability to watch a game with our great-great-grandfathers, they’d mostly be able to follow along. In my estimation, baseball’s ability to provide common ground across generations is one of the more incredible and valuable aspects of the sport.

Of baseball’s many constants throughout the years, one of the more prominent has been its franchises.  The American League brought eight charter franchises into the major leagues in 1901, a perfect match for the National League’s eight. City names and team nicknames have changed—the Washington Senators are now the Minnesota Twins, the Brooklyn Superbas are now the Los Angeles Dodgers, etc.—but the Original 16 franchises have all survived to the present day.

ORIGINAL 16 FRANCHISES
American League National League
1901 Name Modern Name 1901 Name Modern Name
Baltimore Orioles New York Yankees Boston Beaneaters Atlanta Braves
Boston Americans Boston Red Sox Brooklyn Superbas Los Angeles Dodgers
Chicago White Sox Chicago White Sox Chicago Orphans Chicago Cubs
Cleveland Blues Cleveland Indians Cincinnati Reds Cincinnati Reds
Detroit Tigers Detroit Tigers New York Giants San Francisco Giants
Milwaukee Brewers Baltimore Orioles Philadelphia Phillies Philadelphia Phillies
Philadelphia Athletics Oakland Athletics Pittsburgh Pirates Pittsburgh Pirates
Washington Senators Minnesota Twins St. Louis Cardinals St. Louis Cardinals

Two years after the birth of the AL/NL structure, the first modern World Series pitted the National League champion against its American League counterpart. Over the next 57 years, the World Series was guaranteed to feature one of the American League’s eight original franchises facing off against one of the National League’s eight.

Then, in 1961, expansion began. Between 1961 and 1998, 14 expansion franchises joined the Original 16 to form the 30-team major league structure in place today.

The first year of expansion was contained to just the American League, but since 1962 it’s been a two-league venture. Therefore, since the 2015 World Series is the 53rd series to coexist with expansion in both leagues, it is the 53rd time two expansion teams could conceivably meet in the World Series. Yet there was never a Fall Classic held without one of those Original 16 franchise represented until now.

Consequently, the Mets meeting the Royals in the World Series is a historic match-up before it even begins. Never before had two expansion franchises won their league’s pennant in the same year. And yet it feels somewhat absurd to call the Mets (established 1962) and Royals (est. 1969) expansion teams. There are grandparents younger than the Mets and Royals franchises. The Mets are now tied with the Chicago White Sox and Cleveland Indians, two Original 16 franchises, for World Series appearances with five and the Royals are just a step behind with four appearances. This World Series is not witnessing two league newbies facing off; the Mets and Royals are storied franchises with rich histories full of Hall of Famers, memorable victories and crushing defeats. So how has it taken this long for such a match-up to occur?

To say it’s unlikely that it’s taken this long is to dramatically understate. Under the current 30-team structure with 15 teams in each league, there is roughly a 21.8 percent (7^2/15^2) probability of two expansion franchises matching up in the Fall Classic. Of course this is only the fourth postseason under the current system. Here’s what the chances of an all-expansion team World Series have looked like since two-league expansion first began in 1962:

PROBABILITY OF ALL-EXPANSION WORLD SERIES
Year # AL Teams (# Expansion) # NL Teams (# Expansion) Probability
1962-1968 10 (2) 10 (2)  4.0%
1969-1976 12 (4) 12 (4) 11.1%
1977-1992 14 (6) 12 (4) 14.3%
1993-1997 14 (6) 14 (6) 18.4%
1998-2011 14 (6) 16 (8) 21.4%
2012-pres 15 (7) 15 (7) 21.8%

These probability figures are overly simplistic in that they assume that at the start of each season every team has an equal chance to make the World Series. With talent carryover and sustained runs of excellence like the Reds and A’s dynasties in the ‘70s or the turn-of-the-century Yankees, we know this not to be true. Expansion teams were so disadvantaged in their early years that in the first eight seasons (1961-1968) for the new Washington Senators (now Texas Rangers) and Los Angeles Angels and first seven seasons (1962-1968) for the New York Mets and Houston Astros, the four teams combined for exactly one finish above fifth place in their 10-team divisions—the Angels finished third in 1962. That makes what happened in 1969 extraordinary.

