The state of the NL Central

image

All stats as of Sunday morning

Coming into the season, the NL Central looked like the very definition of an average division. The Cardinals, Reds, and Brewers were supposed to be good. The Cubs, Pirates, and Astros, um, not so much. Overall, the division has fulfilled it’s decidedly average promise, currently residing just a touch under .500, which is what we’d expect since the bottom-dwellers were supposed to be more terrible than the competitive teams were supposed to be good.

Looking deeper, however, we some surprises.

Cardinals

If, before the season had started, I told you that through mid-May, Lance Berkman would have played in seven games, Chris Carpenter wouldn’t have thrown a pitch, and Adam Wainwright would have an ERA of 5.61, I’m going to go ahead and say that you wouldn’t have picked the Cardinals to have the second-best run differential in baseball. So how did that happen?

Well, let’s start with the list of players who have been below-average offensively while getting more than 25 at-bats. Are you ready? Here it is:

Daniel Descalso

Yes, that’s it. Every other player who’s garnered significant playing time has been a well-above-average hitter. This is topped by 35-year-old Carlos Beltran‘s absolutely insane .299/.406/.641 line. There’s no way it keeps up, though. With the exceptions of Matt Holliday, who’s maybe under-performing a little, and Descalso, every major contributor for the Cardinals is well above his career numbers. The Cardinals are a good team, and they can hit, but they aren’t going to hit like this all year.

The pitching is a different story. The Cardinals have had both good luck (Kyle Lohse) and bad luck (Wainwright) spread pretty evenly throughout the staff. Overall, it balances out, and while I’d be surprised if the team still sported an ERA this close to 3.00 at the end of the season, they are solid here.

In the end, the Cardinals are a good team with a decent lead early in the season. They are the favorite in the NL Central going forward.

Reds

The Reds, to this point, are a touch under where they were expected to be. They’re right at .500 and 3.5 games back of the Cardinals. It’s been an interesting early-season ride as they started the year 4-8 before remembering that it’s okay to get base hits sometimes. Their poor play early on means they spotted the Cardinals a decent lead in the division and already have a bit of work to do.

The first thing you need to know about the Reds is that Aroldis Chapman is invincible. He throws 400 mph, and if you look at him wrong, you’ll be swallowed by a chasm that opens at your feet. Okay, not really, but he does have a strikeout-per-nine (K/9) of 15.51 and a strikeout-to-walk ratio of 6.75. Chapman is still dialing it up to 100, seems to have his control in hand, and hasn’t allowed a run all year. At one point late in the first month of the season, he actually had a negative FIP. I don’t know what that means, but I think the other teams had to spot the Reds a run when he pitched. That hardly seems fair given how good he is.

Chapman is only the most dominant member of a pitching staff that has been surprisingly good. The bullpen has been lights out, leading the world in K/9. The rotation has been a little shaky, and though Mat Latos can be expected to come around, one has to wonder if the poor performances from Mike Leake and Homer Bailey (neither has traditional or advanced stats that look very good) will eventually force the Reds’ hand and send Chapman into the rotation.

On the offensive end, things have been less glamorous. The Reds play in a hitters’ park and are supposed to be good anyway, but they have had a number of black holes in the lineup. Scott Rolen is on the DL and it’s possible he has played his last major league game. Todd Frazier should be an adequate replacement, but they need to get something out of third base and left field if they’re going to compete.

On the flip side, Jay Bruce might, just maybe, have turned the corner. We’ve seen stretches like this from him before, so it’s much too early to proclaim him the superstar he was supposed to be, but the signs are good. He’s still young (25), and he has a lot of service time under his belt already (this is his fifth year in the majors). Most importantly, he seems willing to go the other way, and this isn’t just announcers talking. Spray charts agree that something has changed. If he keeps it up, life will be very good for Reds fans for the next several years.

The Reds have a rough schedule over the next few weeks and need to hold their ground. Obviously, it’s still very early, but the Cardinals are good, and the Reds have to be careful about falling too far behind.

Astros

If you ask me, the Astros are the most surprising team in the division right now. They are supposed to be terrible, but here it is the middle of May, and though they’re under .500, they’ve scored more runs than they’ve allowed and look like a team that can put up a fight. So how are they doing it?

Steadily.

The Astros were terrible last year, losing 106 games, but it was a necessary terrible. More than one person was predicting them to be just as bad this year, and that probably wasn’t reasonable. Still, they weren’t supposed to be within shouting distance of .500 after the first few games. They’ve even had a fairly tough schedule with games against Washington, Miami, Atlanta, LA, St. Louis, and Cincinnati. That’s a who’s who of the teams already jockeying for a playoff spot.

It seems that some of the kids are grown up. Notably, J.D. Martinez and Jose Altuve are fulfilling their potential while a few of the roster-fillers and half-prospects like Jed Lowrie and Chris Johnson have played a bit above their heads. The pitching has been solid, but unspectacular.

