The real replacement level of starting pitching

I’ve spoken about my high stakes league in which I co-manage a team with a friend. In that league, another two of our friends co-manage a second team. This past weekend, we had a discussion about potential trades in which I may have appeared unreasonable.

What I did isn’t really out of the ordinary; I simply placed an extremely high price on one of my team’s better hitters if I was going to be receiving a starting pitcher in return. Many of us have a sense that pitchers are harder to trade—or fetch less—than hitters. They do. Or, they should.

Most simply, trade value comes down to replacement level. If you play in a daily league with unlimited, or liberally limited, roster moves and are in need of a starting pitcher (as we are), the replacement level starter can actually be pretty high, provided you are willing to exert some effort and display a bit of ingenuity. Elevating the replacement level of a position player is much more difficult.

While one may tempted to look at the top few starters floating on his league’s waiver wire to define a replacement level starter, that’s not the reality for the shrewd owner. Let’s try to estimate what the real value of a replacement starter can easily be with a little effort and planning.

Let’s assume for the sake of this article that 180 innings is a reasonable target to expect from each pitcher in the starting corps. This works out to about 30 innings a month. Remember, nobody says that those innings must all come from the same player. If you can find one opportunity to spot start a waiver wire pitcher per week and fill that spot with a middle reliever the rest of the time, you should be able to piece together a high quality pitching line. (This is easier, operationally, when all roster spots are P instead of RP-, SP-specific; one of oft-stated my pet peeves!)

I’m not a hardcore researcher-writer, so I’m going to pluck numbers here for the purposes of illustration—there are so many variations of league size that calculating the average stats of a waiver wire pitcher would be an exercise in the arbitrary anyway. However, in a 12-team mixed league, it’s not unreasonable to think that your standard omni-available pitcher might have a skill level of something like 4.50 ERA, 1.35 WHIP, six K/9 and one win per 3.5 starts.

You have to find only one opportunity a week when you think one of any of these pitchers, against various opponents, with various skill sets, and in various run environments can perform above his average. It’s not that much of a stretch to think you can coach these pitchers up to a line more along the lines of 4.25 ERA, 1.30 WHIP, 6.5 K/P and one win per three starts. Of course, depending on the choices you make, you could wind up with better rates and lower Ks or the reverse. Frankly, that’s one of the benefits of this approach as well; it allows you to chase what you most need. Though to be fair, if the alternative is trading for a quality pitcher, that player should be able to help you everywhere.

Proceeding, it’s not too difficult to find waiver wire middle relievers who post numbers more along the lines of 2.50 ERA, 1.25 WHIP, 7.5 K/9 and one W per 15 innings pitched.

At the end of the day, you are looking at six innings from your starter per week and three innings from your reliever. This should net you somewhere between 27 and 33 innings per month. For simplicity’s sake, let’s take the mathematical middle and mete out 30 innings of this composition “replacement pitcher” with a ratio of two to one starter to reliever innings and extrapolate that across a six-month season.

IP: 180
ERA: 3.66
WHIP 1.28
K: 130
W: 11

That’s not bad for a free additional starter, right? That line doesn’t hurt you anywhere!

So, if I can get this for free, what would it take for me to give up, say a healthy Paul Konerko? A lot more than Tommy Hanson, right? And, if I told you I probably still wouldn’t do it even for David Price, you might think I’m taking it too far, but I really wouldn’t be acting so unreasonably, correct?

These names may or not be random.

My free pitcher may be a 10 or 15 percent drop from a pitcher like Price, with some additional variability regarding wins. For either the star or the composite replacement, win are difficult to predict.

However, when the most attractive first basemen on the wire are players like Justin Smoak, there is just very little chance I can find 85-90 percent of Paul Konerko in the free agent pool. Maybe I can really micromanage meticulously and elevate my replacement level production, but that’s ton more effort than just grabbing one of a dozen relievers and keeping an eye out for decent pitchers facing the Pirates, Mariners or Padres (preferably at Petco).