Four new franchises were added in 1969 and each league split into two divisions for the first time. The Mets won 100 games to take the NL East title and become the first expansion team to make the playoffs. They defeated the Atlanta Braves in the first-ever National League Championship Series and were famously given the “Miracle Mets” moniker after they went on to defeat the 109-win Baltimore Orioles and become the first expansion team to win a title. Remarkably, it would be another 16 years before another expansion team won a championship: The Royals won it all in 1985.

The Original 16 had established relationships and infrastructure which left expansion teams at a marked disadvantage. As a result, in stark opposition to the probabilistic odds, 2015 marked just the eighth time that both the ALCS and NLCS featured an expansion team and an all-expansion team World Series was even a possibility.

The first time the Original 16 could have been shut out from the World Series was in 1980, and it very nearly happened. That year the Royals swept the Yankees three games to none in the ALCS (the LCS was a five-game series until it expanded to seven games in 1985). The NLCS featured the Philadelphia Phillies and Houston Astros (est. 1962) in what became one of the greatest postseason series in baseball history.

Game 1 of the 1980 NLCS featured a pitchers duel between Ken Forsch and Steve Carlton. The Astros took an early 1-0 lead in the third inning, but the Phillies scored two in the bottom of the sixth and held on to win 3-1. Incredibly, that was the blowout game in the series. The next four games all went into extra innings, with the Astros winning Games Two and Three in the 10th and 11th innings respectively. With a two games to one series lead, the Astros were just one win away from their first trip to the World Series.

Despite a starting pitcher mismatch of Philadelphia’s  Carlton vs. Houston’s Vern Ruhle in Game Four, the Astros found themselves six outs from the World Series with a 2-0 lead into the eighth before Philadelphia came back and won in the 10th to force a decisive Game Five. In a reversal of the pitcher mismatch, the winner-take-all game was started by Houston’s future Hall of Famer Nolan Ryan and Philly’s 21-year-old rookie Marty Bystrom. Once again, the Astros found themselves with a lead in the eighth inning, but this time they had Ryan on the mound. The first all-expansion team World Series was all but inevitable until, of course, the Phillies came back and won in the 10th inning, again, sending an Original 16 franchise to the World Series, again.

The next chance for an all-expansion team World Series came in 1984 when the San Diego Padres (est. 1969) won the National League pennant and the Royals reached the ALCS. But there was no near miss that year, as the Tigers swept the Royals on their way to the World Series. Two years later, however, the baseball world found itself one strike away from the first Original-16-free World Series.

By 1986, the LCS had become a seven-game affair. The Mets defeated the Astros in six to win the National League pennant and in the ALCS, the California Angels put together a three games to one lead on the Boston Red Sox. In the potential Game Five clincher, the Angels took a 5-2 lead into the ninth  inning. Angels pitcher Mike Witt yielded a two-run home run to Don Baylor, but retired Jim Rice and Dwight Evans, leaving the Angels clinging to a 5-4 lead one out away from a pennant. Angels reliever Gary Lucas hit Sox catcher Rich Gedman with a pitch, which brought Dave Henderson to the plate and closer Donnie Moore to the mound. Moore got a 2-2 count on Henderson, putting the Angles just one strike away from the World Series, only for Henderson to crush a home run and give the Red Sox the lead.

The Angels tied it in the bottom of the ninth, but a second Henderson/Moore showdown in the 11th inning resulted in a sac fly which ultimately gave the Red Sox the victory. The Sox went on to win Games Six and Seven easily, and it would be another 14 years before expansion teams reached both the ALCS and NLCS again.

The 1990s were notably dominated by Original 16 teams thanks to dynastic runs from the Yankees and Braves, so perhaps it isn’t surprising that the next threat for an all-expansion team World Series was delayed until the turn of the century. The National League sent the Mets and Arizona Diamondbacks (est. 1998) to the World Series in 2000 and 2001, both years in which the Seattle Mariners (est. 1977) and New York Yankees faced off in the ALCS. Unfortunately for Seattle, a brilliant 2000 ALCS by Alex Rodriguez (.409/.480/.773) went for naught and New York took the series in six games. The following year, the Mariners recorded the most regular season wins in major league history with 116, only to meet another crushing defeat at the hands of the Yankees, this time in five games.

The last two opportunities for Original 16 World Series exclusion were just as fruitless. In 2005, the White Sox took the Angels in five for a World Series date with the Astros and in 2011 the Cardinals defeated the Milwaukee Brewers (est. 1969) in six to set up their extraordinary 2011 World Series triumph over the Texas Rangers. Which brings us back to 2015.