What Astros fans are probably getting right now is a short view of the future. There’s still some veteran weight to shed in the form of Carlos Lee, and the farm system is not exactly great, but with the new front office and the performance of some of the young ‘uns, things are less bleak. They’ll still finish well behind the Reds and Cardinals (and probably the Brewers), but this year doesn’t look as miserable as last year.

Pirates

I can’t be the only one who saw how the Pirates played in 2011 and though this year they might do something. Not win the division, certainly, but maybe finish around .500. So much for that. The Pirates are bad, but that’s what happens with a roster full of cast-offs and roster-filler. The Pirates currently employ all of the following players:

Erik Bedard
A.J. Burnett
Casey McGehee
Clint Barmes
Nate McLouth
Rod Barajas

That’s a quarter of the roster dedicated to guys who may have been good once but whose time has passed. What exactly the Pirates were thinking when acquiring these guys is beyond me. They seem to have fallen into the trap of believing that because last year wasn’t a disaster, they should try to field a competitive team. In this case, “competitive team” means a competitive team in 2009.

If I’m a Pirates fan, I’m really frustrated right now. Management is wasting money on these guys. Last year was a step forward, but I won’t be surprised if they take a step back this year. THT Forecasts agree with me, project the Pirates to finish with 97 losses this year.

Brewers

It’s been a rough year for the Brewers already. They’ve had several major injuries to contend with, others haven’t performed, and Prince Fielder is missed. The Brewers were supposed to be the third team in a three-team race with the Reds and Cardinals. They’ve made up a couple of games over the last few contests, and five back must feel a lot better than seven back. They’re going to have to play better to compete, though.

First base has been a black hole with the departure of Fielder. We’re 20 percent of the way through the season, and the Brewers have generated 0.0 WAR at first. That is, literally, the definition of replacement level. It certainly doesn’t help that Mat Gamel, who was supposed to man the position, is out for the year with a knee injury.

Healthy but still disappointing is Aramis Ramirez. Ramirez was supposed to replace some of Fielder’s offense, but so far, he’s hit just .228/.281/.390. That is not getting it done.

But there’s hope. Brewer pitchers have been getting poor results so far, but they have been crazy unlucky, as the difference between the team ERA and FIP is nearly a run. You should expect to see enormous and more or less immediately better results from Yovani Gallardo and Randy Wolf, among others.

Still, there’s more reasons to be pessimistic than optimistic about the Brewers. They’ll be playing hurt all year and will need the Reds and especially the Cardinals to falter badly if they hope to sneak into the playoffs.

Cubs

The Cubs are not very good. Everyone surprised by this, please raise your hand. Yeah, me neither. But there is something to that. The Cubs are doing the bad-team thing the right way. In the offseason, they got rid of some players who aren’t in the long-term plans. Soon, they’ll get rid of more and, one day, Alfonso Soriano‘s contract will expire.

As Theo Epstein tries to build a competitive ballclub over the next few years, Cubs fans are going to be looking for bright spots wherever they can find them. Right now, that means Bryan LaHair, Starlin Castro and Jeff Samardzija.

LaHair has simply been fantastic, hitting .359/.455/.717. Those are cartoon numbers, and obviously he’ll regress, but he’s been good to watch so far, even if the Cubs probably can’t count on the 29-year-old first baseman long term.

Castro and Samardzija should be around for a while, though. The conversion of Smardzija to a starter has gone fantastically. He’s going to run into an innings limit eventually, but he should be fun to watch until them. Most any team would be happy to have Castro at short every day.

So yeah, if you’re a Cubs fan, it’s another year of waiting, but there are some interesting things to watch.

Print Friendly
 Share on Facebook0Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Google+0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone
« Previous: 50 years from the Mets junk drawer
Next: This week in (fantasy) baseball 5/7-5/13 »

Comments

  1. bucdaddy said...

    Burnett and Bedard wastes of money? Are you paying any attention?

    Burnett’s had four good starts and a terrible start where he took one for the team. He has 31 strikeouts in 31.2 IP. Bedard has a 2.57 ERA and 37 strikeouts in 35 innings. And you completely ignored the performance/emergence of McDonald.

    The Pirates are second in the league in ERA and within two games of .500 despite what has so far been their even worse than usual offense. No, I don’t think they can keep up with the pitching either, but they also can’t keep up hitting as badly as they have (please say they can’t).

    You mention the tough schedule the Astros have played. The Pirates’ first 40 games or so were/are equally brutal, but they just beat the Astros two of three and allowed them five runs all weekend.

    Come on, we don’t ask for much after 20 years of bad baseball. A little acknowledgement that we have a decent major league rotation for the first time in decades would be a kind thing to do.

  2. John said...

    That’s a quarter of the roster dedicated to guys who may have been good once but whose time has passed. What exactly the Cards were thinking when acquiring these guys is beyond me.

