Holland and Granderson

“Uncle Shane, what if a player hit a home run every time?”

I’ve been hearing questions like that a lot lately. My sister just moved up to Asheville with her two children. Among doing other things, this has thrown me in pretty close with my nephew Holland, who is a pretty fair ballplayer for nine. Trying to help the boy through a rough transition, I’ve been taking time to watch some baseball games with him the last couple weeks.

I’ve been getting peppered with Holland’s questions during these games, and in trying to deepen his baseball knowledge I’ve actually tried to answer a few. For instance, after I explained how most pitchers don’t bat too well in the bigs, he asked if a pitcher had ever managed to hit an over-the-fence home run. This is where I got to tell him how Babe Ruth started in the majors. The name “Babe Ruth” strikes Holland the way I imagine invoking Zeus struck the classical Greeks: awesome power at a distant remove. Telling Holland the Babe had been a pitcher left him speechless, and this is no easy feat.

So when Holland asked if someone could hit a home run every time, I actually tried to engage the question. Nobody could do it over a whole career, I explained, but for a single game I supposed it was possible. Pretty easy, actually, if you were a pinch-hitter and came up only once. (Images of a fist-pumping Kirk Gibson flitted through my mind.) Holland needed the term “pinch-hitter” explained, though, and the train of thought wobbled off-course and lost steam.

Events of the evening would bring it back.

Holland and I were watching the Rangers and Tigers on MLB Network. This disappointed Holland, as he likes the Yankees, but their game against the Twins wasn’t being carried by MLBN in our area. I had my iPod loaded with the proper app, though, so I could follow the score on his behalf (and mine, of course). The Twins leaped ahead with four in the first, but the Yankees got most of that back in their half, sparked by a Curtis Granderson home run. New York rallied again in the second, and took the lead … on a Curtis Granderson home run.

And as I told Holland this, suddenly a question he had asked in youthful ignorance began gaining some heft.

I knew a bit about the players who had hit four homers in a single game. Lou Gehrig had been the first, his accomplishment swept off the front pages by John McGraw‘s retirement the same day. I recalled those four homers and a double off the wall at Ebbets Field, though I was blanking on Joe Adcock‘s name. I knew it had been done a number of other times—but I did not know whether anyone had accomplished it in just four plate appearances.

And I didn’t know whether Curtis Granderson had this kind of historic accomplishment in him. But I was sure thinking about it.

As Yu Darvish doused a Detroit rally with only one run scored to maintain a slim lead, bedtime came for Holland. He left for bed without resistance, which I suspect wouldn’t have happened had the Yankees been playing. As Texas began mounting its own threat in the top of the fifth, I checked my app again, just in case. And there it was. Bottom of the fourth, one out. A single, deceptively prosaic line.

“Curtis Granderson homered.”

It had only been a couple minutes, so I went to knock on my nephew’s door. Three home runs, and it’s just the fourth inning. Pretty exciting news for Holland, yes, but more so for me, because I understood the context. I knew how unusual this was. I knew Granderson had a shot now, a real measurable shot, at history. Four home runs would tie the record. And with four-plus innings at least left for the hot Yankees’ bats, he would have more than one chance.

But Holland’s question echoed within me. What if Curtis hit a home run every time? What if …?


“Impossible.” We use that word pretty loosely sometimes, as shorthand for “so unlikely it’s not worth thinking about.” And at the start of the game, a five-homer performance was just that kind of impossible. The same kind of impossible that some randomly chosen journeyman, hanging on to a rotation slot by his fingernails, will pitch a perfect game.

But at some point, as the statistics accumulate, that rhetorically tossed-off “impossible” becomes “you know, maybe.” Curtis Granderson had reached that point, and because of a question my nine-year-old nephew had asked, I was at that point with him.

Of course, Granderson didn’t make history. He singled in the sixth and singled in the eighth, and the Yankees hung on to win. Only in the context of his first three at-bats could that be considered any kind of disappointment. Or perhaps if you’re still nine, and don’t fully grasp the bounds of the game, and of human abilities.

But Holland picked an awfully good time to ask what adults would consider a pretty silly question. And when he comes home from school today, I will have an answer for him. If a player hit a home run every time … he would be Carlos Delgado. Of the 13 players to hit four home runs in a game, he is the only one who did it in four plate appearances.