This year, five of the American League’s six playoff teams were expansion franchises, which meant an expansion team was guaranteed to take the pennant as soon as the New York Yankees lost the Wild Card game. The National League’s five playoff teams, however, featured four Original 16 franchises and the New York Mets. The only way for this extraordinary streak to fall this year was for the Mets to be the last ones standing in the National League. If not for a Ruthian October from Daniel Murphy perhaps the wait would continue, but on the backs of Murphy and a brilliant starting rotation, the first all-expansion team World Series is finally here.

Where do we go next? Will the all-expansion team World Series become commonplace? Does our future have more Mariners/Marlins Fall Classics than Cardinals/Yankees ones? Given the still extraordinary financial and organizational strengths of Original 16 franchises like the Yankees, Cardinals and Dodgers, it’s hard to imagine this Royals/Mets match-up marks the beginning of the end for the dominance of the Original 16, but only time will tell. All I know for certain is that a quirky streak has met its seemingly inevitable end and for the first time ever, neither team we watch compete for the World Championship is directly related to the teams our great-great-grandfathers watched. Fortunately, on the off chance Great-Great-Gramps stops by for a game, we’ll always have 90 feet in common.

References & Resources

  • Baseball-Reference


Corinne Landrey writes for FanGraphs and MLB.com's Cut4 site. Follow her on Twitter @crashlandrey.
15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mike L
8 years ago

Still hoping for an all-Florida World Series one day.

22 Browns
8 years ago
Reply to  Mike L

Why no one else in Florida is ! The marlins had 2 World Champions and the worst attendance in the league, only to be topped by the Tampa Bay Rays who had very competitive teams from 2008 until last year and their attendance was always last. Florida, I mean Miami , and Tampa Bay do not deserve MLB Franchises !

Robert H
8 years ago

If we want to be pedantic (and of course we do), the 1901-2 Orioles are not considered part of the Yankee franchise. It was less of a move and more of a simultaneous contraction/expansion. NYY franchise data in b-r starts in 1903. More info here:
http://www.sports-reference.com/blog/2014/07/1901-02-orioles-removed-from-yankees-history/
and John Thorn’s lengthy account here
http://ourgame.mlblogs.com/2012/02/29/the-house-that-mcgraw-built/
Of course, the first (modern) World Series wasn’t played until 1903, when the Highlanders were already in NY, so we could still count the Yankees as an original franchise from that perspective.

Paul G.
8 years ago

Define “expansion” team.

As Robert H notes there is a dispute if the original American League Baltimore Orioles and the New York Yankees are the same franchise. I think the consensus was that they were the same franchise until recently, but Baseball-Reference.com now treats them as separate. I think the web site announced that sometime in the past year or two. Others disagree. If the Yankees are an expansion team then the 1998 World Series vs. San Diego is the first all expansion World Series unless….

The link between the Milwaukee Brewers franchise and the St. Louis Browns is also controversial, but B-R.com still treats them as the same franchise. Others do not. If the St. Louis Browns are considered an expansion team, that would make the 1969 World Series against the Mets the first all expansion, unless….

And then we get into the entire 19th century where there were 3 or 4 major leagues, depending on how you treat the Union Association, and teams dropped out and jumped in on yearly basis 1876-1892. In some admittedly shallow research, the only franchise that played in more than one city was a UA team that failed to finish their only season and that it is disputed if that is one franchise or two, and the NL charter Hartford team that played in Brooklyn for their second and last season. Records of a franchise being bought and then moved do appear in the literature, but each new city is considered a new franchise. For instance, the St. Louis Maroons won the UA in 1884, then moved to the NL for 1885-1886, the franchise was sold the league, the league sold it to John T. Brush, Brush moved the team to Indianapolis and retained almost all of the roster. Those are different franchises, officially. If we are treating those as expansion teams, then the only non-expansion teams in the National League are charter members Boston (now Atlanta) and Chicago. If we consider the charter members of the American League to not be expansion teams, then the first all expansion World Series would be 1921 (New York vs. New York) or 1944 (St. Louis vs. St. Louis, the NL team being a charter member of the American Association which may or may not count) or 1966 (Baltimore vs. Brooklyn, which was a legitimate American Association expansion team) or 1980 (Kansas City vs. Philadelphia), depending on how you handle the prior examples and assuming I didn’t goof.

Now if consider the American League to be an expansion league then the first World Series was all expansion as Pittsburgh was a charter member of the AA. If that does not count then 1905 (Giants vs. Philadelphia).

But, yes, if you are using the standard definition of teams added since 1961, then, yes, this is the first all expansion World Series.