    34 y/o Lohse
    36 y/o JC Romero
    35 y/o Westbrook
    36 y/o Berkman
    35 y/o Furcal
    35 y/o Beltran

    The Pirates are not good, but the reason you state that they are not good could be stated about every team in baseball (Checked the Dodgers starters lately?).

    The Pirates are terrible becuase they can’t hit and no one though that Barajas and Barmes we’re going to hit .300.

  3. Jason Linden said...

    John – I mentioned it with the Pirates because those are all guys they brought in and none of them has been good recently. You bring up the Cardinals, but you know, most of those guys were good very recently. Not so with the scrubs the Pirates brought in.

    Bucdaddy – Right now, any player who is not in the long term plans for the Pirates is a waste of money. They aren’t ready to make a run at the playoffs yet, so bringing in castoffs is pointless regardless of how they perform. If either of those pitchers performs for the whole season, I’ll eat my hat.

  4. bucdaddy said...

    Jason,

    You still have to put a team on the field, why not make it the best team you can, even for the short term, while you wait for your Coles and Taillons and Rudy Owenses to show up? What SHOULD they have done with their rotation? Taken the worst guys they could find just cause they’re cheap and lose 110 again? I don’t understand what you want them to do. Not bother trying?

    Nobody expected Barajas and Barmes to set the world on fire, but even our low expectations aren’t being met. But it’s still relatively early in the season. Funny how when a guy is hitting over his head for a month everybody wants to point to SSS, but when a guy is hitting under his weight for a month nobody wants to give him the benefit of the doubt.

    Of course, our track record for picking up guys like Barmes and Barajas and Matt Diaz and the like isn’t very good, so you have some basis for pessimism. But cheese ‘n crackers, take a look at what they had to work with. Doumit and Ronny Cedeno weren’t long-term answers either, and do you see any viable shortstops and catchers in the system who aren’t at least two levels away? And that’s supposing Sanchez ever gets his act together.

    So again, should they have just not bothered to try somebody different?

  5. Jason Linden said...

    bucdaddy – I get where you’re coming from, and you have a point, but as someone who was rooting for the Reds during the 2000s, I just have no tolerance for bringing on guys like that. I always got my hopes up because someone scrub they brought in had been good 3 or 4 years ago and I was always disappointed. Eventually, I reached the point where I’d rather they lost 95 with in house talent than 90 with some 35-year-old former all-star.

    I do get where you’re coming from, I just don’t agree.

  6. Chris said...

    I don’t know that you can expect the Brewers ERA to come closer to that FIP.  Their fielding is bad, so the ERA will probably run well above FIP throughout the season.  The starting shortstop and first baseman are gone.  And the 2 remaining regulars (Weeks and A-Ram) have been sub-par fielders for a long time now.

    Just my two cents.  Maybe I’m wrong.

  7. Kyle said...

    Don’t need to go into too much detail given all that Bucdaddy has said, but I think the analysis of the pirates in the article is wildly off. This team is better than the 2011 team. In the 2011-12 offseason we were pretty sure that baseball would expand playoffs, and the NL central looked relatively weak overall. The pirates didn’t break the bank for those guys and they gave themselves the semblance of a shot to do something exciting in 2012. As a bucs fan I am the opposite of frustrated right now.

  8. Connie Mack's Daddy said...

    As most are pointing out, this cursory analysis of the Bucs is just… off. Not to mention, the recently benched JD Martinez is hitting about .220 which is not exactly what I’d call “fulfilling his potential”.

  9. Chris said...

    The Pirates are 16-18, with a Pythag of 14-20, and the fans (here) are content.  Odd what you can get used to after 20 years.

  10. Jason Linden said...

    Chris – Yes, exactly. I have a soft spot for the Pirates, but they are not good.

    Connie – I’ll own up to the Martinez gaffe. I don’t know what I was thinking there, though his numbers were better when I started writing this article.

  11. Kyle said...

    @ Chris @ Jason You both have gotten used to the Bucs being bad for 20 years as well, and this kind of attitude and analysis is exactly the kind of stuff that I love hearing right now. You both have gotten used to forgetting about the Pirates. They are an afterthought in this article about the NL Central (Pirates are currently in third) and they shouldn’t be. The pitching staff, both starting and relief is doing quite well despite being complete wastes of precious money. Pedro Alvarez has actually hit some home runs amid the strikeouts. Taillon and Cole are pitching well.

    There is more than meets the eye going on in Pittsburgh, but by all means, continue to completely overlook them, it will make it sweeter when we Cannonball All Y’all.

    And as I write this we have just beaten the Marlins.

  12. Kevin said...

    You realize that the Players Association would likely have launched a formal investigation into the Pirates if they hadn’t signed a few players, right?  They’re not currently in the market for guys who ARE good.  They have to settle for guys that COULD BE good.  And so, they are forced to sign some vets each year.  I may quibble over which vets they sign, but I understand that they do have to sign some.

  13. RDG said...

    Big surprise, the Brewers suck with Fielder gone and the FedEx trucks going through Milwaukee

    nohelmetsrequired.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Current ye@r *