There’s a second benefit of filling my needed pitching slot this way as opposed to trading a premium bat for a quality arm. My injury risk from that pitching spot is nil. I’m not relying on any single pitcher. I simply need to find roughly four quality spot starting opportunities a month and select from a plentiful pool of capable set-up arms. If I trade for Price and he gets hurt, I gave up Konerko for nothing, or for very little.

The last point may not be totally fair, as I still hold the injury risk of Konerko. So, if he gets hurt and I didn’t trade him for Price, I’m left holding the bag. But, the point stands. Remember, I’m not trading Konerko for Price, but trading the difference between Konerko and his replacement for the difference between Price and his.

One final point regarding this theory: While it may be intuitive to think that you are exposing yourself to a greater degree of expected variance in performance by using a conglomerate of pitchers and therefore not allowing any individual performer the opportunity for his performance to normalize, that is not the case. Your starter-by-committee has a cumulative expected performance as does the individual pitcher. Any greater likelihood of variance would be due to particular pitchers having larger individual variances in expected performance; the fact that you are using one player versus 15 or 30 is essentially irrelevant.

In conclusion, it can be considered reasonable to highly value elite hitting and demand others “overpay” if they are selling you pitching. Of course, if you are hoarding hitting such that you are amassing surplus production that doesn’t influence your point totals, then you need to redistribute your assets. But, remember, it isn’t too difficult to put together a quite serviceable replacement level pitcher from the scraps on the wire, without giving away anything but a floating roster spot.

Print Friendly
 Share on Facebook0Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Google+0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone
« Previous: The daily grind 5-21
Next: BOB:  Athletics stadium limbo »

Comments

  1. George said...

    A good strategy for mixed.  Unworkable for single league.  For example, here are the available starters on my league’s WW:

    Randy Wolf (just dropped last week, will probably be rostered and gone next week)
    JA Happ
    Jamie Moyer
    Kevin Corriea
    Alex White
    Charlie Morton
    Jeremy Guthrie
    Travis Wood
    Brad Lincoln

    Good luck streaming from that group!

  2. Matt said...

    This is a brilliant way to stream pitchers! I never thought of using middle relievers on off days to “beef up” a starters’ stats. I picked up Ernesto Frieri today.

    Since my league doesn’t value middle relievers, I don’t know who the lights out 7th and 8th inning guys are. Who are some that you would suggest? Is Frieri one of the best options?

  3. Chris said...

    What about if you have a ready replacement hitter (ala Mike Morse, Sandoval, and even possibly one of the 17 red sox outfielders on the DL) just waiting to be activated?  Does that change your strategy?  Are you more willing to trade a hitter if you think you can get by with a replacement level hitter for the next 2-4 weeks while your 85-90% replacement level player heals up?

  4. Jacob Rolling Rothberg said...

    Great article, it illustrates pretty perfectly the reasons for having add-limits in head to head leagues. Stops people from gaming the system.

  5. Chris said...

    Great article. I’m facing this obstacle in just about every one of my leagues. Currently I’m trying to trade Moustakas as I’ve got sick depth coming in at 3B (Headley, Moustakas, Arenado, Rendon and Chisenhall), and I tried to acquire Chapman to fill replace a lost RP, but got seriously rebuffed for it. Sure, Moose Tacos isn’t quite up to Konerko’s status, but in a deep keeper league, the guy has to have some value as he’s young and now hitting in the middle of the Royal’s lineup, but I’m getting roughly replacement level offers for him.

    Any suggestions on how to boost his value and get the most out of him?

  6. Nevin said...

    I think the strategy is correct, but the number of people willing to recognize and understand it will be low.  It will lead to reputation as someone tough to deal with.  But if you’re the one dealing the pitching and getting the hitter back, and they don’t understand that hedged arbitrage, then its good for you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Current day month ye@r *