Fantasy Waiver Wire: Week 4, Vol II

I was watching the Cubs the other night (something I am sadly prone to do) when recent Waiver Wire feature Welington Castillo came to the plate, drew a 2-1 count, and I thought briefly:

Holy smokes, I am going to will Welington Castillo to his first walk of the season. Right … now. I am the man.

On the very next pitch he swung and missed so hard that his helmet popped off (something it seems he does fairly often), and one strike later he was back on the bench. Still no walks.

Can’t win ‘em all. Castillo has continued crushing since he was a recommendation here, though, to the tune of a now .838 OPS. He’s still due for a big drop due to a too-high BABIP of .450, but I still like the dude. A lot. He’s worth a pickup.

Elsewhere in the Waiver Wire records:

Karl wrote about Travis Hafner awhile back, and he hasn’t dropped off since. He’s a must-add at this point.

Chris Johnson was one of the most added players on CBS this week (from 28 percent to 65 percent), but I’m sticking by my guns that he’s due for a massive decline, probably soon, and Juan Francisco is a better buy there. Playing time lately has favored Johnson as the Braves have faced left-handed pitchers in three of their last four games.

Andrew Bailey now has four saves since he appeared in this space, and he’s striking out more than 40 percent of the batters he’s facing. It’s looking more and more like Joel Hanrahan will be returning as the setup man.

Speaking of closers:

Rafael Betancourt | Colorado Rockies | RP | ESPN: 100 percent ownership; Yahoo!: 89 percent; CBS: 85 percent
YTD: 7 saves, 1.93 ERA, 9.1 IP
ZiPS Updated Projection: 3.25 ERA in 55.3 IP

Rex Brothers | Colorado Rockies | RP | ESPN: 0.1 percent ownership; Yahoo!: 2 percent ; CBS: 6 percent
YTD: 1.00 ERA in 9 IP
ZiPS Updated Projection: 3.55 ERA in 71 IP

No, I am not about to recommend picking up Rafael Betancourt, who is clearly owned almost everywhere. My waiver wire brother Karl and I have have good success pinpointing closers about to take over: Kyuji Fujikawa, Jim Henderson, and Andrew Bailey to name a few. It’s probably the result of our staggering intelligence and leading man looks. Or, like, something.

Today I ring the first alarm bells for Rafael Betancourt. The Rockies veteran was seen as a solid B-list closer entering the season, featuring strong strikeout rates and excellent control, but whose value was tempered by a few realities:

1. He closes for a team that is not expected to be very good.
2. He pitches in Coors Field.
3. He’s an extreme flyball pitcher, which, when combined with the above, means he’s going to give up home runs every so often.
4. He’s in the final year of his contract, and therefore makes a good real-life trade candidate, which means he may or not still be closing later in the year.

Despite all of this, I saw him as a safe option entering the year, and have him on an expiring deal in my dynasty league. Well, I put him on the block Sunday night, and if you own him, now might be the right time for you to do the same. This might be especially true because (on a visceral level) things seem to be going fine for the right-hander at the moment. He has seven saves in seven chances, over 9.1 innings during which he’s posted a stingy 1.93 ERA. His job is still seen as secure.

His 3.35 FIP and 5.60 xFIP (5.60!!) point to struggles ahead, though. Most of that is due to a BABIP of just .179 and the fact that he has yet to allow a home run on any of the 15 fly balls he’s yielded this season, but there are other things that concern me as well.

1. Strikeouts are down and walks are up. Way down, and way up. Betancourt is currently fanning 11 percentage points less than his career average, at 15.4 percent. This wouldn’t be a terrible thing, given his pinpoint control in recent years between 3-5 percent, but in 2013 thus far Betancourt is also walking 12.8 percent of the batters he’s facing. That’s more than twice last year’s figure of 5.1 percent.
2. Velocity is down a tick. It’s not a ton, and it’s still early in the year, but Betancourt has averaged just 89.8 miles per hour on his fastball this season, down from 92.8 in 2010, 92.3 in 2011 and 91.4 last year.
3. His O-Swing% is way down (25.6 percent). This figure is below 30 percent for the first time since 2009, and nearly 13 points down from his career high mark of 38.4 percent in 2010.
4. His swinging strike rate has plummeted, as well, dropping below 10 percent for the first time in his career.

None of these factors (by themselves) are a death knell for Betancourt’s fantasy value and it must be stated (as always) that it is still very early. Betancourt has faced 39 batters this season, and he’s generally gotten them out for the Rockies. He has yet to blow a save. And he’s been a very good pitcher for years. But taking all of these factors in concert … I’m concerned. It wouldn’t surprise me in the slightest to see Betancourt implode soon, and then again soon after that, and we’ve seen closers replaced for less this season.

If that ends up happening, my vote to replace him is Rex Brothers, although Matt Belisle and Wilton Lopez would be strong candidates as well. All three relievers have been solid for Colorado, with varying degrees of luck sprinkled in. Brothers has the best velocity of the bunch (93 mph this season, 95 the previous two), and he currently has the best actual results. It’s kind of splitting hairs among him, Belisle and Lopez, and there’s literally no telling what the Rockies will do.

Recommendation: The suggestion here is to watch this position closely. It’s certainly possible that Betancourt’s peripherals catch back up with his results, and he hangs onto this job all season. It is equally possible, however, that the points mentioned above signal trouble on the horizon. If you’re desperate for saves, this might be an area in which to capitalize. Brothers, Belisle and Lopez can all provide help in deeper leagues where setup men have value. Otherwise, take a wait-and-see approach to determine whether Betancourt can get his stuff back in line, and whether one of the would-be replacements can separate from the pack.