The date, though, is a bit galling: Sept. 25, 2003. Not even nine years ago, and I had forgotten this unique baseball accomplishment so thoroughly that I had to look it up to know it had even happened. Maybe to get any long-lasting recognition, you do have to hit five home runs in a game.

Impossible, you say. But you know, maybe …

Print Friendly
 Share on Facebook0Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Google+0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone
« Previous: And That Happened
Next: 60th anniversary: Hoyt Wilhelm’s only homer »


  1. DevilsAdvocate said...

    I’m sure that at least a couple of these players have managed 4 homers in their first 4 plate appearances.  But on a day when a player manages 4 home runs, there are usually enough hits going around that the player gets a 5th plate appearance.

    And I know Art Shamsky hit 4 homeruns in 4 plate appearances at one point in the 60’s…spread over 2 games.

  2. Gerard Ottaviano said...

    Bobby Murcer hit 4 consecutive HRs, I believe, split over a doubleheader on June 24, 1970…

  3. Paul G. said...

    That was quite touching.  Thank you for sharing.

    Gehrig was the first player in the modern era (and by extension the American League) to hit four homers in a game, and he is the only Yankee to do it, which is shocking in itself, but there were a couple of 19th century players who beat him to quadruple glory. 

    Bobby Lowe hit 4 consecutive in a game in 1894, including 2 in the 3rd inning.  The way I read it, the fans left him a “tip” of $160 which is roughly $4,000 in 2010 dollars.  After Gehrig performed his feat, they actually got the two together for a picture.

    The other player was Ed Delahanty in 1896.  For added flavor they were all of the inside-the-park variety.  Somehow his Phillies still lost the game!

  4. Paul E said...

    Deron Johnson in ‘70 or ‘71 with a young, piss-poor Phillies club had 4Hr’s in 4 PA’s over two games,

    Gehrig had 4 in 4 PA’s in the 1932 game and flew out to deepest CF in Shibe Park – about 440’ from home plate – in his 5th PA

  5. Shane Tourtellotte said...

    I gladly take my correction from Paul G. regarding four-homer games.  I knew Retrosheet’s Play Index did not cover games before 1918, but I thought I remembered Gehrig being the first, and deadball years didn’t seem conducive to someone matching the record.

    As for the wraparound examples, they are all good, but they are a little beside my original point.  It’s not the magic number 4 that entranced me, but the possibility of a batter being absolutely perfect, if only for one game.

    And somehow, I ended up writing this just before one of those rare days when a pitcher was absolutely perfect for one game.  If you discount the budding controversy over the last strike, that is.

  6. Paul G. said...

    Yes, it is an oddity that there were two 19th century 4 home run games.  So I did a little digging.

    Bobby Lowe’s feat (May, 30, 1894, Game 2 of a DH) was park assisted.  Boston’s usual home digs at the South End Grounds were unavailable because they had burned to the ground along with 117 more buildings.  They were temporarily playing at the Congress Street Grounds, the former home of the defunct Boston Reds of the Players League and American Association.  The exact dimensions of the stadium are unknown but it was noted for a short distance to the fence down both foul lines.  The SABR web site (http://sabr.org/bioproj/park/33169c79) did a little geometry and they estimate it was a puny 250 feet, perhaps shorter.  Lowe pulled all 4 homers down the line.  The Boston Globe reported that all four “would be good for four bases on an open prairie” for what that is worth.  Also for what it is worth, in the 27 games played at Congress that year there were 86 homers.  This was in a year where the average team hit 52 homers for the entire season.  I think the park helped.

    The Ed Delahanty game (July 13, 1896) was in Chicago at the West Side Grounds (or Park, depending on the source).  The Cubs field was the opposite of the Congress Street Grounds with a very large outfield, a fairly impressive 340 feet down the line and some 560 feet to deepest center.  There was a lot of room out there for a ball to get “lost” which probably helped greatly with inside-the-park homers.  But what makes it more impressive is the Cubs’ center fielder was Bill Lange who was well noted for his defensive prowess.  Apparently after the first 3 homers, Lange jokingly positioned himself in extremely deep center field.  My guess is Lange then repositioned himself into a more normal spot which proved to be a mistake as Ed hit his fourth homer in generally the same super deep location.  Ed must have had a very good, very lucky day.

    So with all that said, Lou Gehrig is the first player to hit four homers in a game in a park with reasonable dimensions and all four shots clearing the fence.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>