Paul G.
8 years ago
Reply to  Paul G.

Obviously, the 1966 World Series was Los Angeles and Baltimore, not Brooklyn. And when I say that LA/Brooklyn is an actual American Association expansion team, in 1884 the AA expanded from 8 teams to 12 and then contracted back down to 8 the next season. Brooklyn was the only new team from 1884 that survived the shake out.

And do be glad I didn’t bring up the Temple Cup.

ray miller
8 years ago

This is an article I wish I had written! In fact, I had it written in my head to some extent for some time now. Thank you, Corrine for actually making the effort and doing such a good job!

As for the “pedantic” objections in the other two emails . . . C’mon, guys, let’s not over-do it! I personally don’t consider the Yankees and Browns (-> Orioles) to be expansion teams in the same sense that the Royals and Mets are, but I’m willing to be persuaded. The (current) Giants and Phillies are clearly expansion teams (1883) with the DNA of a couple of extreme small-market franchises in them (well, okay, the Phils bought the legal right to enter the NL from Worcester, so they basically got a second-hand whiff of the Brown Stockings’ DNA). Considering the entire AL to be expansion franchises for the purposes of this discussion is one of those things that William Safire would call a MEGO: “My Eyes Glaze Over”! 🙂 Seriously, though, “expansion”, as we understand it, is a modern concept: leagues filled out their line-up of clubs differently back in the day. This is actually a topic that I’m particularly interested in.

In any event, the problem is solved, as Paul points out, by saying “the first post-1961 all-expansion World Series”, which is the point of Corrine’s article and the article I never wrote. That really is as extraordinary a circumstance as Corrine says it is.

Paul G.
8 years ago
Reply to  ray miller

Hey, this is the Hardball Times. If someone is not taking it too far, then something went wrong. 🙂

John G.
8 years ago

MLB didn’t “expand” (i.e. have more than 16 teams) until 1961. Under the revised history, the original Orioles and Brewers may have folded, but they were immediately *replaced* for the next season(s) by the Yankees and Browns (later Orioles), keeping MLB at 16 teams for each season.

So, for those who get caught up in semantics, instead of referring to the Yankees and Browns/Orioles as “expansion” teams and trying to change decades of how fans have followed baseball, wouldn’t it be simpler and more accurate to refer to them as “replacement” teams?

In any case, this is a very interesting, well-researched, and nicely done article. Thank you.

Philip
8 years ago
Reply to  John G.

Just disregard the issue of the World Series for a moment.

The problem with the whole Yankees situation is that they want it both ways. They don’t want to be a continuation of the 1901-02 Baltimore Orioles franchise, but also don’t want to be labeled as an “expansion” team.

Talacker
8 years ago

It seems unfair that the AL got 6 playoff teams this year and the NL only got 5. 🙂

Marc Schneider
8 years ago

I actually find the non-expansion/non-moving teams World Series more interesting, ie, WS matchups that could have occurred prior to 1953 (when the Braves moved to Milwaukee). There are only 10 (9 if ;you count the Yankees has having moved from Baltimore but I count them as original/non-moving because I want to): Yankees, Red Sox, Pirates, Phillies, Cardinals, Cubs, White Sox, Tigers, Indians, Reds. The last original WS was in 2013 with the Red Sox/Cardinals; before that 2009 (Yanks/Phillies), 2006 (Cards/Tigers), 2004 (Cards/Red Sox). Before 2004, the last original team WS had been 1976 (Yanks/Reds), having been preceded in 1975 by Red Sox/Reds. Most of the teams currently in the majors are either expansion teams or have moved from their original city (in some cases, twice).

GregF
8 years ago
Reply to  Marc Schneider

Good point about the “original 16” teams moving to other places and representing the new locations in World Series. Until recently, I never thought about the fact that the 1965 World Series was the first of this nature, with Minnesota and Los Angeles, instead of Washington and Brooklyn.

Larry Forcey
8 years ago

Thank you for writing this up…. I had been waiting for an all-expansion WS for many years & mainstream media does not appear to appreciate the historical sinificance.

22 Browns
8 years ago
Reply to  Larry Forcey

Oh the advocacy PC press in one instance stated it was between two post segregation era teams ARGGGGGGG> Will the liberal turds never stop !

22 Browns
8 years ago

The author left out the first LCS between expansion teams and the first non American franchise to be in an LCS , the 1985 ALCS between the Toronto Blue Jays and the K.C. Royals.