Allen Webster | Boston Red Sox | SP | ESPN: 1.6 percent ownership; Yahoo!: 2 percent; CBS: 11 percent
YTD: 6 IP, 2 ER, 5 strikeouts, one walk
ZiPS Updated Projection: 4.89 ERA in 114 IP

Webster made his major league debut Sunday night, and held his own, striking out five and walking one over six innings against the Royals. He allowed two runs, both on home runs. His fastball touched 97 before settling down into the mid-90s, but his stuff looked crisp. He didn’t look very out of place, and didn’t look rattled by either of the home runs he allowed. He’s not a household name just yet, but he’s a very good prospect. New THTer Noah Woodward touched on Webster’s movement in his PITCHf/x debut, which is worth a read.

Webster was a late bloomer after being drafted in the 18th round by the Dodgers in 2008, but his recent minor league track record is nothing short of impressive. In 121.2 innings with Double-A Chattanoga in 2011, Webster struck out 117 and walked 57. He had a strong spring this year and continued that with Triple-A Pawtucket, striking out 12 and walking just three in 10 innings before the Red Sox called his number.

Recommendation: He isn’t up for good, but the 23-year-old is certainly a name for redraft leagues to file away for later in the summer, when injuries and ineffectiveness of Boston’s rotation may give him another, longer shot. Leagues can be won or lost on such foresight (or lack thereof). In dynasty leagues, he’s a must-add.

Print Friendly
 Share on Facebook0Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Google+0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone
« Previous: Currently historic: A new strikeout king?
Next: The daily grind: 4-24-13 »


  1. Jack Weiland said...

    @AJ – Thank you for the compliment and for stopping by again.

    I don’t think a change is imminent in LA. I’ve never been a big League fan (and indeed made a nice profit on Wilhelmsen early last season) but he hasn’t been horrible. He’s not striking anyone out right now, but I’m guessing that’s something that will even out in time, and his control has been spot on. Also the Dodgers invested a lot in signing him for three years, so they’re less likely to pull the rip cord than a team like the Rockies may be with Betancourt.

    I think Jansen is a superior pitcher, don’t get me wrong, but I don’t think the Dodgers are all that close to pulling the plug on a dude they just traded for and signed to a multi-year extension. Jansen is an elite holds option, though, and he’s going to help with strikeouts and WHIP, so I don’t think I’d cut him loose for Brothers just yet. Mostly I would watch Colorado closely and see which way the wind seems to be blowing if Betancourt starts getting shelled.

  2. AJ Leight said...

    Thanks for the response, Jack. See – I agree somewhat about the investment they made in League giving him a little more leash than normal, but I also think that since they made such large investments everywhere else that they’ll be quick to give the job to someone who has proven they are elite when healthy. That’s why I think the “contract leash” that would normally apply is sorta canceled out. Who knows, though. Either way, thanks for the reply and the entertaining articles.

  3. AJ Leight said...

    Basically, my thinking is that you can’t blow saves when the team payroll is above 200M. So even though he has a nice contract himself, they won’t hesitate to give his job away if he strings together a couple bad outings. That was the point I was trying to make.

  4. AJ Leight said...

    Sorry I’m flooding your comments section, but I just saw something else you mentioned. I won’t be cutting Jansen for Brothers. I spent a high pick on Jansen due to other high-strikeout relievers being spoken for prior to the draft. But I was more trying to decide if it was worth another roster spot to chase saves in Colorado. I’ll be able to drop Nava or Moss once Cespedes comes off the DL Sunday, so that’s more where I was looking to trim. Nonetheless, I think I’ll hold steady and just keep an eye on Brothers. I have Henderson, Mujica, Kenley and Fujikawa on the DL. Thanks again for putting up with my random ramblings =)

  5. Jack Weiland said...

    @AJ – Not random at all, you make a very good point. I guess my take was a combo of “League hasn’t been all bad” and “they’ve made a significant committment to him” … but I agree with you that LA is in win-now mode, and the arguably erratic activity by the front office furthers your case that they could do something drastic at any moment. The strikeout rate is pretty puzzling, and most of my analysis on that returning is because it’s so strange that all of the sudden he isn’t striking anyone out. So it bears watching, for sure.

    Gotcha on your plan. If a guy with good K/BB ratios, and holds can help you, Brothers could be an asset for sure.

  6. Mike said...

    Colorado has the 2nd best record in baseball right now, so I don’t know that you should presume they’re going to be trading their closer anytime soon.

  7. Jack Weiland said...

    @Mike – I’m not presuming that. The sentence you’re referring to was about Betancourt’s perceived value entering this year.

  8. AJ said...

    Great read, as usual! I think I’m gonna pick up Brothers. Before I do, I have one question: Is Brandon League going to implode eventually and give KJ the job? I was pretty certain of it a month ago, but now I don’t know. Luckily our league uses holds as well, but I’m ready for Kenley to be the head honcho (for completely selfish reasons). Thanks!

  9. Karl de Vries said...

    “It’s probably the result of our staggering intelligence and leading man looks. Or, like, something.”

    No, your original instincts were dead on. Go with your gut, as they say.


  10. brett said...

    you cant help but love the arm and sinking action on websters fastball….as mike newman said ” a top 10 pitching prospect” for 3 innings…webster has a slight frame and the major concern for now is him holding his fine stuff going past the 4 inning mark…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>